trying my best to fix the regex and editing python code

pythonCode/personTestingOutput/compse.xml

@@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ of course the concept of self has been the object of study since
 the dawn of civilization. Although he had significant
 psychoanalytic precursors, notably in the work of <ent type='PERSON'>Paul Federn</ent>, Erik
 <ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent> was the first to propose that the core of much
-psychopathology lies in disorders of self experience. <ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent>'s
+psychopathology lies in disorders of self experience. Erikson's
 concept of identity, which amalgamated the many sources of beliefs
 about who one is is both evocative of common experience and proved
 clinically useful. Many kinds of difficultly, as well a normal, and
 supernormal psychological development can be usefully explored as
 experiences of loss or diffusion of identity or attempts to
 establish a satisfactory identity where one was lacking.
-<ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent>'s work is problematic from a psychoanalytic point of
+Erikson's work is problematic from a psychoanalytic point of
 view for two reasons. First, reading <ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent> carefully one
 discovers that his wonderful portrayal of emotional states through
 imagery, metaphor and clinical detail is not matched by explicit,
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ potentially successful attempts to achieve valuable identities,
 that while there might be difficulties in the way the patient's
 basic project and his ways of attempting to accomplish it were
 closer to healthy development than the patient or the society might
-recognize. <ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent>'s psychobiographical studies of Luther, <ent type='PERSON'>Gandhi</ent>,
+recognize. Erikson's psychobiographical studies of Luther, <ent type='PERSON'>Gandhi</ent>,
 <ent type='PERSON'>Hitler</ent> and <ent type='PERSON'>Shaw</ent> are messages to readers, many of them young, about
-the value of their struggles to form workable identities. <ent type='PERSON'>Erikson</ent>'s
+the value of their struggles to form workable identities. Erikson's
 implicit view is that an appreciative stance toward the patients'
 struggles which include or dominated by external realities is
 therapeutic.
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ pathology resulted from a self system that was internal incongruent
 or problematic in terms of the environment. Therapeutic
 intervention consisted in understanding and appropriately revising
 the self system in the light of more mature and current
-understanding. What is central to our discussion is <ent type='PERSON'>Sullivan</ent>'s view
+understanding. What is central to our discussion is Sullivan's view
 that the self system was both the product of the external
 environment and made no sense whatever outside of a social system.
 Several analysts, notably <ent type='PERSON'>Klein</ent>, Winnicott, Khan, Fairburn,
@@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ much of the difficulty in self experience arose from a failure to
 adequately separate from the mother of infancy. Although there are
 many well informed analysts who would disagree with me, I will
 assert that the overwhelming data of infant and later developmental
-studies demonstrate that <ent type='PERSON'>Mahler</ent>'s symbiotic phase is not part of
+studies demonstrate that Mahler's symbiotic phase is not part of
 normal development nor is separateness, in the sense she meant it,
 characteristic of ordinary or healthy more mature psychological
 function.
-However the clinical observations that lead to <ent type='PERSON'>Mahler</ent>'s
+However the clinical observations that lead to Mahler's
 thinking and that have been explained in terms of her theories are
 certainly common. That is, there are many people who seem to have
 shaky experiences of themselves and function with a conflicting
@@ -161,11 +161,11 @@ training in microscopy enables us to vastly extend ordinary visual
 capacities. While <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent> claimed to be making explicit what everyone
 did anyway, his position, right or wrong, was deeply antithetical
 to Freud's view of psychoanalysis as a natural science-like
-investigation and also <ent type='PERSON'>Hartman</ent>'s explicit statements that empathy
+investigation and also Hartman's explicit statements that empathy
 in the sense that <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent> meant it had no appropriate role in
 psychoanalytic investigation.
 A second, and less problematically, position about
-psychoanalytic investigative method was <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>'s position on
+psychoanalytic investigative method was Kohut's position on
 transference. In his early writings on self psychology <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>
 assumed that the only data to be taken seriously in psychoanalysis
 were the data of the transference. The various stories the patient
@@ -259,12 +259,12 @@ course of life and that it is their qualities, not their existence,
 that is altered with maturity. (Having made this assertion <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>
 never elaborated or demonstrated it. Recently <ent type='PERSON'>Bertram Cohler</ent> and
 myself have undertaken the task of exploring the empirical evidence
-for <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>'s position.)
-<ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>'s findings, and the findings of many of those who have
+for Kohut's position.)
+Kohut's findings, and the findings of many of those who have
 examined the psychology of the self from other viewpoints, have
 been questioned in too apparently distinct ways, whose
 interconnection I will show you in a moment.
-The first objection is that <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent>'s theories serve to avoid
+The first objection is that Kohut's theories serve to avoid
 painful psychological truths. Many of the phenomena <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent> observed
 had been observed previously and classified as defensive
 operations. For example, idealizations of the analyst were commonly
@@ -282,10 +282,10 @@ self. <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent> never clearly defines his central concept o
 Essentially he says that everyone knows from experience what the
 self is and leaves it at that. After studying the many discussions
 of the meaning of the "self" in the psychoanalytic literature one
-is reminded of the <ent type='PERSON'>Buddha</ent>'s comments on the self. He said that
+is reminded of the Buddha's comments on the self. He said that
 those who believe in the self are like "a man who says that he is
 in love with the most beautiful woman in the land, but is unable
-to specify her name, her family or her appearance" (Digha Nikaya
+to specify her name, her family or her appearance" (<ent type='PERSON'>Digha Nikaya</ent>
 I 193, quoted in <ent type='ORG'>Carrithers</ent> (1983).) The essential theoretical
 difficulty was clarified by <ent type='PERSON'>Meissner</ent> who pointed out that the term
 self as habitually used by <ent type='PERSON'>Kohut</ent> and most other writers whose work
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ consistently used to refer to both a psychological representation
 and also a psychological agent. Although more systematic
 researchers, for example <ent type='PERSON'>Hartman</ent>, limit the concept of self to a
 psychological representation of the person, they also give the self
-a markedly subsidiary role in psychology. <ent type='PERSON'>Meissner</ent>'s argument is
-quite similar to <ent type='PERSON'>Schafer</ent>'s later discussions of internalization in
+a markedly subsidiary role in psychology. Meissner's argument is
+quite similar to Schafer's later discussions of internalization in
 which <ent type='PERSON'>Schafer</ent> observed that the elaborate analytic theories of
 internalization were in fact nothing more then the translation into
 psychoanalytic jargon of unconscious fantasies and did not, in his
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ building the absence of these difficulties into the architecture
 of the system it becomes necessary to discover ways to overcome
 them. A much more elaborate system of error trapping and control
 becomes essential.
-<ent type='ORG'>Parallel</ent> systems are highly vulnerable to internal conflicts
+Parallel systems are highly vulnerable to internal conflicts
 and instabilities. Attempts to remove these features from the
 system usually entail the loss of precisely what has been gained
 through parallelism. To give an very elementary but quite everyday
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ notion. First the past quarter century has yielded a massive
 demonstration that human development normal continues across the
 entire life course - that the idea of a definite mature
 developmental state whether occurring with the resolution of the
-<ent type='ORG'>Oedipus</ent> complex or the end of late adolescence or whenever else is
+Oedipus complex or the end of late adolescence or whenever else is
 mistaken. Second there seem to be quite diverse ways to be
 psychologically healthy which becomes readily apparent if we avoid
 employing a priori notions of the meaning of health. Finally the
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ various and new levels in the hierarchy seem to develop with
 greater maturity. In particular greater capacities for abstraction
 both from data and process appear to be a normal part of human
 development. With these capacity comes increased abilities for
-metacognition. <ent type='ORG'>Piaget</ent>'s observation of the progressive decentering
+metacognition. Piaget's observation of the progressive decentering
 of cognition with the related capacity, for example to think about
 thinking, represents such an elaboration of abstraction
 hierarchies.
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ I am well aware of having painted the picture of the
 computational self with extremely broad strokes and having done
 violence to many subtle and important issues in the process. At the
 same time I am impressed that psychoanalysts having discovered that
-the <ent type='NORP'>Freudian</ent> and ego-psychological paradigms are inadequate have
+the Freudian and ego-psychological paradigms are inadequate have
 largely abandoned the attempt to develop broad theories that
 encompass the particular data of the psychoanalytic field, choosing
 instead to focus on smaller more tractable problems and maintaining