mirror of
https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org.git
synced 2024-12-24 15:09:38 -05:00
Remove link redirect for Seirdy article (#1511)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gray <dng@disroot.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d6b59e94b
commit
e0933d6521
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
title: Linux Overview
|
||||
icon: fontawesome/brands/linux
|
||||
---
|
||||
It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/2022/02/02/floss-security.html). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years.
|
||||
It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/posts/2022/02/02/floss-security/). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years.
|
||||
|
||||
At the moment, desktop GNU/Linux does have some areas that could be better improved when compared to their proprietary counterparts, e.g.:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user