From c46139a17edd0237ab3e6243346e5b5e201e4673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:07:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Avoid locking account_data tables for upserts --- synapse/storage/account_data.py | 85 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/synapse/storage/account_data.py b/synapse/storage/account_data.py index c8a1eb016..56a0bde54 100644 --- a/synapse/storage/account_data.py +++ b/synapse/storage/account_data.py @@ -222,9 +222,12 @@ class AccountDataStore(SQLBaseStore): """ content_json = json.dumps(content) - def add_account_data_txn(txn, next_id): - self._simple_upsert_txn( - txn, + with self._account_data_id_gen.get_next() as next_id: + # no need to lock here as room_account_data has a unique constraint + # on (user_id, room_id, account_data_type) so _simple_upsert will + # retry if there is a conflict. + yield self._simple_upsert( + desc="add_room_account_data", table="room_account_data", keyvalues={ "user_id": user_id, @@ -234,19 +237,20 @@ class AccountDataStore(SQLBaseStore): values={ "stream_id": next_id, "content": content_json, - } + }, + lock=False, ) - txn.call_after( - self._account_data_stream_cache.entity_has_changed, - user_id, next_id, - ) - txn.call_after(self.get_account_data_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)) - self._update_max_stream_id(txn, next_id) - with self._account_data_id_gen.get_next() as next_id: - yield self.runInteraction( - "add_room_account_data", add_account_data_txn, next_id - ) + # it's theoretically possible for the above to succeed and the + # below to fail - in which case we might reuse a stream id on + # restart, and the above update might not get propagated. That + # doesn't sound any worse than the whole update getting lost, + # which is what would happen if we combined the two into one + # transaction. + yield self._update_max_stream_id(next_id) + + self._account_data_stream_cache.entity_has_changed(user_id, next_id) + self.get_account_data_for_user.invalidate((user_id,)) result = self._account_data_id_gen.get_current_token() defer.returnValue(result) @@ -263,9 +267,12 @@ class AccountDataStore(SQLBaseStore): """ content_json = json.dumps(content) - def add_account_data_txn(txn, next_id): - self._simple_upsert_txn( - txn, + with self._account_data_id_gen.get_next() as next_id: + # no need to lock here as account_data has a unique constraint on + # (user_id, account_data_type) so _simple_upsert will retry if + # there is a conflict. + yield self._simple_upsert( + desc="add_user_account_data", table="account_data", keyvalues={ "user_id": user_id, @@ -274,40 +281,46 @@ class AccountDataStore(SQLBaseStore): values={ "stream_id": next_id, "content": content_json, - } + }, + lock=False, ) - txn.call_after( - self._account_data_stream_cache.entity_has_changed, + + # it's theoretically possible for the above to succeed and the + # below to fail - in which case we might reuse a stream id on + # restart, and the above update might not get propagated. That + # doesn't sound any worse than the whole update getting lost, + # which is what would happen if we combined the two into one + # transaction. + yield self._update_max_stream_id(next_id) + + self._account_data_stream_cache.entity_has_changed( user_id, next_id, ) - txn.call_after(self.get_account_data_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)) - txn.call_after( - self.get_global_account_data_by_type_for_user.invalidate, + self.get_account_data_for_user.invalidate((user_id,)) + self.get_global_account_data_by_type_for_user.invalidate( (account_data_type, user_id,) ) - self._update_max_stream_id(txn, next_id) - - with self._account_data_id_gen.get_next() as next_id: - yield self.runInteraction( - "add_user_account_data", add_account_data_txn, next_id - ) result = self._account_data_id_gen.get_current_token() defer.returnValue(result) - def _update_max_stream_id(self, txn, next_id): + def _update_max_stream_id(self, next_id): """Update the max stream_id Args: - txn: The database cursor next_id(int): The the revision to advance to. """ - update_max_id_sql = ( - "UPDATE account_data_max_stream_id" - " SET stream_id = ?" - " WHERE stream_id < ?" + def _update(txn): + update_max_id_sql = ( + "UPDATE account_data_max_stream_id" + " SET stream_id = ?" + " WHERE stream_id < ?" + ) + txn.execute(update_max_id_sql, (next_id, next_id)) + return self.runInteraction( + "update_account_data_max_stream_id", + _update, ) - txn.execute(update_max_id_sql, (next_id, next_id)) @cachedInlineCallbacks(num_args=2, cache_context=True, max_entries=5000) def is_ignored_by(self, ignored_user_id, ignorer_user_id, cache_context):