mirror of
https://git.anonymousland.org/anonymousland/synapse.git
synced 2024-10-01 11:49:51 -04:00
Merge branch 'rav/simplify_event_auth_interface' into develop
This commit is contained in:
commit
f68b5e5773
1
changelog.d/13017.misc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/13017.misc
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||||||
|
Remove redundant `room_version` parameters from event auth functions.
|
@ -45,9 +45,7 @@ if typing.TYPE_CHECKING:
|
|||||||
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def validate_event_for_room_version(
|
def validate_event_for_room_version(event: "EventBase") -> None:
|
||||||
room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: "EventBase"
|
|
||||||
) -> None:
|
|
||||||
"""Ensure that the event complies with the limits, and has the right signatures
|
"""Ensure that the event complies with the limits, and has the right signatures
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NB: does not *validate* the signatures - it assumes that any signatures present
|
NB: does not *validate* the signatures - it assumes that any signatures present
|
||||||
@ -60,12 +58,10 @@ def validate_event_for_room_version(
|
|||||||
NB: This is used to check events that have been received over federation. As such,
|
NB: This is used to check events that have been received over federation. As such,
|
||||||
it can only enforce the checks specified in the relevant room version, to avoid
|
it can only enforce the checks specified in the relevant room version, to avoid
|
||||||
a split-brain situation where some servers accept such events, and others reject
|
a split-brain situation where some servers accept such events, and others reject
|
||||||
them.
|
them. See also EventValidator, which contains extra checks which are applied only to
|
||||||
|
locally-generated events.
|
||||||
TODO: consider moving this into EventValidator
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Args:
|
Args:
|
||||||
room_version_obj: the version of the room which contains this event
|
|
||||||
event: the event to be checked
|
event: the event to be checked
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Raises:
|
Raises:
|
||||||
@ -103,7 +99,7 @@ def validate_event_for_room_version(
|
|||||||
raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server")
|
raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
is_invite_via_allow_rule = (
|
is_invite_via_allow_rule = (
|
||||||
room_version_obj.msc3083_join_rules
|
event.room_version.msc3083_join_rules
|
||||||
and event.type == EventTypes.Member
|
and event.type == EventTypes.Member
|
||||||
and event.membership == Membership.JOIN
|
and event.membership == Membership.JOIN
|
||||||
and EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER in event.content
|
and EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER in event.content
|
||||||
@ -117,7 +113,6 @@ def validate_event_for_room_version(
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
room_version_obj: RoomVersion,
|
|
||||||
event: "EventBase",
|
event: "EventBase",
|
||||||
auth_events: Iterable["EventBase"],
|
auth_events: Iterable["EventBase"],
|
||||||
) -> None:
|
) -> None:
|
||||||
@ -136,7 +131,6 @@ def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
|||||||
a bunch of other tests.
|
a bunch of other tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Args:
|
Args:
|
||||||
room_version_obj: the version of the room
|
|
||||||
event: the event being checked.
|
event: the event being checked.
|
||||||
auth_events: the room state to check the events against.
|
auth_events: the room state to check the events against.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -205,7 +199,10 @@ def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
|||||||
raise AuthError(403, "This room has been marked as unfederatable.")
|
raise AuthError(403, "This room has been marked as unfederatable.")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# 4. If type is m.room.aliases
|
# 4. If type is m.room.aliases
|
||||||
if event.type == EventTypes.Aliases and room_version_obj.special_case_aliases_auth:
|
if (
|
||||||
|
event.type == EventTypes.Aliases
|
||||||
|
and event.room_version.special_case_aliases_auth
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
# 4a. If event has no state_key, reject
|
# 4a. If event has no state_key, reject
|
||||||
if not event.is_state():
|
if not event.is_state():
|
||||||
raise AuthError(403, "Alias event must be a state event")
|
raise AuthError(403, "Alias event must be a state event")
|
||||||
@ -225,7 +222,7 @@ def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# 5. If type is m.room.membership
|
# 5. If type is m.room.membership
|
||||||
if event.type == EventTypes.Member:
|
if event.type == EventTypes.Member:
|
||||||
_is_membership_change_allowed(room_version_obj, event, auth_dict)
|
_is_membership_change_allowed(event.room_version, event, auth_dict)
|
||||||
logger.debug("Allowing! %s", event)
|
logger.debug("Allowing! %s", event)
|
||||||
return
|
return
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -247,17 +244,17 @@ def check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
|||||||
_can_send_event(event, auth_dict)
|
_can_send_event(event, auth_dict)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if event.type == EventTypes.PowerLevels:
|
if event.type == EventTypes.PowerLevels:
|
||||||
_check_power_levels(room_version_obj, event, auth_dict)
|
_check_power_levels(event.room_version, event, auth_dict)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if event.type == EventTypes.Redaction:
|
if event.type == EventTypes.Redaction:
|
||||||
check_redaction(room_version_obj, event, auth_dict)
|
check_redaction(event.room_version, event, auth_dict)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (
|
if (
|
||||||
event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_INSERTION
|
event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_INSERTION
|
||||||
or event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_BATCH
|
or event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_BATCH
|
||||||
or event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_MARKER
|
or event.type == EventTypes.MSC2716_MARKER
|
||||||
):
|
):
|
||||||
check_historical(room_version_obj, event, auth_dict)
|
check_historical(event.room_version, event, auth_dict)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
logger.debug("Allowing! %s", event)
|
logger.debug("Allowing! %s", event)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ class EventValidator:
|
|||||||
def validate_new(self, event: EventBase, config: HomeServerConfig) -> None:
|
def validate_new(self, event: EventBase, config: HomeServerConfig) -> None:
|
||||||
"""Validates the event has roughly the right format
|
"""Validates the event has roughly the right format
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Suitable for checking a locally-created event. It has stricter checks than
|
||||||
|
is appropriate for an event received over federation (for which, see
|
||||||
|
event_auth.validate_event_for_room_version)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Args:
|
Args:
|
||||||
event: The event to validate.
|
event: The event to validate.
|
||||||
config: The homeserver's configuration.
|
config: The homeserver's configuration.
|
||||||
|
@ -48,14 +48,13 @@ class EventAuthHandler:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
async def check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
async def check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
||||||
self,
|
self,
|
||||||
room_version_obj: RoomVersion,
|
|
||||||
event: EventBase,
|
event: EventBase,
|
||||||
context: EventContext,
|
context: EventContext,
|
||||||
) -> None:
|
) -> None:
|
||||||
"""Check an event passes the auth rules at its own auth events"""
|
"""Check an event passes the auth rules at its own auth events"""
|
||||||
auth_event_ids = event.auth_event_ids()
|
auth_event_ids = event.auth_event_ids()
|
||||||
auth_events_by_id = await self._store.get_events(auth_event_ids)
|
auth_events_by_id = await self._store.get_events(auth_event_ids)
|
||||||
check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth_events_by_id.values())
|
check_auth_rules_for_event(event, auth_events_by_id.values())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def compute_auth_events(
|
def compute_auth_events(
|
||||||
self,
|
self,
|
||||||
|
@ -800,9 +800,7 @@ class FederationHandler:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
||||||
# when we get the event back in `on_send_join_request`
|
# when we get the event back in `on_send_join_request`
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(event, context)
|
||||||
room_version, event, context
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
return event
|
return event
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def on_invite_request(
|
async def on_invite_request(
|
||||||
@ -973,9 +971,7 @@ class FederationHandler:
|
|||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
||||||
# when we get the event back in `on_send_leave_request`
|
# when we get the event back in `on_send_leave_request`
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(event, context)
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, context
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Failed to create new leave %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Failed to create new leave %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
raise e
|
raise e
|
||||||
@ -1034,9 +1030,7 @@ class FederationHandler:
|
|||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
# The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
|
||||||
# when we get the event back in `on_send_knock_request`
|
# when we get the event back in `on_send_knock_request`
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(event, context)
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, context
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Failed to create new knock %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Failed to create new knock %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
raise e
|
raise e
|
||||||
@ -1207,9 +1201,9 @@ class FederationHandler:
|
|||||||
event.internal_metadata.send_on_behalf_of = self.hs.hostname
|
event.internal_metadata.send_on_behalf_of = self.hs.hostname
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(event)
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, context
|
event, context
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Denying new third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Denying new third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
@ -1259,10 +1253,8 @@ class FederationHandler:
|
|||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(event)
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(event, context)
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, context
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Denying third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Denying third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
raise e
|
raise e
|
||||||
|
@ -1430,9 +1430,6 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
allow_rejected=True,
|
allow_rejected=True,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
room_version = await self._store.get_room_version_id(room_id)
|
|
||||||
room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def prep(event: EventBase) -> Optional[Tuple[EventBase, EventContext]]:
|
def prep(event: EventBase) -> Optional[Tuple[EventBase, EventContext]]:
|
||||||
with nested_logging_context(suffix=event.event_id):
|
with nested_logging_context(suffix=event.event_id):
|
||||||
auth = []
|
auth = []
|
||||||
@ -1455,8 +1452,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
context = EventContext.for_outlier(self._storage_controllers)
|
context = EventContext.for_outlier(self._storage_controllers)
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(event)
|
||||||
check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth)
|
check_auth_rules_for_event(event, auth)
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Rejecting %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Rejecting %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
|
context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
|
||||||
@ -1499,11 +1496,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
assert not event.internal_metadata.outlier
|
assert not event.internal_metadata.outlier
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# first of all, check that the event itself is valid.
|
# first of all, check that the event itself is valid.
|
||||||
room_version = await self._store.get_room_version_id(event.room_id)
|
|
||||||
room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(event)
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("While validating received event %r: %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("While validating received event %r: %s", event, e)
|
||||||
# TODO: use a different rejected reason here?
|
# TODO: use a different rejected reason here?
|
||||||
@ -1521,7 +1515,7 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# ... and check that the event passes auth at those auth events.
|
# ... and check that the event passes auth at those auth events.
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, claimed_auth_events)
|
check_auth_rules_for_event(event, claimed_auth_events)
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning(
|
logger.warning(
|
||||||
"While checking auth of %r against auth_events: %s", event, e
|
"While checking auth of %r against auth_events: %s", event, e
|
||||||
@ -1569,9 +1563,7 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
auth_events_for_auth = calculated_auth_event_map
|
auth_events_for_auth = calculated_auth_event_map
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
check_auth_rules_for_event(event, auth_events_for_auth.values())
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, auth_events_for_auth.values()
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Failed auth resolution for %r because %s", event, e)
|
logger.warning("Failed auth resolution for %r because %s", event, e)
|
||||||
context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
|
context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
|
||||||
@ -1671,7 +1663,7 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
|
|||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, current_auth_events)
|
check_auth_rules_for_event(event, current_auth_events)
|
||||||
except AuthError as e:
|
except AuthError as e:
|
||||||
logger.warning(
|
logger.warning(
|
||||||
"Soft-failing %r (from %s) because %s",
|
"Soft-failing %r (from %s) because %s",
|
||||||
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ from synapse.api.errors import (
|
|||||||
SynapseError,
|
SynapseError,
|
||||||
UnsupportedRoomVersionError,
|
UnsupportedRoomVersionError,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersions
|
from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS
|
||||||
from synapse.api.urls import ConsentURIBuilder
|
from synapse.api.urls import ConsentURIBuilder
|
||||||
from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version
|
from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version
|
||||||
from synapse.events import EventBase, relation_from_event
|
from synapse.events import EventBase, relation_from_event
|
||||||
@ -1274,23 +1274,6 @@ class EventCreationHandler:
|
|||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
return prev_event
|
return prev_event
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if event.is_state() and (event.type, event.state_key) == (
|
|
||||||
EventTypes.Create,
|
|
||||||
"",
|
|
||||||
):
|
|
||||||
room_version_id = event.content.get(
|
|
||||||
"room_version", RoomVersions.V1.identifier
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
maybe_room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS.get(room_version_id)
|
|
||||||
if not maybe_room_version_obj:
|
|
||||||
raise UnsupportedRoomVersionError(
|
|
||||||
"Attempt to create a room with unsupported room version %s"
|
|
||||||
% (room_version_id,)
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
room_version_obj = maybe_room_version_obj
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
room_version_obj = await self.store.get_room_version(event.room_id)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if event.internal_metadata.is_out_of_band_membership():
|
if event.internal_metadata.is_out_of_band_membership():
|
||||||
# the only sort of out-of-band-membership events we expect to see here are
|
# the only sort of out-of-band-membership events we expect to see here are
|
||||||
# invite rejections and rescinded knocks that we have generated ourselves.
|
# invite rejections and rescinded knocks that we have generated ourselves.
|
||||||
@ -1298,9 +1281,9 @@ class EventCreationHandler:
|
|||||||
assert event.content["membership"] == Membership.LEAVE
|
assert event.content["membership"] == Membership.LEAVE
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(event)
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
||||||
room_version_obj, event, context
|
event, context
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
except AuthError as err:
|
except AuthError as err:
|
||||||
logger.warning("Denying new event %r because %s", event, err)
|
logger.warning("Denying new event %r because %s", event, err)
|
||||||
|
@ -226,10 +226,9 @@ class RoomCreationHandler:
|
|||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
old_room_version = await self.store.get_room_version(old_room_id)
|
validate_event_for_room_version(tombstone_event)
|
||||||
validate_event_for_room_version(old_room_version, tombstone_event)
|
|
||||||
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
|
||||||
old_room_version, tombstone_event, tombstone_context
|
tombstone_event, tombstone_context
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Upgrade the room
|
# Upgrade the room
|
||||||
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ from typing import (
|
|||||||
from synapse import event_auth
|
from synapse import event_auth
|
||||||
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes
|
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes
|
||||||
from synapse.api.errors import AuthError
|
from synapse.api.errors import AuthError
|
||||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersion, RoomVersions
|
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersion
|
||||||
from synapse.events import EventBase
|
from synapse.events import EventBase
|
||||||
from synapse.types import MutableStateMap, StateMap
|
from synapse.types import MutableStateMap, StateMap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ def _resolve_auth_events(
|
|||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
# The signatures have already been checked at this point
|
# The signatures have already been checked at this point
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
|
||||||
event,
|
event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
@ -349,7 +348,6 @@ def _resolve_normal_events(
|
|||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
# The signatures have already been checked at this point
|
# The signatures have already been checked at this point
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
|
||||||
event,
|
event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
@ -574,7 +574,6 @@ async def _iterative_auth_checks(
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
room_version,
|
|
||||||
event,
|
event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
@ -15,10 +15,12 @@
|
|||||||
import unittest
|
import unittest
|
||||||
from typing import Optional
|
from typing import Optional
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from parameterized import parameterized
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from synapse import event_auth
|
from synapse import event_auth
|
||||||
from synapse.api.constants import EventContentFields
|
from synapse.api.constants import EventContentFields
|
||||||
from synapse.api.errors import AuthError
|
from synapse.api.errors import AuthError
|
||||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
|
from synapse.api.room_versions import EventFormatVersions, RoomVersion, RoomVersions
|
||||||
from synapse.events import EventBase, make_event_from_dict
|
from synapse.events import EventBase, make_event_from_dict
|
||||||
from synapse.types import JsonDict, get_domain_from_id
|
from synapse.types import JsonDict, get_domain_from_id
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -30,38 +32,39 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# creator should be able to send state
|
# creator should be able to send state
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V9,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# ... but a rejected join_rules event should cause it to be rejected
|
# ... but a rejected join_rules event should cause it to be rejected
|
||||||
rejected_join_rules = _join_rules_event(creator, "public")
|
rejected_join_rules = _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V9,
|
||||||
|
creator,
|
||||||
|
"public",
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
rejected_join_rules.rejected_reason = "stinky"
|
rejected_join_rules.rejected_reason = "stinky"
|
||||||
auth_events.append(rejected_join_rules)
|
auth_events.append(rejected_join_rules)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.assertRaises(
|
self.assertRaises(
|
||||||
AuthError,
|
AuthError,
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V9,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# ... even if there is *also* a good join rules
|
# ... even if there is *also* a good join rules
|
||||||
auth_events.append(_join_rules_event(creator, "public"))
|
auth_events.append(_join_rules_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator, "public"))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.assertRaises(
|
self.assertRaises(
|
||||||
AuthError,
|
AuthError,
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V9,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -73,15 +76,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
joiner = "@joiner:example.com"
|
joiner = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(joiner),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, joiner),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# creator should be able to send state
|
# creator should be able to send state
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -89,8 +91,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
self.assertRaises(
|
self.assertRaises(
|
||||||
AuthError,
|
AuthError,
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, joiner),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(joiner),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -104,28 +105,28 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
king = "@joiner2:example.com"
|
king = "@joiner2:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_power_levels_event(
|
_power_levels_event(
|
||||||
creator, {"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "29", king: "30"}}
|
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||||
|
creator,
|
||||||
|
{"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "29", king: "30"}},
|
||||||
),
|
),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(king),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, king),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# pleb should not be able to send state
|
# pleb should not be able to send state
|
||||||
self.assertRaises(
|
self.assertRaises(
|
||||||
AuthError,
|
AuthError,
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, pleb),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
),
|
),
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# king should be able to send state
|
# king should be able to send state
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, king),
|
||||||
_random_state_event(king),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -134,37 +135,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
other = "@other:example.com"
|
other = "@other:example.com"
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Reject an event with no state key.
|
# Reject an event with no state key.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator, state_key=""),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject.
|
# If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room.
|
# Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room.
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, other),
|
||||||
_alias_event(other),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -173,38 +170,35 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
other = "@other:example.com"
|
other = "@other:example.com"
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# No particular checks are done on the state key.
|
# No particular checks are done on the state key.
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator, state_key=""),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
||||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room.
|
# Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, other),
|
||||||
_alias_event(other),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
auth_events,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_msc2209(self):
|
@parameterized.expand([(RoomVersions.V1, True), (RoomVersions.V6, False)])
|
||||||
|
def test_notifications(self, room_version: RoomVersion, allow_modification: bool):
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
Notifications power levels get checked due to MSC2209.
|
Notifications power levels get checked due to MSC2209.
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
@ -212,28 +206,26 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auth_events = [
|
auth_events = [
|
||||||
_create_event(creator),
|
_create_event(room_version, creator),
|
||||||
_join_event(creator),
|
_join_event(room_version, creator),
|
||||||
_power_levels_event(
|
_power_levels_event(
|
||||||
creator, {"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "30"}}
|
room_version, creator, {"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "30"}}
|
||||||
),
|
),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
_join_event(room_version, pleb),
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level.
|
pl_event = _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
room_version, pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
|
||||||
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
|
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# But an MSC2209 room rejects this change.
|
# on room V1, pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
if allow_modification:
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(pl_event, auth_events)
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
|
||||||
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
|
else:
|
||||||
auth_events,
|
# But an MSC2209 room rejects this change.
|
||||||
)
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(pl_event, auth_events)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_join_rules_public(self):
|
def test_join_rules_public(self):
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
@ -243,58 +235,60 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auth_events = {
|
auth_events = {
|
||||||
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator),
|
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator),
|
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(creator, "public"),
|
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, creator, "public"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Check join.
|
# Check join.
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_member_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
||||||
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "ban"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user who left can re-join.
|
# A user who left can re-join.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "leave"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can accept an invite.
|
# A user can accept an invite.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -306,64 +300,88 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auth_events = {
|
auth_events = {
|
||||||
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator),
|
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator),
|
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(creator, "invite"),
|
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, creator, "invite"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A join without an invite is rejected.
|
# A join without an invite is rejected.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_member_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
||||||
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "ban"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user who left cannot re-join.
|
# A user who left cannot re-join.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "leave"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can accept an invite.
|
# A user can accept an invite.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self):
|
def test_join_rules_restricted_old_room(self) -> None:
|
||||||
|
"""Old room versions should reject joins to restricted rooms"""
|
||||||
|
creator = "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
|
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
auth_events = {
|
||||||
|
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
|
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator),
|
||||||
|
("m.room.power_levels", ""): _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, creator, {"invite": 0}
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V6, creator, "restricted"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb),
|
||||||
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self) -> None:
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
Test joining a restricted room from MSC3083.
|
Test joining a restricted room from MSC3083.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -377,29 +395,25 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
pleb = "@joiner:example.com"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auth_events = {
|
auth_events = {
|
||||||
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator),
|
("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(RoomVersions.V8, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator),
|
("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(RoomVersions.V8, creator),
|
||||||
("m.room.power_levels", ""): _power_levels_event(creator, {"invite": 0}),
|
("m.room.power_levels", ""): _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(creator, "restricted"),
|
RoomVersions.V8, creator, {"invite": 0}
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
("m.room.join_rules", ""): _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8, creator, "restricted"
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Older room versions don't understand this join rule
|
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A properly formatted join event should work.
|
# A properly formatted join event should work.
|
||||||
authorised_join_event = _join_event(
|
authorised_join_event = _join_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
pleb,
|
pleb,
|
||||||
additional_content={
|
additional_content={
|
||||||
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@creator:example.com"
|
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@creator:example.com"
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
authorised_join_event,
|
authorised_join_event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
@ -408,14 +422,16 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
# are done properly).
|
# are done properly).
|
||||||
pl_auth_events = auth_events.copy()
|
pl_auth_events = auth_events.copy()
|
||||||
pl_auth_events[("m.room.power_levels", "")] = _power_levels_event(
|
pl_auth_events[("m.room.power_levels", "")] = _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@inviter:foo.test": 150}}
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
|
creator,
|
||||||
|
{"invite": 100, "users": {"@inviter:foo.test": 150}},
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event(
|
pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event(
|
||||||
"@inviter:foo.test"
|
RoomVersions.V8, "@inviter:foo.test"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
_join_event(
|
_join_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
pleb,
|
pleb,
|
||||||
additional_content={
|
additional_content={
|
||||||
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@inviter:foo.test"
|
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@inviter:foo.test"
|
||||||
@ -427,20 +443,21 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
# A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected.
|
# A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected.
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected.
|
# An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected.
|
||||||
pl_auth_events = auth_events.copy()
|
pl_auth_events = auth_events.copy()
|
||||||
pl_auth_events[("m.room.power_levels", "")] = _power_levels_event(
|
pl_auth_events[("m.room.power_levels", "")] = _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}}
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
|
creator,
|
||||||
|
{"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}},
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
_join_event(
|
_join_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
pleb,
|
pleb,
|
||||||
additional_content={
|
additional_content={
|
||||||
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@other:example.com"
|
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@other:example.com"
|
||||||
@ -453,8 +470,8 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
# *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.)
|
# *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
_member_event(
|
_member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||||
pleb,
|
pleb,
|
||||||
"join",
|
"join",
|
||||||
sender=creator,
|
sender=creator,
|
||||||
@ -466,39 +483,41 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "ban"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
authorised_join_event,
|
authorised_join_event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user who left can re-join.
|
# A user who left can re-join.
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "leave"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
|
||||||
authorised_join_event,
|
authorised_join_event,
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to
|
# A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to
|
||||||
# be authorised since the user is already joined.)
|
# be authorised since the user is already joined.)
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
|
RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "join"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since
|
# A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since
|
||||||
# the user was invited.)
|
# the user was invited.)
|
||||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
_join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb),
|
||||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
|
||||||
auth_events.values(),
|
auth_events.values(),
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -508,20 +527,25 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
TEST_ROOM_ID = "!test:room"
|
TEST_ROOM_ID = "!test:room"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _create_event(user_id: str) -> EventBase:
|
def _create_event(
|
||||||
|
room_version: RoomVersion,
|
||||||
|
user_id: str,
|
||||||
|
) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
return make_event_from_dict(
|
return make_event_from_dict(
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "m.room.create",
|
"type": "m.room.create",
|
||||||
"state_key": "",
|
"state_key": "",
|
||||||
"sender": user_id,
|
"sender": user_id,
|
||||||
"content": {"creator": user_id},
|
"content": {"creator": user_id},
|
||||||
}
|
},
|
||||||
|
room_version=room_version,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _member_event(
|
def _member_event(
|
||||||
|
room_version: RoomVersion,
|
||||||
user_id: str,
|
user_id: str,
|
||||||
membership: str,
|
membership: str,
|
||||||
sender: Optional[str] = None,
|
sender: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||||
@ -530,79 +554,102 @@ def _member_event(
|
|||||||
return make_event_from_dict(
|
return make_event_from_dict(
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "m.room.member",
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
||||||
"sender": sender or user_id,
|
"sender": sender or user_id,
|
||||||
"state_key": user_id,
|
"state_key": user_id,
|
||||||
"content": {"membership": membership, **(additional_content or {})},
|
"content": {"membership": membership, **(additional_content or {})},
|
||||||
"prev_events": [],
|
"prev_events": [],
|
||||||
}
|
},
|
||||||
|
room_version=room_version,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _join_event(user_id: str, additional_content: Optional[dict] = None) -> EventBase:
|
def _join_event(
|
||||||
return _member_event(user_id, "join", additional_content=additional_content)
|
room_version: RoomVersion,
|
||||||
|
user_id: str,
|
||||||
|
additional_content: Optional[dict] = None,
|
||||||
|
) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
|
return _member_event(
|
||||||
|
room_version,
|
||||||
|
user_id,
|
||||||
|
"join",
|
||||||
|
additional_content=additional_content,
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _power_levels_event(sender: str, content: JsonDict) -> EventBase:
|
def _power_levels_event(
|
||||||
|
room_version: RoomVersion,
|
||||||
|
sender: str,
|
||||||
|
content: JsonDict,
|
||||||
|
) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
return make_event_from_dict(
|
return make_event_from_dict(
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "m.room.power_levels",
|
"type": "m.room.power_levels",
|
||||||
"sender": sender,
|
"sender": sender,
|
||||||
"state_key": "",
|
"state_key": "",
|
||||||
"content": content,
|
"content": content,
|
||||||
}
|
},
|
||||||
|
room_version=room_version,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _alias_event(sender: str, **kwargs) -> EventBase:
|
def _alias_event(room_version: RoomVersion, sender: str, **kwargs) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
data = {
|
data = {
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "m.room.aliases",
|
"type": "m.room.aliases",
|
||||||
"sender": sender,
|
"sender": sender,
|
||||||
"state_key": get_domain_from_id(sender),
|
"state_key": get_domain_from_id(sender),
|
||||||
"content": {"aliases": []},
|
"content": {"aliases": []},
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
data.update(**kwargs)
|
data.update(**kwargs)
|
||||||
return make_event_from_dict(data)
|
return make_event_from_dict(data, room_version=room_version)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _random_state_event(sender: str) -> EventBase:
|
def _random_state_event(room_version: RoomVersion, sender: str) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
return make_event_from_dict(
|
return make_event_from_dict(
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "test.state",
|
"type": "test.state",
|
||||||
"sender": sender,
|
"sender": sender,
|
||||||
"state_key": "",
|
"state_key": "",
|
||||||
"content": {"membership": "join"},
|
"content": {"membership": "join"},
|
||||||
}
|
},
|
||||||
|
room_version=room_version,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _join_rules_event(sender: str, join_rule: str) -> EventBase:
|
def _join_rules_event(
|
||||||
|
room_version: RoomVersion, sender: str, join_rule: str
|
||||||
|
) -> EventBase:
|
||||||
return make_event_from_dict(
|
return make_event_from_dict(
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
|
||||||
"event_id": _get_event_id(),
|
**_maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version),
|
||||||
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
||||||
"sender": sender,
|
"sender": sender,
|
||||||
"state_key": "",
|
"state_key": "",
|
||||||
"content": {
|
"content": {
|
||||||
"join_rule": join_rule,
|
"join_rule": join_rule,
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
}
|
},
|
||||||
|
room_version=room_version,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
event_count = 0
|
event_count = 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _get_event_id() -> str:
|
def _maybe_get_event_id_dict_for_room_version(room_version: RoomVersion) -> dict:
|
||||||
|
"""If this room version needs it, generate an event id"""
|
||||||
|
if room_version.event_format != EventFormatVersions.V1:
|
||||||
|
return {}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
global event_count
|
global event_count
|
||||||
c = event_count
|
c = event_count
|
||||||
event_count += 1
|
event_count += 1
|
||||||
return "!%i:example.com" % (c,)
|
return {"event_id": "!%i:example.com" % (c,)}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user