mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-26 07:49:37 -05:00
242 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
242 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Ground Wave Emergency Network
|
|
|
|
GWEN-A Threat
|
|
|
|
According to environmental documents we have received, the United
|
|
States Air Force is actively preparing for fighting and winning a
|
|
protracted nuclear war. Across America, the Air Force is
|
|
constructing up to 400 towers specifically designed to allow the
|
|
transmission of trigger-release codes for B-1 bomber and MX
|
|
missile nuclear warheads at the beginning of nuclear war. This
|
|
system of radio towers is called the Ground Wave Emergency
|
|
Network(GWEN). Neither the Air Force, Congress, nor the American
|
|
public has adequately informed itself about what the use of GWEN
|
|
would mean to life on the planet. Nor, consequently, have we
|
|
been able to make a considered decision on whether we should
|
|
pursue such a politically and environmentally dangerous system.
|
|
|
|
There has been an important change in American plans for fighting
|
|
nuclear war since the early days of nuclear planning. The early
|
|
goal of massive retaliation was replaced in the Kennedy era with a
|
|
policy of "flexible response." More recently, selective use of
|
|
nuclear weapons was seen to be impaired by lack of real time
|
|
Presidential control over our nuclear warfighting capability.
|
|
Carter's Presidential Directive 59(July 25, 1980) set out to
|
|
ensure that improved communication would allow the President or a
|
|
successor to actively pursue nuclear war for a prolonged period.
|
|
These changes in nuclear policy have moved the U.S. toward the
|
|
use of nuclear weapons for war fighting, not war prevention. GWEN
|
|
is part of the system being built to allow nuclear war fighting.
|
|
|
|
What is GWEN?
|
|
|
|
GWEN is a network of low frequency radio towers whose purpose is
|
|
to send release messages to U.S. strategic forces at the beginning
|
|
of and during a nuclear conflict. The Air Force states two main
|
|
rationales for the system: GWEN is resistant to electromagnetic
|
|
pulse (although not hardened against nuclear blasts themselves)
|
|
and is an internally redundant system (messages can be switched
|
|
along various paths when certain towers are destroyed during a
|
|
nuclear war).
|
|
|
|
The network consists of three types of communications stations:
|
|
|
|
Input-Output Stations: These stations can both enter messages
|
|
for transmission through the GWEN network and receive messages
|
|
from the network. An example of such a station is the Strategic
|
|
Air Command headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska.
|
|
|
|
Receive Only Stations: These stations will be located at missile
|
|
command centers and Air Force bases. Emergency Action Messages,
|
|
such as those that order the use of nuclear weapons, will be
|
|
received at these stations.
|
|
|
|
Relay Stations: These stations will make up the bulk of the GWEN
|
|
network and will consist of automated radio relays. These
|
|
stations will be located in areas that are currently not high
|
|
priority military targets (such as Eugene). The relay stations
|
|
will be organized so that messages can be routed around the
|
|
network even if large numbers of the relays are destroyed during
|
|
nuclear war. This will require several hundred relay stations.
|
|
|
|
The GWEN network is currently under construction, although a
|
|
small part of it is already operational. Construction of GWEN is
|
|
to take place in three phases. These phases are:
|
|
|
|
Phase 1: A limited number of test sites, presumably input/output
|
|
stations, have already been built at existing military
|
|
installations.
|
|
|
|
Phase 2: The Thin Line Connectivity Capability, currently under
|
|
construction, consists of 95 towers and would perform the GWEN
|
|
function temporarily.
|
|
|
|
Phase 3: Final Operational Capacity will involve towers
|
|
variously numbered at 158, 240, or "approximately 400," depending
|
|
on the Air Force document/informant cited. This phase has not
|
|
yet been built, nor funds for it appropriated, although the Army
|
|
Corps of Engineers has completed lease negotiations for some of
|
|
the sites.
|
|
|
|
Each site would consist of a 299 foot tower (presumably to get
|
|
around automatic imposition of the National Environmental Policy
|
|
Act requirement for an environmental impact statement for any
|
|
federally-funded 300 foot tower), a concrete building, and a
|
|
series of fences on a 700 foot square site. Underground, a
|
|
"ground screen" of copper wire would radiate to 330 feet at
|
|
regular intervals. Physically unimpressive, the towers are
|
|
presented to the public by the Air Force as radio towers for
|
|
"emergency communications."
|
|
|
|
Each tower will cost $1.4 million, the entire system a billion
|
|
dollars. Other systems such as AFSATCOM, Milstar, Green Pine,
|
|
and Giant Talk are designed to provide nuclear war communications
|
|
at other electromagnetic frequencies and with the same or other
|
|
weapons systems. Because of GWEN's relatively simplistic
|
|
technology, the Air Force presumes that GWEN will be replaced in
|
|
15 years by a satellite system.
|
|
|
|
GWEN and Environmental Law
|
|
|
|
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that
|
|
significant environmental or human health impacts of any proposed
|
|
federal project be assessed and described in an environmental
|
|
impact statement so that the public and decisionmakers can judge
|
|
whether the projects should be undertaken. As a federal project
|
|
funded by public money, the GWEN system and each GWEN tower fall
|
|
under the mandates of this law (whether or not the 300 foot tower
|
|
height is reached).
|
|
|
|
An environmental assessment is less complete than an
|
|
environmental impact statement, involves less public input, ad is
|
|
written for projects that are expected to have no significant
|
|
health or environmental impact. The Generic Environmental
|
|
Assessment for GWEN describes the environmental effects of
|
|
constructing the GWEN towers. It takes into account the
|
|
possibility of encountering "Indian" graves during excavation.
|
|
It states that no weed killers will be used that would
|
|
permanently damage the soil. Portable chemical toilets will be
|
|
used while building te tower. It describes the general range or
|
|
radio wave radiation that will emanate from the tower when in
|
|
use.
|
|
|
|
Despite other Air Force documents clearly demonstrating GWEN is
|
|
being built to assist with nuclear war, the Environmental
|
|
Assessment never mentions the words "nuclear war", nor does it
|
|
describe the role GWEN is to play in nuclear warfighting
|
|
strategy. THe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) demands,
|
|
however, that the effects of a project in use be assessed and
|
|
discussed. In the case of a roadbuilding project, for instance,
|
|
NEPA requires more than an examination of the environmental
|
|
impact of road materials and road construction. NEPA requires a
|
|
discussion of the secondary impacts of using the road, e.g.
|
|
increased auto emissions or alteration of local community life.
|
|
|
|
The impacts of the GWEN system in use as yet remain unaddressed.
|
|
The only time GWEN will be put into use is to either start
|
|
nuclear war, or shortly after nuclear war has started. Its sole
|
|
function is to ensure that nuclear warfighting capability will
|
|
endure through what a Joint Chiefs of Staff publication calls
|
|
"graceful degradation, restart and recovery." On this basis, the
|
|
Air Force is required to review the impacts of a prolonged
|
|
nuclear war on the environment and on human health.
|
|
|
|
The environmental implications of at least four aspects of the
|
|
GWEN system need to be addressed in an environmental impact
|
|
statement:
|
|
|
|
1. GWEN contributes to the execution of prolonged nuclear war.
|
|
|
|
2. Any site on which a GWEN tower is built becomes a higher
|
|
priority target in the event of nuclear war.
|
|
|
|
3. Communications systems such as GWEN are essential for
|
|
conducting a prolonged nuclear war.
|
|
|
|
4. Systems such as GWEN contribute to the illusion that a nuclear
|
|
war is winnable, and therefore thinkable, and therefore more
|
|
likely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Now?
|
|
|
|
Citizens are currently suffering from the schizophrenic situation
|
|
in which scientists ad other technicians develop military
|
|
hardware to fill Caspar Weinberger's prescription that U.S.
|
|
nuclear forces should "prevail even under the conditions of a
|
|
prolonged war", while at the same time being told by other
|
|
scientists (biologists, climatologists, physicians, etc. that
|
|
really very little will prevail under the condition of nuclear
|
|
war except subfreezing temperatures, darkness, exposure to
|
|
ionizing and ultraviolet radiation, starvation, and mass
|
|
extinction.
|
|
|
|
We have reached the point where the mutual concerns of both peace
|
|
activists ad environmentalists are intertwined. There is no
|
|
greater threat to our environment than nuclear war. As our
|
|
government contrives new and more threatening systems for mass
|
|
destruction, the horrifying ad inevitable effects of the use
|
|
these systems must be enumerated if the public and the government
|
|
are to make meaningful and informed decisions.
|
|
|
|
The No-GWEN Alliance contends that the Air Force needs to prepare
|
|
an environmental impact statement that discusses the possibly
|
|
environmental effects of using GWEN to facilitate a prolonged
|
|
nuclear war. On June 27, we filed suit against the Air Force,
|
|
asking the court to enjoin the Air Force from continuing
|
|
construction on the GWEN system until it has described te
|
|
possible effects of GWEN in use, i.e., the effects of prolonged
|
|
nuclear war, and the likelihood that communities such as ours will
|
|
be a high priority for retaliation because of the GWEN system.
|
|
|
|
Several suits have been brought against the military regarding
|
|
weapons systems and they are relevant to our proposed suit:
|
|
Concerned About Trident v. Rumsfeld, Wisconsin v. Weinberger,
|
|
Catholic Action v. Weinberger, and Foundation on Economic Trends
|
|
v. Weinberger. These suits have addressed such issues as the
|
|
applicability of NEPA to the military, the need for assessment of
|
|
alternative sites and longterm effects of the weapon system in
|
|
place, and contemplated versus stated use for a weapons site.
|
|
Western Solidarity v. Reagan is a suit that has not yet been ruled
|
|
on; a minor emphasis of the suit involves the claim that the
|
|
effects of nuclear war must be addressed in the environmental
|
|
impact statement for the MX missile.
|
|
|
|
We have been joined in our efforts by citizens'groups in Chico,
|
|
California, and Amherst, Massachusetts, and by the Commissioners
|
|
of Lane Country, Oregon. Nationally renowned figures, such as
|
|
William Arkin of the Institute for Policy Studies ad Starley
|
|
Thompson of the TTAPS Report on Nuclear Winter have agreed to
|
|
give expert testimony on our behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Can You Help?
|
|
|
|
We need your financial support. As you know, legal suits are
|
|
expensive. The Air Force has virtually limitless funds to
|
|
subvert the intent and process of NEPA. We are a small group of
|
|
citizens who have come together to fight the arms race that is
|
|
being thrust into our backyards, but our goal is to force public
|
|
discussion of the entire concept of prolonged nuclear war rather
|
|
than to merely block the placement of one tower in Eugene. We
|
|
ask you to send a generous personal contribution ad to ask your
|
|
affiliated group to join and/or sponsor our effort.
|
|
|
|
Time is of the essence. The Air Force plans to conclude
|
|
construction of the TLCC phase before the end of the year.
|
|
|
|
It is only through coordinated commitment that this country's
|
|
citizens can seek to hold the military accountable for its
|
|
actions.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself on this issue of
|
|
vital concern to us. Thank you, also, in advance, for your
|
|
considered aid and generosity.
|
|
|
|
For more information, please contact:
|
|
|
|
NO-GWEN ALLIANCE of Lane County
|
|
P.O. Box 3197
|
|
Eugene, OR 97403
|
|
(503) 344-8052
|