mirror of
https://mau.dev/maunium/synapse.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:36:05 -04:00
Sliding Sync: Easier to understand timeline assertions in tests (#17511)
Added `_assertTimelineEqual(...)` because I got fed up trying to understand the crazy diffs from the standard `self.assertEqual(...)`/`self.assertListEqual(...)` Before: ``` [FAIL] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/eric/Documents/github/element/synapse/tests/rest/client/sliding_sync/test_rooms_timeline.py", line 103, in test_rooms_limited_initial_sync self.assertListEqual( File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 1091, in assertListEqual self.assertSequenceEqual(list1, list2, msg, seq_type=list) File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 1073, in assertSequenceEqual self.fail(msg) twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: Lists differ: ['$4QcmnzhdazSnDYcYSZCS_6-MWSzM_dN3RC7TRvW0w[95 chars]isM'] != ['$8N1XJ7e-3K_wxAanLVD3v8KQ96_B5Xj4huGkgy4N4[95 chars]nnU'] First differing element 0: '$4QcmnzhdazSnDYcYSZCS_6-MWSzM_dN3RC7TRvW0wWA' '$8N1XJ7e-3K_wxAanLVD3v8KQ96_B5Xj4huGkgy4N4-E' - ['$4QcmnzhdazSnDYcYSZCS_6-MWSzM_dN3RC7TRvW0wWA', - '$8N1XJ7e-3K_wxAanLVD3v8KQ96_B5Xj4huGkgy4N4-E', ? ^ + ['$8N1XJ7e-3K_wxAanLVD3v8KQ96_B5Xj4huGkgy4N4-E', ? ^ - '$q4PRxQ_pBZkQI1keYuZPTtExQ23DqpUI3-Lxwfj_isM'] + '$4QcmnzhdazSnDYcYSZCS_6-MWSzM_dN3RC7TRvW0wWA', + '$j3Xj-t2F1wH9kUHsI8X5yqS7hkdSyN2owaArfvk8nnU'] ``` After: ``` [FAIL] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/eric/Documents/github/element/synapse/tests/rest/client/sliding_sync/test_rooms_timeline.py", line 178, in test_rooms_limited_initial_sync self._assertTimelineEqual( File "/home/eric/Documents/github/element/synapse/tests/rest/client/sliding_sync/test_rooms_timeline.py", line 110, in _assertTimelineEqual self._assertListEqual( File "/home/eric/Documents/github/element/synapse/tests/rest/client/sliding_sync/test_rooms_timeline.py", line 79, in _assertListEqual self.fail(f"{diff_message}\n{message}") twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: Items must Expected items to be in actual ('?' = missing expected items): [ (10, master) $w-BoqW1PQQFU4TzVJW5OIelugxh0mY12wrfw6mbC6D4 (m.room.message) activity4 (11, master) $sSidTZf1EOQmCVDU4mrH_1-bopMQhwcDUO2IhoemR6M (m.room.message) activity5 ? (12, master) $bgOcc3D-2QSkbk4aBxKVyOOQJGs7ZuncRJwG3cEANZg (m.room.member, @user1:test) join ] Actual ('+' = found expected items): [ + (11, master) $sSidTZf1EOQmCVDU4mrH_1-bopMQhwcDUO2IhoemR6M (m.room.message) activity5 + (10, master) $w-BoqW1PQQFU4TzVJW5OIelugxh0mY12wrfw6mbC6D4 (m.room.message) activity4 (9, master) $FmCNyc11YeFwiJ4an7_q6H0LCCjQOKd6UCr5VKeXXUw (m.room.message, None) activity3 ] ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b620e0a15
commit
e3db7b2d81
1
changelog.d/17511.misc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/17511.misc
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
Easier to understand `timeline` assertions in Sliding Sync tests.
|
@ -12,13 +12,14 @@
|
||||
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
|
||||
#
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
from typing import List, Optional
|
||||
|
||||
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
|
||||
|
||||
import synapse.rest.admin
|
||||
from synapse.rest.client import login, room, sync
|
||||
from synapse.server import HomeServer
|
||||
from synapse.types import StreamToken
|
||||
from synapse.types import StreamToken, StrSequence
|
||||
from synapse.util import Clock
|
||||
|
||||
from tests.rest.client.sliding_sync.test_sliding_sync import SlidingSyncBase
|
||||
@ -42,6 +43,82 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
|
||||
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
|
||||
|
||||
def _assertListEqual(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
actual_items: StrSequence,
|
||||
expected_items: StrSequence,
|
||||
message: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Like `self.assertListEqual(...)` but with an actually understandable diff message.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
if actual_items == expected_items:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
expected_lines: List[str] = []
|
||||
for expected_item in expected_items:
|
||||
is_expected_in_actual = expected_item in actual_items
|
||||
expected_lines.append(
|
||||
"{} {}".format(" " if is_expected_in_actual else "?", expected_item)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
actual_lines: List[str] = []
|
||||
for actual_item in actual_items:
|
||||
is_actual_in_expected = actual_item in expected_items
|
||||
actual_lines.append(
|
||||
"{} {}".format("+" if is_actual_in_expected else " ", actual_item)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
newline = "\n"
|
||||
expected_string = f"Expected items to be in actual ('?' = missing expected items):\n [\n{newline.join(expected_lines)}\n ]"
|
||||
actual_string = f"Actual ('+' = found expected items):\n [\n{newline.join(actual_lines)}\n ]"
|
||||
first_message = "Items must"
|
||||
diff_message = f"{first_message}\n{expected_string}\n{actual_string}"
|
||||
|
||||
self.fail(f"{diff_message}\n{message}")
|
||||
|
||||
def _assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
room_id: str,
|
||||
actual_event_ids: List[str],
|
||||
expected_event_ids: List[str],
|
||||
message: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Like `self.assertListEqual(...)` for event IDs in a room but will give a nicer
|
||||
output with context for what each event_id is (type, stream_ordering, content,
|
||||
etc).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if actual_event_ids == expected_event_ids:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
event_id_set = set(actual_event_ids + expected_event_ids)
|
||||
events = self.get_success(self.store.get_events(event_id_set))
|
||||
|
||||
def event_id_to_string(event_id: str) -> str:
|
||||
event = events.get(event_id)
|
||||
if event:
|
||||
state_key = event.get_state_key()
|
||||
state_key_piece = f", {state_key}" if state_key is not None else ""
|
||||
return (
|
||||
f"({event.internal_metadata.stream_ordering: >2}, {event.internal_metadata.instance_name}) "
|
||||
+ f"{event.event_id} ({event.type}{state_key_piece}) {event.content.get('membership', '')}{event.content.get('body', '')}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return f"{event_id} <event not found in room_id={room_id}>"
|
||||
|
||||
self._assertListEqual(
|
||||
actual_items=[
|
||||
event_id_to_string(event_id) for event_id in actual_event_ids
|
||||
],
|
||||
expected_items=[
|
||||
event_id_to_string(event_id) for event_id in expected_event_ids
|
||||
],
|
||||
message=message,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rooms_limited_initial_sync(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that we mark `rooms` as `limited=True` when we saturate the `timeline_limit`
|
||||
@ -85,17 +162,18 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Check to make sure the latest events are returned
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
self._assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
room_id=room_id1,
|
||||
actual_event_ids=[
|
||||
event["event_id"]
|
||||
for event in response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
expected_event_ids=[
|
||||
event_response4["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response5["event_id"],
|
||||
user1_join_response["event_id"],
|
||||
],
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"],
|
||||
message=str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Check to make sure the `prev_batch` points at the right place
|
||||
@ -227,16 +305,17 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
+ str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Check to make sure the latest events are returned
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
self._assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
room_id=room_id1,
|
||||
actual_event_ids=[
|
||||
event["event_id"]
|
||||
for event in response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
expected_event_ids=[
|
||||
event_response2["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response3["event_id"],
|
||||
],
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"],
|
||||
message=str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# All events are "live"
|
||||
@ -303,18 +382,19 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
+ str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Check to make sure that the "live" and historical events are returned
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
self._assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
room_id=room_id1,
|
||||
actual_event_ids=[
|
||||
event["event_id"]
|
||||
for event in response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
expected_event_ids=[
|
||||
event_response2["event_id"],
|
||||
user1_join_response["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response3["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response4["event_id"],
|
||||
],
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"],
|
||||
message=str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Only events after the `from_token` are "live" (join, event3, event4)
|
||||
@ -361,17 +441,18 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
|
||||
|
||||
# We should see events before the ban but not after
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
self._assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
room_id=room_id1,
|
||||
actual_event_ids=[
|
||||
event["event_id"]
|
||||
for event in response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
expected_event_ids=[
|
||||
event_response3["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response4["event_id"],
|
||||
user1_ban_response["event_id"],
|
||||
],
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"],
|
||||
message=str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# No "live" events in an initial sync (no `from_token` to define the "live"
|
||||
# range)
|
||||
@ -428,17 +509,18 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsTimelineTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
||||
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok)
|
||||
|
||||
# We should see events before the ban but not after
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[
|
||||
self._assertTimelineEqual(
|
||||
room_id=room_id1,
|
||||
actual_event_ids=[
|
||||
event["event_id"]
|
||||
for event in response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
[
|
||||
expected_event_ids=[
|
||||
event_response3["event_id"],
|
||||
event_response4["event_id"],
|
||||
user1_ban_response["event_id"],
|
||||
],
|
||||
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"],
|
||||
message=str(response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
# All live events in the incremental sync
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user