privacyguides.org/blog/posts/virtual-insanity.md
Jonah Aragon 367b9e548d
docs(blog): Re-add profile info to blog authors (#2717)
Co-authored-by: blacklight447 <github.ef27z@simplelogin.com>
2024-08-20 14:43:40 +02:00

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

date categories authors links tags license
created
2021-11-01
Opinion
freddy
posts/move-fast-and-break-things.md
posts/why-i-run-a-tor-relay.md
Facebook
BY-SA

Virtual Insanity

Not so long ago, the world was predicting the end for Facebook. Now it is no more. Gone from the face of the planet never to be seen again. Except it isnt.

Facebook has not disappeared. No, not even the damning Facebook Papers can shut it down. Mark Zuckerberg stood up on stage, and announced that it had changed its name to: Meta.

A key part of this new vision for the company is the idea of the metaverse. If it sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie or novel, thats because it is. The term was first coined by author Neal Stephenson in his 1992 book Snow Crash. Zuckerbergs only problem is that novel was dystopian. Heres a brief snippet of Stephensons description of the metaverse:

“Your avatar can look any way you want it to, up to the limitations of your equipment. If youre ugly, you can make your avatar beautiful. If youve just gotten out of bed, your avatar can still be wearing beautiful clothes and professionally applied makeup. You can look like a gorilla or a dragon or a giant talking penis in the Metaverse. Spend five minutes walking down the Street and you will see all of these.”

In fairness, that doesnt seem unlike the sort of content you see on Facebook today. Compare this to what Zuckerberg wrote in his 2021 Founders Letter:

“In this future, you will be able to teleport instantly as a hologram to be at the office without a commute, at a concert with friends, or in your parents living room to catch up. This will open up more opportunity no matter where you live. Youll be able to spend more time on what matters to you, cut down time in traffic, and reduce your carbon footprint.”

The similarities are uncanny.

This wouldnt be the first time that Facebook has been described as dystopian. One Mashable article called the social media giant Orwellian and Huxleyan at the same time. Quite a feat.

The Facebook Papers have some pretty shocking-though not entirely surprising-revelations as well. The leaked documents demonstrate the extent to which Facebook values engagement above all else (including a good experience). For instance, we learnt that the algorithm is optimised for low quality content, prioritises rage over happiness for profit, and promotes extremist content. Most alarming was that the firm failed to reduce disinformation during the pandemic even when given the opportunity. Zuckerberg said no to this, presumably because it would reduce engagement and, in turn, Facebooks advertising revenue.

Lets not forget all Facebooks previous scandals. From the Cambridge Analytica kerfuffle to conducting manipulative social experiments in secret.

In light of this, the name change makes sense. It deceives you into thinking the company has evolved into a benevolent corporation, when it simply hasnt. Zuckerberg would much prefer you to think about Meta as a playful universe where you can meet with friends across the globe in virtual reality. Where humans train themselves to sound like heavily discounted robots. Where Facebook is not a Horrid Company.

Despite all this: Meta is Facebook, just worse. It doesnt matter about the new name, the company has not changed. It will still be violating our privacy, daily, on an unprecedented scale. It will still be as reliably scandalous as a Carry On film. It will still be terrible. Plus it will have all the added claptrap of a sub-par holographic universe attached.