decentralized-cryptography-.../zero_knowledge/zkEVMs/zkSync/README.md

39 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

## zkSync
<br>
### tl; dr
<br>
* layer-2 scaling solution for ethereum, aiming for scalability.
* zkSync 2 is called Era, zkSync 1 is called light.
* uses "optimistic" transfers, which allow users to send and receive txs without waiting for conformation (reducing tx times, and allowing higher tx throughput).
* tvl: zkSync era has higher transfers of assets ($125M) than Polygon zkEVM ($2.57M)
* sybil addresses: zkSync era has more potential sybil addresses based on the depositing addresses wallet age and usage on Ethereum/Layer 2 networks.
* tx costs: ~$0.25-$2, high compared to optimistic rollups like arbitrum and Ootimism ($0.13 - $0.45)
<br>
----
### zksync era
* zksync era archtecture:
* native account abstraction (any account on era can pay fees in any tokens or even transact with zero fees on protocols willing to subsidize usage)
* powerful llvm compiler
* data compression (publishing states diffs instead of tx inputs, enabling data compression, more frequent oracle updates, cheap privacy, seamless off-chain sotrage extension)
* hyperscalability
<br>
----
### cool resources
<br>
* **[zksync ecosystem](https://ecosystem.zksync.io/)**
* **[gm zkEVM, by zksync](https://blog.matter-labs.io/gm-zkevm-171b12a26b36)**
* **[dune board zksync vs. polygon zkEVM](https://dune.com/21shares_research/zkevm-comparison-zksync-era-vs-polygon-hermez)**