mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
647 lines
42 KiB
XML
647 lines
42 KiB
XML
<xml><p> #$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@
|
||
$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#%$&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#
|
||
%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
|
||
&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
|
||
@#$%& @#$%&
|
||
#$%&@ The New Tesla Electromagnetics and #$%&@
|
||
$%&@# The Secrets of Free Electrical Energy $%&@#
|
||
%&@#$ %&@#$
|
||
&@#$% (Part 1) by T. E. Bearden &@#$%
|
||
@#$%& @#$%&
|
||
#$%&@ Retyped Without Permission, 7/13/86, by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_) #$%&@
|
||
$%&@# $%&@#
|
||
%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
|
||
&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
|
||
@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&
|
||
#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics
|
||
------------------------------------------
|
||
A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
|
||
|
||
There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing in
|
||
conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presends a summary of those
|
||
flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar longitudinal
|
||
waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla
|
||
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.
|
||
|
||
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my friends and
|
||
colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain anonymous. One of the
|
||
two is an experimental genius who can produce items that do not work by ortho-
|
||
dox theory. The second is a master of materials science and electromagnetics
|
||
theory. I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and stimuli
|
||
regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, and their
|
||
forbearance with the many discussions we have held on this and related
|
||
subjects.
|
||
|
||
It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are strictly my own, and
|
||
not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are falsely
|
||
made identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is the flux of
|
||
virtual particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass. The charged part-
|
||
icle is thus a "system" of true massless charge coupled to a bare chargeless
|
||
mass. The observable "mass" is static, three-dimensional and totally spatial.
|
||
"Charge" is dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and spatiotemporal.
|
||
Further, the charge and observable mass can be de-coupled, contrary to present
|
||
theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simply what we
|
||
presently refer to as "Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge are all
|
||
identical. Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an "ether," as
|
||
suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of
|
||
Relativity, Revised Edition, Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And
|
||
all three of them are identically anenergy -- not energy, but more fundamental
|
||
components of energy.
|
||
|
||
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional spatial
|
||
stress. Instead, it is the intensity of a many-dimensional (at least four-
|
||
dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four dimensions of spacetime.
|
||
This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is identically masless
|
||
charged. (It is not "filled" with charge; rather, it is charge!) Just as, in
|
||
a gas under pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further stresses the
|
||
gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime).
|
||
Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow exclusively
|
||
in time, exclusively in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla waves --
|
||
which are scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can exhibit
|
||
extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not possess. And
|
||
Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in which to move, as
|
||
compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to visualize a tesla scalar wave is
|
||
to regard it as a pure oscillation of time itself.
|
||
|
||
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case, or at
|
||
least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that reason, voltage is
|
||
regarded as "potential drop." This also is not true. Rigorously, the potential
|
||
is the intensity of the virtual particle flux at a single point -- whether or
|
||
not there is any mass at the point -- and both the pressure and the point
|
||
itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial (3-dimensional) as
|
||
presently assumed. Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the
|
||
difference in potential between two seperated spatial points, and always
|
||
implies at least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it
|
||
spatial!). "Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of observable
|
||
mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and depends
|
||
upon the absence of observable mass flow. The two are not even of the same
|
||
dimensionality.
|
||
|
||
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact it is
|
||
a very high value. Vacuum has no mass, but it has great massless charge and
|
||
virtual particle charge flux. For proof that a charged vacuum is the seat of
|
||
something in motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of static
|
||
electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature, Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp.
|
||
154-155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically, and it is also spacetime, and
|
||
at least four-dimensional.
|
||
|
||
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in its
|
||
context. A three-dimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in time. If we
|
||
model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4-space.
|
||
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence. In the vacuum 4-space, a
|
||
spatial nothing is still a something. The "virtual" concept and mathematical
|
||
concept of a derivative are simply two present ways of unconsciously addressing
|
||
this fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.
|
||
|
||
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum) has been
|
||
seperated into two parts. We can only think of a space as "continuing to exist
|
||
in time." To separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation is
|
||
continually required. The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation
|
||
is the photon interaction, the interaction of vector electromagnetic energy or
|
||
waves with mass. I have already strongly pointed out this effect and presented
|
||
a "raindrop model" or first-order physical change itself in my book, The
|
||
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.
|
||
|
||
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of (and
|
||
connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it is a separate, fundamental field
|
||
of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from the magnetic field. See
|
||
Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley
|
||
Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to 15-14. Curiously, this
|
||
fact has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely ignored in
|
||
the West. The "(triangle)x" operator, when applied to the A-field, makes
|
||
B-field. If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field
|
||
possesses much-expanded characteristics from those presently allowed in the
|
||
"bound" theory. Specifically, it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field;
|
||
it is not a normal vector field.
|
||
|
||
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental constant of
|
||
nature. Instead it is a function of the intensity of the massless charge flux
|
||
(that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum in
|
||
which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the same,
|
||
one may say that the speed of light is a function of the intensity of the
|
||
spatiotemporal vacuum!). The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum,
|
||
the faster the speed of light in it. This is an observed fact and already shown
|
||
by hardcore measurements. For example, distinct differences actually exist in
|
||
the speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as
|
||
compared to measurements in space away from planetary masses. In a vacuum on
|
||
the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster. For a discussion
|
||
and the statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity
|
||
of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42
|
||
(original in Russian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The
|
||
Russians have used this knowledge for over two decades in their strategic
|
||
psychotronics (energetics) program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware
|
||
of the measured variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists
|
||
simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!
|
||
|
||
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact, energy
|
||
arises from vector processes, and it can be disassembled into more fundamental
|
||
(anenergy) scalar components, since the vectors can. These scalar components
|
||
individually can be moved to a distant location without expending work, since
|
||
one is not moving force vectors. There the scalar components can be joined and
|
||
reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at a distance,
|
||
with no loss in between the initial and distant points. For proof that a vector
|
||
field can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar fields,
|
||
see E. T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 1,
|
||
1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced by two coupled
|
||
scalar waves.
|
||
|
||
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of energy
|
||
from a time-varying, electrically charged source. In fact, an exact solution of
|
||
the problem does allow this longitudinal wave. See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum,
|
||
"A New Derivation for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in Einsteins Theory,"
|
||
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68
|
||
for the proof.
|
||
|
||
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited, and do
|
||
not permit the explicit consideration of the internal, finer-grained structures
|
||
of a vector or a scalar. That is, a fundamental problem exists with the
|
||
basic assumptions in the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a vector
|
||
field, for example, does not have inter-nested sublevels (subspaces) containing
|
||
finer "shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has already
|
||
discovered that electrical reality is built that way. Thus one should actually
|
||
use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses. A scalar is
|
||
filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces" containing
|
||
vectors, where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame without an
|
||
observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero has real
|
||
roots. Real physical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed in
|
||
accordance with Muses' theory. For an introduction to Muses' profound
|
||
hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein,
|
||
Communication, Ogranization and Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian Hills,
|
||
Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers: Computational
|
||
Convepts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also Charles
|
||
Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary 1978.
|
||
|
||
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation of energy
|
||
law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment. The oldest law called for
|
||
the conservation of mass. The present law calls for the conservation of "mass
|
||
and energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as simply another
|
||
aspect of energy, then the present law calls for the conservation of energy.
|
||
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental concept. Since the
|
||
energy concept is tied to work and the movement of vector forces, it implicitly
|
||
assumes "vector movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible concept.
|
||
But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be further
|
||
broken down into more fundamental coupled scalar components. Further, Tesla
|
||
discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can be individually
|
||
separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc. This directly implies that
|
||
energy per se need not be conserved. The new law therefore calls for the
|
||
conservation of anenergy, the components of energy. These components may be
|
||
coupled into energy, and the energy may be further compacted into mass. It is
|
||
the sum total of the (anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled -- that is
|
||
conserved, not the matter or the energy per se. Further, this conservation of
|
||
anenergy is not spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of at least
|
||
four or more dimensions.
|
||
|
||
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about
|
||
fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a statement about FIRST ORDER
|
||
reality -- the reality that emerges from the vector interaction of
|
||
electromagnetic energy with matter. When we break down the vectors into scalars
|
||
(shadow vectors or hypervectors), we immediatly enter a vastly different, far
|
||
more fundamental reality. In this reality superluminal velocity, multiple
|
||
universes, travel back and forth in time, higher dimensions, variation of all
|
||
"fundamental constants" of nature, materialization and dematerialization, and
|
||
violation of the "conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our present
|
||
Aristotlean logic -- fitted to the photon interaction by vector light as the
|
||
fundamental observation mechanism -- is incapable of describing or modeling
|
||
this more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar interactions as
|
||
much subtler, far less limited observation/detection mechanisms, we must have a
|
||
new "superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality
|
||
uncovered by Nikola Tesla.
|
||
|
||
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always occuring with
|
||
-- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is not necessarily quantized, just as
|
||
it is not necessarily locked to mass. Ehrenhaft discovered and reported
|
||
fractional charges for years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored. See P.A.M.
|
||
Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature", Sumposium on the
|
||
Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha, D.
|
||
Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 12-14 for a presentation of some of Ehrenhaft's
|
||
results. Within the last few years Stanford University researchers have also
|
||
positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge." For a layman's
|
||
description of their work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science News, Vol.
|
||
119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69. Indeed, Dirac in his referenced article
|
||
points out that Millikan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments --
|
||
reported one measurement of fractional charge, but discounted it as probably
|
||
due to error.
|
||
|
||
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through normal space.
|
||
Thus we use or model only the most elementary type of motion -- that performed
|
||
by vector electromagnetic energy. We do not allow for things to "travel inside
|
||
the vector flow itself." Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle flow
|
||
inside the first, and a third, even more subtle flow inside the second, and
|
||
so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and out of energy itself -- and any
|
||
anenergy component of energy. There are hypervectors and hyperscalars unlimited
|
||
, within the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Further, these
|
||
"interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical reality
|
||
itself to be directly engineered, almost without limits.
|
||
|
||
(16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually, nothing presently
|
||
measured exists in time, because the physicical detection/measurement process
|
||
of our present instruments destroys time, ripping it off and tossing it away --
|
||
and thereby "collapsing the wave function." Present scientific methodology thus
|
||
is seriously flawed. It does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth, but only
|
||
a partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great scientific oversights.
|
||
For example. mass does not exist in time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A
|
||
fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant x time" does. Energy
|
||
does not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space itself does
|
||
not exist in time -- spacetime does. We are almost always one dimension short
|
||
in every observable we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and we have
|
||
developed instruments that detect and measure spatially only. Such instruments
|
||
can never measure and detect the phenomenology of the nested substrata of time.
|
||
By using scalar technology, however, less limited instruments can indeed be
|
||
constructed -- and they have been. With such new instruments, the phenomenology
|
||
of the new electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering technology
|
||
developed.
|
||
|
||
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of virtual
|
||
state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated frames (hyperspaces).
|
||
Actually, the two are identical, as I showed in the appendix to my book, The
|
||
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235. A
|
||
virtual particle in the laborotory frame is an observable particle in a
|
||
hyperspatial frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away. This of course
|
||
implies that the hyperspatial velocity of all virtual particles is greater than
|
||
the speed of light. The particle physicist is already deeply involved in
|
||
hyperspaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In other words
|
||
, he is using tachyons (particles that move faster than light) without
|
||
realizing it.
|
||
|
||
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is not an
|
||
observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or detected. According to this
|
||
assumption, one must always infer time from spatial measurements, because all
|
||
detections and measurements are spatial. With this assumption, our scientists
|
||
prejudice themselves against looking for finer, subquantal measurement
|
||
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present limitation is the
|
||
result of the type of electromagnetics we presently know, where all instruments
|
||
(the "measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic energy
|
||
(light). Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is continually
|
||
absorbing and emitting photons, and in the process they are continually
|
||
connecting to time and disconnecting from time. If time is continually being
|
||
carried away from the detector itself by its emitted photons, then the detector
|
||
cannot hold and "detect" that which it has just lost. With Tesla
|
||
electromagnetics, however, the fundamental limitation of our present instru-
|
||
ments need not apply. With finer instruments, we can show there are an infinite
|
||
number of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time" which is
|
||
continually being lost by vector light (photon) interaction. By using
|
||
subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time -- in
|
||
which case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in
|
||
contradistinction to present assumptions.
|
||
|
||
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered to be, a
|
||
continuous dimension such as length. This is only a gross approximation. Indeed
|
||
, time is not like a continuous "dimension," but more like a series of
|
||
"stiches," each of which is individually made and then ripped out before the
|
||
next stitch appears. "Vector light" photons interact one at a time, and it is
|
||
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself. The absorbtion
|
||
of a photon -- which is energy x time -- by a spatial mass converts it to
|
||
masstime: the time was added by the photon. The emission of a photon tears away
|
||
the time, leaving behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that
|
||
time flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains and carries
|
||
time. It is also not accidental that the photon IS the individual quantum.
|
||
Since all our instruments presently are continually absorbing and emitting
|
||
photons, they are all "quantized," and they accordingly "quantize" their
|
||
detections. This is true because all detection is totally internal to the
|
||
detector, and the instruments only detect only their own internal changes.
|
||
Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized background, the
|
||
detections themselves are quantized. The Minkowski model is fundamentally
|
||
erroneous in its modeling of time, and for that reason relativity and quantum
|
||
mechanics continue to resist all attempts to successfully combine them, quantum
|
||
field theory notwithstanding.
|
||
|
||
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are considered
|
||
mutually exclusive. Actually this is also untrue. In 1974, for example,
|
||
Santilli proved that electrical field and gravitational fiend indeed are not
|
||
mutually exclusive. In that case one is left with two possibilities:
|
||
(a) they are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially the same thing.
|
||
For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some Puzzling
|
||
Questions," Annals of Physics, Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974. With the new Tesla
|
||
electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in time itself can be produced electrically
|
||
, and electrostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the mass) becomes
|
||
a "magic" tool capable of directly affecting anything that exists in time --
|
||
including the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial drive are
|
||
immediate and direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.
|
||
|
||
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of physics, and
|
||
not affected by physical means. Literally, the prevailing belief of Western
|
||
scientists is that man is a mechanical robot -- even though relativity depends
|
||
entirely upon the idea of the idea of the "observer." Western science today
|
||
thus has essentially become dogmatic, and in this respect borders on a religion.
|
||
Since this "religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched in its power
|
||
in the state, Western science is turning itself into an oligarchy. But mind
|
||
occupies time, and when we measure and affect time, we can directly measure and
|
||
affect mind itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his dignity
|
||
and his humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to science. In my
|
||
book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already pointed out the reality of mind and
|
||
a simplified way in which it can be modeled to the first order. With scalar wave
|
||
instruments, the reality of mind and thought can be measured in the laboratory,
|
||
and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific discipline.
|
||
|
||
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not permitted
|
||
or severely discouraged in the present theory. For one thing, integrals of
|
||
multiple valued derivative functions have the annoying habit of "blowing up" and
|
||
yielding erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not allow
|
||
multiple types of time! This leads to the absurdity of the present interpretation
|
||
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single observation)
|
||
at a time. So if one believes as "absurd" a thing as the fact that more than
|
||
one person can observe an apple at the same time, the present physics fails.
|
||
However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple simultaneous
|
||
observation leads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that most Western
|
||
physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its consequences.
|
||
In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous observation,
|
||
all possibilities are real and physical. There are an infinite number of
|
||
worlds, orthogonal to one another, and each world is continually splitting into
|
||
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rate. Nonetheless, this physics
|
||
was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in 1956, and the thesis was
|
||
published in 1957. (See Hugh Everett, III, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of
|
||
Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A. Wheeler,
|
||
B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce S.
|
||
Dewitt and Neill Graham, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University
|
||
Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
|
||
consistent with the present experimental
|
||
basis of physics. The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for only
|
||
a single "rodl" or universe -- or "level." The expanded theory, on the other
|
||
hand, contains multiply nested levels of virtual state charge -- and these
|
||
levels are identically the same as orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes."
|
||
Multiple kinds -- and values -- of time also exist. The new concept differs from
|
||
Everett's, however, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the
|
||
virtual state. That is, an observable in one universe is always a virtual
|
||
quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have multi-level
|
||
"continuities" and "discontinuities" simultaneously, without logical conflict.
|
||
It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels of scalar vacuum --
|
||
that lace together the discontinuous quanta generated by the interaction of
|
||
vector light with mass.
|
||
|
||
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a new,
|
||
expanded logic which contains the old Aristotlean logic as a subset. I have
|
||
already pointed out the new logic in my paper, "A Conditional Criterion for
|
||
Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979, available from the National
|
||
Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.
|
||
|
||
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and
|
||
relativity are drastically changed by the Tesla electromagnetics, as I point-
|
||
ed out in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla
|
||
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.
|
||
|
||
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more
|
||
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as Newtonian
|
||
physics is a special case of the relativistic physics. But in the new
|
||
electromagnetics case, the differences between the old and the new are far more
|
||
drastic and profound.
|
||
|
||
Additional References
|
||
---------- ----------
|
||
|
||
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental Magnetic Charge
|
||
(Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic Energy)," 1981/1982 (private
|
||
communication). Dr. Boren has a cogent argument that the positron is the
|
||
fundamental unit of magnetic charge. His theory thus assigns fundamentally
|
||
different natures to positive charge and
|
||
negative charge. In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
|
||
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than the "negative"
|
||
end. In other words, the circuit works simply from higher accumulation of
|
||
negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesser accumulation of negative
|
||
charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere be positive charges (protons,
|
||
positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. Borens theory, though dramatic
|
||
at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and meticulous examination --
|
||
particularly since he has been able to gather experimental data which support
|
||
his theory and disagree with present theory.
|
||
|
||
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena,"
|
||
philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No. 191, December 1939, pp. 694
|
||
-701.
|
||
|
||
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and Weight
|
||
of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4 x 10(-5) cm.
|
||
to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the Production of Real Images of
|
||
Submicroscopic Particles by means of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and
|
||
Jour. of Sci., Vol. II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 30-51.
|
||
|
||
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance of Charges
|
||
smaller than the Electron - (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law of Resistance;
|
||
(c) The computation of errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci.,
|
||
Vol. V (Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.
|
||
|
||
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge, in
|
||
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.
|
||
|
||
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation for
|
||
Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition, 1981, pp.
|
||
15-20.
|
||
|
||
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in Plasma,"
|
||
Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S. Translation, Consultants
|
||
Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593-597.
|
||
|
||
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to the power
|
||
conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review A, Vol. 20, no. 4, October
|
||
1979, pp. 1614-1618.
|
||
|
||
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With a
|
||
Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available through the Defense
|
||
Technical Information Center (AD 773188).
|
||
|
||
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the Direction of current
|
||
flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311-312
|
||
|
||
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist, 17
|
||
September 1981, p. 723.
|
||
|
||
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall Acceleration
|
||
of a Relativistic Charged Particle. II. A Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time-
|
||
Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya VUZ, Fizika, No. 7, 1979, pp.
|
||
28-32. English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
|
||
829-833. If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this Soviet
|
||
paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial fields.
|
||
|
||
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts in Physics and
|
||
Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.
|
||
|
||
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity, Library
|
||
of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive compilation of measurements of
|
||
the speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of light is not constant but changes,
|
||
sometimes even daily.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
|
||
|
||
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much more funda-
|
||
mental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla at the turn of
|
||
the century.
|
||
|
||
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very high
|
||
electrical potential -- something on the order of 200 million volts, with
|
||
respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
|
||
|
||
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" -- which has
|
||
the same potential as the vacuum -- actually has a non-zero absolute potential.
|
||
This circuit ground has a value of zero only with respect to something else
|
||
which has the same absolute electrical potential.
|
||
|
||
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass" current
|
||
(even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a difference dropped in
|
||
potential when a charge mass moves between two spatially seperated points. What
|
||
we have termed "electrical current" only flows where there is a suitable
|
||
conducting medium between things which have a difference in absolute potential.
|
||
Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is considered to be
|
||
a finite resistance -- if we apply a voltage ahd have a mass current flowing
|
||
between the two points! Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have them all.
|
||
To lose one is to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in present
|
||
theory: One can have a "difference in scalar potential" between two points without
|
||
having a "voltage drop" between them. Specifically, if no mass current flows
|
||
between them, no resistance exists between them, and no voltage drop exists
|
||
between them.
|
||
|
||
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum without
|
||
a voltage wave. In that case, the wave has no E-field and no H-field. The only
|
||
reason one has an E field around a statically charged object is because the
|
||
charged electrons accumulated on the object are actually in violent motion. It
|
||
is this motion of the charged masses that produces E-field -- as well as H-field
|
||
whenever that entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory space.
|
||
|
||
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in present
|
||
electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird sitting on a high
|
||
tension line.
|
||
|
||
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass electricity,
|
||
because there is no significant difference in potential drop between the bird
|
||
and the line. Specifically, between the birds two feet -- each in contact with
|
||
a different portion of the line -- there exists no potential difference. This
|
||
is true even though, with respect to the vacuum, each foot is at a potential
|
||
that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass current flowing. And it is true
|
||
even though the absolute potential of each foot may be some 200.1 million
|
||
"volts," were a mass current flowing.
|
||
|
||
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through the air to
|
||
light upon the high tension wire. As he flies towards the wire, he is flying through
|
||
the massless electrostatic potential field of the wire, for that field extends
|
||
an infinite distance away from the wire. The electrostatic potential field --
|
||
pure 0-field -- is actually the spatiotemporal intensity of the massless charge
|
||
at a point. In other words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into an
|
||
increasing "massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher
|
||
than the earth. However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential difference
|
||
is experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so essientially no
|
||
"charged mass currents" are induced in his body. Thus the little flier safely
|
||
navigates into the teeth of a very high electrostatic potential, lights upon the
|
||
wire, and is not "fried" in the process. When he lights on the wire,
|
||
his body has reached the electrostatic potential that each foot's contact
|
||
point has. Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed
|
||
in an increased flux of massless charge -- which is what the electrostatic
|
||
potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that charge
|
||
represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical current.
|
||
|
||
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow -- "scalar"
|
||
current -- without any mechanical work being done in the system. All electrical
|
||
work in a circuit is done against the physical mass of the charged masses that
|
||
flow. Rigorously, force is defined as the time rate of charge of momentum.
|
||
Even in the relativistic case where F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of momentum
|
||
requires mass movement. No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is expended by
|
||
massless charge flow.
|
||
|
||
That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a very high flux
|
||
of massless "particles" -- normally does no work on our systems, and expends
|
||
none of its very high "potential energy." It is exactly the same as the bird
|
||
which flew into an increasing scalar field as it approached the high tension
|
||
wire -- no work was done upon the bird by the increasing scalar flux currents
|
||
encountered by its body.
|
||
|
||
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are as birds
|
||
sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a significant differece in
|
||
potential, via our present electromagnetic circuits, no current can flow
|
||
-- anywhere. Even if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor
|
||
and charged masses to flow, if we with to produce mechanical work. Presently our
|
||
electromagnetic theory allows us to create a difference in potential within
|
||
different parts of a circuit, but only by moving and shifting charged mass. We
|
||
therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it around,
|
||
and we only get back the work we have put into the circuit. In other words,
|
||
presently all wee do is "pump" electrical mass.
|
||
|
||
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we substantially
|
||
"pulsed" the potential on the line. Suppose we "pulsed" it such that the
|
||
bird's physical system -- considered as a circuit containing a capicitance, a
|
||
resistance, an inductance, and many free electrons -- became resonant to
|
||
the pulsing frequency. In that case the "bird system" would resonate, and a
|
||
great deal of electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of the
|
||
bird. In the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass current would flow,
|
||
work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.
|
||
|
||
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector fields are not
|
||
produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with the actual vector mechanics
|
||
itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves continually penetrate the "space" where
|
||
there is no mass movement. This means there can exist a "delta-0" without a
|
||
voltage or an E-field. The present theory does not allow this, because it
|
||
always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring the
|
||
point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin of the individual
|
||
charged particle -- such as the electron -- which "entangles" or "knits
|
||
together" or "couples" independent scalar waves into vector waves. A vector
|
||
wave is simply two coupled scalar waves. The entire force field concept --
|
||
such as the E-field and the B-field -- is operationally Defined in terms of the
|
||
force exhibited on a test particle, or test mass. Rigorusly, an E-field does
|
||
not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two coupled scalar 0-fields
|
||
"tumbling about each other." When these two coupled, tumbling fields meet a
|
||
spinning electron, e.g., the force emerges on the electron mass. In short,
|
||
movement of a rotating mass changes delta-0 to "voltage", creating the
|
||
V/I/R triad.
|
||
|
||
By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one certainly
|
||
can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge intensity or "scalar
|
||
electrostatic potential." However, that is not the only way to increase it.
|
||
Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also be appropriately employed to
|
||
vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under proper circumstances.
|
||
|
||
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla electromagnetic
|
||
theory, it is possible to oscillate -- and change the vacuum potential itself,
|
||
in one part of an electrical system. Thus by correct procedures a part of a
|
||
system can be electrically altered so that the absolute value of its "ground"
|
||
(vacuum) potential differs significantly from the normal vacuum-ground
|
||
potential of the remainder of the circuit. In other words, we shift the
|
||
vacuum-ground potential of the part of the circuit by oscillating the massless
|
||
vacuum charge itself, and in doing so we gain a substantial, oscillatory
|
||
electrical difference between that part of the circuit and the normal ground
|
||
potential of the rest of the system. Then we connect the two parts of the
|
||
system by means of a conductor containing a load in the middle.
|
||
|
||
In every conductor, a large number of "free electrons" are available. If we
|
||
oscillate the actual vacuum charge itself, unlimited additional free
|
||
electrons also become availabe from the Dirac Sea, since partial "unstripping"
|
||
of the negative energy wells (each containing an electron) occurs. This
|
||
"unstripping" of the potential of the well is due to vacuum potential oscil-
|
||
lation, which oscillates time as well as space. To a negative energy well (
|
||
positive time), the oscillation of its "time stream" increases the well's
|
||
negative potential during one half-cycle and decreases its potential for the
|
||
other half-cycle. Thus during half the oscillatory cycle, negative energy
|
||
electrons may be lifted from the Dirac Sea if the oscillation is sufficiently intense.
|
||
|
||
Therefore we obtain an attendant voltage and flow of mass current through the
|
||
load. This voltage and current, by the way, are essentially limitless, and are
|
||
free for the asking, assuming the proper "vacuum oscillation" is initiated
|
||
and maintained so that electrons are continually being lifted from the Dirac
|
||
sea by the time oscillations, and fed into the circuit.
|
||
|
||
Standard electromagnetic theory assumes that the vacuum potential is zero. It
|
||
does not recognize the existence of massless charge, separated from charged
|
||
mass. Therefore, orthodox scientists have never looked for a way to engineer
|
||
the vacuum, because they have not realized it is composed of pure massless
|
||
charge. Electrical physics has almost hopelessly confused charge and charged
|
||
mass, thereby eliminating scalar longitudinal electrostatic waves. Expressed
|
||
in the bird/high tension line analogy, the present electromagnetic theory
|
||
restricts us to walking along the high tension line, laboriously carrying small
|
||
batteries and power units, unaware of the limitless, surging power beneath our
|
||
very feet.
|
||
|
||
Electromagnetically, we have been rather like one of the five blind men who
|
||
touched an elephant. We have only touched one small portion of the
|
||
electromagnetism "elephant," yet we thought we had grasped the entire beast.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Use this information in any way that you wish; I take no responsibility for
|
||
the results of your actions. This file was presented for "informational use"
|
||
only.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
</p></xml> |