adding Glitch Studies and Open Web Index manifesto

content/manifestos-tmp/glitch-studies.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Glitch Studies Manifesto
+
+1. The dominant, continuing search for a noiseless channel has been — and will always be — no more than a regrettable, ill-fated dogma.
+Acknowledge that although the constant search for complete transparency brings newer, ‘better’ media, every one of these improved techniques will always possess their own in- herent fingerprints of imperfection.
+
+2. Dispute the operating templates of creative practice; fight genres, interfaces and expectations!
+Refuse to stay locked into one medium or between contradictions like real vs. virtual, obsolete vs. up-to-date, open vs. proprietary or digital vs. analogue. Surf the vortex of technology, the in-between, the art of artifacts!
+
+3. Get away from the established action scripts and join the avant-garde of the unknown. Become a nomad of noise artifacts!
+The static, linear notion of information-transmission can be interrupted on three occasions: during encoding-decoding (compression); feedback; or when a glitch (an unexpected break within the flow of technology) occurs. Noise artists must exploit these noise artifacts and explore the new opportunities they provide.
+
+4. Employ bends and breaks as a metaphor for différance. Use the glitch as an exoskeleton for progress.
+Find catharsis in disintegration, ruptures and cracks; manipulate, bend and break any medium towards the point where it becomes something new; create glitch art.
+
+5. Realize that the gospel of glitch art also reveals new standards implemented by corruption. Not all glitch art is progressive or something new. The popularization and cultivation of the avant-garde of mishaps has become predestined and unavoidable. Be aware of easily reproducible glitch effects, automated by softwares and plug-ins. What is now a glitch will become a fashion.
+
+6. Force the audience to voyage the acousmatic videoscape.
+Create conceptually synaesthetic artworks, that exploit both visual and aural glitch (or other noise) artifacts at the same time. Employ these noise artifacts as a nebula that shrouds the technology and its inner workings and that will compel an audience to listen and watch more exhaustively.
+
+7. Rejoice in the critical trans-media aesthetics of glitch artifacts.
+Utilize glitches to bring any medium in a critical state of hypertrophy, to (subsequently) criticize its inherent politics.
+
+8. Employ Glitchspeak (as opposed to Newspeak) and study what is outside of knowledge. Glitch theory is what you can just get away with!
+Flow cannot be understood without interruption or function without glitching. This is why glitch studies is necessary.
+
+Rosa Menkman

content/manifestos/2015-open-web-index.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Open Web Index Manifesto
+
+## 1. One search engine is not enough!
+
+Europe’s digital economy and civil society are virtually dependent on non-European businesses. This is particularly evident with regard to search engines, the cornerstone of our digital information infrastructure. Google currently dominates the market, leading to dependencies and economic damage that are no longer acceptable.
+
+If we were to apply the present situation in the digital world to the mass media, we would find ourselves with only one television channel as the sole source of information for the public. Businesses would also be dependent on this channel, as it would be the only available outlet for their advertising.
+
+Such a situation contradicts the pluralism of our Western democratic societies. Pluralism must also be reflected in a diversity of information systems.
+
+The market has failed in this respect. For more than ten years, we have been dependent on a single search engine, and no other company has been able to challenge it. We do not foresee the market regulating itself in the future.
+
+## 2. An open index of the web would set the stage for information autonomy in europe’s economy and society
+
+Restoring choice to the search engine market will mean putting prerequisites in place at the European level as a foundation for pluralism and competing search engines. Merely establishing a publicly funded competing search engine would not be appropriate, as this would only create a further monolithic structure.
+
+The open source, open access and open data communities were essential to enabling the web as we know it today and have become the main drivers of the digital economy. A further key element that we currently lack is open access to the information distributed across the web.
+
+To be clear, we are not seeking a government-funded alternative search engine – we want to enable innovation in the business world and civil society by providing searchable web data.
+
+## 3. Our objective: an EU-funded global index of the web
+
+The key to a European digital information infrastructure would be an EU-funded, global, searchable index of the web open to competing companies, institutions and civil-society actors.
+
+There is no alternative to public funding for such a project. Unlike the early years of the web, the present volume of data and growing complexity of the internet means that even major corporations and organizations do not have the financial resources to establish such an index.
+
+The new index could form the basis for general and specialized search engines, analysis tools and many other applications. Any system based on the index would be free to develop its own business model.
+
+As the key to tapping the world’s collective knowledge, the index must be set up and provided as a universally accessible element of public information infrastructure unaffected by commercial interests, not unlike public broadcasting.
+
+Once it is in place, institutions, businesses and civil-society actors will be able to provide innovative services based on the index and compete in delivering the best ideas for its use. The search engine landscape would thus be transformed from the monopoly of a private company to a pluralistic cooperation that would not be at the mercy of a national government or a single business entity.
+
+**The signatories call on all actors of the European Union to jointly create the preconditions for independence, diversity and autonomy in Europe’s information infrastructure through an open index of the web.**
+
+Read, share and sign the manifest for an open web index at http://openwebindex.eu/
+
+Initated by:
+
+- Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
+- Prof. Dr. Volker Grassmuck, Leuphana University of Lüneburg
+- Dr. Philipp Mayr, GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
+- Sebastian Sünkler, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
+- Agata Królikowski, Leuphana University of Lüneburg
+- Lambert Heller, German National Library of Science and Technology
+- Dr. Wolfgang Sander-Beuermann, SUMA-EV
+- René König, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

content/manifestos/9998-authors.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+\afterpage{\null\thispagestyle{empty}\newpage}
+
+# Authors
+
+**Rosa Menkman** - author of the Glitch Studies Manifesto.
+
+
+\afterpage{\null\thispagestyle{empty}\newpage}