Sort is no longer configurable and we always sort rooms by the `stream_ordering` of the last event in the room or the point where the user can see up to in cases of leave/ban/invite/knock.
Add `event.internal_metadata.instance_name` (the worker instance that persisted the event) to go alongside the existing `event.internal_metadata.stream_ordering`.
`instance_name` is useful to properly compare and query for events with a token since you need to compare both the `stream_ordering` and `instance_name` against the vector clock/`instance_map` in the `RoomStreamToken`.
This is pre-requisite work and may be used in https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17293
Adding `event.internal_metadata.instance_name` was first mentioned in the initial Sliding Sync PR while pairing with @erikjohnston, see 09609cb0db (diff-5cd773fb307aa754bd3948871ba118b1ef0303f4d72d42a2d21e38242bf4e096R405-R410)
Spawning from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17187#discussion_r1619492779 around wanting to put `SlidingSyncBody` (parse the request in the rest layer), `SlidingSyncConfig` (from the rest layer, pass to the handler), `SlidingSyncResponse` (pass the response from the handler back to the rest layer to respond) somewhere that doesn't contaminate the imports and cause circular import issues.
- Moved Pydantic parsing models to `synapse/types/rest`
- Moved handler types to `synapse/types/handlers`
Fixes: #17013
Add logging for whether room keys are replaced
This is motivated by the Crypto team who need to diagnose crypto issues.
The existing opentracing logging is not enough because it is not enabled
for all users.
Based on [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575): Sliding Sync
This iteration only focuses on returning the list of room IDs in the sliding window API (without sorting/filtering).
Rooms appear in the Sliding sync response based on:
- `invite`, `join`, `knock`, `ban` membership events
- Kicks (`leave` membership events where `sender` is different from the `user_id`/`state_key`)
- `newly_left` (rooms that were left during the given token range, > `from_token` and <= `to_token`)
- In order for bans/kicks to not show up, you need to `/forget` those rooms. This doesn't modify the event itself though and only adds the `forgotten` flag to `room_memberships` in Synapse. There isn't a way to tell when a room was forgotten at the moment so we can't factor it into the from/to range.
### Example request
`POST http://localhost:8008/_matrix/client/unstable/org.matrix.msc3575/sync`
```json
{
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [ [0, 99] ],
"sort": [ "by_notification_level", "by_recency", "by_name" ],
"required_state": [
["m.room.join_rules", ""],
["m.room.history_visibility", ""],
["m.space.child", "*"]
],
"timeline_limit": 100
}
}
}
```
Response:
```json
{
"next_pos": "s58_224_0_13_10_1_1_16_0_1",
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"count": 1,
"ops": [
{
"op": "SYNC",
"range": [0, 99],
"room_ids": [
"!MmgikIyFzsuvtnbvVG:my.synapse.linux.server"
]
}
]
}
},
"rooms": {},
"extensions": {}
}
```
Use fully-qualified `PersistedEventPosition` (`instance_name` and `stream_ordering`) when returning `RoomsForUser` to facilitate proper comparisons and `RoomStreamToken` generation.
Spawning from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17187 where we want to utilize this change
Otherwise things will get confused.
An alternative would be to make sure that for lagging stream we don't
return anything (and make sure the returned next_batch token doesn't go
backwards). But that is a faff.
We try and deduplicate in two places: 1) really early on, and 2) just
before we persist the event. The first case was broken due to it
occuring before the profile information was added, and so it thought the
event contents were different.
The second case did catch it and handle it correctly, however doing so
creates a redundant state group leading to bloat.
Fixes#3791
Currently sending a to-device message to a user ID with a dodgy
destination is accepted, but then ends up spamming the logs when we try
and send to the destination.
An alternative would be to reject the request, but I'm slightly nervous
that could break things.
This PR ports the logic from the
[synapse_auto_accept_invite](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-auto-accept-invite)
module into synapse.
I went with the naive approach of injecting the "module" next to where
third party modules are currently loaded. If there is a better/preferred
way to handle this, I'm all ears. It wasn't obvious to me if there was a
better location to add this logic that would cleanly apply to all
incoming invite events.
Relies on https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17166 to fix linter
errors.
Re-introduces #17191, and includes #17197 and #17214
The basic idea is to stop calling `get_rooms_for_user` everywhere, and
instead use the table `device_lists_changes_in_room`.
Commits reviewable one-by-one.
Removed `request_key` from the `SyncConfig` (moved outside as its own function parameter) so it doesn't have to flow into `_generate_sync_entry_for_xxx` methods. This way we can separate the concerns of caching from generating the response and reuse the `_generate_sync_entry_for_xxx` functions as we see fit. Plus caching doesn't really have anything to do with the config of sync.
Split from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17167
Spawning from https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17167#discussion_r1601497279
It's almost always more efficient to query the rooms that have device
list changes, rather than looking at the list of all users whose devices
have changed and then look for shared rooms.
Linter errors are showing up in #17147 that are unrelated to that PR.
The errors do not currently show up on develop.
This PR aims to resolve the linter errors separately from #17147.
This change will apply the `email` & `picture` provided by OIDC to the
new user account when registering a new user via OIDC. If the user is
directed to the account details form, this change makes sure they have
been selected before applying them, otherwise they are omitted. In
particular, this change ensures the values are carried through when
Synapse has consent configured, and the redirect to the consent form/s
are followed.
I have tested everything manually. Including:
- with/without consent configured
- allowing/not allowing the use of email/avatar (via
`sso_auth_account_details.html`)
- with/without automatic account detail population (by un/commenting the
`localpart_template` option in synapse config).
### Pull Request Checklist
<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->
* [X] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [X] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
- Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
- End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
- Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [X] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))
... when workers are unreachable, etc.
Fixes https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17117.
The general principle is just to make sure that we propagate any
exceptions to the JsonResource, so that we return an error code to the
sending server. That means that the sending server no longer considers
the message safely sent, so it will retry later.
In the issue, Erik mentions that an alternative solution would be to
persist the to-device messages into a table so that they can be retried.
This might be an improvement for performance, but even if we did that,
we still need this mechanism, since we might be unable to reach the
database. So, if we want to do that, it can be a later follow-up.
---------
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
