mirror of
https://git.anonymousland.org/anonymousland/synapse.git
synced 2024-10-01 11:49:51 -04:00
140 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
140 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
|
# Refresh Tokens
|
||
|
|
||
|
Synapse supports refresh tokens since version 1.49 (some earlier versions had support for an earlier, experimental draft of [MSC2918] which is not compatible).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
[MSC2918]: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blob/main/proposals/2918-refreshtokens.md#msc2918-refresh-tokens
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Background and motivation
|
||
|
|
||
|
Synapse users' sessions are identified by **access tokens**; access tokens are
|
||
|
issued to users on login. Each session gets a unique access token which identifies
|
||
|
it; the access token must be kept secret as it grants access to the user's account.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Traditionally, these access tokens were eternally valid (at least until the user
|
||
|
explicitly chose to log out).
|
||
|
|
||
|
In some cases, it may be desirable for these access tokens to expire so that the
|
||
|
potential damage caused by leaking an access token is reduced.
|
||
|
On the other hand, forcing a user to re-authenticate (log in again) often might
|
||
|
be too much of an inconvenience.
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Refresh tokens** are a mechanism to avoid some of this inconvenience whilst
|
||
|
still getting most of the benefits of short access token lifetimes.
|
||
|
Refresh tokens are also a concept present in OAuth 2 — further reading is available
|
||
|
[here](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-1.5).
|
||
|
|
||
|
When refresh tokens are in use, both an access token and a refresh token will be
|
||
|
issued to users on login. The access token will expire after a predetermined amount
|
||
|
of time, but otherwise works in the same way as before. When the access token is
|
||
|
close to expiring (or has expired), the user's client should present the homeserver
|
||
|
(Synapse) with the refresh token.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The homeserver will then generate a new access token and refresh token for the user
|
||
|
and return them. The old refresh token is invalidated and can not be used again*.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, refresh tokens also make it possible for sessions to be logged out if they
|
||
|
are inactive for too long, before the session naturally ends; see the configuration
|
||
|
guide below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
*To prevent issues if clients lose connection half-way through refreshing a token,
|
||
|
the refresh token is only invalidated once the new access token has been used at
|
||
|
least once. For all intents and purposes, the above simplification is sufficient.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Caveats
|
||
|
|
||
|
There are some caveats:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* If a third party gets both your access token and refresh token, they will be able to
|
||
|
continue to enjoy access to your session.
|
||
|
* This is still an improvement because you (the user) will notice when *your*
|
||
|
session expires and you're not able to use your refresh token.
|
||
|
That would be a giveaway that someone else has compromised your session.
|
||
|
You would be able to log in again and terminate that session.
|
||
|
Previously (with long-lived access tokens), a third party that has your access
|
||
|
token could go undetected for a very long time.
|
||
|
* Clients need to implement support for refresh tokens in order for them to be a
|
||
|
useful mechanism.
|
||
|
* It is up to homeserver administrators if they want to issue long-lived access
|
||
|
tokens to clients not implementing refresh tokens.
|
||
|
* For compatibility, it is likely that they should, at least until client support
|
||
|
is widespread.
|
||
|
* Users with clients that support refresh tokens will still benefit from the
|
||
|
added security; it's not possible to downgrade a session to using long-lived
|
||
|
access tokens so this effectively gives users the choice.
|
||
|
* In a closed environment where all users use known clients, this may not be
|
||
|
an issue as the homeserver administrator can know if the clients have refresh
|
||
|
token support. In that case, the non-refreshable access token lifetime
|
||
|
may be set to a short duration so that a similar level of security is provided.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Configuration Guide
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following configuration options, in the `registration` section, are related:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* `session_lifetime`: maximum length of a session, even if it's refreshed.
|
||
|
In other words, the client must log in again after this time period.
|
||
|
In most cases, this can be unset (infinite) or set to a long time (years or months).
|
||
|
* `refreshable_access_token_lifetime`: lifetime of access tokens that are created
|
||
|
by clients supporting refresh tokens.
|
||
|
This should be short; a good value might be 5 minutes (`5m`).
|
||
|
* `nonrefreshable_access_token_lifetime`: lifetime of access tokens that are created
|
||
|
by clients which don't support refresh tokens.
|
||
|
Make this short if you want to effectively force use of refresh tokens.
|
||
|
Make this long if you don't want to inconvenience users of clients which don't
|
||
|
support refresh tokens (by forcing them to frequently re-authenticate using
|
||
|
login credentials).
|
||
|
* `refresh_token_lifetime`: lifetime of refresh tokens.
|
||
|
In other words, the client must refresh within this time period to maintain its session.
|
||
|
Unless you want to log inactive sessions out, it is often fine to use a long
|
||
|
value here or even leave it unset (infinite).
|
||
|
Beware that making it too short will inconvenience clients that do not connect
|
||
|
very often, including mobile clients and clients of infrequent users (by making
|
||
|
it more difficult for them to refresh in time, which may force them to need to
|
||
|
re-authenticate using login credentials).
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Note:** All four options above only apply when tokens are created (by logging in or refreshing).
|
||
|
Changes to these settings do not apply retroactively.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Using refresh token expiry to log out inactive sessions
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you'd like to force sessions to be logged out upon inactivity, you can enable
|
||
|
refreshable access token expiry and refresh token expiry.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This works because a client must refresh at least once within a period of
|
||
|
`refresh_token_lifetime` in order to maintain valid credentials to access the
|
||
|
account.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(It's suggested that `refresh_token_lifetime` should be longer than
|
||
|
`refreshable_access_token_lifetime` and this section assumes that to be the case
|
||
|
for simplicity.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note: this will only affect sessions using refresh tokens. You may wish to
|
||
|
set a short `nonrefreshable_access_token_lifetime` to prevent this being bypassed
|
||
|
by clients that do not support refresh tokens.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Choosing values that guarantee permitting some inactivity
|
||
|
|
||
|
It may be desirable to permit some short periods of inactivity, for example to
|
||
|
accommodate brief outages in client connectivity.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following model aims to provide guidance for choosing `refresh_token_lifetime`
|
||
|
and `refreshable_access_token_lifetime` to satisfy requirements of the form:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. inactivity longer than `L` **MUST** cause the session to be logged out; and
|
||
|
2. inactivity shorter than `S` **MUST NOT** cause the session to be logged out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This model makes the weakest assumption that all active clients will refresh as
|
||
|
needed to maintain an active access token, but no sooner.
|
||
|
*In reality, clients may refresh more often than this model assumes, but the
|
||
|
above requirements will still hold.*
|
||
|
|
||
|
To satisfy the above model,
|
||
|
* `refresh_token_lifetime` should be set to `L`; and
|
||
|
* `refreshable_access_token_lifetime` should be set to `L - S`.
|