The bitcoind wallet required the user to run a bitcoind node. It was replaced with a bdk wallet which allows the user to connect to an electrum instance hosted remotely. An electrum and bitcoind testcontainer were created to the test the bdk wallet. The electrum container reads the blockdata from the bitcoind testcontainer through a shared volume. bitcoind-harness was removed as bitcoind initialisation code was moved into test_utils. The bdk wallet differs from the bitcoind wallet in that it needs to be manually synced with an electrum node. We synchronise the wallet once upon initialisation to prevent a potentially long running blocking task from interrupting protocol execution. The electrum HTTP API was used to get the latest block height and the transaction block height as this functionality was not present in the bdk wallet API or it required the bdk wallet to be re-synced to get an up to date value.
190: Do not pass Monero amount to the CLI r=D4nte a=D4nte
The CLI user only pass the Bitcoin amount they want to sell.
The CLI then do a quote request to nectar which provides the Monero amount the taker can get.
Co-authored-by: Franck Royer <franck@coblox.tech>
188: Tor cleanup r=da-kami a=da-kami
We never removed Tor install from CI. I don't think it should be necessary given that Tor was removed in code.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Karzel <daniel@comit.network>
To allow the related timelock to be defined with the
transaction that uses it. This will allow the access to the
timelock's struct inner field with defining `From` impl.
Hence, reducing complexity of the codebase. Note that the seed will be
used by both nectar and the cli whereas the config mod will be different
so this changes helps with the next step of having a dedicated config
module for each binary.
The punish test needs re-work due to the fact that Alice runs continuously
Currently focusing on the CLI (Bob), so we can re-introduce this test
once we want to ensure that nectar (Alice) punishes.
The test do not work without acks as we stop the event loop as soon
as a message is considered as "sent" when actually the event loop
and swarm may not have yet sent the message.
The ack allow to avoid this issue as the message was considered "sent"
only once the other party sent a response. However, the ack brings
other issue so a review needs to be done to select the appropriate
solution.
We are aware of issues of timeouts when waiting for acknowledgements.
Also, to properly supports acks in a multiple swap context, we need to
revert to doing event processing on the behaviour so that we can link
leverage the `RequestResponse` libp2p behaviour and link the messages
requests ids to swap ids when receiving an ack or response.
Acks are usefully for specific scenarios where we queue a message on the
behaviour to be sent, save as sent in the DB but crash before the
message is actually sent. With acks we are able to resume the swap,
without ack, the swap will abort (refund).
`alice::swap::run_until` will be called once the execution setup is
done. The steps before are directly handled by the event loop,
hence no channels are needed for said steps: connection established,
swap request/response & execution setup.
The `EventLoop` will use the `Builder` interface to instantiate a
`Swap` upon receiving a `SwapRequest` and successfully doing an
execution setup.
Before this change, the `EventLoop` would have to hold the path to the
db and re-open the db everytime it wants to construct a swap.
With this change, we can open the DB once and then hold a
`Arc<Database>` in the `EventLoop` and pass it to new `Swap`s structs.
This was introduced due to a CI run, where Bob included tx_refund, but Alice had waited until T2 had expired,
and then went for punishing Bob instead of refunding.
Weirdly, Alice's punich transaction did not fail in that scenario.
If dialing Bob fails Alice waits for the acknowledgement of the transfer proof indefinitely.
The timout prevents her execution from hanging.
Added a ToDo to re-visit the ack receivers. They don't add value at the moment and should be removed.
Alice was attempting to create a new event loop using the same listen addr as the old one which was still running. This commit aborts the event loop before creating a new one.
Upgrade bitcoin harness dependency to latest commit
Upgrade backoff to fix failing tests. The previous version of backoff had a broken version of the retry function. Upgraded to a newer comit which fixes this problem.
Upgrade hyper to 0.14 as the 0.13 was bringing in tokio 0.2.24
Upgraded bitcoin harness to version that uses tokio 1.0 and reqwest 0.11
Upgrade reqwest to 0.11. Reqwest 0.11 uses tokio 1.0
Upgrade libp2p to 0.34 in preparation for tokio 1.0 upgrade
As per the proposed changed in the sequence diagram.
The aim is to have a unique terminology per message instead of having
the same name for 2 consequent messages that share the same behaviour.
Note that the aim is to remove the shared `RequestResponse` behaviours.
Rust fmt automatically groups the imports (from top to bottom) as `pub use` `use crate` and `use`.
There is no need to introduce sections which cause annoyance when auto importing using the IDE.
149: Fix Alice redeem scenario r=da-kami a=da-kami
Follow up of #144, partial fix of https://github.com/comit-network/xmr-btc-swap/issues/137
Fix Alice redeem scenario
- Properly check the timelocks before trying to redeem
- Distinguish different failure scenarios and reactions to it.
- if we fail to construct the redeem transaction: wait for cancel.
- if we fail to publish the redeem transaction: wait for cancel but let the user know that restarting the application will result in retrying to publish the tx.
- if we succeed to publish the tx but then fail when waiting for finality, print error to the user (secreat already leaked, the user has to check manually if the tx was included)
Co-authored-by: Daniel Karzel <daniel@comit.network>
- Properly check the timelocks before trying to redeem
- Distinguish different failure scenarios and reactions to it.
- if we fail to construct the redeem transaction: wait for cancel.
- if we fail to publish the redeem transaction: wait for cancel but let the user know that restarting the application will result in retrying to publish the tx.
- if we succeed to publish the tx but then fail when waiting for finality, print error to the user (secreat already leaked, the user has to check manually if the tx was included)
This is not really a factory as a factory design pattern is about
producing several instances.
In the current usage, we are only interested in one swap instance. Once
the swap instance is created, the factory becomes useless. Hence, it is
more of a builder pattern.
