mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-18 04:04:34 -05:00
474 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
474 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
RIGHTS GUARANTEED
|
||
|
||
Let's eyeball the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amend-
|
||
ments to the Constitution.
|
||
Now we will really see some fancy magic by the Cult of
|
||
the Black Robes. Decision after decision from federal
|
||
courts across the United States magically become 'law'. The
|
||
Bill of Rights bears no resemblance to the way they were
|
||
originally written.
|
||
When ratifying the Constitution, the states felt there
|
||
were not enough restrictions on the power of the new central
|
||
government. They requested that a Bill of Rights be added
|
||
at the first opportunity. Many argued that no bill of
|
||
rights was needed. Alexander Hamilton said, "The truth is,
|
||
after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitu-
|
||
tion is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful
|
||
purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS."
|
||
Hamilton insisted there was nothing in the Constitution
|
||
which would allow the government to assume powers which the
|
||
bill of rights sought to protect. To reduce the fears of
|
||
some of the states, the First Congress proposed 12 amend-
|
||
ments to the various states for ratification.
|
||
|
||
Here is the preamble to the Bill of Rights as they were
|
||
submitted: "The conventions of a number of the States,
|
||
having at the time of their adopting the Constitution,
|
||
expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or
|
||
abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restric-
|
||
tive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground
|
||
of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the
|
||
beneficent ends of its institution. . "
|
||
|
||
The intent of the First Congress when the Bill of
|
||
Rights were assembled. . 'In order to prevent abuse of its
|
||
powers, we are going to include further restrictions on the
|
||
central government to promote the general welfare, make a
|
||
more perfect union, establish justice and secure the
|
||
blessings of liberty.'
|
||
Every clause in the first ten amendments is a restric-
|
||
tion on the government. It's not how they interpret it nor
|
||
how some judge decides it should apply . . . it's a restric-
|
||
tion, period!
|
||
The first two of the proposed 12 amendments were not
|
||
ratified by the states. The first concerned representation
|
||
in Congress and the second with restricting Congress from
|
||
raising its salary. The first eight amendments are really
|
||
specific restrictions and the last two cover any issue not
|
||
covered in the first eight. The ninth and tenth are the
|
||
ones government ignores the most.
|
||
The First Amendment prohibits the restriction of your
|
||
religious freedoms which we have already covered in earlier
|
||
sections. It covers freedom of speech but if you speak out
|
||
against sensitive issues, you'll be surprised how fast they
|
||
|
||
will shut you up.
|
||
Many people were recently arrested for demonstrating in
|
||
front of the Supreme Court, and in front of the White House
|
||
and Congress. What about the farmers demonstrating in front
|
||
of the Chicago Board of Trade or people involved in the
|
||
abortion issue? Can we still peaceably assemble? Today you
|
||
are free to assemble when the government tells you it is OK
|
||
otherwise, you will probably end up in jail. The charge is
|
||
generally 'criminal trespass'. What? Where did they find
|
||
that one?
|
||
This is a right which has been turned upside down.
|
||
About par for the course, isn't it? By what authority does
|
||
government at any level ignore these restrictive clauses?
|
||
The last clause is the right to petition for a redress
|
||
of grievances. This is one which has fallen into disuse.
|
||
Do you feel you have a grievance against the government?
|
||
The word redress means to right a wrong, correct an
|
||
error, remedy or relieve, to correct or reform. Now do you
|
||
have a grievance that you would like to have redressed?
|
||
Submit a petition.
|
||
There is no specific form to use. The 1st Amendment
|
||
does not specify to which branch of government the petition
|
||
has to be sent. Any branch, department, section, court,
|
||
commission, etc., must accept your petition. They must
|
||
answer and redress what you are complaining about. This is
|
||
a right every reader should exert!
|
||
At the end of the book, you'll find a copy of a
|
||
Petition For Redress of Grievances. It's an ASCII file and
|
||
can be printed out on any printer. It includes the First
|
||
Amendment to show those to whom you are directing your
|
||
petition that you know the amendment. It gives them a
|
||
chance to read it if they don't know what it says. Print it
|
||
then lay out your complaint in your own words.
|
||
The simpler you explain what you want corrected, the
|
||
less chance there is for any bureaucrat to misinterpret what
|
||
you are trying to get across. Also cite whatever provision
|
||
of the constitution you are showing has been violated.
|
||
You might cite the full Ninth and Tenth Amendments to
|
||
prove that the persons to whom you are addressing your
|
||
petition have no authority to assume any powers not specifi-
|
||
cally granted in the Constitution.
|
||
If you are wrong, they will let you know in a hurry. I
|
||
wouldn't accept their answers at face value but check them
|
||
out against my own interpretation of the Constitution and go
|
||
after them again.
|
||
You are perfectly free to address it to anyone in the
|
||
government, be it your own representative, senator, the
|
||
President or Vice-president, the head of a department, a
|
||
judge, the Supreme Court, whomever! Every bureaucrat with
|
||
an ounce of so called power in government should receive a
|
||
petition for redress.
|
||
A likely place to show the people what answers are
|
||
returned would be to write letters to the editors of any
|
||
newspaper in the country.
|
||
This Right to Petition for Redress is a tremendous tool
|
||
for American citizens which has not been used for many
|
||
years. It is an area in the Bill of Rights with which they
|
||
have no experience ignoring so we should make extensive use
|
||
of this right.
|
||
Now the Second Amendment. The judicial branch of
|
||
government, our protectors, have effectively disarmed
|
||
Americans!
|
||
Look at the "gun laws" which courts have upheld all
|
||
over the country. Our 'leaders' have decided that you
|
||
should not own a handgun, assault rifle or a machine gun for
|
||
that matter. What gives them the right to decide that?
|
||
Arms are defined as "Weapons, especially firearms." It
|
||
doesn't say only firearms so where do they make the distinc-
|
||
tion?
|
||
It's plain that the "right of the people to keep and
|
||
bear arms shall not be infringed." It has nothing to do
|
||
with the militia!
|
||
This is part of those declaratory and restrictive
|
||
clauses added to prevent a misconstruction or abuse of it's
|
||
powers.
|
||
They can do nothing which will keep an American citizen
|
||
from owning any weapon he or she desires. It's that simple!
|
||
This was a unique stance for any government to guarantee its
|
||
citizens the right to own weapons. Switzerland is another
|
||
which has such a guarantee.
|
||
Where does it say that arms need to be registered? No
|
||
where! This is part of the prohibition on Congress.
|
||
Registration is a dangerous practice and must be stopped.
|
||
You don't have to look too far into history to see why
|
||
government wants a list of owners of weapons . . . then it's
|
||
no problem to visit everyone on the list and demand the
|
||
weapon be turned in. That is while they hold a weapon on
|
||
the owner.
|
||
We have had presidents shot in our history, other
|
||
people in government have been shot but the Second Amendment
|
||
has stood firm.
|
||
Suddenly, in the early sixties, we have a president
|
||
shot (under circumstances that suggest it was other than a
|
||
plain citizen), then his brother is shot and now all
|
||
Americans are dangerous and should no longer be able to buy,
|
||
have or keep weapons. Isn't that strange?
|
||
Why were the major gun laws passed in 1968 and not when
|
||
other presidents were killed? Is this part of what the
|
||
courts call "public policy" and the Constitution be damned?
|
||
It's a policy to get the weapons away from Americans for
|
||
purposes other than some public official may be shot.
|
||
You hear much talk about guns being authorized only for
|
||
the militia which is gobbledygook. Here are statements of
|
||
several states when they ratified the Constitution and
|
||
requested a Bill of Rights: "The people have a right to
|
||
keep and bear arms; that a well regulated militia,
|
||
including the body of the people CAPABLE OF BEARING ARMS, is
|
||
the proper, natural and safe defence of a free State;".
|
||
|
||
Notice the semicolon after keep and bear arms. . .
|
||
There is no connection of that statement to the well
|
||
regulated militia. These are two complete and separate
|
||
statements.
|
||
Perhaps they no longer want us to be a free State.
|
||
The State of New Hampshire was even more direct in its
|
||
demand on the arms issue. "Congress shall never disarm any
|
||
citizen unless such are or have been in rebellion."
|
||
The people of those times would have never given up
|
||
their weapons whether they were a member of the militia or
|
||
not! The same applies today. No one is forced to own a
|
||
gun. And no one has the right to tell a citizen he or she
|
||
cannot own a gun whatever shape or form it may take.
|
||
Our 'leaders' have probably suddenly discovered that
|
||
they bleed as we do. They want to take away your weapons to
|
||
reduce their chance of bleeding! That is ridiculous also.
|
||
The persons intent on doing bodily harm to anyone will find
|
||
a way to get the weapon they need regardless of what the
|
||
government has to say about weapons.
|
||
If everyone owned a weapon, whether it be a hand gun,
|
||
rifle, shotgun or even a machine gun, there would be a lot
|
||
less violence with weapons.
|
||
The two incidents recently, one in New York City, the
|
||
other in Chicago show that Americans have a right to defend
|
||
themselves. The public and law enforcement officials are
|
||
solidly behind the idea that citizens have that right. Some
|
||
of the elected officials are not so happy about it.
|
||
So what is the purpose of gun laws? Simply people
|
||
control.
|
||
New York City has the first and strictest gun control
|
||
law on the books and what good does it serve? If people are
|
||
intent on committing violence, they will use screwdrivers or
|
||
baseball bats. Are they going to outlaw screwdrivers next?
|
||
Nonsense.
|
||
Look at Switzerland . . . Every able bodied man is
|
||
trained in weapons and issued a weapon to keep in his home,
|
||
ready always. Switzerland has the lowest crime rate in the
|
||
world. There is a lesson there; gun control is an insult to
|
||
the American people.
|
||
Government spends billions on all sorts of weapons but
|
||
feels the citizen who has a constitutional right to have
|
||
weapons is not to be trusted owning a handgun. Is it just
|
||
because they do it and the "guardian of our rights" decide
|
||
they will rubber stamp it because it is 'public policy' now?
|
||
How did a clause designed to be a restriction on big
|
||
brother get turned around to become a restriction on the
|
||
people who delegated the right to be governed?
|
||
Another recent issue in the area of the 2nd Amendment
|
||
shows the contempt the bureaucracy has for us . . bullet
|
||
proof vests. There is a proposal floating around that would
|
||
outlaw anyone except law enforcement personnel from owning
|
||
or wearing a bullet proof vest.
|
||
There will be exceptions to allow our leaders to wear
|
||
one if they desire. They just want to make certain that
|
||
|
||
they will not bleed but we will. How about that?
|
||
How many people would go through the expense of a
|
||
bullet proof vest is questionable. Yet they have no right
|
||
to "pass a law" saying we can't own one.
|
||
Every American citizen should own at least one weapon
|
||
and know how to use it proficiently. Should an incident
|
||
arise, you must be able to protect yourself or family. If
|
||
you have a weapon and never have to use it, what have you
|
||
lost? Nothing . . . and that is the point.
|
||
Every time there is an incident involving a weapon
|
||
where several people are shot or killed, idiots come out of
|
||
the woodwork screaming for more gun control. Yet some jerk
|
||
can drive an automobile into a crowd and kill five or six
|
||
people. No one says we should outlaw automobiles . . . yet
|
||
these people are as dead . . .
|
||
Let me point out now that we have gone through all the
|
||
points on 'keeping and bearing arms'. . . I am NOT a member
|
||
of any gun club or NRA. I just believe in our Constitution.
|
||
The Third Amendment is one which is mainly the result
|
||
of the Revolutionary War. . "No soldier shall be quartered
|
||
in any house. . " but this should be considered together
|
||
with the intent of the 2nd Amendment. It reinforces the
|
||
reason for the 2nd. I sincerely hope we never have to try
|
||
to force the issue of soldiers in American homes through our
|
||
kangaroo court system.
|
||
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
|
||
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
|
||
and seizures, shall not be violated. . " and if you still
|
||
believe that, I have a piece of ocean front property in
|
||
Arizona I want to sell.
|
||
The people of the colonies had a lot of trouble with
|
||
searches and seizures which were conducted by the Kings men.
|
||
They used "Writs of Assistance" which were papers they
|
||
carried in their pockets. They would simply fill out a name
|
||
and hand it to the individual and they had the 'right' to
|
||
search their home.
|
||
There was no need to show "probable cause" or to get a
|
||
warrant from a judicial officer, they just went in a
|
||
person's home and looked and took whatever they decided they
|
||
wanted. See the reason for the 4th Amendment?
|
||
Now the courts have decided that the police can stop an
|
||
automobile, search it and seize what they find without a
|
||
warrant. The executive branch has been given 'authority' to
|
||
go to your bank and get all your records and papers
|
||
(Internal Revenue Service) without even letting you know.
|
||
They can go to the telephone company and get all the records
|
||
of your calls, etc.
|
||
Apparently youngsters in school are not people as
|
||
defined in the 4th Amendment because school officials can
|
||
open a locker and search whenever they want. Does the 4th
|
||
Amendment say schools or school kids are exempt from the
|
||
restriction?
|
||
People who are only accused of a 'crime' have had
|
||
papers taken without search warrants and even had the papers
|
||
|
||
confiscated without any authority in our Constitution. Case
|
||
after case the courts have watered down the Fourth Amendment
|
||
until it is now practically nonexistent. Why?
|
||
More usurpation of the protections we are guaranteed in
|
||
the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. We must assume
|
||
control of our government!
|
||
When we speak of the Fifth Amendment, most people think
|
||
of "someone invoking the Fifth" or refusing to testify
|
||
against himself. (Judges have it even easier, all they have
|
||
to say is it is frivolous.) But the Fifth Amendment is an
|
||
involved amendment and contains a bunch of guarantees.
|
||
There are many parts to the 5th Amendment. . No one
|
||
shall be tried for the same crime twice. . No one shall be
|
||
held to answer for a capital or infamous crime except
|
||
through a Grand Jury. . No one is required to be a witness
|
||
against himself. . . Nor can any citizen be deprived of
|
||
life, liberty or property without due process of law. . Nor
|
||
can private property be taken for public use without just
|
||
compensation! That's a load of protection for us.
|
||
The 5th Amendment is more dead than the 4th Amendment.
|
||
There are some judges who will not even allow the 5th Amend-
|
||
ment to be mentioned in their courtrooms. Do you remember
|
||
what their oath said?
|
||
All the clauses of this amendment are important to our
|
||
survival but the most important part is: "nor be deprived
|
||
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
|
||
This about covers all the other issues of the entire
|
||
amendment.
|
||
Now courts are trying to decide or demanding that a
|
||
citizen define due process. More judicial buffoonery! What
|
||
is the 'law'? First, our Constitution and secondly, all
|
||
laws passed in conformance with the Constitution.
|
||
If your papers are seized without a warrant parti-
|
||
cularly describing the papers to be seized, this is not due
|
||
process. Any reader can figure from that just what due
|
||
process is.
|
||
Did you agree to allow our rights to be ignored or
|
||
purposely violated? If we have all these rights and the
|
||
entire government must respect and protect them, how could
|
||
they possibly do their job?
|
||
In the Sixth Amendment, we examine the rights of a
|
||
person who is accused of a crime. The accused has the right
|
||
to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury where the
|
||
crime was to have been committed.
|
||
The accused also has the right to be informed of the
|
||
nature and cause of the crime he/she is being charged with.
|
||
Also to be confronted by the witnesses against him. They
|
||
also have the right to have the government pay for witnesses
|
||
if the accused can't afford to pay to have them testify for
|
||
him. Further, they have the right to have assistance of
|
||
counsel for their defense.
|
||
Most of this amendment has been turned around. The
|
||
speedy trial requirement has usually been observed. Public
|
||
trial has not. There have been many instances where judges
|
||
|
||
decide what will be made public violating this amendment.
|
||
They claim they have 'discretion' to decide that point.
|
||
Where does this amendment allow for that discretion?
|
||
An impartial jury is a requirement being ignored more
|
||
and more. Government prosecutors have been known to check
|
||
backgrounds of potential jurors through computers and
|
||
eliminate those who would not be favorable to their side.
|
||
They deny this saying this could never happen in our system.
|
||
But they don't always tell the truth as we have seen.
|
||
We spoke earlier about the necessity of an impartial
|
||
jury trying the law as well as the supposed crime. When
|
||
pressed about this, the federales will admit that the jury
|
||
has the right to try the law also but feel they are not
|
||
required to inform the jury of this fact.
|
||
It is most important that any accused person have a
|
||
truly impartial jury as required by this amendment. It
|
||
should not be necessary for a person accused of a crime to
|
||
have to try to prove that the jury was biased in any way.
|
||
This is one of those sneaky points where the government can
|
||
get away with handpicking the jury to assure a conviction.
|
||
If a jury is truly impartial, you should be able to go
|
||
out into the street and pick the first twelve people you
|
||
meet to be jurors.
|
||
Having the right to be confronted with the witnesses
|
||
against him is also by the wayside. Now we have undercover
|
||
agents who simply make an accusation and are protected from
|
||
appearing as required by this amendment.
|
||
Must protect their identity . . . they say. What about
|
||
this constitutional requirement?
|
||
The right to counsel has been twisted out of recogni-
|
||
tion. According to the judges and courts, when it says
|
||
counsel, it means attorney or lawyer.
|
||
But it doesn't say that. Counsel has never been
|
||
defined as an attorney. Judges and attorneys are all
|
||
members of the same fraternity. They have decided that
|
||
counsel means attorney to keep their friends working.
|
||
Why should it matter to a court if you have an
|
||
attorney? They require an attorney because attorneys are a
|
||
member of the court. The courts will then force the
|
||
attorney to follow their rules and sacrifice your rights in
|
||
order not to upset the judge or court. If you were accused
|
||
of a crime and you knew a person who was not an attorney but
|
||
was well versed in law, you have the right under the Sixth
|
||
Amendment to have him assist you in your defense.
|
||
Judges enjoy amending the Constitution and you will
|
||
have a fight on your hands to insist that this right be
|
||
respected. But, what is a little fight with a public
|
||
servant? Remember . . . the judicial branch considers
|
||
rights as fighting words.
|
||
The Seventh Amendment assures the right to a jury trial
|
||
in a civil case according to the practice of common law.
|
||
Common law practice came to this country from Great Britain
|
||
and was used throughout the original thirteen colonies at
|
||
the time the Constitution was adopted. For a good explana-
|
||
|
||
tion of common law, purchase a copy of The Federalist Papers
|
||
and read paper #83 by Alexander Hamilton.
|
||
The right to a trial by jury in a criminal case has
|
||
already been guaranteed in the basic document. Neverthe-
|
||
less, the states wanted this further restriction. The right
|
||
in a civil case where the value in controversy exceeds
|
||
twenty dollars shall be preserved. The case could be tried
|
||
before a judge alone but only if the parties in the suit
|
||
agree to waive the jury.
|
||
This also means that each citizen is guaranteed the
|
||
right to demand a jury trial anytime they are assessed by
|
||
big brother, whether it be a fine or an assessment by the
|
||
Internal Revenue Service. That any controversy where the
|
||
value exceeds twenty dollars, you have the right under this
|
||
amendment to demand that the fact be tried before an
|
||
impartial jury. This was included to prevent overzealous
|
||
actions by the central government and their agents.
|
||
The Eighth Amendment forbids the government from
|
||
demanding excessive bail where, considering the financial
|
||
circumstances of the individual, the government could keep
|
||
someone in jail for an indefinite period where the needs of
|
||
justice would not be served.
|
||
It's obvious that this practice has been turned around
|
||
because judges will decide that they want to hold someone in
|
||
jail and set excessive bail requirements. There again, we
|
||
find judges amending the Constitution violating Article V of
|
||
the basic document. They have decided . . . It's as simple
|
||
as that!
|
||
The men who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of
|
||
Rights knew they could not cover all the events and cir-
|
||
cumstances that might happen in the future so they included
|
||
two more amendments as "catch-alls."
|
||
The Ninth and Tenth Amendments. The first eight
|
||
amendments were abuses which the colonists suffered under
|
||
British Royal rule and were spelled out as prohibitions
|
||
against the national government. Now to make sure the
|
||
government was kept inside the fence of delegated powers,
|
||
they included the Ninth Amendment.
|
||
It reads as follows: "THE ENUMERATION IN THE CONSTITU-
|
||
TION, OF CERTAIN RIGHTS, SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR
|
||
DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE." The Ninth makes
|
||
it unmistakably clear that the government cannot and could
|
||
not interfere with any rights which the people retained.
|
||
These include an endless list of things not spelled out in
|
||
the first eight amendments. A citizen has the right to do
|
||
or not do whatever he or she pleases as long as the rights
|
||
of others are not violated. Of course those choices must be
|
||
in keeping with the JUST laws which conform with and are
|
||
passed in pursuance of the Constitution.
|
||
Now let's again take a look at what the Tenth Amendment
|
||
spells out: "THE POWERS NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES
|
||
BY THE CONSTITUTION NOR PROHIBITED BY IT TO THE STATES, ARE
|
||
RESERVED TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY OR TO THE PEOPLE."
|
||
How do they get away with police powers, making any
|
||
|
||
thing but gold and silver coin as tender, allowing a private
|
||
corporation control the value of our money, establishing
|
||
crimes, etc? These two amendments simply point out what was
|
||
true . . . That the new government was one of specific,
|
||
limited, enumerated powers delegated by us.
|
||
Have they faithfully observed these amendments? Of
|
||
course not. Now you can see why the national government
|
||
ignores these two amendments. They show absolutely that
|
||
they are forbidden from doing anything which was not spelled
|
||
out.
|
||
These two amendments are the 'yardsticks' by which we
|
||
can judge whether any branch of government, be it the
|
||
legislative, executive or judicial, is exceeding it's
|
||
authority. Is our Constitution dead? It's up to you.
|
||
Let's read in part what the Declaration of Independence
|
||
says about rights being violated: "That to secure these
|
||
rights, governments are instituted among men. . That,
|
||
whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these
|
||
ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it,
|
||
and to institute a new government. . [when we are forced to
|
||
suffer] a long train of abuses and usurpations. . It is
|
||
their right, it is their duty, to throw off such govern-
|
||
ment, and to provide new guards for their security."
|
||
Our government, under constitutional standards, has
|
||
only three functions. They are (1) DELIVER OUR MAIL, (2)
|
||
DEFEND OUR SHORES and (3) STAY THE HELL OUT OF OUR LIVES!
|
||
There is nothing further! They have NO OTHER POWER.
|
||
|
||
|
||
REGISTRATION DETAILS COMING UP ....
|
||
|
||
THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT ....
|
||
|