mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
212 lines
11 KiB
HTML
212 lines
11 KiB
HTML
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>nofredom</title>
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../CSSstyle.css"/>
|
|
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<h1 id="title-index">Politics-Conspiracies-Project</h1>
|
|
<nav id="menu">
|
|
<a href="../index.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Home</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../fulltext2.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../analysis.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Analysis</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../gallery.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Gallery</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../methods.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Methods</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../about.html">
|
|
<div class="button">About</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../GitHub.html">
|
|
<div class="button">GitHub <img alt="github icon"
|
|
src="https://logos-download.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GitHub_logo.png"
|
|
width="15"/>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
</nav>
|
|
<h2>nofredom</h2>
|
|
<p>WHY AMERICANS WON'T CHOOSE FREEDOM</p>
|
|
<p>By JACOB G. HORNBERGER</p>
|
|
<p>All across the land there is an unusual stirring among the
|
|
American populace. The American people are sensing that
|
|
something is severely wrong in our nation. They see the ever-increasing taxation, regulation, bureaucracies, and police
|
|
intrusions. And they are gradually discovering that, despite
|
|
their right to vote, they have no effective control over any
|
|
of this.</p>
|
|
<p>Yet, despite this unease on the eve of America's third century
|
|
of existence, the American people refuse to choose the only
|
|
possible solution to America's woes: freedom--freedom through
|
|
the constitutional elimination of the welfare state/planned
|
|
economy way of life.</p>
|
|
<p>Why this refusal to choose freedom? One answer lies in the
|
|
fact that many Americans do not even realize that they are
|
|
unfree. Having served the required twelve-year sentence in
|
|
public schools, most Americans believe that income taxation,
|
|
subsidies, welfare, protectionism, minimum-wage laws, and all
|
|
of the other aspects of the welfare state/planned economy way
|
|
of life constitute freedom.</p>
|
|
<p>But what about those who have discovered the truth? Are there
|
|
not many of these who still will not choose freedom?
|
|
Unfortunately, the answer is yes. Although recognizing the
|
|
basic immorality of the welfare state/planned economy way of
|
|
life, many freedom devotees have chosen to devote their
|
|
efforts to reforming it rather than eliminating it. Why? Why
|
|
do they insist on defending a way of life which they concede
|
|
is immoral as well as a deprivation of the freedom which they
|
|
value so highly? Let us examine some of the reasons why these
|
|
individuals who know better won't choose freedom.</p>
|
|
<p>One reason is the tremendous fear which most Americans have of
|
|
their own government. The agency of government which Americans
|
|
fear most, of course, is the Internal Revenue Service, the
|
|
tax-collecting arm of the United States government. A mere
|
|
letter of inquiry from the IRS is enough to cause Americans to
|
|
go into a cold sweat. Not that this fear is unjustified. Every
|
|
American knows that the agents of the IRS have virtually
|
|
unlimited power to extract, from the pockets of the citizenry,
|
|
what they consider to be the "rightful" amount owed to the
|
|
political authorities. As Professor Ebeling, FFF's vice-president of academic affairs, once put it on a radio talk
|
|
show in which we were jointly participating, "If you want to
|
|
know the ways and means of the IRS, simply study the
|
|
operations of the KGB."</p>
|
|
<p>But the IRS is not the only agency which inspires great fear
|
|
in the American citizenry. I have a friend who is the
|
|
executive vice-president of a major American bank. He told me
|
|
that most bank presidents, although considered by others (and
|
|
themselves) to be "high-powered" individuals, will quiver and
|
|
quake like an autumn leaf when confronted by a banking
|
|
regulator. In fact, the mere mention of an impending visit by
|
|
banking regulators will send most bankers into the same
|
|
fearful frenzy experienced by an elementary school student who
|
|
is being sent to the principal's office.</p>
|
|
<p>Why? What is it that causes a grown-up to have such a
|
|
paralyzing fear of another grown-up? What causes American
|
|
adults to cower like little children in the face of a
|
|
bureaucrat?</p>
|
|
<p>The answer lies in the strong and powerful government, in both
|
|
domestic and foreign affairs, which Americans of this century
|
|
have brought into existence. For a strong government will
|
|
almost always result in a weak citizenry. And a weak and
|
|
terrified citizenry can rarely be relied upon to resist
|
|
tyranny by their own government. Instead, they will spend
|
|
their time "flexing their muscles" vicariously through the
|
|
"toughness" shown by their government, usually in foreign
|
|
affairs.</p>
|
|
<p>A second reason: Too many freedom devotees have lost hope that
|
|
freedom can actually be achieved. And so, having convinced
|
|
themselves that slavery in America is inevitable, they devote
|
|
their efforts to "working within the system" rather than to
|
|
replacing the system with freedom.</p>
|
|
<p>A good example of this involves those church officials who
|
|
have dedicated themselves to getting prayer into public
|
|
schools. Few people will deny the tremendous accomplishment of
|
|
the Founding Fathers when they separated church and state
|
|
through the First Amendment. They realized that religious
|
|
zealots with political power are among the most dangerous
|
|
forces to which a society can ever be exposed. And so, the
|
|
Founding Fathers fought for and achieved a way of life in
|
|
which the majority could not impose, through the coercive
|
|
power of government, religious doctrines on the rest of the
|
|
populace.</p>
|
|
<p>But, as every American knows, it is an entirely different
|
|
situation with secular education. Here, as in the olden days
|
|
with religion, children are required to be sent to
|
|
governmentally approved institutions to learn governmentally
|
|
approved doctrines with religious doctrine, by virtue of the
|
|
First Amendment, being the only exception.</p>
|
|
<p>What is the reaction of many church leaders to religion being
|
|
excepted from the teachings in public schools? Having accepted
|
|
the legitimacy or inevitability of state involvement in the
|
|
field of education, they wish to empower the state authorities
|
|
to teach religious doctrine, in addition to secular doctrine,
|
|
to the nation's youth. In other words, instead of trying to
|
|
place education on the same level as religion . . . instead of
|
|
fighting for freedom of education as our Founding Fathers
|
|
fought for freedom of religion . . . instead of calling for a
|
|
separation of school and state as our American ancestors did
|
|
with church and state . . . instead of rendering to God both
|
|
religion and education . . . present-day ministers of God,
|
|
having "thrown in the towel" with respect to educational
|
|
liberty, now wish to render to Caesar not only education but,
|
|
through prayer in government schools, religion as well.</p>
|
|
<p>A third reason why many freedom devotees won't choose freedom:
|
|
they continue to operate under the delusion that the welfare
|
|
state/planned economy can be made to work. In fact, an
|
|
examination of much of the literature that emanates from
|
|
various American freedom think-tanks is absorbed with
|
|
correcting the "waste, fraud, and abuse" of the system rather
|
|
than replacing the system itself with freedom. Their solution
|
|
is always the same: "The system needs reform."</p>
|
|
<p>An example is found in the November 2, 1990, issue of The
|
|
Backgrounder, a newsletter of The Heritage Foundation, a
|
|
renowned, conservative think-tank based in Washington, D.C.
|
|
Referring to the budget crisis last fall, Scott A. Hodge, a
|
|
member of The Heritage staff, writes, "Members of Congress did
|
|
not have the courage to cut one dollar of waste, pork, fraud,
|
|
or unnecessary spending from the fiscal 1991 budget." Mr.
|
|
Hodge follows up with, "There is no need for Congress to
|
|
dismantle the 'social safety net'. . ."</p>
|
|
<p>Mr. Hodge's argument, then, is that the welfare state--
|
|
socialism--not only should be kept intact but also that it is
|
|
capable of being made to operate efficiently. The utopian
|
|
dream is that if we just elect "better" people to public
|
|
office . . . if politicians will just do the "right" thing
|
|
. . . if people will just give up the "waste" which they have
|
|
been receiving, it is possible to reform and refine the system
|
|
so that all of us can live happily ever after in socialist
|
|
heaven.</p>
|
|
<p>This illusion--this pipe-dream--that holds so many freedom
|
|
devotees in its grip is one of the major obstacles to the
|
|
achievement of freedom. But unfortunately, not only in
|
|
America. In the Soviet Union, the attitude is exactly the
|
|
same. If the politicians and bureaucrats will only do the
|
|
"right" thing, the Soviet officials argue, the socialist
|
|
system can be kept intact and made to work "correctly."</p>
|
|
<p>Another reason that freedom devotees are inhibited from
|
|
choosing freedom: They believe that by doing so, they will not
|
|
have intellectual "respectability" among their fellow
|
|
Americans. Although privately acknowledging the fundamental
|
|
evil and immorality of the welfare state/planned economy way
|
|
of life, they believe that calling for its elimination is too
|
|
"extreme." Therefore, they maintain their "respectability" (or
|
|
so they think) by advocating the continuation of the evil and
|
|
immorality and, even more shameful, by wrapping their
|
|
arguments in freedom rhetoric.</p>
|
|
<p>It is not difficult, then, to see the stark contrast between
|
|
the American Founding Fathers and our present-day freedom
|
|
devotees. Our ancestors refused to permit the terrible,
|
|
psychological destructiveness of fear to control their
|
|
actions. Faced with one of the most powerful monarchs in
|
|
history, and his equally powerful regulatory and tax-collecting minions, they nevertheless chose to pledge their
|
|
lives, fortunes, and sacred honor in the defense of freedom--
|
|
even though it meant fighting their own government and their
|
|
fellow British citizens. Devoted to principle, rather than
|
|
expediency, they had no desire to reform the mercantilist
|
|
economic system of their own government; recognizing the evil
|
|
and immorality of such a system, they strived to eliminate it.
|
|
And knowing that the pursuit of right was more important than
|
|
popular acceptance, they stood their ground for the whole
|
|
world to see!</p>
|
|
<p>It is that spirit of liberty which moved our American
|
|
ancestors that is so desperately needed in our time. And when
|
|
it finally grips the hearts and minds of the American people,
|
|
which I am certain it will, freedom at last will be chosen.</p>
|
|
<p>Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of
|
|
Freedom Foundation, P.O. Box 9752, Denver, CO 80209.</p>
|
|
<p>------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From the March 1991 issue of FREEDOM DAILY,
|
|
Copyright (c) 1991, The Future of Freedom Foundation,
|
|
PO Box 9752, Denver, Colorado 80209, 303-777-3588.
|
|
Permission granted to reprint; please give appropriate credit
|
|
and send one copy of reprinted material to the Foundation.
|
|
</p>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|