mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-18 04:04:34 -05:00
85 lines
4.1 KiB
Plaintext
85 lines
4.1 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
The following is a column taken from the April 26, 1994 San Francisco
|
|
Chronicle. The author's name is Scott Marley.
|
|
|
|
Scott Marley
|
|
THE BIBLE TELLS ME SO
|
|
|
|
--The `sin' that obsesses some Christians did not rate a mention by
|
|
Christ himself.
|
|
|
|
Why do Christian fundamentalists hate gays? Because (so they tell
|
|
us) they believe the Bible is infallibly true. And the Bible (so
|
|
they tell us) condemns homosexuals.
|
|
|
|
I've heard that over and over again all my life: The Bible condemns
|
|
homosexuals. And I accepted it without question -- until the last
|
|
couple of years when I've started reading the Bible for myself. And
|
|
I'm more than a little surprised at how little it actually says about
|
|
homosexuals -- and how much it says about those who condemn them.
|
|
|
|
The Bible's alleged condemnation of homosexuals boils down pretty
|
|
much to three passages: the story of Sodom, two verses from
|
|
Leviticus, and the first chapter of Romans.
|
|
|
|
The Sodom story is Genesis 19. Some angels came to Sodom to visit
|
|
Lot, and the men of Sodom gave the angels a hard time, so God
|
|
destroyed the city. If you think the word "know" in verse five means
|
|
"have carnal knowledge of" (which it occasionally does in the Bible,
|
|
though not nearly as often as people seem to think), then maybe the
|
|
men wanted to rape the angels, and I suppose that's a homosexual act
|
|
of a sort.
|
|
|
|
But there are dozens of later references to Sodom, and not once is
|
|
any kind of sexual behavior mentioned. In Ezekiel 16:48-49, God
|
|
Himself even spells out the sins of Sodom. Homosexuality is not on
|
|
His list. And the Bible is infallibly true.
|
|
|
|
Leviticus condemns homosexuality twice, in 18:22 and 20:13. It's
|
|
part of the Mosaic law, a long list of foods and acts that were
|
|
considered unclean, from eating shellfish to cursing your father.
|
|
And one of the big themes of the New Testament, I've been
|
|
discovering, is that Christians are not bound by Mosaic law. If the
|
|
Bible is infallibly true, then Christians may use their own judgment
|
|
in choosing whether to follow the Mosaic law, and should stop all
|
|
this fretting about those who choose differently.
|
|
|
|
And there's the first chapter of Romans, where Paul describes people
|
|
who worship idols instead of God, "wherefore God also gave them up to
|
|
uncleanness," and they turned to homosexuality and a long list of
|
|
other wrongs running the gamut from murder and deceit to whispering.
|
|
I've never heard any of these fundamentalists quote this passage all
|
|
the way to its punch line: "Therefore art thou inexcusable, O man,
|
|
whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another,
|
|
thou condemnest thyself." Paul isn't telling this story to condemn
|
|
the homosexuals: He's condemning the people who condemn the
|
|
homosexuals.
|
|
|
|
Read Romans all the way through and its hard to miss Paul's point:
|
|
He's writing to a group of Jewish Christians who have been
|
|
criticising gentile Christians for not keeping the Mosaic law, and
|
|
Paul is telling them, politely but firmly, to knock it off. If the
|
|
Bible is infallibly true, it's wrong to use Leviticus as a basis for
|
|
condemning homosexuals.
|
|
|
|
Jesus wasn't faced with AIDS, of course, so we can't be sure what he
|
|
would have said or done about it. But he did know another disease
|
|
much like AIDS, both in its incurability and in the way that society
|
|
shunned its victims. I've read the New Testament a couple of times
|
|
through, and I just haven't come across the passage where Jesus goes
|
|
to the funerals of lepers carrying a picket sign.
|
|
|
|
So it seems to me that a real fundamentalist would be preaching that
|
|
it's wrong for a church to exclude people solely because they're gay,
|
|
and it seems to me that a real fundamentalist would be following
|
|
Jesus' example and trying to bring comfort to people with AIDS, and
|
|
perhaps even working toward a cure. The more I get to know the Bible
|
|
for myself, the less I think these so-called fundamentalists are any
|
|
such thing. I think they're wolves in Lamb of God's clothing.
|
|
|
|
--Scott Marley is a writer and editor in the Bay Area.
|
|
|
|
THE PRECEDING WAS A COLUMN WRITTEN BY SCOTT MARLEY AND PRINTED IN THE
|
|
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS
|
|
AND OPINIONS OF THE PERSON WHO ENTERED IT IN THIS ECHO CONFERENCE.
|