mirror of
https://git.anonymousland.org/anonymousland/synapse.git
synced 2025-05-02 11:26:09 -04:00
Merge branch 'develop' of github.com:matrix-org/synapse into registration-api-changes
This commit is contained in:
commit
bf6fa6dd3d
73 changed files with 8192 additions and 3952 deletions
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ If you already have an account, you must **login** into it.
|
|||
|
||||
`Try out the fiddle`__
|
||||
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/4q2jyxng/
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/jquery/1.8.3/matrix-org/synapse/tree/master/jsfiddles/register_login
|
||||
|
||||
Registration
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ user and **send a message** to that room.
|
|||
|
||||
`Try out the fiddle`__
|
||||
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/zL3zto9g/
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/jquery/1.8.3/matrix-org/synapse/tree/master/jsfiddles/create_room_send_msg
|
||||
|
||||
Creating a room
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ join a room **via a room alias** if one was set up.
|
|||
|
||||
`Try out the fiddle`__
|
||||
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/7fhotf1b/
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/jquery/1.8.3/matrix-org/synapse/tree/master/jsfiddles/room_memberships
|
||||
|
||||
Inviting a user to a room
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ of getting events, depending on what the client already knows.
|
|||
|
||||
`Try out the fiddle`__
|
||||
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/vw11mg37/
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/jquery/1.8.3/matrix-org/synapse/tree/master/jsfiddles/event_stream
|
||||
|
||||
Getting all state
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
@ -633,4 +633,4 @@ application.
|
|||
|
||||
`Try out the fiddle`__
|
||||
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/uztL3yme/
|
||||
.. __: http://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/jquery/1.8.3/matrix-org/synapse/tree/master/jsfiddles/example_app
|
||||
|
|
79
docs/human-id-rules.rst
Normal file
79
docs/human-id-rules.rst
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|||
This document outlines the format for human-readable IDs within matrix.
|
||||
|
||||
Overview
|
||||
--------
|
||||
UTF-8 is quickly becoming the standard character encoding set on the web. As
|
||||
such, Matrix requires that all strings MUST be encoded as UTF-8. However,
|
||||
using Unicode as the character set for human-readable IDs is troublesome. There
|
||||
are many different characters which appear identical to each other, but would
|
||||
identify different users. In addition, there are non-printable characters which
|
||||
cannot be rendered by the end-user. This opens up a security vulnerability with
|
||||
phishing/spoofing of IDs, commonly known as a homograph attack.
|
||||
|
||||
Web browers encountered this problem when International Domain Names were
|
||||
introduced. A variety of checks were put in place in order to protect users. If
|
||||
an address failed the check, the raw punycode would be displayed to disambiguate
|
||||
the address. Similar checks are performed by home servers in Matrix. However,
|
||||
Matrix does not use punycode representations, and so does not show raw punycode
|
||||
on a failed check. Instead, home servers must outright reject these misleading
|
||||
IDs.
|
||||
|
||||
Types of human-readable IDs
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
There are two main human-readable IDs in question:
|
||||
|
||||
- Room aliases
|
||||
- User IDs
|
||||
|
||||
Room aliases look like ``#localpart:domain``. These aliases point to opaque
|
||||
non human-readable room IDs. These pointers can change, so there is already an
|
||||
issue present with the same ID pointing to a different destination at a later
|
||||
date.
|
||||
|
||||
User IDs look like ``@localpart:domain``. These represent actual end-users, and
|
||||
unlike room aliases, there is no layer of indirection. This presents a much
|
||||
greater concern with homograph attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
Checks
|
||||
------
|
||||
- Similar to web browsers.
|
||||
- blacklisted chars (e.g. non-printable characters)
|
||||
- mix of language sets from 'preferred' language not allowed.
|
||||
- Language sets from CLDR dataset.
|
||||
- Treated in segments (localpart, domain)
|
||||
- Additional restrictions for ease of processing IDs.
|
||||
- Room alias localparts MUST NOT have ``#`` or ``:``.
|
||||
- User ID localparts MUST NOT have ``@`` or ``:``.
|
||||
|
||||
Rejecting
|
||||
---------
|
||||
- Home servers MUST reject room aliases which do not pass the check, both on
|
||||
GETs and PUTs.
|
||||
- Home servers MUST reject user ID localparts which do not pass the check, both
|
||||
on creation and on events.
|
||||
- Any home server whose domain does not pass this check, MUST use their punycode
|
||||
domain name instead of the IDN, to prevent other home servers rejecting you.
|
||||
- Error code is ``M_FAILED_HUMAN_ID_CHECK``. (generic enough for both failing
|
||||
due to homograph attacks, and failing due to including ``:`` s, etc)
|
||||
- Error message MAY go into further information about which characters were
|
||||
rejected and why.
|
||||
- Error message SHOULD contain a ``failed_keys`` key which contains an array
|
||||
of strings which represent the keys which failed the check e.g::
|
||||
|
||||
failed_keys: [ user_id, room_alias ]
|
||||
|
||||
Other considerations
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
- Basic security: Informational key on the event attached by HS to say "unsafe
|
||||
ID". Problem: clients can just ignore it, and since it will appear only very
|
||||
rarely, easy to forget when implementing clients.
|
||||
- Moderate security: Requires client handshake. Forces clients to implement
|
||||
a check, else they cannot communicate with the misleading ID. However, this is
|
||||
extra overhead in both client implementations and round-trips.
|
||||
- High security: Outright rejection of the ID at the point of creation /
|
||||
receiving event. Point of creation rejection is preferable to avoid the ID
|
||||
entering the system in the first place. However, malicious HSes can just allow
|
||||
the ID. Hence, other home servers must reject them if they see them in events.
|
||||
Client never sees the problem ID, provided the HS is correctly implemented.
|
||||
- High security decided; client doesn't need to worry about it, no additional
|
||||
protocol complexity aside from rejection of an event.
|
|
@ -1182,16 +1182,16 @@ This event is sent by the caller when they wish to establish a call.
|
|||
- ``type`` : "string" - The type of session description, in this case 'offer'
|
||||
- ``sdp`` : "string" - The SDP text of the session description
|
||||
|
||||
``m.call.candidate``
|
||||
``m.call.candidates``
|
||||
This event is sent by callers after sending an invite and by the callee after answering.
|
||||
Its purpose is to give the other party an additional ICE candidate to try using to
|
||||
Its purpose is to give the other party additional ICE candidates to try using to
|
||||
communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
Required keys:
|
||||
- ``call_id`` : "string" - The ID of the call this event relates to
|
||||
- ``version`` : "integer" - The version of the VoIP specification this messages
|
||||
adheres to. his specification is version 0.
|
||||
- ``candidate`` : "candidate object" - Object describing the candidate.
|
||||
- ``candidates`` : "array of candidate objects" - Array of object describing the candidates.
|
||||
|
||||
``Candidate Object``
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1249,7 +1249,33 @@ Or a rejected call:
|
|||
<------- m.call.hangup
|
||||
|
||||
Calls are negotiated according to the WebRTC specification.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Glare
|
||||
-----
|
||||
This specification aims to address the problem of two users calling each other
|
||||
at roughly the same time and their invites crossing on the wire. It is a far
|
||||
better experience for the users if their calls are connected if it is clear
|
||||
that their intention is to set up a call with one another.
|
||||
|
||||
In Matrix, calls are to rooms rather than users (even if those rooms may only
|
||||
contain one other user) so we consider calls which are to the same room.
|
||||
|
||||
The rules for dealing with such a situation are as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
- If an invite to a room is received whilst the client is preparing to send an
|
||||
invite to the same room, the client should cancel its outgoing call and
|
||||
instead automatically accept the incoming call on behalf of the user.
|
||||
- If an invite to a room is received after the client has sent an invite to the
|
||||
same room and is waiting for a response, the client should perform a
|
||||
lexicographical comparison of the call IDs of the two calls and use the
|
||||
lesser of the two calls, aborting the greater. If the incoming call is the
|
||||
lesser, the client should accept this call on behalf of the user.
|
||||
|
||||
The call setup should appear seamless to the user as if they had simply placed
|
||||
a call and the other party had accepted. Thusly, any media stream that had been
|
||||
setup for use on a call should be transferred and used for the call that
|
||||
replaces it.
|
||||
|
||||
Profiles
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue