mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
186 lines
10 KiB
HTML
186 lines
10 KiB
HTML
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>conspire</title>
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../CSSstyle.css"/>
|
|
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<h1 id="title-index">Politics-Conspiracies-Project</h1>
|
|
<nav id="menu">
|
|
<a href="../index.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Home</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../fulltext2.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../analysis.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Analysis</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../gallery.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Gallery</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../methods.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Methods</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../about.html">
|
|
<div class="button">About</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../GitHub.html">
|
|
<div class="button">GitHub <img alt="github icon"
|
|
src="https://logos-download.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GitHub_logo.png"
|
|
width="15"/>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
</nav>
|
|
<h2>conspire</h2>
|
|
<p>From: Alan Lustiger alu@pruxp.pr.att.com
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
|
|
Subject: 25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOM BOMB"
|
|
S4dc.13e2@looking.on.ca
|
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 4:30:03 EST
|
|
Lines: 209</p>
|
|
<p>25 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE "ATOMIC BOMB"</p>
|
|
<p>1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over
|
|
Hiroshima in 1945?</p>
|
|
<p>No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists,
|
|
the thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed
|
|
detonation over <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> territory.</p>
|
|
<p>2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped
|
|
onto Nagasaki, Japan?</p>
|
|
<p>Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim
|
|
in the late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such
|
|
bomb ever exploded over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly
|
|
cling to this supposed "fact."</p>
|
|
<p>3. What are the materials needed to make an "atom bomb?"</p>
|
|
<p>Uranium-238 and plutonium-239.</p>
|
|
<p>4. Aren't these materials radioactive?</p>
|
|
<p>Highly so. Anybody who attempts to use these materials is endangering
|
|
his/her life.</p>
|
|
<p>5. Is it likely that nuclear scientists in the 40's would be
|
|
handling uranium and plutonium?</p>
|
|
<p>This would be highly unlikely. Very few people felt so threatened
|
|
by the <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> to be willing to risk their lives on a theoretical
|
|
chance of a superbomb that could end a far-away war a little sooner.</p>
|
|
<p>6. Aren't there witnesses to the atomic bomb in Hiroshima?</p>
|
|
<p>The only "witnesses" that could possibly survived this supposed
|
|
explosion would have been blinded by the intense flash of light,
|
|
so their testimony is quite unreliable and contradictory.</p>
|
|
<p>7. According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested
|
|
before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?</p>
|
|
<p>No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo
|
|
or anywhere else before Hiroshima.</p>
|
|
<p>8. Isn't that strange?</p>
|
|
<p>Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment;
|
|
there is no other weapon that according to the accepted "facts" deployed
|
|
before any testing whatsoever.</p>
|
|
<p>9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly
|
|
occuring during the fifties and sixties?</p>
|
|
<p>Very few, perhaps a few hundred, who claimed to have seen them.</p>
|
|
<p>10. What did the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy
|
|
Commission say in their report of October 30, 1949?</p>
|
|
<p>They recommended strongly against the development of what they
|
|
called the "Super Bomb," which is simply a thermonuclear
|
|
bomb. They said that "A super bomb might become a weapon of
|
|
genocide."</p>
|
|
<p>11. Isn't this four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki?</p>
|
|
<p>Yes. Obviously development of nuclear weapons occurred well
|
|
after their supposed implementation in 1945.</p>
|
|
<p>12. Is radioactivity dangerous?</p>
|
|
<p>Everything is radioactive to some extent.</p>
|
|
<p>13. What was the triggering method of the bomb that supposedly
|
|
was dropped on Hiroshima?</p>
|
|
<p>According to the standard historical accounts, it used a gun-assembly trigger.</p>
|
|
<p>14. Wasn't the gun-assembly method of triggering abandoned
|
|
in the design stage?</p>
|
|
<p>Yes; according to these same sources the gun method would not
|
|
work with uranium-derived plutonium-239 because some of the
|
|
plutonium-239 absorbs a neutron to become plutonium-240, which
|
|
undergoes spontaneous fission, all before supercriticality,
|
|
causing a premature and very small explosion that is unusable
|
|
for the very purpose that it was supposedly designed for!</p>
|
|
<p>15. How do conventional historians rectify these two "facts?"</p>
|
|
<p>They don't even attempt to.</p>
|
|
<p>16. How many books have been written about the atomic bomb?</p>
|
|
<p>Many hundreds, as well as thousands of articles in magazines
|
|
and newspapers.</p>
|
|
<p>17. Why was Hiroshima "targeted," and not Tokyo?</p>
|
|
<p>Perhaps because no one had heard of Hiroshima, and no one knew anyone
|
|
from there. It would be far more difficult to claim that Tokyo was bombed
|
|
than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In fact, most world maps from before "World
|
|
War Two" do not even mention these cities at all.</p>
|
|
<p>18. How does Japan benefit from the "atom bomb" story?</p>
|
|
<p>As a direct result of the "war," Japan has received billions of dollars
|
|
worth of US aid for its defense. Japan has essentially no defense
|
|
budget, so it can pour resources through MITI into defeating the US
|
|
economically, all while playing on the emotions of anti-"nuke" activists
|
|
about the "horrors" of nuclear weapons.</p>
|
|
<p>19. Wow, I never thought of that. How else do the <span class="NORP">Japanese</span>
|
|
benefit from this story?</p>
|
|
<p>The <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> now own major Hollywood studios, from which many war
|
|
movies are produced. Also, they play upon our sympathy for the
|
|
supposed "atom bomb" to blind us to the fact that this foreign
|
|
nation had taken over our semiconductor industry, many California
|
|
banks and practically the entire state of Hawaii.</p>
|
|
<p>This is all a part of the <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> plot to take over the world.
|
|
According to the "Protocols of the Elders of the Orient," this
|
|
is a <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> conspiracy all foretold by their ancient texts
|
|
that very few Anglo-Saxons have the ability to read.</p>
|
|
<p>19. How many people are supposed to have died in the explosions?</p>
|
|
<p>It is hard to say. Some sources say 60000 in Hiroshima, others say
|
|
140000. No attempt has been made to rectify the various numbers.</p>
|
|
<p>20. How many people die annually from car accidents in the US?</p>
|
|
<p>Over 50000.</p>
|
|
<p>21. So, what makes Hiroshima so special?</p>
|
|
<p>Nothing, especially given the contradictory evidence about it.</p>
|
|
<p>22. Boy, I'm mad. What should I do about this?</p>
|
|
<p>Glad you asked. First, send me lots of money so we can spread this
|
|
message far and wide. Maybe we'll take out ads in college newspapers
|
|
or something.</p>
|
|
<p>Second, direct your anger at the <span class="NORP">Japanese</span>. We are the victims, and
|
|
they are the aggressors. Make yourself feel important again by bashing
|
|
Japan at every opportunity. <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> people are inherently evil, and
|
|
basically subhuman. They were never bombed, and if they would have been
|
|
they would have deserved it. Who do they think they are, anyway?</p>
|
|
<p>Yes, we Revisionists have all the answers. Life is a lot simpler than
|
|
you thought it was. Join us, and you won't have to be bothered anymore
|
|
by any feelings of guilt for your inherent hatred. We can justify it!
|
|
Oh, it's not the <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> you hate, but the crippled? Hey - so do we!
|
|
It's easy: we don't like feeling uncomfortable around people in wheelchairs,
|
|
either! Who do they think they are, taking all the good parking spaces
|
|
when they were stupid enough to slip on a banana peel? IT'S A
|
|
CONSPIRACY! --See how easy it is to start? Now, just mix in a few
|
|
real facts, and start converting all of the otherwise messed-up
|
|
people to OUR CAUSE!</p>
|
|
<p>23. Wow! You mean that I could write stuff like this, too?</p>
|
|
<p>Sure! It's embarrasingly easy to write what we wrote above. In fact,
|
|
it's even superior to the usual anti-Semitic revisionist garbage,
|
|
because it has a higher percentage of REAL FACTS! Most of the
|
|
apparent "contradictions" above come from the facts that Nagasaki
|
|
was bombed by a plutonium bomb, not uranium; and that hydrogen
|
|
bombs are thermonuclear, not atomic bombs. Just juggle information
|
|
about the different types of bombs and mix them up so they seem to
|
|
be contradicting each other. It doesn't take ANY INTELLIGENCE
|
|
WHATSOEVER, and you can get lots of free air time on "48 Hours"!</p>
|
|
<p>Oh, I forgot to mention: I have a <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> girlfriend who agrees
|
|
with EVERY WORD I've written above. Here she is:</p>
|
|
<p>"Yes, I am his <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> girlfriend. I love him very much, and I've
|
|
always been troubled by my <span class="NORP">Japanese</span> friends claiming to know people
|
|
who died in Hiroshima."</p>
|
|
<p>There you have it! Just throw some unverifiable opinions on top
|
|
of ridiculous proofs to STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE!</p>
|
|
<p>24. Couldn't I be arrested for this?</p>
|
|
<p>No! This country is founded on FREE SPEECH! But, just make sure
|
|
that you mention how much you are being persecuted for saying
|
|
your version of history. (More than three email messages a day
|
|
qualify for being called harrassment. Five may merit a lawsuit.)</p>
|
|
<p>25. Where can I get more information?</p>
|
|
<p>Go to a library. Take a book at random. Skim it. Then, decide how
|
|
that book is either for you or against you. If it is for you, quote
|
|
liberally and out of context. If against you, do the same.</p>
|
|
<p>DON"T LET YOURSELF GET CONFUSED BY THE FACTS! We certainly don't!</p>
|
|
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Alan LustigerINTERNET:lustiger@att.com UUCP:att!pruxp!alu
|
|
ATTMAIL:!alustiger CIS:72657366</p>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|