mirror of
https://mau.dev/maunium/synapse.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:36:05 -04:00
3fef535ff2
`bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
3009 lines
118 KiB
Python
3009 lines
118 KiB
Python
#
|
|
# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
|
|
#
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
|
|
# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
|
|
# License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
#
|
|
# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
|
|
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
|
|
#
|
|
# Originally licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0:
|
|
# <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>.
|
|
#
|
|
# [This file includes modifications made by New Vector Limited]
|
|
#
|
|
#
|
|
import logging
|
|
from copy import deepcopy
|
|
from typing import Optional
|
|
from unittest.mock import patch
|
|
|
|
from parameterized import parameterized
|
|
|
|
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
|
|
|
|
from synapse.api.constants import (
|
|
AccountDataTypes,
|
|
EventContentFields,
|
|
EventTypes,
|
|
JoinRules,
|
|
Membership,
|
|
RoomTypes,
|
|
)
|
|
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
|
|
from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import RoomSyncConfig, StateValues
|
|
from synapse.rest import admin
|
|
from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
|
|
from synapse.server import HomeServer
|
|
from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
|
|
from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID
|
|
from synapse.types.handlers import SlidingSyncConfig
|
|
from synapse.util import Clock
|
|
|
|
from tests.replication._base import BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase
|
|
from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, TestCase
|
|
|
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class RoomSyncConfigTestCase(TestCase):
|
|
def _assert_room_config_equal(
|
|
self,
|
|
actual: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
message_prefix: Optional[str] = None,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
self.assertEqual(actual.timeline_limit, expected.timeline_limit, message_prefix)
|
|
|
|
# `self.assertEqual(...)` works fine to catch differences but the output is
|
|
# almost impossible to read because of the way it truncates the output and the
|
|
# order doesn't actually matter.
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
actual.required_state_map, expected.required_state_map, message_prefix
|
|
)
|
|
for event_type, expected_state_keys in expected.required_state_map.items():
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
actual.required_state_map[event_type],
|
|
expected_state_keys,
|
|
f"{message_prefix}: Mismatch for {event_type}",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(
|
|
"from_list_config",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList` to a
|
|
`RoomSyncConfig`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"from_room_subscription",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription` to a
|
|
`RoomSyncConfig`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) for both the `event_type` and `state_key` will override
|
|
all other values.
|
|
|
|
Note: MSC3575 describes different behavior to how we're handling things here but
|
|
since it's not wrong to return more state than requested (`required_state` is
|
|
just the minimum requested), it doesn't matter if we include things that the
|
|
client wanted excluded. This complexity is also under scrutiny, see
|
|
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575#discussion_r1185109050
|
|
|
|
> One unique exception is when you request all state events via ["*", "*"]. When used,
|
|
> all state events are returned by default, and additional entries FILTER OUT the returned set
|
|
> of state events. These additional entries cannot use '*' themselves.
|
|
> For example, ["*", "*"], ["m.room.member", "@alice:example.com"] will _exclude_ every m.room.member
|
|
> event _except_ for @alice:example.com, and include every other state event.
|
|
> In addition, ["*", "*"], ["m.space.child", "*"] is an error, the m.space.child filter is not
|
|
> required as it would have been returned anyway.
|
|
>
|
|
> -- MSC3575 (https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575)
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_type",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values for the
|
|
same `state_key`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"multiple_wildcard_type",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values
|
|
for the same `state_key`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, "@foo"),
|
|
("org.matrix.personal_count", "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_state_key",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `state_key` will override all other values for the
|
|
same `event_type`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD,
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_merge",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) entries for the `event_type` and another one for
|
|
`state_key` will play together.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_merge2",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that an all wildcard ("*", "*") entry will override any other
|
|
values (including other wildcards).
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
# One of these should take precedence over everything else
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"lazy_members",
|
|
"""
|
|
`$LAZY` room members should just be another additional key next to other
|
|
explicit keys. We will unroll the special `$LAZY` meaning later.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_from_room_config(
|
|
self,
|
|
_test_label: str,
|
|
_test_description: str,
|
|
room_params: SlidingSyncConfig.CommonRoomParameters,
|
|
expected_room_sync_config: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)` will result in the `expected_room_sync_config`.
|
|
"""
|
|
room_sync_config = RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(
|
|
room_sync_config,
|
|
expected_room_sync_config,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(
|
|
"no_direct_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"@bar"},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_type_wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {
|
|
"dummy",
|
|
"dummy2",
|
|
},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_key_wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {"tulips"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_type_and_state_key_wildcard_merge",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {
|
|
"dummy",
|
|
"dummy2",
|
|
},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_combine_room_sync_config(
|
|
self,
|
|
_test_label: str,
|
|
a: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
b: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Combine A into B and B into A to make sure we get the same result.
|
|
"""
|
|
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
|
|
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
|
|
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
|
|
|
|
# Combine B into A
|
|
room_sync_config_a.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_b)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_a, expected, "B into A")
|
|
|
|
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
|
|
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
|
|
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
|
|
|
|
# Combine A into B
|
|
room_sync_config_b.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_a)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_b, expected, "A into B")
|
|
|
|
|
|
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it returns
|
|
the correct list of rooms IDs.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
|
|
|
|
def test_no_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test when the user has never joined any rooms before
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
# user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=now_token,
|
|
to_token=now_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_get_newly_joined_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user has newly_joined show up. newly_joined is when you
|
|
join after the `from_token` and <= `to_token`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
|
|
# from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because we joined during the token
|
|
# range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user is already joined show up.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
|
|
# from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user is invited to, banned from, and knocked on show
|
|
up.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Setup the invited room (user2 invites user1 to the room)
|
|
invited_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
|
|
invited_room_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
|
|
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
ban_response = self.helper.ban(
|
|
ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the knock room (user1 knocks on the room)
|
|
knock_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=RoomVersions.V7.identifier
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
knock_room_id,
|
|
EventTypes.JoinRules,
|
|
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
# User1 knocks on the room
|
|
knock_channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
"/_matrix/client/r0/knock/%s" % (knock_room_id,),
|
|
b"{}",
|
|
user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(knock_channel.code, 200, knock_channel.result)
|
|
knock_room_membership_state_event = self.get_success(
|
|
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state_event(
|
|
knock_room_id, EventTypes.Member, user1_id
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
assert knock_room_membership_state_event is not None
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
invited_room_id,
|
|
ban_room_id,
|
|
knock_room_id,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
# It should be pointing to the the respective membership event (latest
|
|
# membership event in the from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[invited_room_id].event_id,
|
|
invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[ban_room_id].event_id,
|
|
ban_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[knock_room_id].event_id,
|
|
knock_room_membership_state_event.event_id,
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
|
|
# of the `to_token`.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a room that the user was kicked from still shows up. When the user
|
|
comes back to their client, they should see that they were kicked.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
to_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# The kicked room should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
|
|
kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
|
|
# of the `to_token`.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Forgotten rooms do not show up even if we forget after the from/to range.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, we would be able to track when the `/forget` happens and apply it
|
|
accordingly in the token range but the forgotten flag is only an extra bool in
|
|
the `room_memberships` table.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup a normal room that we leave. This won't show up in the sync response
|
|
# because we left it before our token but is good to check anyway.
|
|
leave_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
|
|
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.ban(ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
before_room_forgets = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Forget the room after we already have our tokens. This doesn't change
|
|
# the membership event itself but will mark it internally in Synapse
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{leave_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{ban_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{kick_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_forgets,
|
|
to_token=before_room_forgets,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that newly_left rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
|
|
were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
|
|
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
_leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room2_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only the newly_left room should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range but
|
|
# the `event_id` is `None` because we left the room causing the server to leave
|
|
# the room because no other local users are in it (quirk of the
|
|
# `current_state_delta_stream` table that we source things from)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
|
|
None, # _leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are instead `newly_left`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Rooms we join after the `to_token` should *not* show up. See condition "1b)"
|
|
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Room join after our `to_token` shouldn't show up
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined during the
|
|
from_token/to_token. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We should still see the room because we were joined during the
|
|
# from_token/to_token time period.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined before the `from_token`
|
|
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We should still see the room because we were joined before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were kicked before the `from_token`
|
|
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
#
|
|
# We have to join before we can leave (leave -> leave isn't a valid transition
|
|
# or at least it doesn't work in Synapse, 403 forbidden)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
to_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
|
|
kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"kick_response": kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were kicked
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
|
|
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1a)"
|
|
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1b)" comments
|
|
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we we're
|
|
joined up to the `to_token`.
|
|
|
|
Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it adds `newly_left`
|
|
rooms to the response.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Join room1
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room2 before the `to_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room2 after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because there is no `from_token` to
|
|
# define a "live" range to compare against
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test when the provided `from_token` comes after the `to_token`. We should
|
|
basically expect the same result as having no `from_token`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id4 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Join room1 before `before_room_token`
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room2 before `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after
|
|
# the `to_token` in this test
|
|
to_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join room2 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# --------
|
|
|
|
# Join room3 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room4 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after the
|
|
# `to_token` in this test
|
|
from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room4 after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=from_token,
|
|
to_token=to_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
|
|
#
|
|
# There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
|
|
# `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined `room1` before either of the tokens
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
|
|
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments
|
|
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Join and leave multiple times shouldn't affect rooms from showing up. It just
|
|
matters that we were joined or newly_left in the from/to range. But we're also
|
|
testing that joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the
|
|
results.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Join and leave multiple times before the from/to range shouldn't affect rooms
|
|
from showing up. It just matters that we were joined or newly_left in the
|
|
from/to range. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Make it look like we joined after the token range but we were invited before the
|
|
from/to range so the room should still show up. See condition "1a)" comments in
|
|
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Invited to the room before the token
|
|
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
|
|
room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_respsonse = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"invite_response": invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
"join_respsonse": join_respsonse["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were only invited before the
|
|
# token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_and_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
|
|
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there is `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_change1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_change1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_before_and_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event even though there are no
|
|
membership events in the from/range but there are `displayname`/`avatar_url`
|
|
changes before/after the token range.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname before the token range
|
|
displayname_change_before_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_before_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_before_token_range_response": displayname_change_before_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_leave_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
|
|
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates and we leave after the `to_token`.
|
|
|
|
See condition "1a)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Leave after the token
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_join_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple `join` membership events (after the `to_token`) in a row
|
|
indicating `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates doesn't affect the results (we
|
|
joined after the token range so it shouldn't show up)
|
|
|
|
See condition "1b)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because we joined after the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_joined_with_leave_join_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that even though we're joined before the token range, if we leave and join
|
|
within the token range, it's still counted as `newly_joined`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and join back during the token range
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_more_changes_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_more_changes_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because there is some non-join event in
|
|
# between our latest join event.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_joined_only_joins_during_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a join and more joins caused by display name changes, all during the
|
|
token range, still count as `newly_joined`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response1 = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2 = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response1": displayname_change_during_token_range_response1[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response2": displayname_change_during_token_range_response2[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we first joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple rooms are not confused as we fixup the list. This test is
|
|
spawning from a real world bug in the code where I was accidentally using
|
|
`event.room_id` in one of the fix-up loops but the `event` being referenced was
|
|
actually from a different loop.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Invited and left the room before the token
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Invited to room2
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
before_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Invited and left room3 during the from/to range
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id3, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room2
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room3
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room3_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room3_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
# `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
|
|
#
|
|
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
|
|
room_id2,
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
room_id3,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it works with
|
|
sharded event stream_writers enabled
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets_for_client_rest_resource,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> dict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
|
|
# Enable shared event stream_writers
|
|
config["stream_writers"] = {"events": ["worker1", "worker2", "worker3"]}
|
|
config["instance_map"] = {
|
|
"main": {"host": "testserv", "port": 8765},
|
|
"worker1": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1001},
|
|
"worker2": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1002},
|
|
"worker3": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1003},
|
|
}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def _create_room(self, room_id: str, user_id: str, tok: str) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Create a room with a specific room_id. We use this so that that we have a
|
|
consistent room_id across test runs that hashes to the same value and will be
|
|
sharded to a known worker in the tests.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# We control the room ID generation by patching out the
|
|
# `_generate_room_id` method
|
|
with patch(
|
|
"synapse.handlers.room.RoomCreationHandler._generate_room_id"
|
|
) as mock:
|
|
mock.side_effect = lambda: room_id
|
|
self.helper.create_room_as(user_id, tok=tok)
|
|
|
|
def test_sharded_event_persisters(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
This test should catch bugs that would come from flawed stream position
|
|
(`stream_ordering`) comparisons or making `RoomStreamToken`'s naively. To
|
|
compare event positions properly, you need to consider both the `instance_name`
|
|
and `stream_ordering` together.
|
|
|
|
The test creates three event persister workers and a room that is sharded to
|
|
each worker. On worker2, we make the event stream position stuck so that it lags
|
|
behind the other workers and we start getting `RoomStreamToken` that have an
|
|
`instance_map` component (i.e. q`m{min_pos}~{writer1}.{pos1}~{writer2}.{pos2}`).
|
|
|
|
We then send some events to advance the stream positions of worker1 and worker3
|
|
but worker2 is lagging behind because it's stuck. We are specifically testing
|
|
that `get_sync_room_ids_for_user(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
|
|
correctly in these adverse conditions.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker1"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
worker_hs2 = self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker2"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker3"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Specially crafted room IDs that get persisted on different workers.
|
|
#
|
|
# Sharded to worker1
|
|
room_id1 = "!fooo:test"
|
|
# Sharded to worker2
|
|
room_id2 = "!bar:test"
|
|
# Sharded to worker3
|
|
room_id3 = "!quux:test"
|
|
|
|
# Create rooms on the different workers.
|
|
self._create_room(room_id1, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
self._create_room(room_id2, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
self._create_room(room_id3, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room2
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room3
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Ensure that the events were sharded to different workers.
|
|
pos1 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response1["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos1.instance_name, "worker1")
|
|
pos2 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response2["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos2.instance_name, "worker2")
|
|
pos3 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response3["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos3.instance_name, "worker3")
|
|
|
|
before_stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We now gut wrench into the events stream `MultiWriterIdGenerator` on worker2 to
|
|
# mimic it getting stuck persisting an event. This ensures that when we send an
|
|
# event on worker1/worker3 we end up in a state where worker2 events stream
|
|
# position lags that on worker1/worker3, resulting in a RoomStreamToken with a
|
|
# non-empty `instance_map` component.
|
|
#
|
|
# Worker2's event stream position will not advance until we call `__aexit__`
|
|
# again.
|
|
worker_store2 = worker_hs2.get_datastores().main
|
|
assert isinstance(worker_store2._stream_id_gen, MultiWriterIdGenerator)
|
|
actx = worker_store2._stream_id_gen.get_next()
|
|
self.get_success(actx.__aenter__())
|
|
|
|
# For room_id1/worker1: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
|
|
# and generate membership changes.
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# For room_id2/worker2: which is currently stuck, join the room.
|
|
join_on_worker2_response = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# For room_id3/worker3: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
|
|
# and generate membership changes.
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_on_worker3_response = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Get a token while things are stuck after our activity
|
|
stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
# Let's make sure we're working with a token that has an `instance_map`
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(len(stuck_activity_token.room_key.instance_map), 0)
|
|
|
|
# Just double check that the join event on worker2 (that is stuck) happened
|
|
# after the position recorded for worker2 in the token but before the max
|
|
# position in the token. This is crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker2_response["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
# Ensure the join technially came after our token
|
|
self.assertGreater(
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker2"),
|
|
)
|
|
# But less than the max stream position of some other worker
|
|
self.assertLess(
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
|
|
# max
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_max_stream_pos(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Just double check that the join event on worker3 happened after the min stream
|
|
# value in the token but still within the position recorded for worker3. This is
|
|
# crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker3_response["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
# Ensure the join came after the min but still encapsulated by the token
|
|
self.assertGreaterEqual(
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
|
|
# min
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.stream,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertLessEqual(
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker3"),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We finish the fake persisting an event we started above and advance worker2's
|
|
# event stream position (unstuck worker2).
|
|
self.get_success(actx.__aexit__(None, None, None))
|
|
|
|
# The function under test
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_stuck_activity_token,
|
|
to_token=stuck_activity_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
# room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
|
|
# and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was stuck.
|
|
# This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
|
|
# `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2
|
|
# wasn't advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the
|
|
# join technically comes after `stuck_activity_token``.
|
|
#
|
|
# room_id2,
|
|
room_id3,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `filter_rooms()` to make sure it includes/excludes rooms
|
|
correctly.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def _create_dm_room(
|
|
self,
|
|
inviter_user_id: str,
|
|
inviter_tok: str,
|
|
invitee_user_id: str,
|
|
invitee_tok: str,
|
|
) -> str:
|
|
"""
|
|
Helper to create a DM room as the "inviter" and invite the "invitee" user to the room. The
|
|
"invitee" user also will join the room. The `m.direct` account data will be set
|
|
for both users.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# Create a room and send an invite the other user
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
inviter_user_id,
|
|
is_public=False,
|
|
tok=inviter_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.invite(
|
|
room_id,
|
|
src=inviter_user_id,
|
|
targ=invitee_user_id,
|
|
tok=inviter_tok,
|
|
extra_data={"is_direct": True},
|
|
)
|
|
# Person that was invited joins the room
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id, invitee_user_id, tok=invitee_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Mimic the client setting the room as a direct message in the global account
|
|
# data
|
|
self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
|
|
invitee_user_id,
|
|
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
|
|
{inviter_user_id: [room_id]},
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
|
|
inviter_user_id,
|
|
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
|
|
{invitee_user_id: [room_id]},
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return room_id
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_dm_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_dm` for DM rooms
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a DM room
|
|
dm_room_id = self._create_dm_room(
|
|
inviter_user_id=user1_id,
|
|
inviter_tok=user1_tok,
|
|
invitee_user_id=user2_id,
|
|
invitee_tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_dm=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_dm=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {dm_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_dm=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_dm=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_encrypted_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_encrypted` for encrypted rooms
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create an encrypted room
|
|
encrypted_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
encrypted_room_id,
|
|
EventTypes.RoomEncryption,
|
|
{"algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2"},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_encrypted=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_encrypted=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {encrypted_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_encrypted=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_encrypted=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_invite_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_invite` for rooms that the user has been invited to
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a room that user1 is invited to
|
|
invite_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.invite(invite_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_invite=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_invite=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {invite_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_invite=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_invite=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_room_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.room_types` for different room types
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room (no room type)
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a space room
|
|
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
|
|
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {
|
|
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try finding only normal rooms
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[None]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding only spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding normal rooms and spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding an arbitrary room type
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=["org.matrix.foobarbaz"]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_not_room_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.not_room_types` for different room types
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room (no room type)
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a space room
|
|
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
|
|
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {
|
|
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(not_room_types=[None]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id, foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
not_room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms or spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
not_room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
|
|
# `not_room_types` should win.
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None], not_room_types=[None]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Nothing matches because nothing is both a normal room and not a normal room
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
|
|
# `not_room_types` should win.
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE], not_room_types=[None]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `sort_rooms()` to make sure it sorts/orders rooms
|
|
correctly.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def test_sort_activity_basic(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Rooms with newer activity are sorted first.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
[room_id2, room_id1],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(Membership.LEAVE,),
|
|
(Membership.INVITE,),
|
|
(Membership.KNOCK,),
|
|
(Membership.BAN,),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_activity_after_xxx(self, room1_membership: str) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
When someone has left/been invited/knocked/been banned from a room, they
|
|
shouldn't take anything into account after that membership event.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Create the rooms as user2 so we can have user1 with a clean slate to work from
|
|
# and join in whatever order we need for the tests.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# If we're testing knocks, set the room to knock
|
|
if room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
EventTypes.JoinRules,
|
|
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Here is the activity with user1 that will determine the sort of the rooms
|
|
# (room2, room1, room3)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
if room1_membership == Membership.LEAVE:
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.INVITE:
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
|
|
self.helper.knock(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.BAN:
|
|
self.helper.ban(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Activity before the token but the user is only been xxx to this room so it
|
|
# shouldn't be taken into account
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Activity after the token. Just make it in a different order than what we
|
|
# expect to make sure we're not taking the activity after the token into
|
|
# account.
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id2, "activity in room2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_rooms_token,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
[room_id2, room_id1, room_id3],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque room IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"room_id1": room_id1,
|
|
"room_id2": room_id2,
|
|
"room_id3": room_id3,
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_default_bump_event_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we only consider the *latest* event in the room when sorting (not
|
|
`bump_event_types`).
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
message_response = self.helper.send(room_id1, "message in room1", tok=user1_tok)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id2, "message in room2", tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Send a reaction in room1 which isn't in `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` but we only
|
|
# care about sorting by the *latest* event in the room.
|
|
self.helper.send_event(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
type=EventTypes.Reaction,
|
|
content={
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
"event_id": message_response["event_id"],
|
|
"key": "👍",
|
|
"rel_type": "m.annotation",
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
# room1 sorts before room2 because it has the latest event (the reaction).
|
|
# We only care about the *latest* event in the room.
|
|
[room_id1, room_id2],
|
|
)
|