implement reserved users for mau limits

This commit is contained in:
Neil Johnson 2018-08-07 17:49:43 +01:00
parent a74b25faaa
commit e8eba2b4e3
4 changed files with 99 additions and 13 deletions

View file

@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
import logging
from twisted.internet import defer
@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ from synapse.util.caches.descriptors import cached
from ._base import SQLBaseStore
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Number of msec of granularity to store the monthly_active_user timestamp
# This means it is not necessary to update the table on every request
@ -26,24 +28,31 @@ LAST_SEEN_GRANULARITY = 60 * 60 * 1000
class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def __init__(self, dbconn, hs):
super(MonthlyActiveUsersStore, self).__init__(None, hs)
self._clock = hs.get_clock()
self.hs = hs
threepids = self.hs.config.mau_limits_reserved_threepids
self.reserved_user_ids = set()
self.reserved_users = ()
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def initialise_reserved_users(self, threepids):
# TODO Why can't I do this in init?
store = self.hs.get_datastore()
reserved_user_list = []
for tp in threepids:
user_id = yield hs.get_datastore().get_user_id_by_threepid(
user_id = yield store.get_user_id_by_threepid(
tp["medium"], tp["address"]
)
if user_id:
self.reserved_user_ids.add(user_id)
self.upsert_monthly_active_user(user_id)
reserved_user_list.append(user_id)
else:
logger.warning(
"mau limit reserved threepid %s not found in db" % tp
)
self.reserved_users = tuple(reserved_user_list)
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def reap_monthly_active_users(self):
"""
Cleans out monthly active user table to ensure that no stale
@ -58,8 +67,20 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
int(self._clock.time_msec()) - (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 30)
)
# Purge stale users
sql = "DELETE FROM monthly_active_users WHERE timestamp < ?"
txn.execute(sql, (thirty_days_ago,))
# questionmarks is a hack to overcome sqlite not supporting
# tuples in 'WHERE IN %s'
questionmarks = '?' * len(self.reserved_users)
query_args = [thirty_days_ago]
query_args.extend(self.reserved_users)
sql = """
DELETE FROM monthly_active_users
WHERE timestamp < ?
AND user_id NOT IN ({})
""".format(','.join(questionmarks))
txn.execute(sql, query_args)
# If MAU user count still exceeds the MAU threshold, then delete on
# a least recently active basis.
@ -69,6 +90,8 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
# While Postgres does not require 'LIMIT', but also does not support
# negative LIMIT values. So there is no way to write it that both can
# support
query_args = [self.hs.config.max_mau_value]
query_args.extend(self.reserved_users)
sql = """
DELETE FROM monthly_active_users
WHERE user_id NOT IN (
@ -76,8 +99,9 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
ORDER BY timestamp DESC
LIMIT ?
)
"""
txn.execute(sql, (self.hs.config.max_mau_value,))
AND user_id NOT IN ({})
""".format(','.join(questionmarks))
txn.execute(sql, query_args)
yield self.runInteraction("reap_monthly_active_users", _reap_users)
# It seems poor to invalidate the whole cache, Postgres supports
@ -136,7 +160,7 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
Arguments:
user_id (str): user to add/update
Return:
int : timestamp since last seen, None if never seen
Deferred[int] : timestamp since last seen, None if never seen
"""
@ -158,7 +182,6 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(SQLBaseStore):
Args:
user_id(str): the user_id to query
"""
if self.hs.config.limit_usage_by_mau:
last_seen_timestamp = yield self._user_last_seen_monthly_active(user_id)
now = self.hs.get_clock().time_msec()