privacyguides.org/collections/_evergreen/linux-desktop.md

layout	title	mathjax	description
evergreen	Linux Desktop	false	Linux distributions are commonly recommended for privacy protection and user freedom. Below are some suggestions with some general privacy and security improvements.

Traditional distributions

{% for item_hash in site.data.operating-systems.linux-desktop %} {% assign item = item_hash[1] %}

{% if item.type == "Recommendation" %} {% include recommendation-card.html %} {% endif %}

{% endfor %}

Immutable distributions

{% for item_hash in site.data.operating-systems.linux-desktop-immutable %} {% assign item = item_hash[1] %}

{% if item.type == "Recommendation" %} {% include recommendation-card.html %} {% endif %}

{% endfor %}

Anonymity-focused distributions

{% for item_hash in site.data.operating-systems.linux-desktop-tor %} {% assign item = item_hash[1] %}

{% if item.type == "Recommendation" %} {% include recommendation-card.html %} {% endif %}

{% endfor %}

GNU/Linux

It is often believed that open source software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn't always the case. It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to code reviews, and how often attention is given to specific parts of the codebase that may go untouched for years.

At the moment, desktop GNU/Linux does have some areas that could be better improved when compared to their proprietary counterparts, e.g:

• A verified boot chain, unlike Apple's Secure Boot (with Secure Enclave), Android's Verified Boot or Microsoft Windows's boot process with TPM. These features and hardware technologies can all help prevent persistant tampering by malware or evil maid attacks
• Strong sandboxing solution such as that found in MacOS, ChromeOS, and Android. Commonly used Linux sandboxing solutions such as Flatpak and Firejail still have a long way to go
• Strong exploit mitigations

Despite these drawbacks, desktop GNU/Linux distributions are great if you want to:

• Avoid telemetry that often comes with proprietary operating systems
• Maintain software freedom
• Have purpose built systems such as Whonix or Tails

This page uses the term "Linux" to describe desktop GNU/Linux distributions. Other operating systems which also use the Linux kernel such as ChromeOS, Android, and Qubes OS are not discussed here.

Release cycle

We highly recommend that you choose distributions which stay close to the stable upstream software releases. This is because frozen release cycle distributions often don't update package versions and fall behind on security updates.

For frozen distributions, package maintainers are expected to backport patches to fix vulnerabilities (Debian is one such example) rather than bump the software to the "next version" released by the upstream developer. Some security fixes do not recieve a CVE (particularly less popular software) at all and therefore do not make it into the distribution with this patching model. As a result minor security fixes are sometimes held back until the next major release.

We don't believe holding packages back and applying interim patches is a good idea, as it diverges from the way the developer might have intended the software to work. Richard Brown has a presentation about this:

Traditional vs Atomic updates

Traditionally, Linux distributions update by sequentially updating the desired packages. Traditional updates such as those used in Fedora, Archlinux, and Debian based distributions can be less reliable if an error occurs while updating.

Atomic updating distributions apply updates in full or not at all. Typically, transactional update systems are also atomic.

A transactional update system creates a snapshot that is made before and after an update is applied. If an update fails at any time (perhaps due to a power failure), the update can be easily rolled back to a "last known good state".

The Atomic update method is used for immutable distributions like Silverblue, Tumbleweed, and NixOS and can achieve reliability with this model. Adam Šamalík provided a presentation on how rpm-ostree works with Silverblue:

"Security-focused" distributions

There is often some confusion about "security-focused" distributions and "pentesting" distributions. A quick search for "the most secure Linux distribution" will often give results like Kali Linux, Black Arch, and Parrot OS. These distributions are offensive penetration testing distributions that bundle tools for testing other systems. They don't include any "extra security" or defensive mitigations intended for regular use.

Arch-based distributions

Arch based distributions are not recommended for new users, regardless of the distribution. Arch does not have an distribution update mechanism for the underlying software choices. As a result the user of the system must stay aware with current trends and adopt technologies as they supersede older practices.

For a secure system, the user is also expected to have sufficient Linux knowledge to properly set up security for their system such as adopting a mandatory access control system, setting up kernel module blacklists, hardening boot parameters, manipulating sysctl parameters, and knowing what components they need such as Polkit.

Any user using the Arch User Repository (AUR), must be comfortable in auditing PKGBUILDs that they install from that service. AUR packages are user-produced content and are not vetted in any way and therefore are vulnerable to software supply chain attacks, which has in fact happened in the past. AUR should always be used sparingly and often there is a lot of bad advice on various pages which direct users to blindly use AUR helpers without sufficient warning. Similar warnings apply to using third party Personal Package Archives (PPAs) on Debian based distributions or Community Projects (COPR) on Fedora.

For advanced users, we only recommend Arch Linux, not any of its derivatives. We recommend against these two Arch derivatives specifically:

• Manjaro: This distribution holds packages back for 2 weeks to make sure that their own changes don't break, not to make sure that upstream is stable. When AUR packages are used, they are often built against the latest libraries from Arch's repositories.
• Garuda: They use Chaotic-AUR which automatically and blindly compiles packages from the AUR. There is no verification process to make sure that the AUR packages don't suffer from supply chain attacks.

Linux-libre kernel and "Libre" distributions

We strongly recommend against using the Linux-libre kernel, since it removes security mitigations and suppresses kernel warnings about vulnerable microcode for ideological reasons.

General Recommendations

Drive Encryption

Most Linux distributions have an installer option for enabling Linux Unified Key Setup (LUKS) encryption upon installation.

If this option isn't set at installation time, the user will have to backup their data and re-install, as encryption is applied after disk partitioning but before file systems are formatted.

When securely erasing storage devices such as a Solid-state drive (SSD) you should use the ATA Secure Erase command. This command can be issued from your UEFI setup. If the storage device is a regular hard drive, consider using nwipe.

Swap

Consider using ZRAM or encrypted swap instead of unencrypted swap to avoid potential security issues with sensitive data being pushed to swap space. Fedora based distributions use ZRAM by default.

Wayland

We recommend using a desktop environment that supports the Wayland display protocol as it developed with security in mind. Its predecessor, X11, does not support GUI isolation, allowing all windows to record screen, log and inject inputs in other windows, making any attempt at sandboxing futile. While there are options to do nested X11 such as Xpra or Xephyr, they often come with negative performance consequences and are not convenient to set up and are not preferable over Wayland.

Fortunately, common environments such as GNOME, KDE, and the window manager Sway have support for Wayland. Some distributions like Fedora and Tumbleweed use it by default and some others may do so in the future as X11 is in hard maintenance mode. If you're using one of those environments it is as easy as selecting the "Wayland" session at the desktop display manager (GDM, SDDM).

We recommend against using desktop environments or window managers that do not have Wayland support such as Cinnamon (default on Linux Mint), Pantheon (default on Elementary OS), MATE, XFCE, and i3.

Proprietary firmware (microcode updates)

Linux distributions such as those which are Linux-libre or DIY (Archlinux) don't come with the proprietary microcode updates. Some notable examples of these vulnerabilities include Spectre, Meltdown, SSB, Foreshadow, MDS, SWAPGS, and other hardware vulnerabilities.

We highly recommend that you install the microcode updates, as your CPU is already running the proprietary microcode from the factory. Fedora and openSUSE both have the microcode updates applied by default.

Privacy tweaks

MAC address randomization

Many desktop linux distributions (Fedora, openSUSE etc) will come with NetworkManager, to configure ethernet and WiFi settings.

It is possible to randomize the MAC address when using NetworkManager. This provides a bit more privacy on WiFi networks as it makes it harder to track specific devices on the network you're connected to. It does not make you anonymous.

We recommend changing the setting to random instead of stable, as suggested in the article.

If you are using systemd-networkd, you will need to set MACAddressPolicy=random which will enable RFC 7844 (Anonymity Profiles for DHCP Clients).

There isn't much point in randomizing the MAC address for ethernet connections as a system administrator can find you by looking at the port you are using on the network switch. Randomizing WiFi MAC addresses depends on support from the WiFi's firmware.

Other identifiers

There are other system identifiers which you may wish to be careful about. You should give this some thought to see if it applies to your threat model:

• 10.1 Hostnames and usernames
• 10.2 Timezones / Locales / Keymaps
• 10.3 Machine ID

System counting

The Fedora project counts how many unique systems access its mirrors by using an ID on the system access its mirrors by counting using an ID on the system. They do this to determine load and provision better servers for updates where necessary.

This option appears to be off by default. We recommend adding countme=false to /etc/dnf/dnf.conf just in case it is enabled in the future. On systems that use rpm-ostree such as Silverblue, the countme option is disabled by masking the rpm-ostree-countme timer.

openSUSE also uses a unique ID to count systems, which can be disabled by deleting the /var/lib/zypp/AnonymousUniqueId file.

Sandboxing and Application confinement

Some sandboxing solutions for desktop Linux distributions do exist, however they are not as strict as those found in MacOS or ChromeOS. Applications installed from the package manager (dnf, apt, etc.) typically have no sandboxing or confinement whatsoever. Below are a few projects that aim to solve this problem:

Flatpak

Flatpak aims to be a universal package manager for Linux. One of its main goals is to provide a universal package format which can be used in most Linux distributions. It provides some permission control. Madaidan points out that Flatpak sandboxing could be improved as particular Flatpaks often have greater permission than required. There does seem to be some agreement that this is the case.

Users can restrict applications further by issuing flatpak overrides. This can be done with the commandline or by using Flatseal. Some sample overrides are provided by tommytran732 and rusty-snake.

We generally recommend revoking access to:

• the Network (share=network) socket (internet access)
• the pulse audio socket (for both audio in and out), device=all (access to all devices including the camera)
• org.freedesktop.secrets dbus (access to secrets stored on your keychain) for applications which do not need it

If an application works natively with Wayland (and not running through the XWayland compatibility layer), consider revoking its access to the X11 (socket=x11) and Inter-process communications (IPC) socket (share=ipc) as well.

We also recommend restricting broad filesystem permissions such as filesystem=home and filesystem=host which should be revoked and replaced with just the directories that the app needs to access.

Hard-coded access to some kernel interfaces like /sys and /proc and weak seccomp filters unfortunately cannot be secured by the user with Flatpak.

Firejail

Firejail is another method of sandboxing. As it is a large setuid binary, it has a large attack surface which may assist in privilege escalation.

The main risk is that Firejail may make the system safer from processes confined by it, but make it also less safe from processes running outside of Firejail. We don't recommend the use of Firejail.

Mandatory Access Control

Mandatory access control systems require policy files in order to force constraints on the system.

The two main control systems are SELinux (used on Android and Fedora) and AppArmor.

Fedora includes SELinux preconfigured with some policies that will confine system daemons (background processes). We don't recommend disabling SELinux.

openSUSE gives the choice of AppArmor or SELinux during the installation process. We recommend sticking to the default for each variant (AppArmor for Tumbleweed and SELinux for MicroOS). openSUSE's SELinux policies are derived from Fedora.

Arch and Arch-based operating systems often do not come with a mandatory access control system and that must be configured manually for either AppArmor or SELinux.

Making your own policies/profiles

For advanced users, you can make your own AppArmor profiles, SELinux policies, Bubblewrap profiles, and seccomp blacklist to have better confinement of applications. This is quite a tedious and complicated task so we won't go into detail about how to do it here, but we do have a few projects that you could use as reference.

• Whonix's AppArmor Everything
• Krathalan's AppArmor profiles
• noatsecure's SELinux templates
• Seirdy's Bubblewrap scripts

Securing Linux containers

If you're running a server you may have heard of Linux Containers, Docker, or Podman which refer to a kind of OS-level virtualization. Containers are more common in server and development environments where individual apps are built to operate independently.

Docker is one of the most common container solutions. It does not run a proper sandbox, and this means that there is a large kernel attack surface. The daemon controls everything and typically runs as root. If it crashes for some reason, all the containers will crash too. The gVisor runtime which implements an application level kernel can help limit the number of syscalls an application can make and can help isolate it from the host's kernel.

Redhat develops Podman and secures it with SELinux to isolate containers from each other. One of the notable differences between Docker and Podman is that Docker requires root while Podman can run with rootless containers that are also daemonless, meaning if one crashes they don't all come down.

Another option is Kata containers, where virtual machines masquerade as containers. Each Kata container has its own Linux kernel and is isolated from the host.

These container technologies can be useful even for enthusiastic home users who may want to run certain web app software on their local area network (LAN) such as vaultwarden or images provided by linuxserver.io to increase privacy by decreasing dependence on various web services.

Additional hardening

Firewalls

A firewall may be used to secure connections to your system. If you're on a public network, the necessity of this may be greater than if you're on a local trusted network that you control. We would generally recommend that you block incoming connections only, unless you're using an application firewall such as OpenSnitch or Portmaster.

Redhat distributions (such as Fedora) are typically configured through firewalld. Redhat has plenty of documentation regarding this topic. There is also the uncomplicated firewall which can be used as an alternative.

Consider blocking all ports which are not well known or "privileged ports". That is, ports from 1025 up to 65535. Block both TCP and UDP after the operating system is installed.

If you use Fedora, consider removing the whitelist for for smb-client and mdns services if you do not use them.

All these firewalls use the Netfilter framework and therefore cannot protect against malicious programs running on the system. A malicious program could insert its own rules.

If you are using Flatpak packages, you can revoke their network socket access using Flatseal and prevent those applications from accessing your network. This permission is not bypassable.

If you are using non-classic Snap packages on a system with proper snap confinement support (with both AppArmor and CGroupsv1 present), you can use the Snap Store to revoke network permission as well. This is also not bypassable.

Kernel hardening

There are some additional kernel hardening options such as configuring sysctl keys and kernel command-line parameters which are described in the following pages. We don't recommend you change these options unless you learn about what they do.

• 2.2 Sysctl
• 2.3 Boot parameters
• 2.5 Kernel attack surface reduction

Note that setting kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=0 will stop Flatpak, Snap (that depend on browser-sandbox), Electron based AppImages, Podman, Docker, and LXC containers from working. Do not set this flag if you are using container products.

Linux-Hardened

Some distributions like Arch Linux have the linux-hardened, kernel package. It includes hardening patches and more security-conscious defaults. Linux-Hardened has kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=0 disabled by default. See the warning above about how this might impact you.

Simultaneous multithreading (SMT)

SMT has been the cause of numerous hardware vulnerabilities, and subsequent patches for those vulnerabilities often come with performance penalties that negate most of the performance gain given by SMT. If you followed the "kernel hardening" section above, some kernel parameters already disable SMT. If the option is available to you, we recommend that you disable it in your firmware as well.

Hardened memory allocator

The hardened memory allocator from GrapheneOS can be used on Linux distributions. It is available by default on Whonix and is available as an AUR package on Arch based distributions. If you are using the AUR package, consider setting up LD_PRELOAD as described in the Arch Wiki.

Umask

If you are not using openSUSE, consider changing the default umask for both regular users and root to 077. Changing umask to 077 can break snapper on openSUSE and is not recommended.

Mountpoint hardening

Consider adding the following options nodev, noexec, and nosuid to mountpoints which do not need them. Typically, these could be applied to /boot, /boot/efi, /home, /root, and /var.

If you use Toolbox, /var/log/journal must not have any of those options. If you are on Arch Linux, do not apply noexec to /var/tmp.

Linux Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)

There is also further hardening to PAM to secure authentication to your system. 14. PAM has some tips on this.

On Redhat distributions you can use authselect to configure this e.g.:

sudo authselect select <profile_id, default: sssd> with-faillock without-nullok with-pamaccess

On systems where pam_faillock is not available, consider using pam_tally2 instead.

USB port protection

To better protect your USB ports from attacks such as BadUSB we recommend USBGuard. USBGuard has documentation as does the Arch Wiki.

Another alternative option if you're using the linux-hardened is the deny_new_usb sysctl. See Preventing USB Attacks with linux-hardened.

Secure Boot

Secure Boot can be used to secure the boot process by preventing the loading of unsigned UEFI drivers or boot loaders. Some guidance for this is provided in 21. Physical security and 21.4 Verified boot.

For further resources on Secure Boot we suggest taking a look at the following for instructional advice

• The Archwiki's Secure Boot article. There are two main methods, the first is to use a shim, the second more complete way is to use your own keys.

For background of how Secure Boot works on Linux:

• The Strange State of Authenticated Boot and Disk Encryption on Generic Linux Distributions
• Rod Smith's Managing EFI Boot Loaders for Linux
• Dealing with Secure Boot
• Controlling Secure Boot

One of the problems with Secure Boot particularly on Linux is that only the chainloader (shim), the boot loader (GRUB), and the kernel are verified and that's where verification stops. The initramfs is often left unverified, unencrypted, and open up the window for an evil maid attack. There are a few things that can be done to reduce risk such as:

• Creating an EFI Boot Stub that contains the kernel, initramfs and microcode. This EFI stub can then be signed. If you use dracut this can easily be done with the --uefi-stub switch or the uefi_stub config option.
• Encrypting the boot partition. However, this has its own issues, the first being that GRUB only supports LUKS1 and not the newer default LUKS2 scheme. As the bootloader runs in protected mode and the encryption module lacks SSE acceleration the boot process will take minutes to complete.
• Using TPM to perform a measured boot.

After setting up Secure Boot it is crucial that you set a "firmware password" (also called a "supervisor password, "BIOS password" or "UEFI password"), otherwise an adversary can simply disable secure boot.

These recommendations can make you a little more resistant to evil maid attacks, but they not good as a proper verified boot process such as that found on Android, ChromeOS or Windows.