cleaning files

docs/person_net.tsv

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

old/regexConsp/conspire.xml

@@ -1,213 +1,213 @@
-<xml><p>From: Alan Lustiger <special>alu@pruxp.pr.att.com</special>
+<xml><p>From: Alan Lustiger <special>alu@pruxp.pr.att.com</special>
-Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
+Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
-Subject: 25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOM BOMB"
+Subject: 25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOM BOMB"
-<info type="Message-ID"> S4dc.13e2@looking.on.ca</info>
+<info type="Message-ID"> S4dc.13e2@looking.on.ca</info>
-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 4:30:03 EST
+Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 4:30:03 EST
-Lines: 209
+Lines: 209
-
+
-25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOMIC BOMB"
+25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOMIC BOMB"
-
+
-1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over
+1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over
-Hiroshima in 1945?
+Hiroshima in 1945?
-
+
-No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists, 
+No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists, 
-the thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed 
+the thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed 
-detonation over Japanese territory.
+detonation over Japanese territory.
-
+
-2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped
+2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped
-onto Nagasaki, Japan?
+onto Nagasaki, Japan?
-
+
-Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim
+Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim
-in the late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such
+in the late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such
-bomb ever exploded over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly
+bomb ever exploded over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly
-cling to this supposed "fact."
+cling to this supposed "fact."
-
+
-3. What are the materials needed to make an "atom bomb?"
+3. What are the materials needed to make an "atom bomb?"
-
+
-Uranium-238 and plutonium-239. 
+Uranium-238 and plutonium-239. 
-
+
-4. Aren't these materials radioactive?
+4. Aren't these materials radioactive?
-
+
-Highly so. Anybody who attempts to use these materials is endangering
+Highly so. Anybody who attempts to use these materials is endangering
-his/her life.
+his/her life.
-
+
-5. Is it likely that nuclear scientists in the 40's would be
+5. Is it likely that nuclear scientists in the 40's would be
-handling uranium and plutonium?
+handling uranium and plutonium?
-
+
-This would be highly unlikely. Very few people felt so threatened
+This would be highly unlikely. Very few people felt so threatened
-by the Japanese to be willing to risk their lives on a theoretical
+by the Japanese to be willing to risk their lives on a theoretical
-chance of a superbomb that could end a far-away war a little sooner.
+chance of a superbomb that could end a far-away war a little sooner.
-
+
-6. Aren't there witnesses to the atomic bomb in Hiroshima?
+6. Aren't there witnesses to the atomic bomb in Hiroshima?
-
+
-The only "witnesses" that could possibly survived this supposed
+The only "witnesses" that could possibly survived this supposed
-explosion would have been blinded by the intense flash of light,
+explosion would have been blinded by the intense flash of light,
-so their testimony is quite unreliable and contradictory.
+so their testimony is quite unreliable and contradictory.
-
+
-7. According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested 
+7. According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested 
-before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?
+before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?
-
+
-No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo
+No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo
-or anywhere else before Hiroshima.
+or anywhere else before Hiroshima.
-
+
-8. Isn't that strange?
+8. Isn't that strange?
-
+
-Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment;
+Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment;
-there is no other weapon that according to the accepted "facts" deployed
+there is no other weapon that according to the accepted "facts" deployed
-before any testing whatsoever.
+before any testing whatsoever.
-
+
-9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly
+9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly
-occuring during the fifties and sixties?
+occuring during the fifties and sixties?
-
+
-Very few, perhaps a few hundred, who claimed to have seen them.
+Very few, perhaps a few hundred, who claimed to have seen them.
-
+
-10. What did the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy
+10. What did the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy
-Commission say in their report of October 30, 1949?
+Commission say in their report of October 30, 1949?
-
+
-They recommended strongly against the development of what they
+They recommended strongly against the development of what they
-called the "Super Bomb," which is simply a thermonuclear
+called the "Super Bomb," which is simply a thermonuclear
-bomb. They said that "A super bomb might become a weapon of
+bomb. They said that "A super bomb might become a weapon of
-genocide."
+genocide."
-
+
-11. Isn't this four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
+11. Isn't this four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
-
+
-Yes. Obviously development of nuclear weapons occurred well
+Yes. Obviously development of nuclear weapons occurred well
-after their supposed implementation in 1945. 
+after their supposed implementation in 1945. 
-
+
-12. Is radioactivity dangerous?
+12. Is radioactivity dangerous?
-
+
-Everything is radioactive to some extent. 
+Everything is radioactive to some extent. 
-
+
-13. What was the triggering method of the bomb that supposedly
+13. What was the triggering method of the bomb that supposedly
-was dropped on Hiroshima?
+was dropped on Hiroshima?
-
+
-According to the standard historical accounts, it used a gun-
+According to the standard historical accounts, it used a gun-
-assembly trigger.
+assembly trigger.
-
+
-14. Wasn't the gun-assembly method of triggering abandoned
+14. Wasn't the gun-assembly method of triggering abandoned
-in the design stage?
+in the design stage?
-
+
-Yes; according to these same sources the gun method would not
+Yes; according to these same sources the gun method would not
-work with uranium-derived plutonium-239 because some of the
+work with uranium-derived plutonium-239 because some of the
-plutonium-239 absorbs a neutron to become plutonium-240, which
+plutonium-239 absorbs a neutron to become plutonium-240, which
-undergoes spontaneous fission, all before supercriticality,
+undergoes spontaneous fission, all before supercriticality,
-causing a premature and very small explosion that is unusable
+causing a premature and very small explosion that is unusable
-for the very purpose that it was supposedly designed for!
+for the very purpose that it was supposedly designed for!
-
+
-15. How do conventional historians rectify these two "facts?"
+15. How do conventional historians rectify these two "facts?"
-
+
-They don't even attempt to. 
+They don't even attempt to. 
-
+
-16. How many books have been written about the atomic bomb?
+16. How many books have been written about the atomic bomb?
-
+
-Many hundreds, as well as thousands of articles in magazines
+Many hundreds, as well as thousands of articles in magazines
-and newspapers.
+and newspapers.
-
+
-17. Why was Hiroshima "targeted," and not Tokyo?
+17. Why was Hiroshima "targeted," and not Tokyo?
-
+
-Perhaps because no one had heard of Hiroshima, and no one knew anyone
+Perhaps because no one had heard of Hiroshima, and no one knew anyone
-from there. It would be far more difficult to claim that Tokyo was bombed
+from there. It would be far more difficult to claim that Tokyo was bombed
-than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In fact, most world maps from before "World
+than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In fact, most world maps from before "World
-War Two" do not even mention these cities at all.
+War Two" do not even mention these cities at all.
-
+
-18. How does Japan benefit from the "atom bomb" story?
+18. How does Japan benefit from the "atom bomb" story?
-
+
-As a direct result of the "war," Japan has received billions of dollars
+As a direct result of the "war," Japan has received billions of dollars
-worth of US aid for its defense. Japan has essentially no defense
+worth of US aid for its defense. Japan has essentially no defense
-budget, so it can pour resources through MITI into defeating the US
+budget, so it can pour resources through MITI into defeating the US
-economically, all while playing on the emotions of anti-"nuke" activists
+economically, all while playing on the emotions of anti-"nuke" activists
-about the "horrors" of nuclear weapons.
+about the "horrors" of nuclear weapons.
-
+
-19. Wow, I never thought of that. How else do the Japanese
+19. Wow, I never thought of that. How else do the Japanese
-benefit from this story?
+benefit from this story?
-
+
-The Japanese now own major Hollywood studios, from which many war
+The Japanese now own major Hollywood studios, from which many war
-movies are produced. Also, they play upon our sympathy for the
+movies are produced. Also, they play upon our sympathy for the
-supposed "atom bomb" to blind us to the fact that this foreign
+supposed "atom bomb" to blind us to the fact that this foreign
-nation had taken over our semiconductor industry, many California
+nation had taken over our semiconductor industry, many California
-banks and practically the entire state of Hawaii. 
+banks and practically the entire state of Hawaii. 
-
+
-This is all a part of the Japanese plot to take over the world.
+This is all a part of the Japanese plot to take over the world.
-According to the "Protocols of the Elders of the Orient," this
+According to the "Protocols of the Elders of the Orient," this
-is a Japanese conspiracy all foretold by their ancient texts
+is a Japanese conspiracy all foretold by their ancient texts
-that very few Anglo-Saxons have the ability to read.
+that very few Anglo-Saxons have the ability to read.
-
+
-19. How many people are supposed to have died in the explosions?
+19. How many people are supposed to have died in the explosions?
-
+
-It is hard to say. Some sources say 60000 in Hiroshima, others say
+It is hard to say. Some sources say 60000 in Hiroshima, others say
-140000. No attempt has been made to rectify the various numbers.
+140000. No attempt has been made to rectify the various numbers.
-
+
-20. How many people die annually from car accidents in the US?
+20. How many people die annually from car accidents in the US?
-
+
-Over 50000.
+Over 50000.
-
+
-21. So, what makes Hiroshima so special?
+21. So, what makes Hiroshima so special?
-
+
-Nothing, especially given the contradictory evidence about it.
+Nothing, especially given the contradictory evidence about it.
-
+
-22. Boy, I'm mad. What should I do about this?
+22. Boy, I'm mad. What should I do about this?
-
+
-Glad you asked. First, send me lots of money so we can spread this
+Glad you asked. First, send me lots of money so we can spread this
-message far and wide. Maybe we'll take out ads in college newspapers
+message far and wide. Maybe we'll take out ads in college newspapers
-or something. 
+or something. 
-
+
-Second, direct your anger at the Japanese. We are the victims, and
+Second, direct your anger at the Japanese. We are the victims, and
-they are the aggressors. Make yourself feel important again by bashing
+they are the aggressors. Make yourself feel important again by bashing
-Japan at every opportunity. Japanese people are inherently evil, and
+Japan at every opportunity. Japanese people are inherently evil, and
-basically subhuman. They were never bombed, and if they would have been
+basically subhuman. They were never bombed, and if they would have been
-they would have deserved it. Who do they think they are, anyway?
+they would have deserved it. Who do they think they are, anyway?
-
+
-Yes, we Revisionists have all the answers. Life is a lot simpler than 
+Yes, we Revisionists have all the answers. Life is a lot simpler than 
-you thought it was. Join us, and you won't have to be bothered anymore
+you thought it was. Join us, and you won't have to be bothered anymore
-by any feelings of guilt for your inherent hatred. We can justify it!
+by any feelings of guilt for your inherent hatred. We can justify it!
-Oh, it's not the Japanese you hate, but the crippled? Hey - so do we!
+Oh, it's not the Japanese you hate, but the crippled? Hey - so do we!
-It's easy: we don't like feeling uncomfortable around people in wheelchairs,
+It's easy: we don't like feeling uncomfortable around people in wheelchairs,
-either! Who do they think they are, taking all the good parking spaces
+either! Who do they think they are, taking all the good parking spaces
-when they were stupid enough to slip on a banana peel? IT'S A 
+when they were stupid enough to slip on a banana peel? IT'S A 
-CONSPIRACY! --See how easy it is to start? Now, just mix in a few
+CONSPIRACY! --See how easy it is to start? Now, just mix in a few
-real facts, and start converting all of the otherwise messed-up
+real facts, and start converting all of the otherwise messed-up
-people to OUR CAUSE!
+people to OUR CAUSE!
-
+
-23. Wow! You mean that I could write stuff like this, too?
+23. Wow! You mean that I could write stuff like this, too?
-
+
-Sure! It's embarrasingly easy to write what we wrote above. In fact,
+Sure! It's embarrasingly easy to write what we wrote above. In fact,
-it's even superior to the usual anti-Semitic revisionist garbage,
+it's even superior to the usual anti-Semitic revisionist garbage,
-because it has a higher percentage of REAL FACTS! Most of the 
+because it has a higher percentage of REAL FACTS! Most of the 
-apparent "contradictions" above come from the facts that Nagasaki
+apparent "contradictions" above come from the facts that Nagasaki
-was bombed by a plutonium bomb, not uranium; and that hydrogen
+was bombed by a plutonium bomb, not uranium; and that hydrogen
-bombs are thermonuclear, not atomic bombs. Just juggle information
+bombs are thermonuclear, not atomic bombs. Just juggle information
-about the different types of bombs and mix them up so they seem to
+about the different types of bombs and mix them up so they seem to
-be contradicting each other. It doesn't take ANY INTELLIGENCE
+be contradicting each other. It doesn't take ANY INTELLIGENCE
-WHATSOEVER, and you can get lots of free air time on "48 Hours"!
+WHATSOEVER, and you can get lots of free air time on "48 Hours"!
-
+
-Oh, I forgot to mention: I have a Japanese girlfriend who agrees
+Oh, I forgot to mention: I have a Japanese girlfriend who agrees
-with EVERY WORD I've written above. Here she is:
+with EVERY WORD I've written above. Here she is:
-
+
-"Yes, I am his Japanese girlfriend. I love him very much, and I've
+"Yes, I am his Japanese girlfriend. I love him very much, and I've
-always been troubled by my Japanese friends claiming to know people
+always been troubled by my Japanese friends claiming to know people
-who died in Hiroshima."
+who died in Hiroshima."
-
+
-There you have it! Just throw some unverifiable opinions on top
+There you have it! Just throw some unverifiable opinions on top
-of ridiculous proofs to STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE! 
+of ridiculous proofs to STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE! 
-
+
-24. Couldn't I be arrested for this?
+24. Couldn't I be arrested for this?
-
+
-No! This country is founded on FREE SPEECH! But, just make sure
+No! This country is founded on FREE SPEECH! But, just make sure
-that you mention how much you are being persecuted for saying
+that you mention how much you are being persecuted for saying
-your version of history. (More than three email messages a day
+your version of history. (More than three email messages a day
-qualify for being called harrassment. Five may merit a lawsuit.)
+qualify for being called harrassment. Five may merit a lawsuit.)
-
+
-25. Where can I get more information?
+25. Where can I get more information?
-
+
-Go to a library. Take a book at random. Skim it. Then, decide how
+Go to a library. Take a book at random. Skim it. Then, decide how
-that book is either for you or against you. If it is for you, quote
+that book is either for you or against you. If it is for you, quote
-liberally and out of context. If against you, do the same. 
+liberally and out of context. If against you, do the same. 
-
+
-DON"T LET YOURSELF GET CONFUSED BY THE FACTS! We certainly don't!
+DON"T LET YOURSELF GET CONFUSED BY THE FACTS! We certainly don't!
-
+
-------------------------------------------------------------------
+------------------------------------------------------------------
-Alan LustigerINTERNET:lustiger@att.com  UUCP:att!pruxp!alu
+Alan LustigerINTERNET:lustiger@att.com  UUCP:att!pruxp!alu
-    ATTMAIL:!alustiger CIS:72657366
+    ATTMAIL:!alustiger CIS:72657366
-
+
---
+--
 Selected by Maddi Hausmann.  MAIL your joke (jokes ONLY) to funny@clarinet.com.</p></xml>