Improved logic for 'allow_offline' and 'offline subkey writes'

This commit is contained in:
Christien Rioux 2025-06-18 22:09:36 -04:00
parent 24a098728c
commit 9d4976b243
10 changed files with 756 additions and 237 deletions

View file

@ -253,6 +253,130 @@ async def test_open_writer_dht_value(api_connection: veilid.VeilidAPI):
await rc.delete_dht_record(key)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_open_writer_dht_value_no_offline(api_connection: veilid.VeilidAPI):
rc = await api_connection.new_routing_context()
async with rc:
rec = await rc.create_dht_record(veilid.DHTSchema.dflt(2))
key = rec.key
owner = rec.owner
secret = rec.owner_secret
#print(f"key:{key}")
cs = await api_connection.get_crypto_system(rec.key.kind())
async with cs:
assert await cs.validate_key_pair(owner, secret)
other_keypair = await cs.generate_key_pair()
va = b"Qwertyuiop Asdfghjkl Zxcvbnm"
vb = b"1234567890"
vc = b"!@#$%^&*()"
# Test subkey writes
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is None
vdtemp = await rc.get_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), False)
assert vdtemp.data == va
assert vdtemp.seq == 0
assert vdtemp.writer == owner
vdtemp = await rc.get_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), False)
assert vdtemp is None
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), vb, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is None
await sync(rc, [rec])
vdtemp = await rc.get_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), True)
assert vdtemp.data == vb
vdtemp = await rc.get_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), True)
assert vdtemp.data == va
# Equal value should not trigger sequence number update
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is None
# Different value should trigger sequence number update
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), vb, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is None
# Now that we initialized some subkeys
# and verified they stored correctly
# Delete things locally and reopen and see if we can write
# with the same writer key
await rc.close_dht_record(key)
await rc.delete_dht_record(key)
rec = await rc.open_dht_record(key, veilid.KeyPair.from_parts(owner, secret))
assert rec is not None
assert rec.key == key
assert rec.owner == owner
assert rec.owner_secret == secret
assert rec.schema.kind == veilid.DHTSchemaKind.DFLT
assert rec.schema.o_cnt == 2
# Verify subkey 1 can be set before it is get but newer is available online
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), vc, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is not None
assert vdtemp.data == vb
assert vdtemp.seq == 1
assert vdtemp.writer == owner
# Verify subkey 1 can be set a second time and it updates because seq is newer
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), vc, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
assert vdtemp is None
# Verify the network got the subkey update with a refresh check
vdtemp = await rc.get_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), True)
assert vdtemp is not None
assert vdtemp.data == vc
assert vdtemp.seq == 2
assert vdtemp.writer == owner
# Delete things locally and reopen and see if we can write
# with a different writer key (should fail)
await rc.close_dht_record(key)
await rc.delete_dht_record(key)
rec = await rc.open_dht_record(key, other_keypair)
assert rec is not None
assert rec.key == key
assert rec.owner == owner
assert rec.owner_secret is None
assert rec.schema.kind == veilid.DHTSchemaKind.DFLT
assert rec.schema.o_cnt == 2
# Verify subkey 1 can NOT be set because we have the wrong writer
with pytest.raises(veilid.VeilidAPIError):
await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(1), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
# Verify subkey 0 can NOT be set because we have the wrong writer
with pytest.raises(veilid.VeilidAPIError):
await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(None, False))
# Verify subkey 0 can be set because override with the right writer
# Should have prior sequence number as its returned value because it exists online at seq 0
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(veilid.KeyPair.from_parts(owner, secret), False))
assert vdtemp is not None
assert vdtemp.data == vb
assert vdtemp.seq == 0
assert vdtemp.writer == owner
# Should update the second time to seq 1
vdtemp = await rc.set_dht_value(key, ValueSubkey(0), va, veilid.SetDHTValueOptions(veilid.KeyPair.from_parts(owner, secret), False))
assert vdtemp is None
# Clean up
await rc.close_dht_record(key)
await rc.delete_dht_record(key)
@pytest.mark.skipif(os.getenv("INTEGRATION") != "1", reason="integration test requires two servers running")
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_watch_dht_values():
@ -793,7 +917,7 @@ async def test_dht_write_read_full_subkeys_local():
# Secret to encrypt test data
SECRET = veilid.SharedSecret.from_bytes(b"A"*32)
# Max subkey size
MAX_SUBKEY_SIZE = min(32768, 1024*1024/SUBKEY_COUNT)
MAX_SUBKEY_SIZE = min(32768, 1024*1024//SUBKEY_COUNT)
# MAX_SUBKEY_SIZE = 256
# write dht records on server 0