mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-18 04:04:34 -05:00
49 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
49 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
<conspiracyFile>I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
|
||
George Mercier
|
||
INSURANCE PROGRAMS
|
||
[Pages 478-479]
|
||
[Certain conventions have been used in converting INVISIBLE CONTRACTS to an
|
||
electronic medium. For an explanation of the conventions used, please download
|
||
the file INCONHLP.ZIP for further illumination. Other background information as
|
||
well is contained in INCONHLP.ZIP. It is advisable to EXIT this file right now
|
||
and read the contents of INCONHLP.ZIP before proceeding with your study of this
|
||
file.]
|
||
Through entry into the juristic highways of Interstate Commerce by
|
||
participation in an insurance policy program, as insurance is Interstate
|
||
Commerce, and the King retains a third party beneficiary status in all
|
||
Commercial transactions that full under his regulatory Commercial Jurisdiction
|
||
penumbra. In 1944, the Supreme Court decided a Case called UNITED STATES VS.
|
||
SOUTH-EASTERN UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, [632]
|
||
[632]<div> 322 U.S. 533
|
||
(1944). <div>[632]
|
||
which held that insurance, all by itself, is Interstate Commerce; so if you
|
||
manage to participate in policies of insurance, you are participating in
|
||
Interstate Commerce; Federal commercial benefits are being accepted, and the
|
||
reciprocal QUID PRO QUO taxation is necessary. The fact that the insurance
|
||
company may be state chartered and licensed to do business in only one state,
|
||
and that the policy may have been negotiated, accepted, written, and entered
|
||
into in only one state are not relevant indicia as effecting limitations on
|
||
federal Jurisdictions; PERSONS paying premiums on policies of Insurance are
|
||
PERSONS playing in King's Commerce. A year later after UNITED STATES VS.
|
||
SOUTH-EASTERN UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION was ruled upon, the Congress enacted the
|
||
MCCARREN ACT, [633]
|
||
[633]<div> 59 Statutes
|
||
33; Title 15, Section 1011 to 1015.
|
||
<div>[633]
|
||
declaring that the:
|
||
"... continued regulation and taxation by the several states of the
|
||
business of insurance is in the public interest, and that silence on the part
|
||
of Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier to the regulation or
|
||
taxation of such business by the several states."
|
||
Yes, even the Congress of the United States knows that the application of
|
||
PRINCIPLES OF NATURE relating to silence that are incorporated into the
|
||
RATIFICATION DOCTRINE is even held to be binding on them in some circumstances.
|
||
This Congressional pronouncement, that silence in the context of a proposition
|
||
being made constitutes acceptance, applies to all appropriate factual settings,
|
||
and is held to apply to all PERSONS, even the Congress itself. But as for
|
||
taxation expectations, your acceptance of the benefits of an insurance program
|
||
is deemed as evidence of entry into Interstate Commerce, and hence such
|
||
participants are an object suitable for Federal taxation, regardless of any
|
||
political Status, and regardless of the presence or absence of any other
|
||
juristic contract.
|
||
</conspiracyFile> |