This PR ports the logic from the
[synapse_auto_accept_invite](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-auto-accept-invite)
module into synapse.
I went with the naive approach of injecting the "module" next to where
third party modules are currently loaded. If there is a better/preferred
way to handle this, I'm all ears. It wasn't obvious to me if there was a
better location to add this logic that would cleanly apply to all
incoming invite events.
Relies on https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17166 to fix linter
errors.
Re-introduces #17191, and includes #17197 and #17214
The basic idea is to stop calling `get_rooms_for_user` everywhere, and
instead use the table `device_lists_changes_in_room`.
Commits reviewable one-by-one.
Removed `request_key` from the `SyncConfig` (moved outside as its own function parameter) so it doesn't have to flow into `_generate_sync_entry_for_xxx` methods. This way we can separate the concerns of caching from generating the response and reuse the `_generate_sync_entry_for_xxx` functions as we see fit. Plus caching doesn't really have anything to do with the config of sync.
Split from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17167
Spawning from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17167#discussion_r1601497279
It's almost always more efficient to query the rooms that have device
list changes, rather than looking at the list of all users whose devices
have changed and then look for shared rooms.
Linter errors are showing up in #17147 that are unrelated to that PR.
The errors do not currently show up on develop.
This PR aims to resolve the linter errors separately from #17147.
This change will apply the `email` & `picture` provided by OIDC to the
new user account when registering a new user via OIDC. If the user is
directed to the account details form, this change makes sure they have
been selected before applying them, otherwise they are omitted. In
particular, this change ensures the values are carried through when
Synapse has consent configured, and the redirect to the consent form/s
are followed.
I have tested everything manually. Including:
- with/without consent configured
- allowing/not allowing the use of email/avatar (via
`sso_auth_account_details.html`)
- with/without automatic account detail population (by un/commenting the
`localpart_template` option in synapse config).
### Pull Request Checklist
<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->
* [X] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [X] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
- Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
- End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
- Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [X] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))
... when workers are unreachable, etc.
Fixes https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17117.
The general principle is just to make sure that we propagate any
exceptions to the JsonResource, so that we return an error code to the
sending server. That means that the sending server no longer considers
the message safely sent, so it will retry later.
In the issue, Erik mentions that an alternative solution would be to
persist the to-device messages into a table so that they can be retried.
This might be an improvement for performance, but even if we did that,
we still need this mechanism, since we might be unable to reach the
database. So, if we want to do that, it can be a later follow-up.
---------
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
PR #16942 removed an invalid optimisation that avoided pulling out state
for non-gappy syncs. This causes a large increase in DB usage. c.f.
#16941 for why that optimisation was wrong.
However, we can still optimise in the simple case where the events in
the timeline are a linear chain without any branching/merging of the
DAG.
cc. @richvdh
This PR fixes a very, very niche edge-case, but I've got some more work
coming which will otherwise make the problem worse.
The bug happens when the syncing user leaves a room, and has a sync
filter which includes "left" rooms, but sets the timeline limit to 0. In
that case, the state returned in the `state` section is calculated
incorrectly.
The fix is to pass a token corresponding to the point that the user
leaves the room through to `compute_state_delta`.
When a lot of locks are waiting for a single lock, notifying all locks
independently with `call_later` on each release is really costly and
incurs some kind of async contention, where the CPU is spinning a lot
for not much.
The included test is taking around 30s before the change, and 0.5s
after.
It was found following failing tests with
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/16827.
List of users not to send out device list updates for when they register
new devices. This is useful to handle bot accounts.
This is undocumented as its mostly a hack to test on matrix.org.
Note: This will still send out device list updates if the device is
later updated, e.g. end to end keys are added.
During the migration the automated script to update the copyright
headers accidentally got rid of some of the existing copyright lines.
Reinstate them.
Prior to this PR, if a request to create a public (public as in
published to the rooms directory) room violated the room list
publication rules set in the
[config](https://matrix-org.github.io/synapse/latest/usage/configuration/config_documentation.html#room_list_publication_rules),
the request to create the room was denied and the room was not created.
This PR changes the behavior such that when a request to create a room
published to the directory violates room list publication rules, the
room is still created but the room is not published to the directory.
Sometimes we fail to fetch events during backfill due to missing state,
and we often end up querying the same bad events periodically (as people
backpaginate). In such cases its likely we will continue to fail to get
the state, and therefore we should try *before* loading the state that
we have from the DB (as otherwise it's wasted DB and memory).
---------
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <oliverw@matrix.org>
There are two changes here:
1. Only pull out the required state when handling the request.
2. Change the get filtered state return type to check that we're only
querying state that was requested
---------
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <oliverw@matrix.org>
Instead of persisting outliers in a bunch of batches, let's just do them
all at once.
This is fine because all `_auth_and_persist_outliers_inner` is doing is
checking the auth rules for each event, which requires the events to be
topologically sorted by the auth graph.
The idea here being that the directory server shouldn't advertise rooms
to a requesting server is the requesting server would not be allowed to
join or participate in the room.
<!--
Fixes: # <!-- -->
<!--
Supersedes: # <!-- -->
<!--
Follows: # <!-- -->
<!--
Part of: # <!-- -->
Base: `develop` <!-- git-stack-base-branch:develop -->
<!--
This pull request is commit-by-commit review friendly. <!-- -->
<!--
This pull request is intended for commit-by-commit review. <!-- -->
Original commit schedule, with full messages:
<ol>
<li>
Pass `from_federation_origin` down into room list retrieval code
</li>
<li>
Don't cache /publicRooms response for inbound federated requests
</li>
<li>
fixup! Don't cache /publicRooms response for inbound federated requests
</li>
<li>
Cap the number of /publicRooms entries to 100
</li>
<li>
Simplify code now that you can't request unlimited rooms
</li>
<li>
Filter out rooms from federated requests that don't have the correct ACL
</li>
<li>
Request a handful more when filtering ACLs so that we can try to avoid
shortchanging the requester
</li>
</ol>
---------
Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <oliverw@matrix.org>
