From e0933d6521803e786dec19e9a51e12c591188e47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 09:03:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove link redirect for Seirdy article (#1511) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gray --- docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md b/docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md index da187e73..1223c236 100644 --- a/docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md +++ b/docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ title: Linux Overview icon: fontawesome/brands/linux --- -It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/2022/02/02/floss-security.html). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years. +It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/posts/2022/02/02/floss-security/). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years. At the moment, desktop GNU/Linux does have some areas that could be better improved when compared to their proprietary counterparts, e.g.: