mirror of
https://git.anonymousland.org/anonymousland/synapse-product.git
synced 2024-10-01 08:25:44 -04:00
40bb37eb27
While https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635 stops us from doing the slow thing after we've already done it once, this PR stops us from doing one of the slow things in the first place. Related to - https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13622 - https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635 - https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13676 Part of https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13356 Follow-up to https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13815 which tracks event signature failures. With this PR, we avoid the call to the costly `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` because the signature failure will count as an attempt before and we filter events based on the backoff before calling `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` now. For example, this will save us 156s out of the 185s total that this `matrix.org` `/messages` request. If you want to see the full Jaeger trace of this, you can drag and drop this `trace.json` into your own Jaeger, https://gist.github.com/MadLittleMods/4b12d0d0afe88c2f65ffcc907306b761 To explain this exact scenario around `/messages` -> backfill, we call `/backfill` and first check the signatures of the 100 events. We see bad signature for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` and `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` (both member events). Then we process the 98 events remaining that have valid signatures but one of the events references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event`. So we have to do the whole `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` rigmarole which pulls in those same events which fail again because the signatures are still invalid. - `backfill` - `outgoing-federation-request` `/backfill` - `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch` - `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch_one` for each event received over backfill - ❗ `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)` - ❗ `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)` - `_process_pulled_events` - `_process_pulled_event` for each validated event - ❗ Event `$Q0iMdqtz3IJYfZQU2Xk2WjB5NDF8Gg8cFSYYyKQgKJ0` references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event` which is missing so we try to get it - `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` - `outgoing-federation-request` `/state_ids` - ❗ `get_pdu` for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` which fails the signature check again - ❗ `get_pdu` for `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` which fails the signature check
1206 lines
43 KiB
Python
1206 lines
43 KiB
Python
# Copyright 2018 New Vector Ltd
|
||
#
|
||
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License');
|
||
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
||
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
||
#
|
||
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
||
#
|
||
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
||
# distributed under the License is distributed on an 'AS IS' BASIS,
|
||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||
# limitations under the License.
|
||
|
||
import datetime
|
||
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple, Union
|
||
|
||
import attr
|
||
from parameterized import parameterized
|
||
|
||
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
|
||
|
||
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes
|
||
from synapse.api.room_versions import (
|
||
KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS,
|
||
EventFormatVersions,
|
||
RoomVersion,
|
||
)
|
||
from synapse.events import _EventInternalMetadata
|
||
from synapse.rest import admin
|
||
from synapse.rest.client import login, room
|
||
from synapse.server import HomeServer
|
||
from synapse.storage.database import LoggingTransaction
|
||
from synapse.types import JsonDict
|
||
from synapse.util import Clock, json_encoder
|
||
|
||
import tests.unittest
|
||
import tests.utils
|
||
|
||
|
||
@attr.s(auto_attribs=True, frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||
class _BackfillSetupInfo:
|
||
room_id: str
|
||
depth_map: Dict[str, int]
|
||
|
||
|
||
class EventFederationWorkerStoreTestCase(tests.unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
|
||
servlets = [
|
||
admin.register_servlets,
|
||
room.register_servlets,
|
||
login.register_servlets,
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
||
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
|
||
|
||
def test_get_prev_events_for_room(self):
|
||
room_id = "@ROOM:local"
|
||
|
||
# add a bunch of events and hashes to act as forward extremities
|
||
def insert_event(txn, i):
|
||
event_id = "$event_%i:local" % i
|
||
|
||
txn.execute(
|
||
(
|
||
"INSERT INTO events ("
|
||
" room_id, event_id, type, depth, topological_ordering,"
|
||
" content, processed, outlier, stream_ordering) "
|
||
"VALUES (?, ?, 'm.test', ?, ?, 'test', ?, ?, ?)"
|
||
),
|
||
(room_id, event_id, i, i, True, False, i),
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
txn.execute(
|
||
(
|
||
"INSERT INTO event_forward_extremities (room_id, event_id) "
|
||
"VALUES (?, ?)"
|
||
),
|
||
(room_id, event_id),
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
for i in range(0, 20):
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction("insert", insert_event, i)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# this should get the last ten
|
||
r = self.get_success(self.store.get_prev_events_for_room(room_id))
|
||
self.assertEqual(10, len(r))
|
||
for i in range(0, 10):
|
||
self.assertEqual("$event_%i:local" % (19 - i), r[i])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_rooms_with_many_extremities(self):
|
||
room1 = "#room1"
|
||
room2 = "#room2"
|
||
room3 = "#room3"
|
||
|
||
def insert_event(txn, i, room_id):
|
||
event_id = "$event_%i:local" % i
|
||
txn.execute(
|
||
(
|
||
"INSERT INTO event_forward_extremities (room_id, event_id) "
|
||
"VALUES (?, ?)"
|
||
),
|
||
(room_id, event_id),
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
for i in range(0, 20):
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction("insert", insert_event, i, room1)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction("insert", insert_event, i, room2)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction("insert", insert_event, i, room3)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Test simple case
|
||
r = self.get_success(self.store.get_rooms_with_many_extremities(5, 5, []))
|
||
self.assertEqual(len(r), 3)
|
||
|
||
# Does filter work?
|
||
|
||
r = self.get_success(self.store.get_rooms_with_many_extremities(5, 5, [room1]))
|
||
self.assertTrue(room2 in r)
|
||
self.assertTrue(room3 in r)
|
||
self.assertEqual(len(r), 2)
|
||
|
||
r = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_rooms_with_many_extremities(5, 5, [room1, room2])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertEqual(r, [room3])
|
||
|
||
# Does filter and limit work?
|
||
|
||
r = self.get_success(self.store.get_rooms_with_many_extremities(5, 1, [room1]))
|
||
self.assertTrue(r == [room2] or r == [room3])
|
||
|
||
def _setup_auth_chain(self, use_chain_cover_index: bool) -> str:
|
||
room_id = "@ROOM:local"
|
||
|
||
# The silly auth graph we use to test the auth difference algorithm,
|
||
# where the top are the most recent events.
|
||
#
|
||
# A B
|
||
# \ /
|
||
# D E
|
||
# \ |
|
||
# ` F C
|
||
# | /|
|
||
# G ´ |
|
||
# | \ |
|
||
# H I
|
||
# | |
|
||
# K J
|
||
|
||
auth_graph = {
|
||
"a": ["e"],
|
||
"b": ["e"],
|
||
"c": ["g", "i"],
|
||
"d": ["f"],
|
||
"e": ["f"],
|
||
"f": ["g"],
|
||
"g": ["h", "i"],
|
||
"h": ["k"],
|
||
"i": ["j"],
|
||
"k": [],
|
||
"j": [],
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
depth_map = {
|
||
"a": 7,
|
||
"b": 7,
|
||
"c": 4,
|
||
"d": 6,
|
||
"e": 6,
|
||
"f": 5,
|
||
"g": 3,
|
||
"h": 2,
|
||
"i": 2,
|
||
"k": 1,
|
||
"j": 1,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# Mark the room as maybe having a cover index.
|
||
|
||
def store_room(txn):
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
"rooms",
|
||
{
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"creator": "room_creator_user_id",
|
||
"is_public": True,
|
||
"room_version": "6",
|
||
"has_auth_chain_index": use_chain_cover_index,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(self.store.db_pool.runInteraction("store_room", store_room))
|
||
|
||
# We rudely fiddle with the appropriate tables directly, as that's much
|
||
# easier than constructing events properly.
|
||
|
||
def insert_event(txn):
|
||
stream_ordering = 0
|
||
|
||
for event_id in auth_graph:
|
||
stream_ordering += 1
|
||
depth = depth_map[event_id]
|
||
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="events",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"depth": depth,
|
||
"topological_ordering": depth,
|
||
"type": "m.test",
|
||
"processed": True,
|
||
"outlier": False,
|
||
"stream_ordering": stream_ordering,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.hs.datastores.persist_events._persist_event_auth_chain_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
[
|
||
FakeEvent(event_id, room_id, auth_graph[event_id])
|
||
for event_id in auth_graph
|
||
],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction(
|
||
"insert",
|
||
insert_event,
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
return room_id
|
||
|
||
@parameterized.expand([(True,), (False,)])
|
||
def test_auth_chain_ids(self, use_chain_cover_index: bool):
|
||
room_id = self._setup_auth_chain(use_chain_cover_index)
|
||
|
||
# a and b have the same auth chain.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["a"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["b"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["a", "b"])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["c"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
# d and e have the same auth chain.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["d"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["e"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["f"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["g"]))
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["h"]))
|
||
self.assertEqual(auth_chain_ids, {"k"})
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["i"]))
|
||
self.assertEqual(auth_chain_ids, {"j"})
|
||
|
||
# j and k have no parents.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["j"]))
|
||
self.assertEqual(auth_chain_ids, set())
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["k"]))
|
||
self.assertEqual(auth_chain_ids, set())
|
||
|
||
# More complex input sequences.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["b", "c", "d"])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["h", "i"])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["k", "j"])
|
||
|
||
# e gets returned even though include_given is false, but it is in the
|
||
# auth chain of b.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["b", "e"])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k"])
|
||
|
||
# Test include_given.
|
||
auth_chain_ids = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_ids(room_id, ["i"], include_given=True)
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertCountEqual(auth_chain_ids, ["i", "j"])
|
||
|
||
@parameterized.expand([(True,), (False,)])
|
||
def test_auth_difference(self, use_chain_cover_index: bool):
|
||
room_id = self._setup_auth_chain(use_chain_cover_index)
|
||
|
||
# Now actually test that various combinations give the right result:
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"c"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c", "e", "f"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a", "c"}, {"b"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a", "c"}, {"b", "c"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"d"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "d", "e"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"c"}, {"d"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"e"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, set())
|
||
|
||
def test_auth_difference_partial_cover(self):
|
||
"""Test that we correctly handle rooms where not all events have a chain
|
||
cover calculated. This can happen in some obscure edge cases, including
|
||
during the background update that calculates the chain cover for old
|
||
rooms.
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
room_id = "@ROOM:local"
|
||
|
||
# The silly auth graph we use to test the auth difference algorithm,
|
||
# where the top are the most recent events.
|
||
#
|
||
# A B
|
||
# \ /
|
||
# D E
|
||
# \ |
|
||
# ` F C
|
||
# | /|
|
||
# G ´ |
|
||
# | \ |
|
||
# H I
|
||
# | |
|
||
# K J
|
||
|
||
auth_graph = {
|
||
"a": ["e"],
|
||
"b": ["e"],
|
||
"c": ["g", "i"],
|
||
"d": ["f"],
|
||
"e": ["f"],
|
||
"f": ["g"],
|
||
"g": ["h", "i"],
|
||
"h": ["k"],
|
||
"i": ["j"],
|
||
"k": [],
|
||
"j": [],
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
depth_map = {
|
||
"a": 7,
|
||
"b": 7,
|
||
"c": 4,
|
||
"d": 6,
|
||
"e": 6,
|
||
"f": 5,
|
||
"g": 3,
|
||
"h": 2,
|
||
"i": 2,
|
||
"k": 1,
|
||
"j": 1,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# We rudely fiddle with the appropriate tables directly, as that's much
|
||
# easier than constructing events properly.
|
||
|
||
def insert_event(txn):
|
||
# First insert the room and mark it as having a chain cover.
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
"rooms",
|
||
{
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"creator": "room_creator_user_id",
|
||
"is_public": True,
|
||
"room_version": "6",
|
||
"has_auth_chain_index": True,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
stream_ordering = 0
|
||
|
||
for event_id in auth_graph:
|
||
stream_ordering += 1
|
||
depth = depth_map[event_id]
|
||
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="events",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"depth": depth,
|
||
"topological_ordering": depth,
|
||
"type": "m.test",
|
||
"processed": True,
|
||
"outlier": False,
|
||
"stream_ordering": stream_ordering,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Insert all events apart from 'B'
|
||
self.hs.datastores.persist_events._persist_event_auth_chain_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
[
|
||
FakeEvent(event_id, room_id, auth_graph[event_id])
|
||
for event_id in auth_graph
|
||
if event_id != "b"
|
||
],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Now we insert the event 'B' without a chain cover, by temporarily
|
||
# pretending the room doesn't have a chain cover.
|
||
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_update_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="rooms",
|
||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||
updatevalues={"has_auth_chain_index": False},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.hs.datastores.persist_events._persist_event_auth_chain_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
[FakeEvent("b", room_id, auth_graph["b"])],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_update_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="rooms",
|
||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||
updatevalues={"has_auth_chain_index": True},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction(
|
||
"insert",
|
||
insert_event,
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Now actually test that various combinations give the right result:
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"c"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c", "e", "f"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a", "c"}, {"b"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a", "c"}, {"b", "c"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"d"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "d", "e"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"c"}, {"d"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}, {"b"}, {"e"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, {"a", "b"})
|
||
|
||
difference = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_auth_chain_difference(room_id, [{"a"}])
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertSetEqual(difference, set())
|
||
|
||
@parameterized.expand(
|
||
[(room_version,) for room_version in KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS.values()]
|
||
)
|
||
def test_prune_inbound_federation_queue(self, room_version: RoomVersion):
|
||
"""Test that pruning of inbound federation queues work"""
|
||
|
||
room_id = "some_room_id"
|
||
|
||
def prev_event_format(prev_event_id: str) -> Union[Tuple[str, dict], str]:
|
||
"""Account for differences in prev_events format across room versions"""
|
||
if room_version.event_format == EventFormatVersions.ROOM_V1_V2:
|
||
return prev_event_id, {}
|
||
|
||
return prev_event_id
|
||
|
||
# Insert a bunch of events that all reference the previous one.
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_many(
|
||
table="federation_inbound_events_staging",
|
||
keys=(
|
||
"origin",
|
||
"room_id",
|
||
"received_ts",
|
||
"event_id",
|
||
"event_json",
|
||
"internal_metadata",
|
||
),
|
||
values=[
|
||
(
|
||
"some_origin",
|
||
room_id,
|
||
0,
|
||
f"$fake_event_id_{i + 1}",
|
||
json_encoder.encode(
|
||
{"prev_events": [prev_event_format(f"$fake_event_id_{i}")]}
|
||
),
|
||
"{}",
|
||
)
|
||
for i in range(500)
|
||
],
|
||
desc="test_prune_inbound_federation_queue",
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Calling prune once should return True, i.e. a prune happen. The second
|
||
# time it shouldn't.
|
||
pruned = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.prune_staged_events_in_room(room_id, room_version)
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertTrue(pruned)
|
||
|
||
pruned = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.prune_staged_events_in_room(room_id, room_version)
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertFalse(pruned)
|
||
|
||
# Assert that we only have a single event left in the queue, and that it
|
||
# is the last one.
|
||
count = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_select_one_onecol(
|
||
table="federation_inbound_events_staging",
|
||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||
retcol="COUNT(*)",
|
||
desc="test_prune_inbound_federation_queue",
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
self.assertEqual(count, 1)
|
||
|
||
next_staged_event_info = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_next_staged_event_id_for_room(room_id)
|
||
)
|
||
assert next_staged_event_info
|
||
_, event_id = next_staged_event_info
|
||
self.assertEqual(event_id, "$fake_event_id_500")
|
||
|
||
def _setup_room_for_backfill_tests(self) -> _BackfillSetupInfo:
|
||
"""
|
||
Sets up a room with various events and backward extremities to test
|
||
backfill functions against.
|
||
|
||
Returns:
|
||
_BackfillSetupInfo including the `room_id` to test against and
|
||
`depth_map` of events in the room
|
||
"""
|
||
room_id = "!backfill-room-test:some-host"
|
||
|
||
# The silly graph we use to test grabbing backward extremities,
|
||
# where the top is the oldest events.
|
||
# 1 (oldest)
|
||
# |
|
||
# 2 ⹁
|
||
# | \
|
||
# | [b1, b2, b3]
|
||
# | |
|
||
# | A
|
||
# | /
|
||
# 3 {
|
||
# | \
|
||
# | [b4, b5, b6]
|
||
# | |
|
||
# | B
|
||
# | /
|
||
# 4 ´
|
||
# |
|
||
# 5 (newest)
|
||
|
||
event_graph: Dict[str, List[str]] = {
|
||
"1": [],
|
||
"2": ["1"],
|
||
"3": ["2", "A"],
|
||
"4": ["3", "B"],
|
||
"5": ["4"],
|
||
"A": ["b1", "b2", "b3"],
|
||
"b1": ["2"],
|
||
"b2": ["2"],
|
||
"b3": ["2"],
|
||
"B": ["b4", "b5", "b6"],
|
||
"b4": ["3"],
|
||
"b5": ["3"],
|
||
"b6": ["3"],
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
depth_map: Dict[str, int] = {
|
||
"1": 1,
|
||
"2": 2,
|
||
"b1": 3,
|
||
"b2": 3,
|
||
"b3": 3,
|
||
"A": 4,
|
||
"3": 5,
|
||
"b4": 6,
|
||
"b5": 6,
|
||
"b6": 6,
|
||
"B": 7,
|
||
"4": 8,
|
||
"5": 9,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# The events we have persisted on our server.
|
||
# The rest are events in the room but not backfilled tet.
|
||
our_server_events = {"5", "4", "B", "3", "A"}
|
||
|
||
complete_event_dict_map: Dict[str, JsonDict] = {}
|
||
stream_ordering = 0
|
||
for (event_id, prev_event_ids) in event_graph.items():
|
||
depth = depth_map[event_id]
|
||
|
||
complete_event_dict_map[event_id] = {
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"type": "test_regular_type",
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"sender": "@sender",
|
||
"prev_event_ids": prev_event_ids,
|
||
"auth_event_ids": [],
|
||
"origin_server_ts": stream_ordering,
|
||
"depth": depth,
|
||
"stream_ordering": stream_ordering,
|
||
"content": {"body": "event" + event_id},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
stream_ordering += 1
|
||
|
||
def populate_db(txn: LoggingTransaction):
|
||
# Insert the room to satisfy the foreign key constraint of
|
||
# `event_failed_pull_attempts`
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
"rooms",
|
||
{
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"creator": "room_creator_user_id",
|
||
"is_public": True,
|
||
"room_version": "6",
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Insert our server events
|
||
for event_id in our_server_events:
|
||
event_dict = complete_event_dict_map[event_id]
|
||
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="events",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_dict.get("event_id"),
|
||
"type": event_dict.get("type"),
|
||
"room_id": event_dict.get("room_id"),
|
||
"depth": event_dict.get("depth"),
|
||
"topological_ordering": event_dict.get("depth"),
|
||
"stream_ordering": event_dict.get("stream_ordering"),
|
||
"processed": True,
|
||
"outlier": False,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Insert the event edges
|
||
for event_id in our_server_events:
|
||
for prev_event_id in event_graph[event_id]:
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="event_edges",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"prev_event_id": prev_event_id,
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Insert the backward extremities
|
||
prev_events_of_our_events = {
|
||
prev_event_id
|
||
for our_server_event in our_server_events
|
||
for prev_event_id in complete_event_dict_map[our_server_event][
|
||
"prev_event_ids"
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
backward_extremities = prev_events_of_our_events - our_server_events
|
||
for backward_extremity in backward_extremities:
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="event_backward_extremities",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": backward_extremity,
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction(
|
||
"_setup_room_for_backfill_tests_populate_db",
|
||
populate_db,
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
return _BackfillSetupInfo(room_id=room_id, depth_map=depth_map)
|
||
|
||
def test_get_backfill_points_in_room(self):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure only backfill points that are older and come before
|
||
the `current_depth` are returned.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Try at "B"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["B"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b6", "b5", "b4", "2", "b3", "b2", "b1"])
|
||
|
||
# Try at "A"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["A"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
# Event "2" has a depth of 2 but is not included here because we only
|
||
# know the approximate depth of 5 from our event "3".
|
||
self.assertListEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b3", "b2", "b1"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_backfill_points_in_room_excludes_events_we_have_attempted(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure that events we have attempted to backfill (and within
|
||
backoff timeout duration) do not show up as an event to backfill again.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Record some attempts to backfill these events which will make
|
||
# `get_backfill_points_in_room` exclude them because we
|
||
# haven't passed the backoff interval.
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b5", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b4", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b3", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b2", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# No time has passed since we attempted to backfill ^
|
||
|
||
# Try at "B"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["B"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
# Only the backfill points that we didn't record earlier exist here.
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b6", "2", "b1"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_backfill_points_in_room_attempted_event_retry_after_backoff_duration(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure after we fake attempt to backfill event "b3" many times,
|
||
we can see retry and see the "b3" again after the backoff timeout duration
|
||
has exceeded.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Record some attempts to backfill these events which will make
|
||
# `get_backfill_points_in_room` exclude them because we
|
||
# haven't passed the backoff interval.
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b3", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b1", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b1", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b1", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b1", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Now advance time by 2 hours and we should only be able to see "b3"
|
||
# because we have waited long enough for the single attempt (2^1 hours)
|
||
# but we still shouldn't see "b1" because we haven't waited long enough
|
||
# for this many attempts. We didn't do anything to "b2" so it should be
|
||
# visible regardless.
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=2).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
# Try at "A" and make sure that "b1" is not in the list because we've
|
||
# already attempted many times
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["A"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b3", "b2"])
|
||
|
||
# Now advance time by 20 hours (above 2^4 because we made 4 attemps) and
|
||
# see if we can now backfill it
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=20).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
# Try at "A" again after we advanced enough time and we should see "b3" again
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["A"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b3", "b2", "b1"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_backfill_points_in_room_works_after_many_failed_pull_attempts_that_could_naively_overflow(
|
||
self,
|
||
) -> None:
|
||
"""
|
||
A test that reproduces #13929 (Postgres only).
|
||
|
||
Test to make sure we can still get backfill points after many failed pull
|
||
attempts that cause us to backoff to the limit. Even if the backoff formula
|
||
would tell us to wait for more seconds than can be expressed in a 32 bit
|
||
signed int.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Pretend that we have tried and failed 10 times to backfill event b1.
|
||
for _ in range(10):
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(room_id, "b1", "fake cause")
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# If the backoff periods grow without limit:
|
||
# After the first failed attempt, we would have backed off for 1 << 1 = 2 hours.
|
||
# After the second failed attempt we would have backed off for 1 << 2 = 4 hours,
|
||
# so after the 10th failed attempt we should backoff for 1 << 10 == 1024 hours.
|
||
# Wait 1100 hours just so we have a nice round number.
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=1100).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
# 1024 hours in milliseconds is 1024 * 3600000, which exceeds the largest 32 bit
|
||
# signed integer. The bug we're reproducing is that this overflow causes an
|
||
# error in postgres preventing us from fetching a set of backwards extremities
|
||
# to retry fetching.
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_backfill_points_in_room(room_id, depth_map["A"], limit=100)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# We should aim to fetch all backoff points: b1's latest backoff period has
|
||
# expired, and we haven't tried the rest.
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["b3", "b2", "b1"])
|
||
|
||
def _setup_room_for_insertion_backfill_tests(self) -> _BackfillSetupInfo:
|
||
"""
|
||
Sets up a room with various insertion event backward extremities to test
|
||
backfill functions against.
|
||
|
||
Returns:
|
||
_BackfillSetupInfo including the `room_id` to test against and
|
||
`depth_map` of events in the room
|
||
"""
|
||
room_id = "!backfill-room-test:some-host"
|
||
|
||
depth_map: Dict[str, int] = {
|
||
"1": 1,
|
||
"2": 2,
|
||
"insertion_eventA": 3,
|
||
"3": 4,
|
||
"insertion_eventB": 5,
|
||
"4": 6,
|
||
"5": 7,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
def populate_db(txn: LoggingTransaction):
|
||
# Insert the room to satisfy the foreign key constraint of
|
||
# `event_failed_pull_attempts`
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
"rooms",
|
||
{
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"creator": "room_creator_user_id",
|
||
"is_public": True,
|
||
"room_version": "6",
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Insert our server events
|
||
stream_ordering = 0
|
||
for event_id, depth in depth_map.items():
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="events",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"type": EventTypes.MSC2716_INSERTION
|
||
if event_id.startswith("insertion_event")
|
||
else "test_regular_type",
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
"depth": depth,
|
||
"topological_ordering": depth,
|
||
"stream_ordering": stream_ordering,
|
||
"processed": True,
|
||
"outlier": False,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
if event_id.startswith("insertion_event"):
|
||
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert_txn(
|
||
txn,
|
||
table="insertion_event_extremities",
|
||
values={
|
||
"event_id": event_id,
|
||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
stream_ordering += 1
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.db_pool.runInteraction(
|
||
"_setup_room_for_insertion_backfill_tests_populate_db",
|
||
populate_db,
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
return _BackfillSetupInfo(room_id=room_id, depth_map=depth_map)
|
||
|
||
def test_get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(self):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure only insertion event backward extremities that are
|
||
older and come before the `current_depth` are returned.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_insertion_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Try at "insertion_eventB"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(
|
||
room_id, depth_map["insertion_eventB"], limit=100
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["insertion_eventB", "insertion_eventA"])
|
||
|
||
# Try at "insertion_eventA"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(
|
||
room_id, depth_map["insertion_eventA"], limit=100
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
# Event "2" has a depth of 2 but is not included here because we only
|
||
# know the approximate depth of 5 from our event "3".
|
||
self.assertListEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["insertion_eventA"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room_excludes_events_we_have_attempted(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure that insertion events we have attempted to backfill
|
||
(and within backoff timeout duration) do not show up as an event to
|
||
backfill again.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_insertion_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Record some attempts to backfill these events which will make
|
||
# `get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room` exclude them
|
||
# because we haven't passed the backoff interval.
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventA", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# No time has passed since we attempted to backfill ^
|
||
|
||
# Try at "insertion_eventB"
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(
|
||
room_id, depth_map["insertion_eventB"], limit=100
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
# Only the backfill points that we didn't record earlier exist here.
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["insertion_eventB"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room_attempted_event_retry_after_backoff_duration(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure after we fake attempt to backfill event
|
||
"insertion_eventA" many times, we can see retry and see the
|
||
"insertion_eventA" again after the backoff timeout duration has
|
||
exceeded.
|
||
"""
|
||
setup_info = self._setup_room_for_insertion_backfill_tests()
|
||
room_id = setup_info.room_id
|
||
depth_map = setup_info.depth_map
|
||
|
||
# Record some attempts to backfill these events which will make
|
||
# `get_backfill_points_in_room` exclude them because we
|
||
# haven't passed the backoff interval.
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventB", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventA", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventA", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventA", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "insertion_eventA", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Now advance time by 2 hours and we should only be able to see
|
||
# "insertion_eventB" because we have waited long enough for the single
|
||
# attempt (2^1 hours) but we still shouldn't see "insertion_eventA"
|
||
# because we haven't waited long enough for this many attempts.
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=2).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
# Try at "insertion_eventA" and make sure that "insertion_eventA" is not
|
||
# in the list because we've already attempted many times
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(
|
||
room_id, depth_map["insertion_eventA"], limit=100
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, [])
|
||
|
||
# Now advance time by 20 hours (above 2^4 because we made 4 attemps) and
|
||
# see if we can now backfill it
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=20).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
# Try at "insertion_eventA" again after we advanced enough time and we
|
||
# should see "insertion_eventA" again
|
||
backfill_points = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_insertion_event_backward_extremities_in_room(
|
||
room_id, depth_map["insertion_eventA"], limit=100
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
backfill_event_ids = [backfill_point[0] for backfill_point in backfill_points]
|
||
self.assertEqual(backfill_event_ids, ["insertion_eventA"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_event_ids_to_not_pull_from_backoff(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure only event IDs we should backoff from are returned.
|
||
"""
|
||
# Create the room
|
||
user_id = self.register_user("alice", "test")
|
||
tok = self.login("alice", "test")
|
||
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(room_creator=user_id, tok=tok)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "$failed_event_id", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
event_ids_to_backoff = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_event_ids_to_not_pull_from_backoff(
|
||
room_id=room_id, event_ids=["$failed_event_id", "$normal_event_id"]
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
self.assertEqual(event_ids_to_backoff, ["$failed_event_id"])
|
||
|
||
def test_get_event_ids_to_not_pull_from_backoff_retry_after_backoff_duration(
|
||
self,
|
||
):
|
||
"""
|
||
Test to make sure no event IDs are returned after the backoff duration has
|
||
elapsed.
|
||
"""
|
||
# Create the room
|
||
user_id = self.register_user("alice", "test")
|
||
tok = self.login("alice", "test")
|
||
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(room_creator=user_id, tok=tok)
|
||
|
||
self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.record_event_failed_pull_attempt(
|
||
room_id, "$failed_event_id", "fake cause"
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Now advance time by 2 hours so we wait long enough for the single failed
|
||
# attempt (2^1 hours).
|
||
self.reactor.advance(datetime.timedelta(hours=2).total_seconds())
|
||
|
||
event_ids_to_backoff = self.get_success(
|
||
self.store.get_event_ids_to_not_pull_from_backoff(
|
||
room_id=room_id, event_ids=["$failed_event_id", "$normal_event_id"]
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
# Since this function only returns events we should backoff from, time has
|
||
# elapsed past the backoff range so there is no events to backoff from.
|
||
self.assertEqual(event_ids_to_backoff, [])
|
||
|
||
|
||
@attr.s
|
||
class FakeEvent:
|
||
event_id = attr.ib()
|
||
room_id = attr.ib()
|
||
auth_events = attr.ib()
|
||
|
||
type = "foo"
|
||
state_key = "foo"
|
||
|
||
internal_metadata = _EventInternalMetadata({})
|
||
|
||
def auth_event_ids(self):
|
||
return self.auth_events
|
||
|
||
def is_state(self):
|
||
return True
|