mirror of
https://git.anonymousland.org/anonymousland/synapse.git
synced 2025-05-02 13:46:02 -04:00
Split event_auth.check
into two parts (#10940)
Broadly, the existing `event_auth.check` function has two parts: * a validation section: checks that the event isn't too big, that it has the rught signatures, etc. This bit is independent of the rest of the state in the room, and so need only be done once for each event. * an auth section: ensures that the event is allowed, given the rest of the state in the room. This gets done multiple times, against various sets of room state, because it forms part of the state res algorithm. Currently, this is implemented with `do_sig_check` and `do_size_check` parameters, but I think that makes everything hard to follow. Instead, we split the function in two and call each part separately where it is needed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a19aa8b162
commit
428174f902
10 changed files with 177 additions and 172 deletions
|
@ -37,21 +37,19 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# creator should be able to send state
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_random_state_event(creator),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# joiner should not be able to send state
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
AuthError,
|
||||
event_auth.check,
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_random_state_event(joiner),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_state_default_level(self):
|
||||
|
@ -76,19 +74,17 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# pleb should not be able to send state
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
AuthError,
|
||||
event_auth.check,
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_random_state_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
# king should be able to send state
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_random_state_event(king),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_alias_event(self):
|
||||
|
@ -101,37 +97,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reject an event with no state key.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room.
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_alias_event(other),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_msc2432_alias_event(self):
|
||||
|
@ -144,34 +136,30 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# creator should be able to send aliases
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# No particular checks are done on the state key.
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_alias_event(other),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_msc2209(self):
|
||||
|
@ -191,20 +179,18 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level.
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V1,
|
||||
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# But an MSC2209 room rejects this change.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_join_rules_public(self):
|
||||
|
@ -221,59 +207,53 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Check join.
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user who left can re-join.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can accept an invite.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_join_rules_invite(self):
|
||||
|
@ -291,60 +271,54 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
# A join without an invite is rejected.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user who left cannot re-join.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can accept an invite.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self):
|
||||
|
@ -369,11 +343,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
# Older room versions don't understand this join rule
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V6,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A properly formatted join event should work.
|
||||
|
@ -383,11 +356,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
"join_authorised_via_users_server": "@creator:example.com"
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
authorised_join_event,
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks
|
||||
|
@ -399,7 +371,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event(
|
||||
"@inviter:foo.test"
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_join_event(
|
||||
pleb,
|
||||
|
@ -408,16 +380,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
},
|
||||
),
|
||||
pl_auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected.
|
||||
|
@ -426,7 +396,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_join_event(
|
||||
pleb,
|
||||
|
@ -435,13 +405,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
},
|
||||
),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which
|
||||
# *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_member_event(
|
||||
pleb,
|
||||
|
@ -452,36 +421,32 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
},
|
||||
),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Banned should be rejected.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
authorised_join_event,
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user who left can re-join.
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
authorised_join_event,
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to
|
||||
# be authorised since the user is already joined.)
|
||||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since
|
||||
|
@ -489,11 +454,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
|
||||
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
|
||||
)
|
||||
event_auth.check(
|
||||
event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
|
||||
RoomVersions.V8,
|
||||
_join_event(pleb),
|
||||
auth_events,
|
||||
do_sig_check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue