Rename database classes to make some sense (#8033)

This commit is contained in:
Erik Johnston 2020-08-05 21:38:57 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 0a86850ba3
commit a7bdf98d01
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
337 changed files with 1408 additions and 1323 deletions

View file

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
self.pump(0)
result = self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_select_list(
self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="user_ips",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcols=["access_token", "ip", "user_agent", "device_id", "last_seen"],
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
self.pump(0)
result = self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_select_list(
self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="user_ips",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcols=["access_token", "ip", "user_agent", "device_id", "last_seen"],
@ -204,10 +204,10 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
def test_devices_last_seen_bg_update(self):
# First make sure we have completed all updates.
while not self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
self.store.db_pool.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
):
self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
self.store.db_pool.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
)
user_id = "@user:id"
@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# But clear the associated entry in devices table
self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_update(
self.store.db_pool.simple_update(
table="devices",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id, "device_id": device_id},
updatevalues={"last_seen": None, "ip": None, "user_agent": None},
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# Register the background update to run again.
self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_insert(
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
table="background_updates",
values={
"update_name": "devices_last_seen",
@ -263,14 +263,14 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
)
# ... and tell the DataStore that it hasn't finished all updates yet
self.store.db.updates._all_done = False
self.store.db_pool.updates._all_done = False
# Now let's actually drive the updates to completion
while not self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
self.store.db_pool.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
):
self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
self.store.db_pool.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
)
# We should now get the correct result again
@ -293,10 +293,10 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
def test_old_user_ips_pruned(self):
# First make sure we have completed all updates.
while not self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
self.store.db_pool.updates.has_completed_background_updates()
):
self.get_success(
self.store.db.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
self.store.db_pool.updates.do_next_background_update(100), by=0.1
)
user_id = "@user:id"
@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# We should see that in the DB
result = self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_select_list(
self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="user_ips",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcols=["access_token", "ip", "user_agent", "device_id", "last_seen"],
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ class ClientIpStoreTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# We should get no results.
result = self.get_success(
self.store.db.simple_select_list(
self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="user_ips",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcols=["access_token", "ip", "user_agent", "device_id", "last_seen"],