* Ensure account data stream IDs are unique.
The account data stream is shared between three tables, and the maximum
allocated ID was tracked in a dedicated table. Updating the max ID
happened outside the transaction that allocated the ID, leading to a
race where if the server was restarted then the same ID could be
allocated but the max ID failed to be updated, leading it to be reused.
The ID generators have support for tracking across multiple tables, so
we may as well use that instead of a dedicated table.
* Fix bug in account data replication stream.
If the same stream ID was used in both global and room account data then
the getting updates for the replication stream would fail due to
`heapq.merge(..)` trying to compare a `str` with a `None`. (This is
because you'd have two rows like `(534, '!room')` and `(534, None)` from
the room and global account data tables).
Fix is just to order by stream ID, since we don't rely on the ordering
beyond that. The bug where stream IDs can be reused should be fixed now,
so this case shouldn't happen going forward.
Fixes#7617
While working on https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/5665 I found myself digging into the `Ratelimiter` class and seeing that it was both:
* Rather undocumented, and
* causing a *lot* of config checks
This PR attempts to refactor and comment the `Ratelimiter` class, as well as encourage config file accesses to only be done at instantiation.
Best to be reviewed commit-by-commit.
Calls `self.get_success` on all deferred methods instead of abusing `self.pump()`. This has the benefit of working with coroutines, as well as checking that method execution completed successfully.
There are also a few small cleanups that I made in the process.
* Expose `return_html_error`, and allow it to take a Jinja2 template instead of a raw string
* Clean up exception handling in SAML2ResponseResource
* use the existing code in `return_html_error` instead of re-implementing it
(giving it a jinja2 template rather than inventing a new form of template)
* do the exception-catching in the REST layer rather than in the handler
layer, to make sure we catch all exceptions.
It looks like `user_device_resync` was ignoring cross-signing keys from the results received from the remote server. This patch fixes this, by processing these keys using the same process `_handle_signing_key_updates` does (and effectively factor that part out of that function).
The query keeps showing up in my slow query log.
This changes the plan under the top-level Sort node from
```
WindowAgg (cost=280335.88..292963.15 rows=561212 width=80) (actual time=138.651..160.562 rows=27112 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=280335.88..281738.91 rows=561212 width=84) (actual time=138.597..140.622 rows=27112 loops=1)
Sort Key: state_groups_state.type, state_groups_state.state_key, state_groups_state.state_group
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 4581kB
-> Nested Loop (cost=2.83..226745.22 rows=561212 width=84) (actual time=21.548..47.657 rows=27112 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=2.27..3.28 rows=101 width=8) (actual time=21.526..21.535 rows=20 loops=1)
Group Key: state.state_group
-> CTE Scan on state (cost=0.00..2.02 rows=101 width=8) (actual time=21.280..21.493 rows=20 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using state_groups_state_type_idx on state_groups_state (cost=0.56..2189.40 rows=5557 width=84) (actual time=0.005..0.991 rows=1356 loops=20)
Index Cond: (state_group = state.state_group)
```
to
```
Nested Loop (cost=2.83..226745.22 rows=561212 width=84) (actual time=24.194..52.834 rows=27112 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=2.27..3.28 rows=101 width=8) (actual time=24.130..24.138 rows=20 loops=1)
Group Key: state.state_group
-> CTE Scan on state (cost=0.00..2.02 rows=101 width=8) (actual time=23.887..24.113 rows=20 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using state_groups_state_type_idx on state_groups_state (cost=0.56..2189.40 rows=5557 width=84) (actual time=0.016..1.159 rows=1356 loops=20)
Index Cond: (state_group = state.state_group)
```
This cuts the execution time from ~190ms to ~130ms, i.e. a reduction
of ~30%.
The full plans are visualised at https://explain.depesz.com/s/WpbT and
https://explain.depesz.com/s/KlEk
Signed-off-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Without this patch, if an error happens which isn't caught by `user_device_resync`, then `_maybe_retry_device_resync` would fail, without retrying the next users in the iteration. This patch fixes this so that it now only logs an error in this case.
