decentralized-id.github.io/unsorted/next/we-are-open.md

11 KiB
Raw Blame History

published
false

We are Open Coop

could be useful for thinking about credential adoption profiles

The complexity surrounding any global audience cant be understated, really. I mean, were talking about millions of people. GPI communications have to take into account that many are coming to Greenpeace for the first time, while others know the organization well. The audience is diverse. From young to old, every color and creed, a massive spectrum of people who are interested in the mission to “ensure the ability of the earth to nurture life in all its diversity.”

Yesterday, the draft Verifiable Credentials for Education, Employment, and Achievement Use Cases report was published [...] The next version of the Open Badges specification (v3.0) will be compatible with Verifiable Credentials (VCs).

Open Recognition is the awareness and appreciation of talents, skills and aspirations in ways that go beyond credentialing. This includes recognising the rights of individuals, communities, and territories to apply their own labels and definitions. Their frameworks may be emergent and/or implicit.” (What is Open Recognition, anyway?

Sociocracy is a system of governance that seeks to create psychologically safe environments and productive organizations. It draws on the use of consent, rather than majority voting, in discussion and decision-making by people who have a shared goal or work process.

This post shows how being intentional about community building can help people feel welcome, safe, and able to contribute. It explores three ways in which WAO has collaborated with Participate to do this

As one system begins to deteriorate, a new system begins to emerge. This got us thinking about how this model applies to the world of Open Recognition.

Too often, though, these badges focus on credentialing rather than recognition. Open Recognition is the awareness and appreciation of talents, skills and aspirations in ways that go beyond

OpenBadges

we want to explain what we talk about when we talk about Open Recognition. It builds on this previous post, and aims to move from the abstract to practicalities.

KBW helps people understand the badge landscape. The community is there to provide solidarity for badge champions and newbies. We do not assume prior knowledge of Open Badges or Verifiable Credentials. We recognise and celebrate those who can share their experience. Anyone interested in badges or integrating Open Recognition are welcome to join.

  • Keep Badges Weird… at the Badge Summit

    We have a new suite of badges to encourage participation, create value for others, and reflect on that experience. Participants will be able to both earn AND award badges, so theyll have a chance to prove that theyve understood the theory surrounding CoPs and badges as well as put those theories into practice.

  • Discover Open Badges 3.0! Keep Badges Weird

    1. Check out the (accepted) Open Badges 3.0 proposal
    2. Watch a video from the ePIC conference giving an overview of what Open Badges 3.0 will enable (or view the slide deck
    3. Discuss what this means for you, your organisation, or your community in this thread
  • Reflecting on the Evolving Badges and Credentials Ecosystem

    Recently, the WAO team took the opportunity to update the badge platforms page on Badge Wiki, a knowledgebase for the Open Badge community. As the ecosystem continues to evolve were seeing some early platforms fall by the wayside and new platforms emerge.

  • What is Open Recognition, anyway? Going beyond credentialing and the formal/informal divide

    Badges as credentials includes approaches that are well understood and largely replace or augment existing certification practices. Badges for recognition, however, include approaches that remain somewhat confusing to many people.

  • How badges can change the world: Part 2: Why we need to transition

In Part 1: The Two Loops Model for Open Recognition advocacy, we talked about how as one system begins to deteriorate, an alternative begins to emerge. We know the alternative system, one that integrates credentials with other forms of recognition, is better for everyone. Without that integration, cold-hard credentialing supports outdated power dynamics.