Due to updates to MSC2675 this includes a few fixes:
* Include bundled aggregations for /sync.
* Do not include bundled aggregations for /initialSync and /events.
* Do not bundle aggregations for state events.
* Clarifies comments and variable names.
Instead of only known relation types. This also reworks the background
update for thread relations to crawl events and search for any relation
type, not just threaded relations.
Adds validation to the Client-Server API to ensure that
the potential thread head does not relate to another event
already. This results in not allowing a thread to "fork" into
other threads.
If the target event is unknown for some reason (maybe it isn't
visible to your homeserver), but is the target of other events
it is assumed that the thread can be created from it. Otherwise,
it is rejected as an unknown event.
* Add support for the stable version of MSC2778
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
* Expect m.login.application_service in login and password provider tests
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
* Prefer `HTTPStatus` over plain `int`
This is an Opinion that no-one has seemed to object to yet.
* `--disallow-untyped-defs` for `tests.rest.client.test_directory`
* Improve synapse's annotations for deleting aliases
* Test case for deleting a room alias
* Changelog
* Annotate HomeserverTestCase.servlets
* Correct annotation of federation_auth_origin
* Use AnyStr custom_headers instead of a Union
This allows (str, str) and (bytes, bytes).
This disallows (str, bytes) and (bytes, str)
* DomainSpecificString.SIGIL is a ClassVar
* Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir`
We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At
present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This
commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions
together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different
ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users.
It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote
distinction clear and correct.
A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db
queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because
we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered.
We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic.
----
By my reading this makes these changes:
* When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will
_not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and
deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that
rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion
here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548).
* When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from
room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded.
* Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the
directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do
any exclusion.
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
This is in the context of creating new module callbacks that modules in https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-dinsic can use, in an effort to reconcile the spam checker API in synapse-dinsic with the one in mainline.
This adds a callback that's fairly similar to user_may_create_room except it also allows processing based on the invites sent at room creation.
This avoids the overhead of searching through the various
configuration classes by directly referencing the class that
the attributes are in.
It also improves type hints since mypy can now resolve the
types of the configuration variables.
It's a simplification, but one that'll help make the user directory logic easier
to follow with the other changes upcoming. It's not strictly required for those
changes, but this will help simplify the resulting logic that listens for
`m.room.member` events and generally make the logic easier to follow.
This means the config option `search_all_users` ends up controlling the
search query only, and not the data we store. The cost of doing so is an
extra row in the `user_directory` and `user_directory_search` tables for
each local user which
- belongs to no public rooms
- belongs to no private rooms of size ≥ 2
I think the cost of this will be marginal (since they'll already have entries
in `users` and `profiles` anyway).
As a small upside, a homeserver whose directory was built with this
change can toggle `search_all_users` without having to rebuild their
directory.
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add some tests to characterise the problem
Some failing. Current states:
RoomsMemberListTestCase
test_get_member_list ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_mixed_memberships ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_former_member ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_former_member_with_at_token ...
[FAIL]
test_get_member_list_no_room ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_with_at_token ...
[FAIL]
* Correct the tests
* Check user is/was member before divulging room membership
* Pull out only the 1 membership event we want.
* Update tests/rest/client/v1/test_rooms.py
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
* Fixup tests (following apply review suggestion)
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
