mirror of
https://github.com/comit-network/xmr-btc-swap.git
synced 2025-01-25 23:06:00 -05:00
bors[bot]
27bb9498d5
Merge #170
170: Cancel and refund commands r=da-kami a=da-kami
I plugged the cancel and refund logic into the current state/state-machine logic of the swap.
## Follow ups (out of scope)
We might want to record issues to be tackled later, since we are on a tight time budget :)
Please let me know what you think @D4nte @rishflab
### Problems with `ack` after sending a message
Alice was waiting forever when awaiting the `ack` from bob when sending the lock proof in case she runs into a dial error. It seems the `acks` can cause the program to hang. This is a severe problem that we most probably will encountered in production at some point. For this PR I wrapped the `ack` of Alice upon sending the `encsig` in a timeout to work around this problem, see 7463081f88
- but **we might want to consider to remove all `ack` message. I don't see much value in them if we don't have a resilient retry strategy.**
### Do not require Monero wallet for cancel/refund
The cancel/refund commands don't require a monero wallet.
In this PR we re-uses the builder which requires the monero wallet as well - and we check for the monero balance upon wallet initialization, so the command will fail if no monero wallet is started.
### Save Alice connection info in Bob DB
Save Alice's peer-id/address in DB: It's cumbersome for the user to lookup those details again.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Karzel <daniel@comit.network>
XMR to BTC Atomic Swap
This repository is a proof of concept for atomically swapping XMR for BTC.
We define:
- Alice to be the actor that initially holds XMR.
- Bob to be the actor that initially holds BTC.
In the best-case scenario the protocol looks like this:
- Alice and Bob exchange a set of addresses, keys, zero-knowledge proofs and signatures.
- Bob publishes
Tx_lock
, locking up his bitcoin in a 2-of-2 multisig output owned by Alice and Bob. Given the information exchanged in step 1, Bob can refund his bitcoin if he waits until timet_1
by usingTx_cancel
andTx_refund
. If Bob doesn't refund after timet_1
, Alice can punish Bob for being inactive by first publishingTx_cancel
and, aftert_2
, spending the output usingTx_punish
. - Alice sees that Bob has locked up the bitcoin, so she publishes
Tx_lock
on the Monero blockchain, locking up her monero in an output which can only be spent with a secret key owned by Alice (s_a
) and a secret key owned by Bob (s_b
). This means that neither of them can actually spend this output unless they learn the secret key of the other party. - Bob sees that Alice has locked up the monero, so he now sends Alice a missing key bit of information which will allow Alice to redeem the bitcoin using
Tx_redeem
. - Alice uses this information to spend the bitcoin to an address owned by her.
When doing so she leaks her Monero secret key
s_a
to Bob through the magic of adaptor signatures. - Bob sees Alice's
Tx_redeem
on Bitcoin, extracts Alice's secret key from it and combines it with his own to spend the monero to an address of his own.
The repository is structured as a library and a single test function that executes the swap. The library has the following modules:
alice
: Defines the state machine that describes the swap for Alice. This includes the messages sent to/from Alice.bob
: Defines the state machine that describes the swap for Bob. This includes the messages sent to/from Bob.bitcoin
: Keys, signing functions, transactions etc. for Bitcoin. Also includes a test wallet (see below).monero
: Keys, signing functions, transactions etc. for Monero. Also includes a test wallet (see below).
Currently we have a single test function that proves the following:
- Interaction with both block chains and their respective wallets works.
- The messages required are correct and can manually drive the state transitions to execute a swap.
- It is possible to interact with, and watch, the monero blockchain using
monero-wallet-rpc
. - It is possible to watch a bitcoind instance using
bitcoin-harness
(we already knew this :)
Currently we do not do:
- Actual network communication.
- Verification that the UI is acceptable. Since we do everything in a single test function there is no user interaction, this is unrealistic for a real product.
Testing
We wrote a few additional libraries to facilitate testing:
Wallets
bitcoin
module contains a test wallet by way ofbitcoind
.monero
: module contains a test wallet by way ofmonero-wallet-rpc
.
Blockchain harnesses
We have written two harnesses for interacting with bitcoin and monero.
These harnesses wrap interaction with bitcoind
and monerod
/monero-wallet-rpc
.
We use testcontainers-rs to spin up bitcoind
, monerod
, and monero-wallet-rpc
in docker containers during unit/integration testing.
Languages
Rust
99.8%
Shell
0.2%