mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-17 19:54:27 -05:00
52 lines
3.2 KiB
XML
52 lines
3.2 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
<div class="article">
|
|
<p> I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
|
|
George Mercier</p>
|
|
<p> INSURANCE PROGRAMS
|
|
[Pages 478-479]</p>
|
|
<p>[Certain conventions have been used in converting INVISIBLE CONTRACTS to an
|
|
electronic medium. For an explanation of the conventions used, please download
|
|
the file INCONHLP.ZIP for further illumination. Other background information as
|
|
well is contained in INCONHLP.ZIP. It is advisable to EXIT this file right now
|
|
and read the contents of INCONHLP.ZIP before proceeding with your study of this
|
|
file.]</p>
|
|
<p>Through entry into the juristic highways of Interstate Commerce by
|
|
participation in an insurance policy program, as insurance is Interstate
|
|
Commerce, and the King retains a third party beneficiary status in all
|
|
Commercial transactions that full under his regulatory Commercial Jurisdiction
|
|
penumbra. In 1944, the Supreme Court decided a Case called UNITED STATES VS.
|
|
SOUTH-EASTERN UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, [632]</p>
|
|
<p>[632]============================================================= 322 U.S. 533
|
|
(1944). =============================================================[632]</p>
|
|
<p>which held that insurance, all by itself, is Interstate Commerce; so if you
|
|
manage to participate in policies of insurance, you are participating in
|
|
Interstate Commerce; Federal commercial benefits are being accepted, and the
|
|
reciprocal QUID PRO QUO taxation is necessary. The fact that the insurance
|
|
company may be state chartered and licensed to do business in only one state,
|
|
and that the policy may have been negotiated, accepted, written, and entered
|
|
into in only one state are not relevant indicia as effecting limitations on
|
|
federal Jurisdictions; PERSONS paying premiums on policies of Insurance are
|
|
PERSONS playing in King's Commerce. A year later after UNITED STATES VS.
|
|
SOUTH-EASTERN UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION was ruled upon, the Congress enacted the
|
|
MCCARREN ACT, [633]</p>
|
|
<p>[633]============================================================= 59 Statutes
|
|
33; Title 15, Section 1011 to 1015.
|
|
=============================================================[633]</p>
|
|
<p>declaring that the:</p>
|
|
<p>"... continued regulation and taxation by the several states of the
|
|
business of insurance is in the public interest, and that silence on the part
|
|
of Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier to the regulation or
|
|
taxation of such business by the several states."</p>
|
|
<p>Yes, even the Congress of the United States knows that the application of
|
|
PRINCIPLES OF NATURE relating to silence that are incorporated into the
|
|
RATIFICATION DOCTRINE is even held to be binding on them in some circumstances.
|
|
This Congressional pronouncement, that silence in the context of a proposition
|
|
being made constitutes acceptance, applies to all appropriate factual settings,
|
|
and is held to apply to all PERSONS, even the Congress itself. But as for
|
|
taxation expectations, your acceptance of the benefits of an insurance program
|
|
is deemed as evidence of entry into Interstate Commerce, and hence such
|
|
participants are an object suitable for Federal taxation, regardless of any
|
|
political Status, and regardless of the presence or absence of any other
|
|
juristic contract.</p>
|
|
</div>
|