mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-27 00:09:39 -05:00
310 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
310 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
OUR SENATE?
|
||
|
||
"This has been a tough election and I'm happy it's
|
||
over. And we finally upset that conservative who has been
|
||
holding up all the progressive legislation for so many
|
||
years."
|
||
"Yes, finally." declared the financial backer and
|
||
mentor of the new Senator from Wisconsin. "Now we'll be
|
||
able to get more of our legislation through the Senate.
|
||
This has been an uphill battle all the way. Old Charlie
|
||
Smith sure gave us an intense fight. If we hadn't had the
|
||
financial backing from so many of my friends, we never would
|
||
have unseated him."
|
||
They called the Vice-president to administer the oath
|
||
to the newly elected Senator. The ceremony was set for the
|
||
3rd day of January in his freshly decorated office. Present
|
||
for the swearing in was his family and several friends who
|
||
had arrived in Washington, D.C. only the day before. They
|
||
were thrilled at being in the Capitol building. They'd
|
||
heard so much about all the pomp and circumstance in our
|
||
Congress. The Senator's wife and children were smiling from
|
||
ear to ear as was his mother. She was swelling with pride
|
||
over her son being elected to the United States Senate.
|
||
The Vice-president joined the happy group. "Jack, I've
|
||
come to administer the oath of your office. Hell, I know
|
||
you believe in the Constitution, don't you?"
|
||
"Yes Sir, of course."
|
||
The Vice-president shook his hand and immediately
|
||
walked over to offer his congratulations to Jack's family.
|
||
While the local television reporters were present, no
|
||
one questioned that the oath was not administered. The
|
||
happy scene was simply one of mass confusion. Reporters
|
||
rushed forward to shake the hand of the new Senator. The
|
||
cameras swung around to the Vice-president. He smiled and
|
||
said, "Welcome to The United States Senate! This is the
|
||
World's Most Exclusive Club."
|
||
This performance is a continuing charade playing on the
|
||
ignorance of the American public. The "World's Most
|
||
Exclusive Club" has not been legally in session since the
|
||
election following 1913. How 'bout that?
|
||
There have been over seventy years of illegal legisla-
|
||
tion and unconstitutional treaty verification. 70+ years of
|
||
unconstitutional confirmation of federal judges, ambassadors
|
||
and officers of the President's cabinet. How can this be?
|
||
Surely no one in our government would allow such a practice
|
||
to continue if it were true.
|
||
Unfortunately, it is true. Usually, when you don't
|
||
watch the store . . . you get robbed. And that is what has
|
||
happened to our government. WE haven't been watching the
|
||
store. The behind the scene power brokers have destroyed
|
||
the form of our government. There are special checks and
|
||
balances as protections which our Founding Fathers estab-
|
||
lished at the Convention.
|
||
Two branches of the Congress were established to
|
||
|
||
protect the sovereignty of the states. This was a major
|
||
stumbling block in the writing of our Constitution. The
|
||
first branch, the House of Representatives, were to be
|
||
elected directly by the people. The representation in the
|
||
House would vary according to population. This is still
|
||
true today.
|
||
The Senate, our second branch, was set up to represent
|
||
state interests in the new government. Each state has equal
|
||
representation and voice in national affairs. Senators were
|
||
elected by each respective state legislature. Consequently
|
||
each state became an integral part in the formation of the
|
||
new national government. They designed this to be the link
|
||
between the state and national systems of government. One
|
||
advantage to this system was our Senators were less vul-
|
||
nerable to graft and control by persons with other than
|
||
honorable motives. Whenever state legislatures suspected
|
||
Senators were not watching out for the state's interest in
|
||
national affairs they were often replaced.
|
||
This was the check and balance against the first branch
|
||
which was elected by popular vote. (Documents Illustrative
|
||
of the Formation of the Union of the American States, House
|
||
Document No. 398, 69th Congress, 1st Session,) (1965).
|
||
This principle lasted until 1912. The power managers
|
||
behind our government convinced the American people they had
|
||
more wisdom than our Founding Fathers. They had an
|
||
amendment to our Constitution introduced into Congress
|
||
proposing to give the election of Senators directly to the
|
||
people. This amendment had the net effect of destroying the
|
||
sovereignty of state governments.
|
||
The Secretary of State made the announcement on May 31,
|
||
1913. He declared the amendment ratified by the legisla-
|
||
tures of thirty-six of the forth-eight (sic) states.
|
||
(ibid., footnote page 1071.)
|
||
Sounds innocent enough, doesn't it? Sounds all legal
|
||
and constitutional. This is what dudes in government want
|
||
you to believe . . . but it's a lie, a fairy tale! Let's
|
||
examine this sequence of errors.
|
||
In fancy and boldly written letters, the introductory
|
||
statement to our Constitution declares that WE THE PEOPLE
|
||
established the Constitution for the United States of
|
||
America.
|
||
The key is WE THE PEOPLE. We granted permission to the
|
||
new government for certain specified and limited powers. By
|
||
so doing, we granted the new government operating powers and
|
||
gave them jurisdiction over us. The document is full of
|
||
'thou shalt nots'. Powers which were not granted cannot be
|
||
assumed. Nor can any powers which were granted be enlarged
|
||
or exceeded.
|
||
The individual states were really jealous of their
|
||
sovereignty. They all feared the powers given to the new
|
||
national government were not sufficiently restricted. This
|
||
fear of the smaller states of domination by the larger
|
||
nearly wrecked the Constitutional Convention. They demanded
|
||
a Bill of Rights be added to the new constitution after
|
||
|
||
ratification.
|
||
The entire Bill of Rights will get a thorough examina-
|
||
tion in a later paper. For now, let's concern ourselves
|
||
with one which proves NO authority can be assumed by the
|
||
national government -- the Tenth amendment clearly spells
|
||
out that the powers not delegated belong to the states or
|
||
the people.
|
||
This amendment is the basis to determine whether the
|
||
national government has permission to function in a given
|
||
area. If the power was not delegated by us and spelled out
|
||
in the document, they don't have it. This amendment is the
|
||
one the federal government chooses to ignore and probably
|
||
wishes did not exist.
|
||
Another basic assumption we have to acknowledge is only
|
||
we can agree to any changes in the document. Therefore we
|
||
are responsible for the operation of our government. They
|
||
are responsible to us.
|
||
To be President of the United States, a person MUST be
|
||
a natural born citizen of the United States. (Art II, Sec 1)
|
||
This is a fixed, explicit command. There are NO exceptions
|
||
allowed. No emergency allowances or amendment saying anyone
|
||
but a natural born citizen can be president. This is the
|
||
only requirement in the entire document that a candidate be
|
||
natural born. It's obvious the Founders put it there for a
|
||
specific purpose.
|
||
Philander C. Knox, play acting as Secretary of State,
|
||
introduced the 17th amendment into Congress in 1912. The
|
||
man who was acting as president was William Howard Taft.
|
||
Taft was born in Cincinnati, Ohio on September 15, 1857.
|
||
SURPRISE . . . Ohio was NOT admitted to the Union until
|
||
August 7, 1953! At the time Taft was elected to be presi-
|
||
dent Ohio was simply a territory. It was not a state which
|
||
means he was not a natural born citizen. Our Constitution
|
||
was violated. He was not eligible to be president by any
|
||
stretch of your imagination!
|
||
So our illustrious Congress hits the panic button in a
|
||
frantic effort to correct a major mistake. In their
|
||
infinite 'wisdom', they passed a Joint Resolution admitting
|
||
Ohio as a full and equal member of the union. (Public Law
|
||
204, 83rd Congress, 1st Session).
|
||
Section 2 of that resolution states: "This joint
|
||
resolution shall take effect as of March 1, 1803. Approved
|
||
August 7, 1953." Quick arithmetic shows that to be
|
||
backdated by 150 years. That's ex-post facto law.
|
||
They CAN'T do it! It's a conspicuous violation of our
|
||
Constitution which states: "No . . . ex post facto law
|
||
shall be passed." (Art I, Sec 9) This was added protection
|
||
for our citizens. An act which was legal one day could not
|
||
be declared illegal a day, a week, or even years later. NO
|
||
law can be predated by one day. We didn't agree to any
|
||
change through the amendment process. That guaranteed
|
||
protection of no ex post facto law is still the basic law of
|
||
the land.
|
||
Another problem surfaces under this Public Law. They
|
||
|
||
used a resolution to make a law when the intent of the
|
||
Founders was for only bills to become law. Resolutions are
|
||
to express an opinion or to censure some person or action
|
||
but were never to become law.
|
||
Taft was not president and his illegal lackeys such as
|
||
Philander C Knox were not officials of the government. They
|
||
introduced this amendment illegally into Congress. It is
|
||
therefore an unconstitutional act and of no legal consequ-
|
||
ence.
|
||
The election of Senators is as it was in the beginning,
|
||
by the Legislatures of the various states, NOT by popular
|
||
vote. They have not been in session legally since 1913.
|
||
Wait . . . there's more! Let's look at the last two
|
||
lines of Article V of our Constitution.
|
||
|
||
". . . and that no State, without its consent,
|
||
shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the
|
||
Senate."
|
||
|
||
The 'Secretary of State' announced in 1913 it had been
|
||
ratified by the legislatures of thirty-six of the forty-
|
||
eight states.
|
||
Article V says 100% of the states have to agree to any
|
||
change in their equal voice in the Senate. Not three-
|
||
quarters as he announced. 100 PERCENT of the states must
|
||
agree.
|
||
Delaware and Utah objected to the amendment and nine
|
||
other states did not act on it. Another section of the
|
||
Constitution was violated in defiance of the authority we
|
||
granted. Thirty-six states have forced a change on the
|
||
other states in their equal voting power in the Senate.
|
||
Some might say they still have equal suffrage since
|
||
there are two Senators from each state. (Sounds like a weak
|
||
bureaucratic argument.) However, they no longer represent
|
||
primarily the interest of the state. Now they supposedly
|
||
represent the interests of the people. All the states did
|
||
not agree to allow for a change of equal voting power.
|
||
These acts constitute usurpation of powers we granted.
|
||
For a definition of usurpation, in Black's Law Dictionary,
|
||
we find: "The unlawful seizure or assumption of sovereign
|
||
power. The assumption of government or supreme power by
|
||
force or illegally, in derogation of the constitution and of
|
||
the rights of the lawful ruler."
|
||
Isn't this exactly what we have just found has been
|
||
happening to the authority we granted?
|
||
George Washington, in his Farewell Address made the
|
||
following remark: "Usurpation is the customary weapon by
|
||
which free governments are destroyed." Another admonition
|
||
we have ignored. (Messages and Papers of the Presidents, J.
|
||
D. Richardson, 1898)
|
||
To quote Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers,
|
||
No. 78: "There is no position which depends on clearer
|
||
principles than that every act of a delegated authority,
|
||
contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is
|
||
|
||
exercised, is void." What they did is no good . . . they
|
||
broke the law. (All references to 'paper no.' are from this
|
||
book.)
|
||
Hamilton goes on further in the same paper to state:
|
||
"To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater
|
||
than his principle; that the servant is above his master;
|
||
that the representative of the people are superior to the
|
||
people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may
|
||
do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what
|
||
they forbid."
|
||
Madison, in Paper No. 62 makes clear the reasoning for
|
||
the election of Senators by the states: "In this spirit it
|
||
may be remarked that the equal vote allowed to each State is
|
||
at once a constitutional recognition of the portion of
|
||
sovereignty remaining in the individual States and an
|
||
instrument for preserving that residuary sovereignty."
|
||
"No law or resolution can now be passed without the
|
||
concurrence, first, of a majority of the people, and then of
|
||
a majority of the States."
|
||
Presently, we no longer have that guarantee of one
|
||
branch of the Congress watching the actions of the other
|
||
branch. The established check and balance was destroyed.
|
||
These people now go willy-nilly passing legislation in
|
||
direct contradiction to the intent of our Founding Fathers.
|
||
As one obvious example, in 1982 a money bill originated
|
||
in the Senate. Can't be done legally. This is in direct
|
||
violation of a crystal clear restriction in our Constitution
|
||
which dictates: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall
|
||
originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate
|
||
may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."
|
||
There was much heavy argument during the Constitutional
|
||
Convention on this very issue of money bills.
|
||
Is it becoming apparent that they now feel the servants
|
||
are above the masters? After all, who in blazes are you?
|
||
How do we correct this mess? I will be first to admit
|
||
it will be difficult. There is no question they will be
|
||
reluctant to give up their powers and positions. They're on
|
||
the big gravy train and it's tough to derail. Phone calls
|
||
and letters to the offices of your Senators would be a
|
||
start. Letters to the Editors of local newspapers will
|
||
alert other people. Let's start putting up some roadblocks
|
||
to derail that train.
|
||
Using Petitions For Redress of Grievances to Senators
|
||
and Representatives will be a good tactic. It will be
|
||
interesting to see what they have to say about it.
|
||
State Legislatures will have to become involved in this
|
||
fight. After all, it was their power in the national
|
||
government and their sovereignty which was diluted and
|
||
destroyed. I'm also certain they know nothing about this
|
||
issue at present so each citizen MUST question their state
|
||
representative.
|
||
The states were duped into accepting the 17th Amend-
|
||
ment. The states who did not act on the ratification would
|
||
be the logical ones to initiate the action. They should
|
||
|
||
force the federales to have the amendment set aside. They
|
||
easily repealed the 18th amendment (Prohibition) by Conven-
|
||
tions in the States. We have to start the action and get
|
||
our government back within the confines of the authority
|
||
which we granted!
|
||
The filing of a civil suit as a federal question action
|
||
in federal court would be another option. The action would
|
||
have to be directly against the Senate for being illegally
|
||
in session.
|
||
The American people have the intelligence, ingenuity
|
||
and backbone to get a job done once they are aware of a
|
||
serious problem. We are not a nation of wimps . . . not yet
|
||
anyway. A comment is necessary concerning our new Senator
|
||
not taking the required oath in our opening illustration. I
|
||
personally have witnessed such an incident on local televis-
|
||
ion news which concerned a newly elected Congressman.
|
||
This business of Congress passing a law which is 150
|
||
years ex post facto has other serious ramifications. I will
|
||
cover these in later papers. More surprises on the way and
|
||
it involves our friends at the IRS!
|
||
For now, let's get our Senate back to it's proper
|
||
representation of each State's interest. We are being made
|
||
fools of by our national government.
|
||
Care to check on how many treaties ratified since 1914
|
||
are not constitutionally binding? How about the United
|
||
Nations or the giveaway of the Panama Canal?
|
||
|
||
|
||
YOUR SUPPORT IS APPRECIATED....
|
||
|
||
PLEASE REGISTER....
|
||
|
||
READ 'SALES PITCH' CHAPTER....
|