Git-Mirrors/privacyguides.org
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org.git synced 2025-05-03 23:05:23 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Remove link redirect for Seirdy article (#1511)

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gray <dng@disroot.org>
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-07-05 09:03:56 +00:00 • committed by Daniel Gray
parent 2d6b59e94b
commit e0933d6521
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 41911F722B0F9AE3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/linux-desktop/overview.en.md
View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: Linux Overview title: Linux Overview
icon: fontawesome/brands/linux icon: fontawesome/brands/linux
--- ---
It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/2022/02/02/floss-security.html). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years. It is often believed that [open-source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) software is inherently secure because the source code is available. There is an expectation that community verification occurs regularly; however, this isn’t always [the case](https://seirdy.one/posts/2022/02/02/floss-security/). It does depend on a number of factors, such as project activity, developer experience, level of rigour applied to [code reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review), and how often attention is given to specific parts of the [codebase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase) that may go untouched for years.
At the moment, desktop GNU/Linux does have some areas that could be better improved when compared to their proprietary counterparts, e.g.: At the moment, desktop GNU/Linux does have some areas that could be better improved when compared to their proprietary counterparts, e.g.: