mirror of
https://mau.dev/maunium/synapse.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:36:05 -04:00
Add early returns to _check_for_soft_fail
(#7769)
my editor was complaining about unset variables, so let's add some early returns to fix that and reduce indentation/cognitive load.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f01e2ca039
commit
e866512367
1
changelog.d/7769.misc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/7769.misc
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
Add early returns to `_check_for_soft_fail`.
|
@ -2061,76 +2061,67 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
||||
# For new (non-backfilled and non-outlier) events we check if the event
|
||||
# passes auth based on the current state. If it doesn't then we
|
||||
# "soft-fail" the event.
|
||||
do_soft_fail_check = not backfilled and not event.internal_metadata.is_outlier()
|
||||
if do_soft_fail_check:
|
||||
extrem_ids = await self.store.get_latest_event_ids_in_room(event.room_id)
|
||||
if backfilled or event.internal_metadata.is_outlier():
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
extrem_ids = set(extrem_ids)
|
||||
prev_event_ids = set(event.prev_event_ids())
|
||||
extrem_ids = await self.store.get_latest_event_ids_in_room(event.room_id)
|
||||
extrem_ids = set(extrem_ids)
|
||||
prev_event_ids = set(event.prev_event_ids())
|
||||
|
||||
if extrem_ids == prev_event_ids:
|
||||
# If they're the same then the current state is the same as the
|
||||
# state at the event, so no point rechecking auth for soft fail.
|
||||
do_soft_fail_check = False
|
||||
if extrem_ids == prev_event_ids:
|
||||
# If they're the same then the current state is the same as the
|
||||
# state at the event, so no point rechecking auth for soft fail.
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
if do_soft_fail_check:
|
||||
room_version = await self.store.get_room_version_id(event.room_id)
|
||||
room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
|
||||
room_version = await self.store.get_room_version_id(event.room_id)
|
||||
room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
|
||||
|
||||
# Calculate the "current state".
|
||||
if state is not None:
|
||||
# If we're explicitly given the state then we won't have all the
|
||||
# prev events, and so we have a gap in the graph. In this case
|
||||
# we want to be a little careful as we might have been down for
|
||||
# a while and have an incorrect view of the current state,
|
||||
# however we still want to do checks as gaps are easy to
|
||||
# maliciously manufacture.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# So we use a "current state" that is actually a state
|
||||
# resolution across the current forward extremities and the
|
||||
# given state at the event. This should correctly handle cases
|
||||
# like bans, especially with state res v2.
|
||||
# Calculate the "current state".
|
||||
if state is not None:
|
||||
# If we're explicitly given the state then we won't have all the
|
||||
# prev events, and so we have a gap in the graph. In this case
|
||||
# we want to be a little careful as we might have been down for
|
||||
# a while and have an incorrect view of the current state,
|
||||
# however we still want to do checks as gaps are easy to
|
||||
# maliciously manufacture.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# So we use a "current state" that is actually a state
|
||||
# resolution across the current forward extremities and the
|
||||
# given state at the event. This should correctly handle cases
|
||||
# like bans, especially with state res v2.
|
||||
|
||||
state_sets = await self.state_store.get_state_groups(
|
||||
event.room_id, extrem_ids
|
||||
)
|
||||
state_sets = list(state_sets.values())
|
||||
state_sets.append(state)
|
||||
current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.resolve_events(
|
||||
room_version, state_sets, event
|
||||
)
|
||||
current_state_ids = {
|
||||
k: e.event_id for k, e in current_state_ids.items()
|
||||
}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.get_current_state_ids(
|
||||
event.room_id, latest_event_ids=extrem_ids
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.debug(
|
||||
"Doing soft-fail check for %s: state %s",
|
||||
event.event_id,
|
||||
current_state_ids,
|
||||
state_sets = await self.state_store.get_state_groups(
|
||||
event.room_id, extrem_ids
|
||||
)
|
||||
state_sets = list(state_sets.values())
|
||||
state_sets.append(state)
|
||||
current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.resolve_events(
|
||||
room_version, state_sets, event
|
||||
)
|
||||
current_state_ids = {k: e.event_id for k, e in current_state_ids.items()}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.get_current_state_ids(
|
||||
event.room_id, latest_event_ids=extrem_ids
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Now check if event pass auth against said current state
|
||||
auth_types = auth_types_for_event(event)
|
||||
current_state_ids = [
|
||||
e for k, e in current_state_ids.items() if k in auth_types
|
||||
]
|
||||
logger.debug(
|
||||
"Doing soft-fail check for %s: state %s", event.event_id, current_state_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
current_auth_events = await self.store.get_events(current_state_ids)
|
||||
current_auth_events = {
|
||||
(e.type, e.state_key): e for e in current_auth_events.values()
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Now check if event pass auth against said current state
|
||||
auth_types = auth_types_for_event(event)
|
||||
current_state_ids = [e for k, e in current_state_ids.items() if k in auth_types]
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events
|
||||
)
|
||||
except AuthError as e:
|
||||
logger.warning("Soft-failing %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||
event.internal_metadata.soft_failed = True
|
||||
current_auth_events = await self.store.get_events(current_state_ids)
|
||||
current_auth_events = {
|
||||
(e.type, e.state_key): e for e in current_auth_events.values()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events)
|
||||
except AuthError as e:
|
||||
logger.warning("Soft-failing %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||
event.internal_metadata.soft_failed = True
|
||||
|
||||
async def on_query_auth(
|
||||
self, origin, event_id, room_id, remote_auth_chain, rejects, missing
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user