Update README.md

README.md

@@ -1,26 +1,154 @@
 # 9/11 Truth Resources
 ## ***-----NEVER FORGET-----***
 >“The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.” 
+---
+### Archive & Share
+- https://git.hackliberty.org/c0mmando/911-truth-resources (Main Repo)
 
-### **Predictions**
+---
+## **Predictions**
 - [Alex Jones predicted 9/11 attack on July 25, 2001](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=a8Hk1-BpXO8)
 - [Bill Cooper predicted 9/11 attack on June 28, 2001](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=lLHVQUTrgvM)
 - [Donald Trump Predicted Large-Scale Terror Attack Before 9/11 In 2000](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=60RuXCV71ic)
 
-### **Websites**
+## **Websites**
+### **World Trade Center Destruction Forensics**
+- [Journal of 9/11 Studies](https://web.archive.org/web/20230827165830/http://www.journalof911studies.com/) - This journal is edited by Prof Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, two of the preeminent scholars challenging the official explanation of the World Trade Center collapses. 
+- [Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth](https://www.ae911truth.org/) -  This website features the work of an association of architects, engineers, and affiliates organized by Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects. Gage, with his expertise as architect involved in the design of large steel-framed structures, began giving detailed talks on the three WTC high-rise "collapses" starting in early 2007. 
+- [911speakout](https://911speakout.org/) -  This website by the physics instructor David Chandler contains a concise summary of the reasons for questioning the official story of 9/11, a list of resources of various skeptics of that story, and an index of Chandler's own analysis. The section of the front page entitled "My Own Two Cents Worth: Applying Basic Physics to the Evidence" lists and summarizes Chandler's original articles and videos -- clear and well-reasoned pieces focusing on the physics of the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. 
+- [GordonsSite](https://gordonssite.tripod.com/id1.html) - This site by mechanical engineer Gordon Ross contains detailed analysis of how the Twin Towers came down and how the characteristics of those events indicate demolition.  
+- [Understanding the Demolitions of the World Trade Center Twin Towers](https://web.archive.org/web/20230905034548/https://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm) -  This site, created by a naval structural engineer in France, examines the destruction of the Twin Towers from a common-sense perspective, employing technical analysis and metaphorical imagery, to refute the collapse theories articulated by professor Z P Bazant and K A Seffen, and, more generally, NIST. 
+- [WTC7.net](http://wtc7.net/) -  This site is exclusively about the case of the total collapse of WTC 7, blamed by the government on fires. 
+- [NasaThermalImages](https://web.archive.org/web/20140720071427/http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Hot_Spots) -  This website has an extensive 9-11 section that includes rich archives of evidence about the event -- such as physical evidence pertaining to the destruction of the WTC buildings. 
+- [Lifting the Fog](https://liftingthefog.org/) -  This site documents the Lifting the Fog Conference -- a one-day academic conference using the scientific method to examine the causes of the World Trade Center destruction and the environmental and health impacts. 
+- [truememes](https://web.archive.org/web/20120721001016/http://truememes.com/) - This site by C. Thurston provides a concise but thorough overview of the case for the demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers, and examines the role of memes in maintaining the official story. For example, the article Explosion or Collapse? The Semantics of Deception and the Significance of Categories shows that the framing of the destruction of the Twin Towers as "collapses" pre-empts their objective analysis. 
+- [guardian](https://web.archive.org/web/20040611232809/http://members.fortunecity.com:80/911/) [[mirror]](https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/index.htm) - This website has appeared in at least two different versions at different free hosting sites. It had the first comprehensive exposures of omissions and fraud in official reports abut the WTC collapses, particularly FEMA's study. The site contains engineering articles relating to the WTC collapses, a detailed damage-assessment article on the Pentagon crash, articles on other 9/11/01 topics such as the apparent military stand-down, and articles on Palestine.
+- [911review.com](https://www.911review.com/) - This website contrasts the official myth of 9/11 with the reality revealed by the evidence. Like 911Research, 911Review covers evidence of demolition, but in much less detail. 911Review explores the role of disinformation, such as how the evidence of controlled demolition is hidden. It enumerates a number of erroneous arguments for demolition which serve as red herrings. 
+- [911proof.com](https://web.archive.org/web/20181220083604/http://911proof.com/) - This simple and concise site focuses on experts and credible sources as evidence that the the attack was an inside job, with an emphasis on the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Buidling 7. 
+
+**Classic Articles Exposing the WTC Demolition**
+- [Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?](https://web.archive.org/web/20230520060126/https://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf) [PDF] - This draft for a chapter in a forthcoming book has instantly achieved classic status because of the attention it has garnered thanks to the credentials of its author, Dr. Steven Jones. A physics professor for 20 years, Jones enumerates several features of the 'collapses' of the Twin Towers and Building 7 -- symmetry, the absence of a single historical precedent of fire-induced total collapse of such steel-framed buildings, reports of molten metal in the rubble, horizontal puffs of dust, and many other features seen only in controlled demolitions. 
+- [Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!](https://www.911review.com/articles/jm/mslp_1.htm) - Published in November, 2001, this article examines the physics of hydrocarbon fires and steel, and exposes the absurdity of the popular myth that the WTC fires melted the towers' columns. 
+- [Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics Part II](https://www.911review.com/articles/jm/mslp_2.htm) - Addresses arguments that the fires needed only soften the steel (particularly that of the floor trusses) to precipitate the collapse scenario. 
+- [How Strong Is The Evidence For A Controlled Demolition?](https://web.archive.org/web/20121031035605/http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/)
+
+**Pages with Analysis of the WTC Destruction**
+- [Energetic Examination of the Collapse of the North Tower of the WTC](https://web.archive.org/web/20100830050716/http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/energia3.htm) -  This paper examines the sources and sinks of energy in the collapse of the North Tower.
+- ['Science' at the Service of an Empire](https://web.archive.org/web/20111014105812/http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/nistcomm.htm) - This concise article exposes the central flaw of NIST's report on the Twin Towers: its avoidance of any explanation of the actual collapses by truncating both its timeline and the portion of the Towers modeled.
+- [Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse of the World Trade Center](https://web.archive.org/web/20230601224623/https://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/Dave_Heller.cfm) - This article gives an excellent overview of the evidence that the World Trade Center skyscrapers could not have collapsed due to the jet impacts and fires, and concludes that they must have been destroyed through controlled demolition. 
+- [Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?](https://web.archive.org/web/20071112141336/https://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html) - This article gives a broad summary of problems with the official account of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, but combines it with flawed analysis of the jetliner crashes to suggest that none of the four commandeered jetliners crashed where reported. Our review of his article points out minor errors in his collapse analysis and refutes the points he makes against the crashes of the jetliners at the WTC, the Pentagon, and in Pennsylvania. The article has received considerable press, apparently because its author, Morgan Reynolds, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. 
+- [How did the twin towers fall? Questions remain](http://www.angelfire.com/ult/znewz1/wtc.html) -  This page contains some detailed analysis on the NIST investigation and report. 
+
+**Sites Covering WTC Collapse and Coverup**
+- [WhatReallyHappened.com](http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/) - This site, maintained by Mike Rivero, is updated daily with links to articles in the mainstream media about subjects including 9/11/01. It has a substantial set of original articles on 9/11/01, including about the World Trade Center demolition. The WTC demolition articles have some good analysis, but also promote errors, such as the idea that seismic spikes preceded the 'collapses'. Rivero's page on the truss theory uncritically repeats fallacies of the official story, such as the idea that the trusses held up the flimsily-constructed perimeter walls. 
+- [Skyscraper Safety Campaign](http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/) - This website contains many articles with reasoned criticism of the official response to the total collapses of the World Trade Center skyscrapers. Rather than question the basic premise of the official story, most articles point to inadequacies in the investigations and call for the release of information. 
+- [The People's Investigation of 9/11](https://web.archive.org/web/20021122201227/http://www.911pi.com:80/) - Extensive forums on 9-11 issues
+
+**Sites Archiving Images of the WTC Attack**
+- [World Trade Center](https://amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm) - This site by Aman Zafar has an excellent series of high-resolution photographs of the fires, destruction, and dust of the World Trade Center taken from the west (across the Hudson). Some of Zafar's images are now archived in the World Trade Center photographs section of 911Research. 
+- [Ground Zero Archive](https://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/groundzero_archive.html) - This vast collection of photographs of Ground Zero was compiled from sets taken by workers at the site. It includes collections documenting the work of FEMA, FDNY, USAR, NYPD, and other agencies.
+- [Seeing the Horror](http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0111/biggart12.htm) - This site archives a series of high-resolution photographs showing the destruction of the Twin Towers and immediate aftermath. It includes several photographs by Bill Biggart, who was killed when the North Tower came down. 
+- [GulnaraSamoilova.com](https://web.archive.org/web/20080709042135/http://gulnarasamoilova.com/id46.html) - This is Gulnara Samoilova's site. She took some of the most famous photographs of the attack, including one of the South Tower collapse while she stood less than 1000 feet from the building. 
+- [World Trade Center Attack Memories and Photographs](https://web.archive.org/web/20081227022857/www.reservoir.com/extra/wtc/index.html) - This collection of photographs by Richard Lethin documents his view of the attack, first from his apartment at 5th Ave and 9th Street, and then as he walked south towards the Towers. Lethin captured the early parts of the North Tower's explosion with one of the most detailed sets of photographs. The film in his camera ran out about six seconds into the event. 
+- [World Trade Center Damage Assessment](https://web.archive.org/web/20070731082352/https://army.firststrike.net/nyd/damage/index.htm) - This set of pages archives several hundred photographs of Ground Zero, apparently from diverse sources. 
+- [Steve Spak's Photography & Video Website!!](https://web.archive.org/web/20081228114854/https://stevespak.com/fires/manhattan/groundzero.html) - This is the website of Steve Spak, an eight-year member of the New York City Emergency, and documentarian of the work of New York City's FDNY and EMS. Spak is the source of one of the most comprehensive bodies of Ground Zero photography. 
+
+**Sites with structural data about WTC skyscrapers**
+- [WTC Modeling and Simulation](https://web.archive.org/web/20080614195000/http://wtcmodel.wikidot.com/) - This site provides detailed data on the structural systems -- primarily columns -- of the Twin Towers, extracted from the voluminous NIST Report on the Twin Towers.
+
+---
+
+### The Pentagon  Attack
+**Sites With Original Research**
+- [Arabesque: 9/11 Truth](https://arabesque911.blogspot.com/) - This discerning site has substantial analysis on the Pentagon attack and misinformation surrounding it. It provides evidence not commonly referenced in the "9/11 truth" literature, such as: 9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Witnesses Described. 
+- [The Science of 9/11](https://scienceof911.com.au/) - This site is the work of Frank Legge, PhD, who brings excpetionally clear, reasoned analysis to the subject of the Pentagon attack. Legge has been maligned by an ad-hominem campaign by aggressive promoters of "no-plane" and "fly-over" claims such as CIT and its supporters.
+- [AAL77.com](https://web.archive.org/web/20090321084416/http://aal77.com/) -  This site documents the investigation by John Farmer into the events surrounding the Pentagon attack. Farmer has submitted numerous FOIA requests regarding a broad spectrum of information about the attack, such as a body of hundreds of oral histories compiled by the Center for Military History. 
+- [The Frustrating Fraud](https://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/) -  This site, subtitled "The hijacking of the 9/11 truth movement by the no-757-at-the-Pentagon theory" does what few do -- take on the Pentagon no-plane/no-jetliner theory head-on and expose the errors of those promoting it.  
+- [it was a plane bomb](http://web.archive.org/web/20061124070632/http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/) - Eric Bart is one of the foremost researchers on the Pentagon attack. His site contains the most thorough compilation of eyewitness accounts, and his conclusion that the Pentagon attack plane exploded just before impact reconciles the eyewitness and photographic evidence of the attack. 
+- [Pentagon 2001/9/11 : The fraud !](https://web.archive.org/web/20060717041442/http://perso.orange.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/english.html) -  This well organized site has many photos, and some crash simulations. It appears to take an unbiased position, weighing many different theories. 
+ - [Pentagon Research](https://archive.ph/0JBa2) - This site, before being taken down, had perhaps the most comprehensive and thoroughly sourced collection of information on the Pentagon attack. It took a scientific approach, avoiding unwarranted conclusions. The site's section on eyewitness reports is its weak link, failing to note the extent to which witness reports agree that the aircraft was a 757-like jetliner. The site's author, Russell Pickering, has been the target of ad-homenim attacks by CIT apparently due to the quality of his work. 
+- [flight77.info](http://web.archive.org/web/20080208101431/www.flight77.info/documents.htm) - This site documented a legal struggle to obtain the videos of the crash confiscated by the FBI. The front page reproduced letters requesting information and the responses from government agencies. By the end of 2007, the site's owner, Scott Bingham, discouraged by the state of the 9/11 Truth Movement, and perhaps by the lack of success of his lawsuit in obtaining the release of the 70-plus confiscated videos, ceased to comment on the matter, and gave up the domain. Flight77.info was subsequently taken over by "debunkers". 
+- [Flight 77 - Pentagon Event - 3d Test](https://web.archive.org/web/20050525074409/http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/) - Has beautiful 3-dimensional mock-ups of the supposed 757 crash. This site is the source of the famous graphic showing a gleaming silver object in the shape of a 757 on a collision course with the Pentagon. The graphic implies, if only subconsciously, that a 757 is much more solid than it is. Jean-Pierre Desmoulins, the creator of the site "Pentagon 2001/9/11 : The fraud !," accused this site's author, who signs his posts 'xox', of misleading people with the graphic. Jean-Pierre wrote of the aircraft: ".. it was not a stainless steel solid mass having the size of a 757." The graphic has appeared in numerous productions promoting the conclusion that a Boeing 757 couldn't have crashed into the Pentagon based on appeals to common belief and intuition that scientific analysis show to be incorrect.  
+- [physics911.net](https://web.archive.org/web/20230204215929/https://www.physics911.net/) - Has two of the most widely referenced articles on the physical evidence from the Pentagon strike. An article on 911-strike.com undermines several of the assumptions in these articles, citing crash simulations that suggest a 757 would be reduced to very small fragments in colliding with the Pentagon's outer wall. Pages on 911Review.com dissect two key claims of the Missing Wings article: that portions of the wings should have been visible and that engine parts from the crash did not match a 757. 
+
+**Sites With Original Photographs of the Pentagon Crash Site**
+- [Pentagon Plane Crash Photos](https://web.archive.org/web/20230408020858/https://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon_20020316.html) - This page by Geoff Metcalf contains the full-resolution versions of many of the most important photographs taken of the Pentagon's west block and surroundings after the attack. 
+- [Pentagon Plane Crash Photos](https://web.archive.org/web/20170210085508/https://www.criticalthrash.com/terror/crashthumbnails.html) - This page on the site by crash witness Steve Riskus contains 13 high-resolution photographs of the Pentagon's west block and surroundings immediately after the attack. Three of the photos show extensive fires in front of the facade. 
+
+**Articles by Various Researchers**
+- [The Pentagon Attack on 9/11: A Refutation of the Flyover Hypothesis Based on Analysis of the Flight Path](https://www.stj911.org/legge/Legge_Chandler_NOC_Refutation.html) - This paper debunks CIT's fantastic theory that the jetliner flew over the Pentagon instead of crashing into it by disproving CIT's lynchpin claim that the plane passed north of the Citgo station. Legge and Chandler show that any flight path consistent with CIT's claim would have involved extreme bank angles and g-forces of around 10 -- clearly imposssible for any such plane, and contradicted by many eyewitness reports. 
+- [To Con A Movement: Exposing CIT's PentaCon 'Magic Show'](https://911review.com/articles/ashley/pentacon_con.html) -  This in-depth examination of CIT exposes the their methods and tactics, which appear to be unknown by most of their fans. 
+- [Missing Wings (Critique of)](https://911review.com/reviews/physics911/missing_wings/missingwings.html) - The Missing Wings, one of the key articles on physics911.net, is a pseudo-scientific analysis of the Pentagon attack that purports to prove that a jetliner couldn't have crashed there because the wings couldn't have fit, in their intact entirety, through the breaches in the facade. The critique is a point-by-point examination of the article, noting it's divorced from the scientific method. 
+- [Pentagon: Why the No-757 Crowd is Making an Ass out of Itself](https://web.archive.org/web/20061223013718/https://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/JoeR/pentahole_dimensions_est.htm) - This article provides a detailed analysis of the evidence of the Pentagon crash, examining aircraft dimensions, damage details, crash debris, and eyewitness accounts. it refutes the no-plane claims, such as the idea that the attack aircraft was a missile rather than a jetliner. The author debunks all of the common no-757 theories, and notes the questions that the official story fails to answer. 
+- [A Critical Review of 'The PentaCon - Smoking Gun Version'](arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/critical-review-of-pentacon-smoking-gun.html) - This may be the most thorough review of PentaCon -- a 2007 video that resurrects the idea that a jetliner flew over the Pentagon on 9/11/01 and people were somehow fooled into thinking that it crashed into the building. 
+- [9/11 Hoaxes: No plane hit the Pentagon](https://web.archive.org/web/20111011102643/https://arcterus911.blogspot.com/2009/03/911-hoaxes-no-plane-hit-pentagon.html) - This concise summary of flaws of the Pentagon no-jetliner theory is structured as questions-and-answers. Among other things, it answers the question of why authorities have failed to release tapes showing 757. 
+- [Pentagon Attack Errors](https://www.911review.com/errors/pentagon/index.html) - This section of 911review.com exposes several errors in analysis of the Pentagon crash common among no-757-crash theorists. 
+- [What hit the Pentagon: Remote Controlled Flight 77?](https://web.archive.org/web/20230728133030/https://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html) - In this page, Mark Robinowitz emphasizes that the ongoing controversy about what hit the Pentagon obscures easily provable facts that point to an inside job, such as the fact that the nearly empty part of the Pentagon was targeted by an extreme aerobatic maneuver. 
+- [The ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report: Arrogant Deception](https://web.archive.org/web/20180105015110/http://www.kolumbus.fi/sy-k/pentagon/asce_en.htm) - This detailed analysis of the ASCE report purports to refute the idea that a 757 hit the building as described by the report. 
+- [Pentagon -- Exterior Impact Damage](https://911review.com/articles/stjarna/eximpactdamage.html) - This article provides a detailed analysis of the Pentagon's facade damage using photographs. The author has added annotations to the photographs indicating the column lines. 
+- [SMOKING GUN: The Evidence that May H4ng G.W. Bush](https://web.archive.org/web/20120313154622/http://www.unknownnews.net/cdd052002.html) - This rundown of the Pentagon attack puts it in historical context and reaches conclusions about the nature of the attack similar to those by Eric Bart. 
+- [Pentagon Engine Debris Investigation](https://aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml) - This article debunks the common misconception that, since the visible fan of a 757's engine is about 9 feet in diameter, then all of the parts must be of a similar diameter. 
+- [9-11 and the IMPOSSIBLE](https://web.archive.org/web/20070821021536/home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm) - This page by Skydrifter (Ralph Olmholt) treats the Pentagon crash and other aspects of the 9/11/01 attack. 
+- [NEWSLETTER #7: Special Edition: The Pentagon Attack](https://archive.ph/Fb51X) - This analysis by David McGowan endorses the attack drone theory, largely ignoring the eyewitness evidence. 
+- [Physical and mathematical analysis of pentagon crash](https://web.archive.org/web/20120224083747/houston.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/5053_comment.php) - This long paper by Gerard Holmgren dissects the Pentagon crash using geometry and intuitive arguments to assert the impossibility that the attack plane was a 757. Holmgren makes numerous unsupported assumptions about plane crash physics, failing to acknowledge, for instance, the degree to which such an crash could reduce even a large jetliner to small debris. 
+- [Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!]() - This classic presentation invites the reader to find any recognizable parts from a large jetliner in photos of the Pentagon crash site that are carefully selected to avoid showing debris. 
+- [What convinced me that Flight 77 was not the Killer Jet](https://web.archive.org/web/20030108194136/http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm) -  This and the following two articles are by Dick Eastman, apparently the first to articulate the 'two-plane theory'. 
+- [What convinced me that Flight 77 was not the Killer Jet, Part 2](https://web.archive.org/web/20040603022515/http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm)
+- [What convinced me that Flight 77 was not the Killer Jet, Part 3](https://web.archive.org/web/20040603023133/http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm) -  Examines the 'star evidence' -- the scrap of aircraft skin with markings like that of an AA 757. 
+
+**Sites with Extensive Coverage of the Pentagon Attack** 
+- [The September 11th Attack on the Pentagon](http://pentagon.spacelist.org/) - This page by Brian J. Roberts, a volunteer firefighter with Greenbelt's Volunteer Fire Department and Rescue Squad, contains a detailed description of events at the Pentagon, including those he witnessed. 
+
+---
+
+**Fighting Misinformation**
+- [questionsquestions.net](https://web.archive.org/web/20060830151335/http://www.questionsquestions.net/) - collection of articles in its "information warfare" section providing the most detailed and objective debunking of dubious attack theories
+- [911Review REVIEWED](https://www.911review.com/911review/) -  This site deconstructs the much-promoted website 911review[].]org, suggesting that its sloppy analysis and promotion of discredited and discrediting ideas is either the result of incompetence or an agenda to sabotage the 9/11 truth movement. 
+
+---
+
+**Misc**
 - [250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media](https://web.archive.org/web/20180913204310/http://whale.to/c/250_911.html)
-- [Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth](https://www.ae911truth.org/)
 - [Firefighters for 9/11 Truth](https://www.ff911truth.org/)
 - [More Holes in the Official Story: The 9/11 Cell Phone Calls](https://archives.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO408B.html)
 - [Patriots Question 9/11: Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report](https://web.archive.org/web/20220909083631/http://patriotsquestion911.com/)
 - [Pilots for 9/11 Truth](https://web.archive.org/web/20201122004937/http://pilotsfor911truth.org/index.html)
 - [The Path to 9/11: PARTS 1-8](https://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2008/05/path-to-911-parts-1-7.html)
 - [The Path to 9/11: PARTS 9-16](https://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2008/06/path-to-911-parts-9-16.html)
+- [9/11 false flag (whale.to)](https://web.archive.org/web/20230604034849/http://whale.to/b/911.html)
+- [9-11 Research](https://911research.wtc7.net/index.html) 
 
-### **Videos**
+## **Videos**
+- [9-11 was an occult sacrifice](https://yewtu.be.com/playlist?list=PLcbTglV5Olk0O-Vovzpvs5e1bCNY1Zl90) - [YT Playlist] [67 videos]
+- [9-11: The Suppressed Evidence](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLlXrtW4Wu8OJhIVpM3F5Aqe8zIvGp84te) - [YT Playlist] [134 videos]
+- [9/11 As it happened](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLxq9LUaV-XHYd2vRP1uE0RXI5WP6vYOv8) - [YT Paylist] [23 videos]
+- [9/11 Conspiracy Facts](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLADEETE5CDgoVrSfmzjzoQZzXwGTCXdpv) - [YT Playlist] [17 videos]
+- [9/11 Evidence Videos of False Flag Operation](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLcSS8zn7VkKCw2RRkulkdUFh3xG2PZqeN) - [YT Playlist] [169 videos]
+- [9/11 Evidence](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLcxSnB7H50U4o4tTEfZadCMdF6Zq14vk5) - [YT Playlist] [89 videos]
+- [9/11 Explosive Evidence and Related Material](http://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL5k_ChXg0iebijWLCQAZH_bKc-xJvkDk6) - [YT Playlist] [130 videos]
+- [9/11 Footage/Research](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLXVuI0Wa2lewZfDmbY_D_T8b9yCGxVQSj) - [YT Playlist] [55 videos]
+- [9/11 Red Pill](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL8EHDCydmPo6inaKaxjkdEOreuDQZwHOD) - [YT Playlist] [61 videos]
+- [9/11 Special Picks](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLi4T9fvMxCrh44S29Ri4SDmQ5AJnTWhXt) - [YT Playlist] [73 videos]
+- [9/11 terror attack archives](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLucCR0fxo05lwFzTevam1V0JjJ0NbIvHM) - [YT Playlist] [244 videos]
+- [9/11 Testimony](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL8F33064061A58D78) - [YT Playlist] [32 videos]
+- [9/11 the third tower](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL07D5A1C8318FDAB1) - [YT Playlist] [6 videos]
+- [9/11 Truth](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLDCE5A48A6E77A80B) - [YT Playlist] [67 videos]
+- [9/11 TRUTH](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLFE67239F3459153E) - [YT Playlist] [56 videos]
+- [9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL99FDF01BFECB0EE0) - [YT Playlist] [28 videos]
+- [9/11: Investigating the Inconsistencies](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLjH9zd48xmP9JV1_YkGRrK8gcL2H0T9Pa) - [YT Playlist] [45 videos]
+- [9/11: Remembering The WTC](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL3703574C428CCDAD) - [YT Playlist] [359 videos]
+- [AE911Truth](https://yewtu.be/channel/UCL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ) - [YT Channel] 
+- [Documentaries - 9/11/01](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLBTJXElf9n2u7qTaI-dmK8tBoPUm4UqfZ) - [YT Playlist] [155 videos]
+- [Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Of 9/11](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL-MUhgAHJaku0j-eQkjkPW9m_N-dKK41t) - [YT Playlist] [165 videos]
+- [Never Forget! The 9/11 Terror Attacks](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLCHySiYmH7QBzvdW3eHnhTQ80xpyKDToC) - [YT Playlist] [595 videos]
 - [PROOF of 9/11 Predictive Programming](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=_AUclXzapJo)
+- [The 9/11 Conspiracy](http://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL5k_ChXg0ieaI99x3VtMkbjJGxh87lEgz) - [YT Playlist] [139 videos]
+- [The 9/11 Psy-Op and the Suppression of Dr. Judy Wood's Work](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLRkDC7LzbiK04zF4Di_4g8n5lwkErgWlu) - [YT Playlist] [156 videos]
+- [The Third Truth about 9/11](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL6D407CD8A5A69DFD) - [YT Playlist] [26 videos]
+- [Various 9/11 Related Videos](https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLBB1E8741BA1E7453) - [YT Playlist] [80 videos]
 
-### **Books**
+
+## **Books**
 - [9-11 : Descent Into Tyranny](https://annas-archive.org/md5/7aa1cc60d16920b7d1b430499c425f0e)
 - [9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA](https://annas-archive.org/md5/ea57ffeb723cf8326e9aad03cedadcaf)
 - [9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation](https://annas-archive.org/md5/0be12289ec715a90fa0beb1b5001f948)
@@ -38,7 +166,7 @@
 - [War and Globalisation: The Truth Behind September 11](https://archive.org/details/warglobalisation0000chos)
 - [Where Did The Towers Go?](https://archive.org/details/where_did_the_towers_go)
 
-### **Documentaries**
+## **Documentaries**
 - [15 Years Later: Never Forget 9/11 crimes were never thoroughly investigated...](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=BJ342GueSUg)
 - [9-11 In Plane Site](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=igX7Z8VstN4)
 - [9-11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=stOQ5Vl9d0k)
@@ -64,3 +192,4 @@
 
 ---
 *gr33tz from hackliberty.org*
+