* remove code legacy code related to deprecated config flag "trust_identity_server_for_password_resets" from synapse/config/emailconfig.py
* remove legacy code supporting depreciated config flag "trust_identity_server_for_password_resets" from synapse/config/registration.py
* remove legacy code supporting depreciated config flag "trust_identity_server_for_password_resets" from synapse/handlers/identity.py
* add tests to ensure config error is thrown and synapse refuses to start when depreciated config flag is found
* add changelog
* slightly change behavior to only check for deprecated flag if set to 'true'
* Update changelog.d/11333.misc
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <oliverw@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <oliverw@matrix.org>
Adds validation to the Client-Server API to ensure that
the potential thread head does not relate to another event
already. This results in not allowing a thread to "fork" into
other threads.
If the target event is unknown for some reason (maybe it isn't
visible to your homeserver), but is the target of other events
it is assumed that the thread can be created from it. Otherwise,
it is rejected as an unknown event.
* Prefer `HTTPStatus` over plain `int`
This is an Opinion that no-one has seemed to object to yet.
* `--disallow-untyped-defs` for `tests.rest.client.test_directory`
* Improve synapse's annotations for deleting aliases
* Test case for deleting a room alias
* Changelog
Co-authored-by: Dirk Klimpel <5740567+dklimpel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Morgan <1342360+anoadragon453@users.noreply.github.com>
This is the final piece of the jigsaw for #9595. As with other changes before this one (eg #10771), we need to make sure that we auth the auth events in the right order, and actually check that their predecessors haven't been rejected.
To do this I've reused the existing code we use when persisting outliers elsewhere.
I've removed the code for attempting to fetch missing auth_events - the events should have been present in the send_join response, so the likely reason they are missing is that we couldn't verify them, so requesting them again is unlikely to help. Instead, we simply drop any state which relies on those auth events, as we do at a backwards-extremity. See also matrix-org/complement#216 for a test for this.
* We only need to fetch users in private rooms
* Filter out `user_id` at the top
* Discard excluded users in the top loop
We weren't doing this in the "First, if they're our user" branch so this
is a bugfix.
* The caller must check that `user_id` is included
This is in the docstring. There are two call sites:
- one in `_handle_room_publicity_change`, which explicitly checks before calling;
- and another in `_handle_room_membership_event`, which returns early if
the user is excluded.
So this change is safe.
* Test joining a private room with an excluded user
* Tweak an existing test
* Changelog
* test docstring
* lint
Currently, when we receive an event whose auth_events differ from those we expect, we state-resolve between the two state sets, and check that the event passes auth based on the resolved state.
This means that it's possible for us to accept events which don't pass auth at their declared auth_events (or where the auth events themselves were rejected), leading to problems down the line like #10083.
This change means we will:
* ignore any events where we cannot find the auth events
* reject any events whose auth events were rejected
* reject any events which do not pass auth at their declared auth_events.
Together with a whole raft of previous work, this is a partial fix to #9595.
Fixes#6643.
Based on #11009.
This fixes a bug where we would accept an event whose `auth_events` include
rejected events, if the rejected event was shadowed by another `auth_event`
with same `(type, state_key)`.
The approach is to pass a list of auth events into
`check_auth_rules_for_event` instead of a dict, which of course means updating
the call sites.
This is an extension of #10956.
Found while working on the Gitter backfill script and noticed
it only happened after we sent 7 batches, https://gitlab.com/gitterHQ/webapp/-/merge_requests/2229#note_665906390
When there are more than 5 backward extremities for a given depth,
backfill will throw an error because we sliced the extremity list
to 5 but then try to iterate over the full list. This causes
us to look for state that we never fetched and we get a `KeyError`.
Before when calling `/messages` when there are more than 5 backward extremities:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/http/server.py", line 258, in _async_render_wrapper
callback_return = await self._async_render(request)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/http/server.py", line 446, in _async_render
callback_return = await raw_callback_return
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/rest/client/room.py", line 580, in on_GET
msgs = await self.pagination_handler.get_messages(
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/handlers/pagination.py", line 396, in get_messages
await self.hs.get_federation_handler().maybe_backfill(
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/handlers/federation.py", line 133, in maybe_backfill
return await self._maybe_backfill_inner(room_id, current_depth, limit)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/synapse/handlers/federation.py", line 386, in _maybe_backfill_inner
likely_extremeties_domains = get_domains_from_state(states[e_id])
KeyError: '$zpFflMEBtZdgcMQWTakaVItTLMjLFdKcRWUPHbbSZJl'
```
Resolve and share `state_groups` for all historical events in batch. This also helps for showing the appropriate avatar/displayname in Element and will work whenever `/messages` has one of the historical messages as the first message in the batch.
This does have the flaw where if you just insert a single historical event somewhere, it probably won't resolve the state correctly from `/messages` or `/context` since it will grab a non historical event above or below with resolved state which never included the historical state back then. For the same reasions, this also does not work in Element between the transition from actual messages to historical messages. In the Gitter case, this isn't really a problem since all of the historical messages are in one big lump at the beginning of the room.
For a future iteration, might be good to look at `/messages` and `/context` to additionally add the `state` for any historical messages in that batch.
---
How are the `state_groups` shared? To illustrate the `state_group` sharing, see this example:
**Before** (new `state_group` for every event 😬, very inefficient):
```
# Tests from https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/206
$ COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh TestBackfillingHistory/parallel/should_resolve_member_state_events_for_historical_events
create_new_client_event m.room.member event=$_JXfwUDIWS6xKGG4SmZXjSFrizhARM7QblhATVWWUcA state_group=None
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$1ZBfmBKEjg94d-vGYymKrVYeghwBOuGJ3wubU1-I9y0 state_group=9
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$Mq2JvRetTyclPuozRI682SAjYp3GqRuPc8_cH5-ezPY state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$MfmY4rBQkxrIp8jVwVMTJ4PKnxSigpG9E2cn7S0AtTo state_group=11
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$uYOv6V8wiF7xHwOMt-60d1AoOIbqLgrDLz6ZIQDdWUI state_group=12
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$PAbkJRMxb0bX4A6av463faiAhxkE3FEObM1xB4D0UG4 state_group=13
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.batch event=$Oy_S7AWN7rJQe_MYwGPEy6RtbYklrI-tAhmfiLrCaKI state_group=14
```
**After** (all events in batch sharing `state_group=10`) (the base insertion event has `state_group=8` which matches the `prev_event` we're inserting next to):
```
# Tests from https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/206
$ COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh TestBackfillingHistory/parallel/should_resolve_member_state_events_for_historical_events
create_new_client_event m.room.member event=$PWomJ8PwENYEYuVNoG30gqtybuQQSZ55eldBUSs0i0U state_group=None
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$e_mCU7Eah9ABF6nQU7lu4E1RxIWccNF05AKaTT5m3lw state_group=9
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$ui7A3_GdXIcJq0C8GpyrF8X7B3DTjMd_WGCjogax7xU state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$EnTIM5rEGVezQJiYl62uFBl6kJ7B-sMxWqe2D_4FX1I state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$LGx5jGONnBPuNhAuZqHeEoXChd9ryVkuTZatGisOPjk state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$wW0zwoN50lbLu1KoKbybVMxLbKUj7GV_olozIc5i3M0 state_group=10
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.batch event=$5ZB6dtzqFBCEuMRgpkU201Qhx3WtXZGTz_YgldL6JrQ state_group=10
```
* Pull out `_handle_room_membership_event`
* Discard excluded users early
* Rearrange logic so the change is membership is effectively switched over. See PR for rationale.
