Some network and application specific code does not belong in the protocol module and was moved.
Eventloop, recovery and the outside behaviour were moved to the respective application module because they are application specific.
The `swap_setup` was moved into the network module because upon change both sides will have to be changed and should thus stay close together.
Having `spot_price` and `execution_setup` as separate protocols did not bring any advantages, but was problematic because we had to ensure that `execution_setup` would be triggered after `spot_price`. Because of this dependency it is better to combine the protocols into one.
Combining the protocols also allows a refactoring to get rid of the `libp2p-async-await` dependency.
Alice always listens for the `swap_setup` protocol. When Bob opens a substream on that protocol the spot price is communicated, and then all execution setup messages (swap-id and signature exchange).
Adds `cancel`, `refund`, `punish`, `redeem` and `safely-abort` commands to the ASB that can be used to trigger the specific scenario for the swap by ID.
Move Alice's spot price logic into a dedicated network behaviour that handles all the logic.
The new behaviour encapsulates the complete state necessary for spot price request decision making.
The network behaviour cannot handle asynchronous calls, thus the balance is managed inside the spot price and has to updated regularly from the outside to ensure the spot price balance check has up to date data.
At the moment the balance is updated upon an incoming quote requests.
Code that is relevant for both ASB and CLI remains in the `network::spot_price` module (e.g. `network::spot_price::Error`).
This allows us to remove all visibility modifiers from the message
fields because child modules (in this case {alice,bob}::state) can
always access private fields of structs.
It also moves the messages into a more natural place. Previously,
they were defined within the network layer even though they are
independent of the libp2p implementation.
This reduces the overall amount of LoC that imports take up in our
codebase by almost 100.
It also makes merge-conflicts less likely because there is less
grouping together of imports that may lead to layout changes which
in turn can cause merge conflicts.
This is essentially functionally equivalent but includes some
cleanups by removing a layer of abstraction: `spot_price::Behaviour`
is now just a type-alias for a request-response behaviour.
The `EventLoop` will use the `Builder` interface to instantiate a
`Swap` upon receiving a `SwapRequest` and successfully doing an
execution setup.
Before this change, the `EventLoop` would have to hold the path to the
db and re-open the db everytime it wants to construct a swap.
With this change, we can open the DB once and then hold a
`Arc<Database>` in the `EventLoop` and pass it to new `Swap`s structs.
Alice was attempting to create a new event loop using the same listen addr as the old one which was still running. This commit aborts the event loop before creating a new one.
Upgrade bitcoin harness dependency to latest commit
Upgrade backoff to fix failing tests. The previous version of backoff had a broken version of the retry function. Upgraded to a newer comit which fixes this problem.
Upgrade hyper to 0.14 as the 0.13 was bringing in tokio 0.2.24
Upgraded bitcoin harness to version that uses tokio 1.0 and reqwest 0.11
Upgrade reqwest to 0.11. Reqwest 0.11 uses tokio 1.0
Upgrade libp2p to 0.34 in preparation for tokio 1.0 upgrade
As per the proposed changed in the sequence diagram.
The aim is to have a unique terminology per message instead of having
the same name for 2 consequent messages that share the same behaviour.
Note that the aim is to remove the shared `RequestResponse` behaviours.
Rust fmt automatically groups the imports (from top to bottom) as `pub use` `use crate` and `use`.
There is no need to introduce sections which cause annoyance when auto importing using the IDE.
This is not really a factory as a factory design pattern is about
producing several instances.
In the current usage, we are only interested in one swap instance. Once
the swap instance is created, the factory becomes useless. Hence, it is
more of a builder pattern.
