Reworked Alice XmrLocked state transition handler to handle the
scenario when Alice received the encsig but Bob refunds.
Previously Alice was trying to redeem after receiving the encsig
without checking if t1 had elapsed.
Previously state0 had to be set after creating Alice's behaviour.
With the event loop we no longer has access to the swarm so
set_state0() has to be called indirectly through a channel. This
means it is difficult to guarantee state0 is being set due to the
asynchronous nature of channels. This was solved by initialising
Alice with state0.
Previously the libp2p swarm had to be manually polled within the
protocol execution code to execute actions such as sending a
message. The swarm is now wrapped in SwarmDriver which polls the
swarm in a seperate task
Use reusable test init functions for happy path test
Extract tracing setup to reusable function
Move test initialization to seperate functions
Increase stack size in CI
Fix monero max finality time
Force Bob swarm polling to send message 2
Run Bob state to xmr_locked in punish test to force the sending of
message2. Previously Bob state was run until btc_locked. Although
this was the right thing to do, message2 was not being sent as the
swarm was not polled in btc_locked. Alice punish test passes.
Add info logging to executor
Before this patch Bob is not sending message 3. This is because we are not
polling Bob's swarm correctly. To fix it we can just mimic the other NB's and
bubble up an event when Bob receives message 3 response from Alice, this way we
can `await` upon this event which triggers polling, making Bob's swarm send the
message.
Alice does not respond with anything when receiving message 2 from Bob. We don't
want to leave Bob's request/response protocol waiting so send an empty response
back.
In order for Alice to complete the handshake she needs to transition to state 3,
for this she needs message 2 from Bob.
Send `bob::Message2` to Alice and transition to `State3` - completing the
handshake.
We model the getting of amounts as a network behaviour even though conceptually
it is a protocol. Refine/refactor the code a bit to make this more obvious.
- Use `Amounts` instead of `Messenger`
We only ever connect to a single peer, update peer tracker to reflect this. This
is a single patch because the handling of the two network behaviours is a
intertwined.
- Only track one peer connection
- Track the peer id and the multiaddr of the counterparty
- Emit an event for connection established on Alice's side as well as Bob's side
Add a binary crate `swap` that implements two nodes (Alice and Bob). With this
applied we can start up a node for each role and do:
- Bob: Requests current amounts using BTC is input
- Alice: Responds with amounts
- Bob: (mock) get user input to Ok the amounts
... continue with swap (TODO)
