mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-28 00:39:23 -05:00
63 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
63 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
I found this gem... take a look.
|
|
Kaya #78 @7
|
|
Wed Sep 30 17:23:29 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The following modest proposal was first posted several years ago to
|
|
one of the talk.politics groups. For those who enjoyed the saga of
|
|
BioHarvest, I hope you'll like this, too.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access to Food Must Be Equal!
|
|
|
|
The Bush Administration is proposing radical changes in the way food
|
|
has been purchased by Americans for the past hundred years.
|
|
Agriculture Secretary Clayton Yeutter is floating the idea of a
|
|
"voucher" system for groceries which would allow families to make
|
|
their food and beverage purchases at any supermarket, regardless of
|
|
location. Allowing this kind of choice would destroy the system which
|
|
has made America so competitive today!
|
|
|
|
Equality of access to food, regardless of income or personal wishes,
|
|
has long been the hallmark of our food distribution system. Every
|
|
family knows which food district it is in and where its assigned
|
|
supermarket is, just as it knows which school district it is in and
|
|
which schools are in the district. Citizens elect members of the
|
|
District Food Boards, thus assuring democratic input into the food
|
|
distribution process. And parents are urged--without much success, I
|
|
might add--to join their regional Grocer-Parent Association (GPA) to
|
|
further ensure a wholesome food selection for their children.
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that temporary shortages of such basic products as
|
|
milk, real, and high-fiber bread have almost become a thing of the
|
|
past, despite criticism from so-called libertarians that a free market
|
|
would eliminate all shortages (doubtful). It is true that some luxury
|
|
food items remain unavailable, but is it fair for some to eat quiche
|
|
while others can't get sushi? And we applaud the recent progress by
|
|
State Food Boards in eliminating unhealthful foods from the diet of
|
|
Americans. This progress would likely be undone if people were free
|
|
to choose their food stores.
|
|
|
|
Consider the implications of free choice of supermarkets. The "food
|
|
voucher" system proposed by these nutritional anarchists would surely
|
|
encourage some supermarkets to offer needless luxuries and variety of
|
|
choice so as to lure gullible families into spending their food
|
|
vouchers at these stores. What would then happen is that some stores
|
|
would begin to cater to the tastes of these consumers and so become
|
|
more popular. This would draw even more shoppers, resulting in a kind
|
|
of spiraling prosperity for these opportunistic, greedy stores.
|
|
However, the remaining stores--no doubt disproportionately located in
|
|
inner cities and other poor areas--would suffer lost business and so
|
|
would be less able to provide the luxuries sought by selfish shoppers.
|
|
Some of these stores would obviously close, thus causing hunger and
|
|
unemployment in the affected regions. People of color and victims of
|
|
the class struggle would thus carry the burden of rampant capitalism,
|
|
as they have for thousands of years.
|
|
|
|
Every American has the right to an equal share of the pie, regardless of
|
|
their income or personal spending habits. Say no to deregulation of
|
|
supermarkets! Competition just isn't the American way.
|
|
|
|
|