mirror of
https://github.com/matrix-org/mjolnir.git
synced 2024-07-07 11:51:56 +00:00
c8caf744c5
* Apply members and server bans to the most recently active rooms first. https://github.com/matrix-org/mjolnir/issues/273
443 lines
26 KiB
TypeScript
443 lines
26 KiB
TypeScript
import { strict as assert } from "assert";
|
|
|
|
import config from "../../src/config";
|
|
import { newTestUser } from "./clientHelper";
|
|
import { LogService, MatrixClient, Permalinks, UserID } from "matrix-bot-sdk";
|
|
import BanList, { ALL_RULE_TYPES, ChangeType, ListRuleChange, RULE_SERVER, RULE_USER, SERVER_RULE_TYPES } from "../../src/models/BanList";
|
|
import { ServerAcl } from "../../src/models/ServerAcl";
|
|
import { getFirstReaction } from "./commands/commandUtils";
|
|
import { getMessagesByUserIn } from "../../src/utils";
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a policy rule in a policy room.
|
|
* @param client A matrix client that is logged in
|
|
* @param policyRoomId The room id to add the policy to.
|
|
* @param policyType The type of policy to add e.g. m.policy.rule.user. (Use RULE_USER though).
|
|
* @param entity The entity to ban e.g. @foo:example.org
|
|
* @param reason A reason for the rule e.g. 'Wouldn't stop posting spam links'
|
|
* @param template The template to use for the policy rule event.
|
|
* @returns The event id of the newly created policy rule.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function createPolicyRule(client: MatrixClient, policyRoomId: string, policyType: string, entity: string, reason: string, template = {recommendation: 'm.ban'}) {
|
|
return await client.sendStateEvent(policyRoomId, policyType, `rule:${entity}`, {
|
|
entity,
|
|
reason,
|
|
...template,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("Test: Updating the BanList", function () {
|
|
it("Calculates what has changed correctly.", async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(10000);
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom({ invite: [await moderator.getUserId()]});
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
mjolnir.setUserPowerLevel(await moderator.getUserId(), banListId, 100);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Test adding a new rule
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@added:localhost:9999', '');
|
|
let changes: ListRuleChange[] = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1, 'There should only be one change');
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Added);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].sender, await mjolnir.getUserId());
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Test modifiying a rule
|
|
let originalEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@modified:localhost:9999', '');
|
|
await banList.updateList();
|
|
let modifyingEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@modified:localhost:9999', 'modified reason');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Modified);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], originalEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], modifyingEventId);
|
|
let modifyingAgainEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@modified:localhost:9999', 'modified again');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Modified);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], modifyingEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], modifyingAgainEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.length, 2, 'There should be two rules, one for @modified:localhost:9999 and one for @added:localhost:9999');
|
|
|
|
// Test redacting a rule
|
|
const redactThis = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@redacted:localhost:9999', '');
|
|
await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === '@redacted:localhost:9999').length, 1);
|
|
await mjolnir.redactEvent(banListId, redactThis);
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Removed);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], redactThis, 'Should show the new version of the event with redacted content');
|
|
assert.equal(Object.keys(changes[0].event['content']).length, 0, 'Should show the new version of the event with redacted content');
|
|
assert.notEqual(Object.keys(changes[0].previousState['content']), 0, 'Should have a copy of the unredacted state');
|
|
assert.notEqual(changes[0].rule, undefined, 'The previous rule should be present');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === '@redacted:localhost:9999').length, 0, 'The rule should be removed.');
|
|
|
|
// Test soft redaction of a rule
|
|
const softRedactedEntity = '@softredacted:localhost:9999'
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, softRedactedEntity, '');
|
|
await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === softRedactedEntity).length, 1);
|
|
await mjolnir.sendStateEvent(banListId, RULE_USER, `rule:${softRedactedEntity}`, {});
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Removed);
|
|
assert.equal(Object.keys(changes[0].event['content']).length, 0, 'Should show the new version of the event with redacted content');
|
|
assert.notEqual(Object.keys(changes[0].previousState['content']), 0, 'Should have a copy of the unredacted state');
|
|
assert.notEqual(changes[0].rule, undefined, 'The previous rule should be present');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === softRedactedEntity).length, 0, 'The rule should have been removed');
|
|
|
|
// Now test a double soft redaction just to make sure stuff doesn't explode
|
|
await mjolnir.sendStateEvent(banListId, RULE_USER, `rule:${softRedactedEntity}`, {});
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 0, "It shouldn't detect a double soft redaction as a change, it should be seen as adding an invalid rule.");
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === softRedactedEntity).length, 0, 'The rule should have been removed');
|
|
|
|
// Test that different (old) rule types will be modelled as the latest event type.
|
|
originalEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, 'org.matrix.mjolnir.rule.user', '@old:localhost:9999', '');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Added);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === '@old:localhost:9999').length, 1);
|
|
modifyingEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, 'm.room.rule.user', '@old:localhost:9999', 'modified reason');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Modified);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], modifyingEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], originalEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === '@old:localhost:9999').length, 1);
|
|
modifyingAgainEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, '@old:localhost:9999', 'changes again');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Modified);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], modifyingAgainEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], modifyingEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(r => r.entity === '@old:localhost:9999').length, 1);
|
|
})
|
|
it("Will remove rules with old types when they are 'soft redacted' with a different but more recent event type.", async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(3000);
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom({ invite: [await moderator.getUserId()]});
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
mjolnir.setUserPowerLevel(await moderator.getUserId(), banListId, 100);
|
|
|
|
const entity = '@old:localhost:9999';
|
|
let originalEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, 'm.room.rule.user', entity, '');
|
|
let changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Added);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 1, 'There should be a rule stored that we just added...')
|
|
let softRedactingEventId = await mjolnir.sendStateEvent(banListId, RULE_USER, `rule:${entity}`, {});
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Removed);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], softRedactingEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], originalEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 0, 'The rule should no longer be stored.');
|
|
})
|
|
it("A rule of the most recent type won't be deleted when an old rule is deleted for the same entity.", async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(3000);
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom({ invite: [await moderator.getUserId()]});
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
mjolnir.setUserPowerLevel(await moderator.getUserId(), banListId, 100);
|
|
|
|
const entity = '@old:localhost:9999';
|
|
let originalEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, 'm.room.rule.user', entity, '');
|
|
let changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Added);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 1, 'There should be a rule stored that we just added...')
|
|
let updatedEventId = await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_USER, entity, '');
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
// If in the future you change this and it fails, it's really subjective whether this constitutes a modification, since the only thing that has changed
|
|
// is the rule type. The actual content is identical.
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Modified);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], updatedEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], originalEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 1, 'Only the latest version of the rule gets returned.');
|
|
|
|
// Now we delete the old version of the rule without consequence.
|
|
await mjolnir.sendStateEvent(banListId, 'm.room.rule.user', `rule:${entity}`, {});
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 1, 'The rule should still be active.');
|
|
|
|
// And we can still delete the new version of the rule.
|
|
let softRedactingEventId = await mjolnir.sendStateEvent(banListId, RULE_USER, `rule:${entity}`, {});
|
|
changes = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Removed);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].event['event_id'], softRedactingEventId);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].previousState['event_id'], updatedEventId, 'There should be a previous state event for a modified rule');
|
|
assert.equal(banList.userRules.filter(rule => rule.entity === entity).length, 0, 'The rule should no longer be stored.');
|
|
})
|
|
it('Test: BanList Supports all entity types.', async function () {
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom();
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < ALL_RULE_TYPES.length; i++) {
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, ALL_RULE_TYPES[i], `*${i}*`, '');
|
|
}
|
|
let changes: ListRuleChange[] = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, ALL_RULE_TYPES.length);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, ALL_RULE_TYPES.length);
|
|
})
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Test: We do not respond to recommendations other than m.ban in the banlist', function () {
|
|
it('Will not respond to a rule that has a different recommendation to m.ban (or the unstable equivalent).', async function () {
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom();
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_SERVER, 'exmaple.org', '', {recommendation: 'something that is not m.ban'});
|
|
let changes: ListRuleChange[] = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(changes.length, 1, 'There should only be one change');
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].changeType, ChangeType.Added);
|
|
assert.equal(changes[0].sender, await mjolnir.getUserId());
|
|
// We really don't want things that aren't m.ban to end up being accessible in these APIs.
|
|
assert.equal(banList.serverRules.length, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, 0);
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('Test: We will not be able to ban ourselves via ACL.', function () {
|
|
it('We do not ban ourselves when we put ourselves into the policy list.', async function () {
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const serverName = new UserID(await mjolnir.getUserId()).domain;
|
|
const banListId = await mjolnir.createRoom();
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, mjolnir);
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_SERVER, serverName, '');
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_SERVER, 'evil.com', '');
|
|
await createPolicyRule(mjolnir, banListId, RULE_SERVER, '*', '');
|
|
// We should still intern the matching rules rule.
|
|
let changes: ListRuleChange[] = await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(banList.serverRules.length, 3);
|
|
// But when we construct an ACL, we should be safe.
|
|
const acl = new ServerAcl(serverName)
|
|
changes.forEach(change => acl.denyServer(change.rule.entity));
|
|
assert.equal(acl.safeAclContent().deny.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(acl.literalAclContent().deny.length, 3);
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('Test: ACL updates will batch when rules are added in succession.', function () {
|
|
it('Will batch ACL updates if we spam rules into a BanList', async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(180000)
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const serverName: string = new UserID(await mjolnir.getUserId()).domain
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
moderator.joinRoom(this.mjolnir.managementRoomId);
|
|
const mjolnirId = await mjolnir.getUserId();
|
|
|
|
// Setup some protected rooms so we can check their ACL state later.
|
|
const protectedRooms: string[] = [];
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
|
const room = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId]});
|
|
await mjolnir.joinRoom(room);
|
|
await moderator.setUserPowerLevel(mjolnirId, room, 100);
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.addProtectedRoom(room);
|
|
protectedRooms.push(room);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If a previous test hasn't cleaned up properly, these rooms will be populated by bogus ACLs at this point.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
await Promise.all(protectedRooms.map(async room => {
|
|
// We're going to need timeline pagination I'm afraid.
|
|
const roomAcl = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(room, "m.room.server_acl", "");
|
|
assert.equal(roomAcl?.deny?.length ?? 0, 0, 'There should be no entries in the deny ACL.');
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Flood the watched list with banned servers, which should prompt Mjolnir to update server ACL in protected rooms.
|
|
const banListId = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId] });
|
|
mjolnir.joinRoom(banListId);
|
|
this.mjolnir!.watchList(Permalinks.forRoom(banListId));
|
|
const acl = new ServerAcl(serverName).denyIpAddresses().allowServer("*");
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 200; i++) {
|
|
const badServer = `${i}.evil.com`;
|
|
acl.denyServer(badServer);
|
|
await createPolicyRule(moderator, banListId, RULE_SERVER, badServer, `Rule #${i}`);
|
|
// Give them a bit of a spread over time.
|
|
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We do this because it should force us to wait until all the ACL events have been applied.
|
|
// Even if that does mean the last few events will not go through batching...
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
|
|
// Check each of the protected rooms for ACL events and make sure they were batched and are correct.
|
|
await Promise.all(protectedRooms.map(async room => {
|
|
const roomAcl = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(room, "m.room.server_acl", "");
|
|
if (!acl.matches(roomAcl)) {
|
|
assert.fail(`Room ${room} doesn't have the correct ACL: ${JSON.stringify(roomAcl, null, 2)}`)
|
|
}
|
|
let aclEventCount = 0;
|
|
await getMessagesByUserIn(mjolnir, mjolnirId, room, 100, events => {
|
|
events.forEach(event => event.type === 'm.room.server_acl' ? aclEventCount += 1 : null);
|
|
});
|
|
LogService.debug('BanListTest', `aclEventCount: ${aclEventCount}`);
|
|
// If there's less than two then it means the ACL was updated by this test calling `this.mjolnir!.syncLists()`
|
|
// and not the listener that detects changes to ban lists (that we want to test!).
|
|
// It used to be 10, but it was too low, 30 seems better for CI.
|
|
assert.equal(aclEventCount < 30 && aclEventCount > 2, true, 'We should have sent less than 30 ACL events to each room because they should be batched')
|
|
}));
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('Test: unbaning entities via the BanList.', function () {
|
|
afterEach(function() { this.moderator?.stop(); });
|
|
it('Will remove rules that have legacy types', async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(20000)
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const serverName: string = new UserID(await mjolnir.getUserId()).domain
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
this.moderator = moderator;
|
|
moderator.joinRoom(this.mjolnir.managementRoomId);
|
|
const mjolnirId = await mjolnir.getUserId();
|
|
|
|
// We'll make 1 protected room to test ACLs in.
|
|
const protectedRoom = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId]});
|
|
await mjolnir.joinRoom(protectedRoom);
|
|
await moderator.setUserPowerLevel(mjolnirId, protectedRoom, 100);
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.addProtectedRoom(protectedRoom);
|
|
|
|
// If a previous test hasn't cleaned up properly, these rooms will be populated by bogus ACLs at this point.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
const roomAcl = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(protectedRoom, "m.room.server_acl", "");
|
|
assert.equal(roomAcl?.deny?.length ?? 0, 0, 'There should be no entries in the deny ACL.');
|
|
|
|
// Create some legacy rules on a BanList.
|
|
const banListId = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId] });
|
|
await moderator.setUserPowerLevel(await mjolnir.getUserId(), banListId, 100);
|
|
await moderator.sendStateEvent(banListId, 'org.matrix.mjolnir.shortcode', '', { shortcode: "unban-test"});
|
|
await mjolnir.joinRoom(banListId);
|
|
this.mjolnir!.watchList(Permalinks.forRoom(banListId));
|
|
// we use this to compare changes.
|
|
const banList = new BanList(banListId, banListId, moderator);
|
|
// we need two because we need to test the case where an entity has all rule types in the list
|
|
// and another one that only has one (so that we would hit 404 while looking up state)
|
|
const olderBadServer = "old.evil.com"
|
|
const newerBadServer = "new.evil.com"
|
|
await Promise.all(SERVER_RULE_TYPES.map(type => createPolicyRule(moderator, banListId, type, olderBadServer, 'gregg rulz ok')));
|
|
await createPolicyRule(moderator, banListId, RULE_SERVER, newerBadServer, 'this is bad sort it out.');
|
|
// Wait for the ACL event to be applied to our protected room.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
|
|
await banList.updateList();
|
|
// rules are normalized, that's why there should only be 2.
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, 2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that we have setup our test properly and therefore evil.com is banned.
|
|
const acl = new ServerAcl(serverName).denyIpAddresses().allowServer("*").denyServer(olderBadServer).denyServer(newerBadServer);
|
|
const protectedAcl = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(protectedRoom, "m.room.server_acl", "");
|
|
if (!acl.matches(protectedAcl)) {
|
|
assert.fail(`Room ${protectedRoom} doesn't have the correct ACL: ${JSON.stringify(roomAcl, null, 2)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now unban the servers, we will go via the unban command for completeness sake.
|
|
try {
|
|
await moderator.start();
|
|
for (const server of [olderBadServer, newerBadServer]) {
|
|
await getFirstReaction(moderator, this.mjolnir.managementRoomId, '✅', async () => {
|
|
return await moderator.sendMessage(this.mjolnir.managementRoomId, {msgtype: 'm.text', body: `!mjolnir unban unban-test server ${server}`});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
} finally {
|
|
moderator.stop();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for mjolnir to sync protected rooms to update ACL.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
// Confirm that the server is unbanned.
|
|
await banList.updateList();
|
|
assert.equal(banList.allRules.length, 0);
|
|
const aclAfter = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(protectedRoom, "m.room.server_acl", "");
|
|
assert.equal(aclAfter.deny.length, 0, 'Should be no servers denied anymore');
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe.only('Test: should apply bans to the most recently active rooms first', function () {
|
|
it('Applies bans to the most recently active rooms first', async function () {
|
|
this.timeout(6000000000)
|
|
const mjolnir = config.RUNTIME.client!
|
|
const serverName: string = new UserID(await mjolnir.getUserId()).domain
|
|
const moderator = await newTestUser({ name: { contains: "moderator" }});
|
|
moderator.joinRoom(this.mjolnir.managementRoomId);
|
|
const mjolnirId = await mjolnir.getUserId();
|
|
|
|
// Setup some protected rooms so we can check their ACL state later.
|
|
const protectedRooms: string[] = [];
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
|
const room = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId]});
|
|
await mjolnir.joinRoom(room);
|
|
await moderator.setUserPowerLevel(mjolnirId, room, 100);
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.addProtectedRoom(room);
|
|
protectedRooms.push(room);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If a previous test hasn't cleaned up properly, these rooms will be populated by bogus ACLs at this point.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
await Promise.all(protectedRooms.map(async room => {
|
|
const roomAcl = await mjolnir.getRoomStateEvent(room, "m.room.server_acl", "").catch(e => e.statusCode === 404 ? {deny: []} : Promise.reject(e));
|
|
assert.equal(roomAcl?.deny?.length ?? 0, 0, 'There should be no entries in the deny ACL.');
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Flood the watched list with banned servers, which should prompt Mjolnir to update server ACL in protected rooms.
|
|
const banListId = await moderator.createRoom({ invite: [mjolnirId] });
|
|
mjolnir.joinRoom(banListId);
|
|
this.mjolnir!.watchList(Permalinks.forRoom(banListId));
|
|
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
|
|
// shuffle protected rooms https://stackoverflow.com/a/12646864, we do this so we can create activity "randomly" in them.
|
|
for (let i = protectedRooms.length - 1; i > 0; i--) {
|
|
const j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1));
|
|
[protectedRooms[i], protectedRooms[j]] = [protectedRooms[j], protectedRooms[i]];
|
|
}
|
|
// create some activity in the same order.
|
|
for (const roomId of protectedRooms.slice().reverse()) {
|
|
await mjolnir.sendMessage(roomId, {body: `activity`, msgtype: 'm.text'});
|
|
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// check the rooms are in the expected order
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < protectedRooms.length; i++) {
|
|
assert.equal(this.mjolnir!.protectedRoomsByActivity()[i], protectedRooms[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const badServer = `evil.com`;
|
|
// just ban one server
|
|
const acl = new ServerAcl(serverName).denyIpAddresses().allowServer("*").denyServer(badServer);
|
|
await createPolicyRule(moderator, banListId, RULE_SERVER, badServer, `Rule ${badServer}`);
|
|
|
|
// Wait until all the ACL events have been applied.
|
|
await this.mjolnir!.syncLists();
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < protectedRooms.length; i++) {
|
|
assert.equal(this.mjolnir!.protectedRoomsByActivity()[i], protectedRooms.at(-i - 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that the most recently active rooms got the ACL update first.
|
|
let last_event_ts = 0;
|
|
for (const roomId of protectedRooms) {
|
|
let roomAclEvent: null|any;
|
|
// Can't be the best way to get the whole event, but ok.
|
|
await getMessagesByUserIn(mjolnir, mjolnirId, roomId, 1, events => roomAclEvent = events[0]);
|
|
const roomAcl = roomAclEvent!.content;
|
|
if (!acl.matches(roomAcl)) {
|
|
assert.fail(`Room ${roomId} doesn't have the correct ACL: ${JSON.stringify(roomAcl, null, 2)}`)
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(roomAclEvent.origin_server_ts > last_event_ts, true, `This room was more recently active so should have the more recent timestamp`);
|
|
last_event_ts = roomAclEvent.origin_server_ts;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
})
|