mirror of
https://github.com/edgelesssys/constellation.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:36:09 -04:00
63 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
# Feature status of clouds
|
|
|
|
What works on which cloud? Currently, Confidential VMs (CVMs) are available in varying quality on the different clouds and software stacks.
|
|
|
|
For Constellation, the ideal environment provides the following:
|
|
|
|
1. Ability to run arbitrary software and images inside CVMs
|
|
2. CVMs based on AMD SEV-SNP (available in EPYC CPUs since the Milan generation) or Intel TDX (available in Xeon CPUs since the Sapphire Rapids generation)
|
|
3. Ability for CVM guests to obtain raw hardware attestation statements
|
|
4. Reviewable, open-source firmware inside CVMs
|
|
5. Capability of the firmware to attest the integrity of the code it passes control to, e.g., with an embedded virtual TPM (vTPM)
|
|
|
|
(1) is a functional must-have. (2)--(5) are required for remote attestation that fully keeps the infrastructure/cloud out. Constellation can work without them or with approximations, but won't protect against certain privileged attackers anymore.
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the state of features for different infrastructures as of June 2023.
|
|
|
|
| **Feature** | **Azure** | **GCP** | **AWS** | **OpenStack (Yoga)** |
|
|
|-----------------------------------|-----------|---------|---------|----------------------|
|
|
| **1. Custom images** | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| **2. SEV-SNP or TDX** | Yes | Yes | Yes | Depends on kernel/HV |
|
|
| **3. Raw guest attestation** | Yes | Yes | Yes | Depends on kernel/HV |
|
|
| **4. Reviewable firmware** | No | No | Yes | Depends on kernel/HV |
|
|
| **5. Confidential measured boot** | Yes | No | No | Depends on kernel/HV |
|
|
|
|
## Microsoft Azure
|
|
|
|
With its [CVM offering](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/confidential-computing/confidential-vm-overview), Azure provides the best foundations for Constellation.
|
|
Regarding (3), Azure provides direct access to remote-attestation statements.
|
|
The firmware runs in an isolated domain inside the CVM and exposes a vTPM (5), but it's closed source (4).
|
|
On SEV-SNP, Azure uses VM Privilege Level (VMPL) isolation for the separation of firmware and the rest of the VM; on TDX, they use TD partitioning.
|
|
This firmware is signed by Azure.
|
|
The signature is reflected in the remote-attestation statements of CVMs.
|
|
Thus, the Azure closed-source firmware becomes part of Constellation's trusted computing base (TCB).
|
|
|
|
## Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
|
|
|
|
The [CVMs Generally Available in GCP](https://cloud.google.com/compute/confidential-vm/docs/create-confidential-vm-instance) are based on AMD SEV but don't have SNP features enabled.
|
|
CVMs with SEV-SNP enabled are currently in [public preview](https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/rsa-snp-vm-more-confidential). Regarding (3), with their SEV-SNP offering Google provides direct access to remote-attestation statements.
|
|
However, regarding (5), attestation is partially based on the [Shielded VM vTPM](https://cloud.google.com/compute/shielded-vm/docs/shielded-vm#vtpm) for [measured boot](../architecture/attestation.md#measured-boot), which is a vTPM managed by Google's hypervisor.
|
|
Hence, the hypervisor is currently part of Constellation's TCB.
|
|
Regarding (4), the CVMs still include closed-source firmware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the past, Intel and Google have [collaborated](https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/rsa-google-intel-confidential-computing-more-secure) to enhance the security of TDX.
|
|
Recently, Google has announced a [private preview for TDX](https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/confidential-vms-on-intel-cpus-your-datas-new-intelligent-defense?hl=en).
|
|
With TDX on Google, Constellation has a similar TCB and attestation flow as with the current SEV-SNP offering.
|
|
|
|
## Amazon Web Services (AWS)
|
|
|
|
Amazon EC2 [supports AMD SEV-SNP](https://aws.amazon.com/de/about-aws/whats-new/2023/04/amazon-ec2-amd-sev-snp/).
|
|
Regarding (3), AWS provides direct access to remote-attestation statements.
|
|
However, regarding (5), attestation is partially based on the [NitroTPM](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/nitrotpm.html) for [measured boot](../architecture/attestation.md#measured-boot), which is a vTPM managed by the Nitro hypervisor.
|
|
Hence, the hypervisor is currently part of Constellation's TCB.
|
|
Regarding (4), the [firmware is open source](https://github.com/aws/uefi) and can be reproducibly built.
|
|
|
|
## OpenStack
|
|
|
|
OpenStack is an open-source cloud and infrastructure management software. It's used by many smaller CSPs and datacenters. In the latest *Yoga* version, OpenStack has basic support for CVMs. However, much depends on the employed kernel and hypervisor. Features (2)--(4) are likely to be a *Yes* with Linux kernel version 6.2. Thus, going forward, OpenStack on corresponding AMD or Intel hardware will be a viable underpinning for Constellation.
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
The different clouds and software like the Linux kernel and OpenStack are in the process of building out their support for state-of-the-art CVMs. Azure has already most features in place. For Constellation, the status quo means that the TCB has different shapes on different infrastructures. With broad SEV-SNP support coming to the Linux kernel, we soon expect a normalization of features across infrastructures.
|