This type of registration was probably never used. It only includes the
user name in the HMAC but not the password.
Shared secret registration is still available via
client/r0/admin/register.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Stahl <manuel.stahl@awesome-technologies.de>
Fixes#5833
The emailconfig code was attempting to pull incorrect config file names. This corrects that, while also marking a difference between a config file variable that's a filepath versus a str containing HTML.
--------
- Fix a regression introduced in v1.2.0rc1 which led to incorrect labels on some prometheus metrics. ([\#5734](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/5734))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=+JBn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v1.2.0rc2' into develop
Bugfixes
--------
- Fix a regression introduced in v1.2.0rc1 which led to incorrect labels on some prometheus metrics. ([\#5734](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/5734))
* Fix servlet metric names
Co-Authored-By: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Remove redundant check
* Cover all return paths
A fix for PR #5626, which returned the original event content as part of a call to /relations.
Only problem was that we were attempting to aggregate the relations on top of it when we did so. We now set bundle_aggregations to False in the get_event call.
We also do this when pulling the relation events as well, because edits of edits are not something we'd like to support here.
When asking for the relations of an event, include the original event in the response. This will mostly be used for efficiently showing edit history, but could be useful in other circumstances.
Nothing uses this now, so we can remove the dead code, and clean up the
API.
Since we're changing the shape of the return value anyway, we take the
opportunity to give the method a better name.
Moves the warning about password resets being disabled to the point where a user actually tries to reset their password. Is this an appropriate place for it to happen?
Also removed the disabling of msisdn password resets when you don't have an email config, as that just doesn't make sense.
Also change the error a user receives upon disabled passwords to specify that only email-based password reset is disabled.
Sends password reset emails from the homeserver instead of proxying to the identity server. This is now the default behaviour for security reasons. If you wish to continue proxying password reset requests to the identity server you must now enable the email.trust_identity_server_for_password_resets option.
This PR is a culmination of 3 smaller PRs which have each been separately reviewed:
* #5308
* #5345
* #5368
Replaces DEFAULT_ROOM_VERSION constant with a method that first checks the config, then returns a hardcoded value if the option is not present.
That hardcoded value is now located in the server.py config file.
We checked that 3pids were not already in use before we checked if
we were going to return the account previously registered in the
same UI auth session, in which case the 3pids will definitely
be in use.
https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues/9586
It's more natural for the user if the bit that takes them away
from the registration flow comes last. Adding the dummy stage allows
us to do the stages in this order without the ambiguity.
This allows the client to complete the email last which is more
natual for the user. Without this stage, if the client would
complete the recaptcha (and terms, if enabled) stages and then the
registration request would complete because you've now completed a
flow, even if you were intending to complete the flow that's the
same except has email auth at the end.
Adding a dummy auth stage to the recaptcha-only flow means it's
always unambiguous which flow the client was trying to complete.
Longer term we should think about changing the protocol so the
client explicitly says which flow it's trying to complete.
vector-im/riot-web#9586
This allows the client to complete the email last which is more
natual for the user. Without this stage, if the client would
complete the recaptcha (and terms, if enabled) stages and then the
registration request would complete because you've now completed a
flow, even if you were intending to complete the flow that's the
same except has email auth at the end.
Adding a dummy auth stage to the recaptcha-only flow means it's
always unambiguous which flow the client was trying to complete.
Longer term we should think about changing the protocol so the
client explicitly says which flow it's trying to complete.
https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues/9586
