textfiles-politics/regexConsp/ciactrlf.xml

<xml><p>
Article: 571 of sgi.talk.ratical
From: dave@ratmandu.esd.sgi.com (dave "who can do? ratmandu!" ratcliffe)
Subject: How the CIA turned `being directed by the NSC' into `getting approval'
Keywords: the compartmentalized "need to know" security lid locks up the govn't
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:01:36 GMT
Lines: 573</p>

<p> . . . Control of a good share of what the Pentagon is doing is 
  more important to the CIA than control over the government of 
  Jordan or Syria. . . .
   When the CIA wants to do something for which it does not have
  prior approval and for which it does not have legal sanction, it
  works from the bottom, using all of its guile with security and
  "need to know"--a euphemism for "keep the scheme away from anyone
  at any level of government who might stand in its way."  Hand and
  Lansdale, among others, were almost always able to line up enough
  support in the right places to make it possible for the CIA to get
  a favorable reading from the "Forty Committee" on any subject,
  legal or not.  In fact, this is the great weakness of such a
  committee.  Rather than working to control the agency it works the
  other way.  The procedure makes it possible for the agency to win
  approval from a lesser echelon of the NSC intrastructure, and then,
  by clamping on a security id, it makes others believe that the CIA
  had orders from the NSC or perhaps even from the President, when in
  fact it did not.</p>

<p>    the following appeared in the 7/75 issue of "Genesis:"
   _____________________________________________________________________
   How the CIA Controls President Ford
    By L. Fletcher Prouty
    reprinted here with permission of the author</p>

<p>  In this monstrous U.S. government today, it's not so much what
  comes down from the top that matters as what you can get away with
  from the bottom or from the middle--the least scrutinized level.
  (Contrary to the current CIA propaganda as preached by William
  Colby, Ray Cline, Victor Marchetti and Philip Agee, who say,
  incorrectly, "What the Agency does is ordered by the President.")
   As with the Mafia, crime is a cinch if you know the cops and the
  courts have been paid off.  With the Central Intelligence Agency,
  anything goes when you have a respected boss to sanctify and bless
  your activities and to shield them from outside eyes.
   Such a boss in the CIA was old Allen Dulles, who ran the Agency
  like a mother superior running a whorehouse.  He knew the girls
  were happy, busy, and well fed, but he wasn't quite sure what they
  were doing.  His favorites, all through the years of his prime as
  Director of Central Intelligence, were such stellar performers as
  Frank Wisner, Dick Bissell, George Doole, Sheffield Edwards, Dick
  Helms, Red White, Tracy Barnes, Desmond Fitzgerald, Joe Alsop, Ted
  Shannon, Ed Lansdale and countless others.  They were the great
  operators.  He just made it possible for them to do anything they
  came up with.
   When Wisner and Richard Nixon came up with the idea of mounting
  a major rebellion in Indonesia in 1958, Dulles saw that they got
  the means and the wherewithal.  When General Cabell and his Air
  Force friends plugged the U-2 project for Kelly Johnson of
  Lockheed, Dulles tossed it into the lap of Dick Bissell.  When Dick
  Helms and Des Fitzgerald figured they could play fun and games in
  Tibet, Dulles talked to Tom Gates, then Secretary of Defense, and
  the next we knew CIA agents were spiriting the Dalai Lama out of
  Lhasa, CIA undercover aircraft were clandestinely dropping tons of
  arms, ammunitions, and supplies deep into Tibet and other planes
  were reaching as far as northwestern China to Koko Nor.
   While he peddled the hard-won National Intelligence Estimates to
  all top offices and sprinkled holy water over the pates of our
  leaders, Dulles dropped off minor miracles along the way to
  titillate those in high places.  If you win the heart of the queen
  and convert her to your faith, you can control the king.  This
  works for the Jesuits.  It worked well for the CIA.  Allen Dulles
  was no casual student and practitioner of the ancient art of
  religion.  He was an expert in the art of mind-control.  He learned
  how to operate his disciples and his Agency in the ways of the
  cloth.
   But for every Saint and every Sinner in the fold there must be
  an order of monks, and the Agency has always been the haven for
  hundreds of faceless, nameless minions whose only satisfaction was
  the job well done and the furtherance of the cause.  One of the
  most remarkable--and surely the best--of these was an agent named
  Frank Hand.
   In my book, "The Secret Team," written during 1971 and 1972, I
  mentioned that the most important agent in the CIA was an almost
  unknown individual who spent most of his time in the Pentagon.  At
  that time I did not reveal his name;  but a small item in a recent
  obituary column stated that:</p>

<p>  "Frank Hand, 61, a former senior official of the CIA, died in
  Marshall, Minn. . . .  (he was) a graduate of Harvard Law
  School.  He had served with the CIA from 1950 until
  retirement in 1971."</p>

<p>   After a life devoted to quiet, effective, skillful performance
  of one of the most important jobs in the worldwide structure of
  that unparalleled agency, all that the CIA would publicly say of
  Frank Hand was that he was a "senior official."
   Ask Dick Helms, Ed Lansdale, Bob McNamara, Tom Gates or Allen
  Dulles or John Foster Dulles, if they were with us today, and they
  all would tell us stories about Frank Hand.  They would do more to
  characterize the nature and the sources of power which make use of
  and control the CIA than has ever been told before.  He was that
  superior operative who made big things work unobtrusively.
   You might have been one of the grass-green McNamara "whiz kids,"
  lost in the maze of the Pentagon Puzzle Palace, who came upon a
  short, Hobbit-like, pleasant man who knew the Pentagon so well that
  you got the feeling he was brought in with the original load of
  concrete.  Thousands of career men to this day will never realize
  that Frank Hand was a "Senior Official" of the CIA and not one of
  their civilian cohorts.  To my knowledge he never worked anywhere
  else.  I was there in 1955 and he was there.  I left in December
  1963, and he was at my farewell party.  He must have spent some of
  his time at the agency;  but it must have been before 1955.  If he
  had a dollar for every trip he made in those busy years between the
  Pentagon and the CIA he would have died a very wealthy man.  He
  popularized the Agency term "across the river" and the "Acme
  Plumbers" nickname for agents of the CIA.  (A term later to be
  confused by Colson and John Ehrlichman, among others, with the use
  of the term "White House Plumbers" of Watergate fame.  Someone knew
  that Hunt, McCord, the Cubans, Haig, Butterfield and others all had
  CIA backgrounds and connections and therefore were "Plumbers."
  Only the insiders knew about the real "Acme Plumbers.")
   Frank was as much at home with Allen Dulles as he was with the
  famous old supersleuth, General Graves B. Erskine, and as he was
  with Helms, Colby, or Fitzgerald.  Ian Fleming may have popularized
  the spy and the undercover agent as a flashing James Bond type;
  but in the reality of today's world the great ones are more in the
  mold of Frank Hand and "The Spy Who Came In From The Cold."
   There has long existed a "golden key" group of agency and
  agency-related supermen.  They came from the CIA, the Pentagon, the
  Department of State, the White House and other places in government
  or from the outside.  They have kept themselves inconspicuous and
  they meet in the evening away from their offices.  They are the men
  who open the doors of big government to industry-banking law and to
  the multinational corporate centers of greed and power.  Their
  strength lies in their common awareness of the ways in which real
  power is generated in the government, the real power that controls
  activities of the government.  In many instances this is the power
  of being able to keep something from happening, rather than to make
  it happen.  For example, if the President is murdered, real power
  involves the control of government operations sufficient to make
  any investigation ineffective and to assure that the government
  will do nothing even if the investigation should turn up something.
  Real power is the ability to keep the government bureaucracy from
  going into action when the price of petroleum and wheat is doubled
  or tripled by avaricious international monopolies.
   Some of these "gold key" members have surfaced and have accepted
  publicity, as did Des Fitzgerald, Allen Dulles, Tracy Barnes and
  others.  Frank never did.  He was so anonymous that even his
  friends could not find him.
   The Agency covered for Frank Hand as it did for few others.  The
  James Bonds of this world may be the idols of the Intelligence
  coterie;  but if you are a Bill Colby, Dick Helms, or Allen Dulles,
  you know the real value of an indispensable agent.  Frank was their
  man in the Pentagon, and the Pentagon was always the indispensable
  prime target of the CIA.  When the chips are down, the CIA could
  care less about overturning "Communism" in Cuba or Chile.  What
  really matters is its relative power in the U.S. Government.
  Control of a good share of what the Pentagon is doing is more
  important to the CIA than control over the government of Jordan or
  Syria.
   Once, when the CIA wanted to move a squadron (twenty-five) of
  helicopters from Laos to South Vietnam, long before the troubles
  there had become a war, I turned down the request from the Deputy
  Director of Central Intelligence in the name of the Secretary of
  Defense for no other reason than the fact that I did not find that
  project on the approved list of the National Security Council's
  "Forty Committee" (then called the 5412/2 committee).  That meant
  the agency had neither been directed by the National Security
  Council to move those helicopters into Vietnam, nor had it received
  authorization for such a tactical movement.  In other words, the
  planned intervention into South Vietnam with a squadron of
  helicopters would at that time have been unlawful as an
  intervention into the internal affairs of another country.
   This denial then, in 1960, effectively blocked the CIA from
  being able to move heavy war-making equipment into Vietnam.  The
  helicopters were actually U.S. Marine Corps property on "loan" from
  Okinawa to the CIA for clandestine operations in Laos.
   At that time my immediate superior was General Graves Erskine,
  the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Special (Clandestine)
  Operations, and the man then responsible for all military support
  of clandestine operations of the CIA.  Also at that time, Frank
  Hand, "worked for" Erskine.  Of course, this was a cover
  assignment--"cover slot" as it was known to us and to the CIA.
  Frank had a regular office in the Pentagon.
   No sooner had the CIA request been turned down than someone near
  the top of the agency called Frank and told him about it.  In his
  smiling and friendly way he came into my office, carrying two cups
  of coffee, and began some talk about music, travel, or golf.  Then,
  as was his practice, he would get the subject around to his point
  with such a comment as, "Fletch, who do you suppose took a call
  here about the choppers in Laos?" and we would be off.
   The special ability he possessed was best evidenced by the
  process he would set in motion once he discovered a problem that
  affected the ambitions of the agency.  He would talk about the
  choppers with Erskine.  Then he would drop in to see the Chief of
  Naval Operations and perhaps the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
  He would talk with some of the other civilian Assistant
  Secretaries.  In other words, he would go from office to office
  like a bee spreading pollen, titillating only the most senior
  officers and civilian officials with the most "highly sensitive"
  tidbits about the CIA's plans for Vietnam.  In this manner he would
  find out what the real thinking in the Pentagon might be, and where
  there might be real opposition to such an idea--such as in the
  Marine Corps, which knew it would never get compensation for those
  expensive helicopters and for the loss of time of all their support
  people.  He would also find out where there would be support, as
  with the ever-eager U.S. Army Special Forces, most of whose senior
  officers had been with the CIA.
   Then he would drop out of the picture for awhile to travel back
  to the old CIA headquarters, on the hill that overlooks what is now
  the Watergate complex, for a long talk with Allen Dulles or the
  Deputy Director, General Cabell.  On matters involving the
  clandestine services he would also stop by the old headquarters
  buildings, that lined the reflecting pool near the Lincoln 
  Memorial, to talk with Dick Helms, Desmond Fitzgerald, and other
  operators.  Within a day or two he would have them fully briefed on
  the steps to be taken in order to win over the Defense Department;
  or failing that, how to overpower and outmaneuver the Pentagon in
  the Department of State and the White House.
   The foregoing is a "case study" on the important subject of how
  the CIA really operates and what it believes is its top priority.
  The propaganda being spread around today by the CIA and its
  propagandists that, "What the CIA does is ordered by the
  President," is totally untrue in all but .00001 percent of actual
  historical cases.  It is much more factual to say that, "What the
  CIA does is to find ways to initiate major foreign policy moves
  without having the President find out--or at least without
  discovery until it is too late."
   "It is in precisely that manner that the CIA today works around,
  beneath and behind the White House to effect policies that could
  influence the survival of the nation and the world.  "Gold Key"
  operatives are, at this very moment, carrying out CIA game plans
  entirely outside the power of President Ford's ability to affect
  their activities.  He is totally without knowledge of most of them,
  and therefore powerless to stop or alter them.
   In the case of the helicopters, Frank Hand was able to convince
  Allen Dulles that the disapproval from the Secretary of Defense,
  via my office, was real and that the Secretary would, at that time,
  be unlikely to change his mind.  Frank also could report that the
  position of other top-level assistants was so cool to stepping up
  the hardware *involvement* of the military in Vietnam, in 1960,
  that none of them would likely attempt to persuade the Secretary to
  change his policy of limited involvement.
   Fortified with the information gleaned by Frank Hand, Allen
  Dulles would have two primary options:  drop the idea of moving
  helicopters into Vietnam, or bypass the Secretary of Defense for
  the time being by going to the White House for support.  In 1960
  this was a crucial decision.  The huge attempt to support a
  rebellion in Indonesia had failed utterly, the U-2 operations had
  been curtailed because of the Gary Powers incident, the far-
  reaching operations into Tibet had come to a halt by Presidential
  directive and anti-Castro activities were limited to minor forays.
  And at that time the large-scale (large for CIA) war in Laos had
  become such a disaster that the CIA wanted no more of it.  Dick
  Bissell, the chief of the Clandestine Services, had written strong,
  personal letters to Tom Gates, the Secretary of Defense, wondering
  openly what to do about the 50,000 or more miserable Laotian Meo
  tribesmen the CIA had moved into the battle zones of Laos and then
  had deserted with no plans for their protection, resupply, care or
  feeding.  The CIA badly wanted to be relieved of the war that they
  had started and then found they could not handle.  They wanted to
  transfer and thus preserve the agency's assets, including the
  helicopters, to the bigger prospects in Vietnam.
   So, in 1960, if Allen Dulles dropped the idea of moving his
  assets from Laos, he would not only have lost those helicopters
  back to the Marine Corps but he would have seriously jeopardized
  the CIA's undercover leadership role in the development of the war
  in Vietnam, which it had been fanning since 1954.
   This was a crucial decision for both the CIA and for those who
  wished to contain the agency.  If those who wished to put the CIA
  genie back in the bottle had been able at that time to prevent the
  move of those CIA assets into Vietnam, Dulles would have had to
  disband them:  helicopters, B-26 bombers from the Indonesian
  fiasco, tens of thousands of rifles and other weapons, C-46, C-54
  and other Air America-supported heavy transport aircraft, U-2
  operations over Indochina, radar and other clandestine equipment,
  C-130's specially modified for deep Tibetan operations, and much
  more.  From the point of view of the CIA, the helicopters were
  simply the tip of the iceberg, and the decision was its most
  important in that decade.
   Typically, in his unwitting Mother Superior-style, which
  included bulldog tenacity, Dulles chose the route to the White
  House.  Here again he could rely strongly on Frank Hand.  Working
  with Hand in Erskine's office was the CIA's other best agent, Major
  General Edward G. Lansdale, who had long served in the CIA.  Like
  Hand, he had unequalled contacts in the Department of State and in
  the White House.  In support of Dulles, they contacted their
  friends there and began a subtle and powerful move destined to
  prepare the way for what would appear to be a decision by President
  Eisenhower.  This was an important feature of the "case study":
  The *apparent* Presidential decision.
   When the CIA wants to do something for which it does not have
  prior approval and for which it does not have legal sanction, it
  works from the bottom, using all of its guile with security and
  "need to know"--a euphemism for "keep the scheme away from anyone
  at any level of government who might stand in its way."  Hand and
  Lansdale, among others, were almost always able to line up enough
  support in the right places to make it possible for the CIA to get
  a favorable reading from the "Forty Committee" on any subject,
  legal or not.  In fact, this is the great weakness of such a
  committee.  Rather than working to control the agency it works the
  other way.  The procedure makes it possible for the agency to win
  approval from a lesser echelon of the NSC intrastructure, and then,
  by clamping on a security id, it makes others believe that the CIA
  had orders from the NSC or perhaps even from the President, when in
  fact it did not.
   Thus it was that, about two weeks from the day that I received
  that first call requesting the movement of the squadron of
  helicopters, received word from General Erskine that he had been
  "officially" informed that the White House (Forty Committee) had
  approved the secret operation.  The helicopters were moved into
  Vietnam.  They were the first of thousands.
   The great significance of this incident is to point out how the
  CIA works powerfully, deftly, and with great assurance at any level
  of our government to get anything it wants done.  But the anecdote
  shows only the surface coating of the application of the CIA
  apparatus.
   One year earlier, in 1959, Frank Hand had directed a Boston
  banker to my office.  At that time I worked in the Directorate of
  Plans in Air Force headquarters and my work was top secret.  Few of
  my contemporaries in the Pentagon knew that I was in charge of a
  global U.S. Air Force system created for the dual purpose of
  providing Air Force support for the CIA and for protecting the best
  interests of the USAF while performing that task.  My door was
  labeled simply, "Team B";  yet that Boston banker knocked and
  entered with assurance.  Somehow he knew what my work was and he
  knew that I might be able to help him.
   In 1959 there were very few helicopters in all of the services,
  and military procurement of those expensive machines was at an
  all-time low.  The Bell Helicopter Company was all but out of
  business, and its parent company, Bell Aerospace Corp., was having
  trouble keeping it financially afloat.  Meanwhile, the shrewd Royal
  Little, President of the Providence-based Textron Company, had a
  good cash position and could well afford the acquisition of a
  loser.  Textron and the First National Bank of Boston got together
  to talk helicopters.  Neither one knew a thing about them.  But men
  in First Boston were close to the CIA, and they learned that the
  CIA was operating helicopters in Laos.  What they needed to know
  now was, "What would be the future of the military helicopter, and
  would the use of helicopters in South East Asia escalate if given a
  little boost--such as moving a squadron from Laos to Vietnam?"  The
  CIA could tell them about that, and Frank Hand would be the man who
  could get them to the right people in the Pentagon.
   The banker from Boston phrased his questions as though he
  believed that the helicopters in Laos were somehow operating under
  the Air Force, and then went on to ask about their tactical
  significance and about the possible increase of helicopter
  utilization for that kind of warfare.  This was at a time when not
  even newspapers had reported anything like the operation of such
  large and expensive aircraft in that remote war.  We had a rather
  thorough discussion and then he left.  He called me several times
  after that and visited my office a month or two later.
   As the record will show, Textron did acquire the Bell Helicopter
  Company and the CIA did step up use of helicopters to the extent
  that one of the CIA's own proprietary companies, Asia Aeronautics
  Inc., had more than four thousand men on each of two bases where
  helicopters were maintained.  Most of those men were involved in
  their maintenance--Bell Helicopters, no less!
   Orders for Bel Helicopters for use in Vietnam exceeded $600-
  million.  Anyone wanting to know more about how the U.S. got so
  heavily ($200-billion and the loss of 58,000 American lives)
  involved in Indochina need look no further.  This was the pattern
  and the plan.
   At the present time, when the White House, the House, and the
  Senate are all investigating the CIA, it is important to understand
  the CIA and to put it all in the proper perspective.  It is not the
  President who instructs the CIA concerning what it will do.  And in
  many cases it is *not* even the Director of Central Intelligence
  who instructs the CIA.  The CIA is a great, monstrous machine with
  tremendous and terrible power.  It can be set in motion from the
  outside like a programmer setting a computer in operation, and then
  it covers up what it is doing when men like Frank Hand--the real
  movers--put grease on the correct gears.  And in a majority of
  cases, the power behind it all is big business, big banks, big law
  firms and big money.  The agency exists to be used by them.
   Let no one misunderstand what I mean.  It was President Lyndon
  B. Johnson who on more than one occasion said that the CIA was
  "operating a damn Murder Inc. in the Carribean."  In other words,
  he knew it was doing this--and he was the President!  This
  knowledge has been recently confirmed by Defense Secretary James
  Schlesinger (who is a former head of the CIA) and others by their
  admission that they told the agency to end all "terminations."  But
  Lyndon Johnson was powerless to do anything about it.  This is an
  astounding admission from a President, the very man from whom, the
  CIA says, it always gets its instructions.
   The present concern over "domestic surveillance" and such other
  lean tidbits--most important to you and me as they are--is not
  important to the CIA.  It can easily dispense with a James Angleton
  or even a Helms or a Colby (just look at the list of CIA bigwigs
  who have been fired--Allen Dulles, Frank Wisner, Dick Bissell, Dick
  Helms, and now perhaps Colby);  but the great machine will live on
  while Congress digs away at the Golden Apples tossed casually aside
  by the CIA--the supreme Aphrodite of them all.  Notice that the
  agency cares little about giving away "secrets" in the form of
  cleverly written insider books such as those by Victor Marchetti
  and Philip Agee.  The CIA just makes it look as though it cared
  with some high-class window dressing.  Actually the real harm to
  the American public from those books is to make people believe that
  certain carefully selected propaganda is true.
   In the story of Frank Hand we come much closer to seeing exactly
  how the CIA operates to control this government and other foreign
  governments.  It is still operating that way.  Today it is
  President Ford who is the unwitting accessory.</p>

<p> * * * * * * * *</p>

<p>  the following is taken from an article Fletcher Prouty wrote 
  for the February 1986 issue of "Freedom" magazine, entitled,
  "Why Vietnam?  The Selection and Preparation of the 
  Battlefield For America's Entry into the Indochina War," Part
  7 in a Series on the Central Intelligence Agency.  i include
  it to amplify on the curious visit Colonel Prouty received in
1959 from the vice president of the First National Bank of 
Boston and how it demonstrates that</p>

<p>   There was only one way that vice president of the First 
  National Bank of Boston could have come directly to my  
  office in the Pentagon.  The CIA had sent him there.   
   This is one of the most important "truly confidential"
  roles of the agency.  The CIA is the best friend of the top 
  executives of America's biggest businesses, and it works for
  them at home and abroad.  It is always successful in the 
  highest echelons of government and finance. . . .
   Translated into everyday terms, Casey's CIA, as was Allen
  Dulles' CIA, is one of the true bastions of power as a 
  servant of the American and transnational business and 
  financial community.</p>

<p>          --ratitor</p>

<p>   ______________________________________________________________________
   |            |
   |    Helicopters in Vietnam    |
   |            |
   | Toward the end of World War II, a small number of    |
   |  helicopters made their appearance in military operations. |
   |  During the costly battle for Okinawa, in the summer of 1945,  |
   |  General Joseph Stilwell--famed for his role as commander in   |
   |  the China-Burma-India theater of the war--began to use an |
   |  early model of the Sikorsky helicopter as a"command car." |
   | During the early 1950s, the Korean War gave the  |
   |  helicopter industry a much needed boost and several models  |
   |  were used there.  After the Korean War, the use of  |
   |  helicopters in all services was severely curtailed by high  |
   |  costs of procurement and by the enormous amounts of time and  |
   |  money required to keep them in operation.  By 1959 almost |
   |  all helicopter manufacturers were broke, or at least on very  |
   |  hard times.  This included the Bell Helicopter Company in |
   |  Buffalo, New York.        |
   | The helicopters used on operational missions into Laos,  |
   |  mentioned in this article, were the only military   |
   |  helicopters anywhere in the world getting regular and   |
   |  frequent tactical use.  However, their very existence in  |
   |  Thailand and their employment in Laos were secrets.  They |
   |  had been moved from Okinawa to Thailand and were supported  |
   |  by my office in the Pentagon.     |
   | One day, in 1959, a man entered my office to discuss   |
   |  helicopters.        |
   | Because of the nature of the work my office was doing, |
   |  this was an infrequent event.  Outside the door of the  |
   |  office there was a small blue card that read:     |
   |            |
   |     Air Force Plans    |
   |     "Team B"     |
   |     Chief--Lt. Col. L. F. Prouty   |
   |            |
   | That card by the door drew little attention, and it was  |
   |  meant to be that way.  Then how did this civilian visitor |
   |  from the outside world know that "Team B" was the place he  |
   |  wanted to visit--for business purposes?     |
   | He introduced himself as a vice president of the First |
   |  National Bank of Boston.  He said he was interested in the  |
   |  tactical utilization of helicopters.  Somehow he had been |
   |  directed to "Team B."  "Team B" had been established in 1955  |
   |  to provide "military support of the clandestine activities  |
   |  of the CIA."  The use of helicopters in Laos was a  |
   |  clandestine operation of the CIA.     |
   | My visitor knew quite a bit about the helicopters in   |
   |  Thailand.  He wanted to know if this utilization of large |
   |  helicopters on tactical missions was a harbinger of more  |
   |  helicopters or was it simply a make-work project?  Then he  |
   |  got to the reason for his visit.      |
   | He said that the Textron Company of Providence, Rhode  |
   |  Island, was a major customer of his bank.  Textron was in a   |
   |  good cash position and the bank was advising them to    |
   |  diversify and acquire a marginally viable company for tax |
   |  purposes and with an eye to future value.     |
   | To the First National Bank of Boston the helicopter  |
   |  business and specifically the Bell Helicopter Company in  |
   |  Buffalo appeared to be a prime prospect on both counts.   |
   |  Textron was interested.  The only problem was the market. |
   |  Would there ever be an interest in and a need for   |
   |  helicopters by the military, meaning in big numbers?  The |
   |  Laotian operation was the only show in town.    |
   | Because of the role being played by my office in support   |
   |  of the use of helicopters in Southeast Asia, I already knew   |
   |  the Bell people well both in Washington, D.C., and Buffalo.   |
   |  I knew Bill Gesel, the president of Bell Helicopter.  I knew  |
   |  they were competent, but in trouble for lack of orders.   |
   | I described the helicopter as a useful vehicle of limited  |
   |  potential, but rather well suited for covert operations.  In  |
   |  simple terms, the helicopter was too costly for the regular   |
   |  military budget, but, as a rule, covert operations had money  |
   |  to burn.  That was the kind of money helicopters needed.  |
   |  Because of the trend of covert operations in Southeast Asia,  |
   |  I believed the demand for helicopters would increase.   |
   | As events later transpired, the First National Bank of |
   |  Boston, of which this man was a vice president, was   |
   |  instrumental in getting Textron to acquire the Bell   |
   |  Helicopter Company.  This was the beginning of the Textron  |
   |  acquisition of Bell and of the great success Bell had in  |
   |  selling helicopters for use in Indochina.  As we all know |
   |  now, the Bell "Huey" helicopter was the unsung hero of the  |
   |  struggle in Vietnam.  Thousands were used there.    |
   | On one occasion, while I was at lunch at the Army and  |
   |  Navy Club in Washington, Bill Gesel, still president of   |
   |  Bell, came by my table and pulled a check out of his pocket   |
   |  that was in the range of nine figures--hundreds of millions   |
   |  of dollars.  Needless to say, Bell was doing well.  Textron   |
   |  was doing well.  The First National Bank of Boston had  |
   |  earned its fees and, as a result, the remains of hundreds of  |
   |  Hueys are scattered all over the countryside of Vietnam.  |
   |  The Huey had become the famous "gun ship" of that war.  |
   | There was only one way that vice president of the First  |
   |  National Bank of Boston could have come directly to my  |
   |  office in the Pentagon.  The CIA had sent him there.    |
   | This is one of the most important "truly confidential" |
   |  roles of the agency.  The CIA is the best friend of the top   |
   |  executives of America's biggest businesses, and it works for  |
   |  them at home and abroad.  It is always successful in the  |
   |  highest echelons of government and finance.   |
   | This is the way things were more than 25 years ago.  You   |
   |  may be assured these successes have not diminished under the  |
   |  current director of central intelligence, William J. Casey,   |
   |  a true friend of business.      |
   | During a speech, delivered in December 1979 before an  |
   |  American Bar Association workshop on "Law, Intelligence and   |
   |  National Security," Casey said that he would like to see the  |
   |  CIA be a place "in the United States government to  |
   |  systematically look at the economic opportunities and   |
   |  threats in a long-term perspective, . . . [to] recommend, or  |
   |  act on the use of economic leverage, either offensively or  |
   |  defensively for strategic purposes."    |
   | Translated into everyday terms, Casey's CIA, as was Allen  |
   |  Dulles' CIA, is one of the true bastions of power as a  |
   |  servant of the American and transnational business and  |
   |  financial community.        |
   |            |
   |____________________________________________________________________|</p>

<p>--
       daveus rattus </p>

<p>     yer friendly neighborhood ratman</p>

<p>      KOYAANISQATSI</p>

<p> ko.yan.nis.qatsi (from the Hopi Language)  n.  1. crazy life.  2. life
 in turmoil.  3. life out of balance.  4. life disintegrating.  
   5. a state of life that calls for another way of living.
i</p></xml>