* Add some tests to characterise the problem
Some failing. Current states:
RoomsMemberListTestCase
test_get_member_list ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_mixed_memberships ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_former_member ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_former_member_with_at_token ...
[FAIL]
test_get_member_list_no_room ...
[OK]
test_get_member_list_no_permission_with_at_token ...
[FAIL]
* Correct the tests
* Check user is/was member before divulging room membership
* Pull out only the 1 membership event we want.
* Update tests/rest/client/v1/test_rooms.py
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
* Fixup tests (following apply review suggestion)
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
Turns out that the functionality added in #10546 to skip TLS was incompatible
with older Twisted versions, so we need to be a bit more inventive.
Also, add a test to (hopefully) not break this in future. Sadly, testing TLS is
really hard.
The code to deduplicate repeated fetches of the same set of events was
N^2 (over the number of events requested), which could lead to a process
being completely wedged.
The main fix is to deduplicate the returned deferreds so we only await
on a deferred once rather than many times. Seperately, when handling the
returned events from the defrered we only add the events we care about
to the event map to be returned (so that we don't pay the price of
inserting extraneous events into the dict).
Given that backfill and get_missing_events are basically the same thing, it's somewhat crazy that we have entirely separate code paths for them. This makes backfill use the existing get_missing_events code, and then clears up all the unused code.
When a user deletes an email from their account it will
now also remove all pushers for that email and that user
(even if these pushers were created by a different client)
* Validate device_keys for C-S /keys/query requests
Closes#10354
A small, not particularly critical fix. I'm interested in seeing if we
can find a more systematic approach though. #8445 is the place for any discussion.
Here we split on_receive_pdu into two functions (on_receive_pdu and process_pulled_event), rather than having both cases in the same method. There's a tiny bit of overlap, but not that much.
* drop room pdu linearizer sooner
No point holding onto it while we recheck the db
* move out `missing_prevs` calculation
we're going to need `missing_prevs` whatever we do, so we may as well calculate
it eagerly and just update it if it gets outdated.
* Add another `if missing_prevs` condition
this should be a no-op, since all the code inside the block already checks `if
missing_prevs`
* reorder if conditions
This shouldn't change the logic at all.
* Push down `min_depth` read
No point reading it from the database unless we're going to use it.
* Collect the sent_to_us_directly code together
Move the remaining `sent_to_us_directly` code inside the `if
sent_to_us_directly` block.
* Properly separate the `not sent_to_us_directly` branch
Since the only way this second block is now reachable is if we
*didn't* go into the `sent_to_us_directly` branch, we can replace it with a
simple `else`.
* changelog
