Updated: Modify feature request template for improved clarity

- Updated the description for the "related-issues" section to include specific links for searching issues and pull requests.
- Enhanced clarity in the placeholder text for the "related-issues" section to provide better examples.
- Adjusted the formatting for consistent use of markdown and description clarity.

modified: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml

@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: 🚀 Feature Request
-description: "Submit a proposal for a new feature"
-# title: "[Feature] "
+description: |
+  Submit a proposal for a new feature
+# title: "[Feature]"
 labels: ["feature-request", "P3-low"]
 body:
-  - type: "markdown"
+  - type: markdown
     attributes:
       value: |
         ## **❗ Important: Temporary Delay in Feature Requests and Pull Request Reviews**
@@ -25,25 +26,26 @@ body:
 
         - **Why**: To help maintainers focus on high-priority tasks, we kindly request that unnecessary or repeated pings be minimized. This will help ensure quicker responses for matters that truly need attention.
         - **What This Means**: Non-urgent pings may be ignored or addressed later. Please assess the urgency of your request before pinging a maintainer.
+
   - type: textarea
     id: related-issues
     validations:
       required: true
     attributes:
-      label: "📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests"
-      description:
-        "Search related issues by clicking
-        [HERE](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues?q=) and explain
-        what the difference between them or explain that you are unable to find
-        any related issues"
-      placeholder:
-        "Related to #1 by also touching the ... system. They should not be
-        merged because ..."
+      label: 📑 I have found these related issues/pull requests
+      description: |
+        Please search for related **[ISSUES](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20sort%3Acreated-desc)**
+        and **[PULL REQUESTS](https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Acreated-desc+)**.
+        Explain the differences between them or clarify if you were unable to find any related issues/pull requests.
+      placeholder: |
+        Example: This relates to issue #1, which also affects the ... system. It should not be merged because ...
+
   - type: dropdown
     id: feature-area
     attributes:
-      label: "🏷️ Feature Request Type"
-      description: "What kind of feature request is this?"
+      label: 🏷️ Feature Request Type
+      description: |
+        What kind of feature request is this?
       multiple: true
       options:
         - API / automation options
@@ -60,39 +62,47 @@ body:
         - Other
     validations:
       required: true
+
   - type: textarea
     id: feature-description
     validations:
       required: true
     attributes:
-      label: "🔖 Feature description"
-      description:
-        "A clear and concise description of what the feature request is."
-      placeholder: "You should add ..."
+      label: 🔖 Feature description
+      description: |
+        A clear and concise description of what the feature request is.
+      placeholder: |
+        You should add ...
+
   - type: textarea
     id: solution
     validations:
       required: true
     attributes:
-      label: "✔️ Solution"
-      description: "A clear and concise description of what you want to happen."
-      placeholder: "In my use-case, ..."
+      label: ✔️ Solution
+      description: |
+        A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
+      placeholder: |
+        In my use-case, ...
+
   - type: textarea
     id: alternatives
     validations:
       required: false
     attributes:
-      label: "❓ Alternatives"
-      description:
-        "A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or
-        features you've considered."
-      placeholder: "I have considered ..."
+      label: ❓ Alternatives
+      description: |
+        A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
+      placeholder: |
+        I have considered ...
+
   - type: textarea
     id: additional-context
     validations:
       required: false
     attributes:
-      label: "📝 Additional Context"
-      description:
-        "Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here."
-      placeholder: "..."
+      label: 📝 Additional Context
+      description: |
+        Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
+      placeholder: |
+        ...