Lots of grammar/phrasing modifications. None of it really changed the meaning, except for maybe a few cheekily inserted adjectives, however.
Fixed:
* Missing articles
* Missing words
* Too many words
* Incorrect use of phrases and prepositions
* Sentences with wrong structures entirely
Extended the description of the Tails operating system, and the security considerations when running it under virtualization software. Also added a "See Also" section.
Also:
* Newline at end of sentence
* Someone wrote part of the document in first person
* Reformatted issues section
* Misc grammar fixes
* Extended answers/questions to be full, grammatically correct, complete sentences
* Explained acronyms
* Missing periods
* New sentence to add explanation
* Removed unnecessary newlines at end of document
* Newline at end of sentences
In order to prevent what happened last time, I'm going to edit this document piecemeal so you can choose which PRs to accept and which to reject.
* Partitioned run on sentences
* Cleaned up wording.
* Newline at end of sentences.
* Missing letters
* Removed words in a sentence
* Removed a letter
* I should probably just write a script that correctly formats the placement of newlines in these documents.
Wrote a paragraph or two about verifying the QubesOS ISO signature and wrote a disclaimer that Qubes does not automatically verify external downloads not coming from its own repositories.
Fixed problems related to:
* Unnecessary wordiness
* Subject-Verb Agreement
* Typos
* Not creating newline at end of sentence as per documentation guidelines.
* Putting sentences where they logically needed to be
* Adding articles where necessary
* Added descriptions of links that just used the URL as the display text
I don't understand some of the information here, so tell me if any of the fixes I made inadvertently created inaccuracies.
Updated the wikipedia definition to reflect what's on the page (which is a more accurate definition anyways). It's a little heavy, but since the sentence has quotation marks we should be basing it on a direct quote from the article and not a paraphrase. If you want to paraphrase it because it's dense someone else can come and remove those quotation marks and write their own defintion.
While I did not modify the source, I also want to ask that we not source information from the wikipedia article itself, but rather the sources that it references in its footnotes.
Also:
* Missing a lette
* Removed unnecessary word glyphs
