mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
305 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
305 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
SECURITY IN SOCIALISM
|
||
|
||
|
||
"Folks . . . have we got a good deal for the American
|
||
people. With all the soup kitchens, with all the hungry
|
||
people waiting in line for food, with all the elderly people
|
||
with no place to sleep or call home, we've decided to
|
||
implement a program to eliminate the chances for anything
|
||
like that ever happening again."
|
||
"It won't cost the average person much at all. We will
|
||
put a small charge on the salary of all working people.
|
||
Each employer will contribute a larger amount. All these
|
||
monies will be put into an insurance fund. Employers will
|
||
be able to afford the higher assessment. After all, look at
|
||
all the profits they make. We will pay these funds to
|
||
everyone at age 65 so no one will ever have to worry about
|
||
their golden years again."
|
||
"In fact, to be fair to the women, we will begin to pay
|
||
them at age 62 since women have less earning power and
|
||
outlive their husbands. The citizens will now have fewer
|
||
problems as they get older and receive benefits from this
|
||
system."
|
||
This system will be called Social Security. It's time
|
||
for the government to take care of it's hard working
|
||
people."
|
||
The length and depth of the depression in the early
|
||
1930s was a significant selling point for the social
|
||
security program. Many researchers and historians claim the
|
||
depression was orchestrated. Behind the scenes power
|
||
brokers wanted the slump to give the government reason to
|
||
implement socialistic programs. There is much reading
|
||
available in this area of history also.
|
||
This adventure in socialism began in earnest in August
|
||
1935 when Congress passed the Social Security Act. The act
|
||
established the Social Security Board. It consisted of 3
|
||
members who were chosen by the President and approved by the
|
||
Senate. They were to be so independent that they were to
|
||
report directly to the president. This continued until 1939
|
||
when the board became part of the Federal Security Agency.
|
||
They created this agency to include health and education
|
||
activities.
|
||
Health and education activities? It looks as though
|
||
our government recognized the importance of educating the
|
||
people in socialist principles way back in 1939.
|
||
What a farce. What a sham put over on the American
|
||
people. Show me where there is any security in socialism?
|
||
I'm not twisting words around. That's exactly what Social
|
||
Security means . . . security in socialism. Let me tell you
|
||
there is NO SECURITY IN SOCIALISM!
|
||
Our federal government has been violating the law since
|
||
the beginning of this program. There is no permission in
|
||
our Constitution for any socialist programs. We gave no
|
||
authority for free cheese, specific welfare such as food
|
||
|
||
stamps, medicare, medicaid or Social Security.
|
||
How did our nation ever manage 146 years without such
|
||
an idiotic program? Didn't we have any people who lived to
|
||
be 65? How did they ever survive without big brother
|
||
looking out for them? How did our country manage to endure
|
||
with all those old people dying right in our streets? Did
|
||
we just allow them to starve to death with no handouts from
|
||
government?
|
||
Regardless, you say, they only have our own good in
|
||
mind. Don't you believe it! There is only one thing they
|
||
have in mind . . . the destruction of our Constitution.
|
||
Control of the American people is also high on their list.
|
||
Looking at social security practically, it is simply another
|
||
form of taxation. The operation of the taxing provisions of
|
||
the social security system are now part of the Internal
|
||
Revenue Code.
|
||
Encyclopedia Americana tells us "The term 'social
|
||
security' is usually employed to indicate specific govern-
|
||
ment programs designed primarily to prevent want by assuring
|
||
to families the basic means of subsistence."
|
||
How white of them. What business is it of government?
|
||
Where can you find any authorization in our Constitution for
|
||
programs to prevent want? They are encroaching into lives
|
||
of citizens without a legal right. Unconstitutional . . .
|
||
it's a seizure of powers we did not grant when we estab-
|
||
lished the authority for government. If they assume any
|
||
power we did not allow, it's illegal. That's pretty strong
|
||
so now let's go ahead and prove it.
|
||
The supremacy clause of our Constitution makes that
|
||
crystal clear. We have established that our document is the
|
||
supreme law of our land.
|
||
Any laws made which don't conform to the authority we
|
||
granted in the basic document are NO GOOD!
|
||
And if that weren't plain enough for the people working
|
||
for government, the Tenth Amendment clears that up.
|
||
|
||
ARTICLE X
|
||
"The powers not delegated to the United States by
|
||
the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
|
||
States, are reserved to the States respectively or
|
||
to the people."
|
||
|
||
I'm certain any reader can understand that. Why do you
|
||
suppose the federal government can't understand it? Is it
|
||
possible they prefer to think the Tenth Amendment doesn't
|
||
exist? Either that is true or this is an obvious case of
|
||
collusion between the branches of our government.
|
||
Recently a program concerning our Constitution aired on
|
||
PBS. The moderator said he had gone to every lawyer and
|
||
judge he could find the day before the program. He asked if
|
||
any of them knew what the Tenth amendment said and NOT ONE
|
||
could answer his question! Not one even knew the general
|
||
subject matter of the amendment. Does our Constitution
|
||
still exist? So much for our intelligent judges and
|
||
|
||
lawyers. Give me a break.
|
||
When the first twelve proposed amendments were
|
||
submitted to the states in 1789 to become our Bill of
|
||
Rights, the Congress included this introductory statement
|
||
(or preamble):
|
||
|
||
"The Conventions of a number of the States, having
|
||
at the time of their adopting the Constitution,
|
||
expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconcep-
|
||
tions or abuse of its powers, that further
|
||
declaratory and restrictive clauses should be
|
||
added: And as extending the ground of public
|
||
confidence in the Government, will best insure the
|
||
beneficent ends of its institution:"
|
||
(Documents Illustrative of the Formation of the Union
|
||
of the American States. House Document No. 398, 69th
|
||
Congress, 1st Session 1965)
|
||
|
||
The First Congress is assuring the people that these
|
||
new amendments will be a tighter rope to confine the
|
||
government. And the legal eagles today do not know what the
|
||
tenth amendment says or means? When we get into a discus-
|
||
sion of the Bill of Rights, you will quickly see how the
|
||
federales believe the preceding preamble.
|
||
Going back to our venture into socialism, let's take a
|
||
look at the numbers for a moment. What happens to the money
|
||
which a man has paid into the system for 40 or more years?
|
||
And what if he should die before he becomes eligible to
|
||
collect benefits? Does it go to his wife or survivors? You
|
||
know better than that. It's gone . . . it has become a
|
||
gratuitous donation to Big Brother. An amount equal to
|
||
taxes collected from individuals are assessed from their
|
||
employers. All this money goes to the general fund and
|
||
spent for anything, legal or illegal.
|
||
And assuming there is now a widow, what would she
|
||
receive from his donations? Certainly not the amount paid
|
||
into the system, nor even the interest on those funds.
|
||
How many of our elderly citizens do not have enough money to
|
||
pay for their rent, utilities or food? We won't even
|
||
mention an occasional night out to the movies or a vacation
|
||
to enjoy their remaining years. How many of our older
|
||
citizens have to depend on a church function for a meal?
|
||
How many wait at the Salvation Army or some other private
|
||
charity for Thanksgiving or Christmas dinner? This is a
|
||
crime. What did they say was the intent of the Social
|
||
Security program? To prevent want by assuring to families
|
||
the basic means of subsistence.
|
||
Horse manure! People for generations have been led to
|
||
believe that this program would take care of them in later
|
||
years. What's the story we hear often now? The program
|
||
will be broke in 'X' numbers of years. Mercy, it's running
|
||
out of money so we have to increase the withholding levels.
|
||
The government, the way it is running today, is the solution
|
||
to nothing . . . it's the problem.
|
||
Alexander Hamilton argued fervently in Paper No. 84
|
||
that we did not need a Bill of Rights since the Constitution
|
||
was in itself a bill of rights. He asks the question, "For
|
||
why declare that things shall not be done which there is no
|
||
power to do?" (The Federalist Papers.) He insisted that
|
||
the national government could do nothing which was not
|
||
specifically allowed in the document. However the Congress
|
||
proposed a Bill of Rights. It was adopted to further tie
|
||
down the new government to prohibit any abuse of its powers.
|
||
How does this government get itself involved in the
|
||
business of welfare or social security? The amendment
|
||
process was not invoked to ask for our consent agreeing
|
||
to a change. I didn't agree to any change allowing for
|
||
socialism, did you?
|
||
Can our constitution be changed by an act of Congress
|
||
or by an order by the executive branch? Maybe an order by a
|
||
federal judge can do it. Not true! It can only be changed
|
||
under Article V if you and I agree to the change at the
|
||
voting booth. So--did you agree to the change? Remember
|
||
what the Tenth Amendment said?
|
||
Let's pretend for a moment there was no social security
|
||
program enacted. The people had not been lulled into a
|
||
false sense of protection by a devious government. Suppose
|
||
then the people had put the same amount of money into a
|
||
savings account for the same period. They could retire very
|
||
comfortably on the interest alone.
|
||
Let's carry our fairy tale a little further. As in the
|
||
previous illustration, let's say a man paid into a trust
|
||
fund for 30 or 40 years. Then he died before reaching 65.
|
||
What would the family live on in a case like this? Why all
|
||
the money which had not been donated to big government. His
|
||
widow and entire family could live extremely well on the
|
||
interest received from the trust fund. And there would be
|
||
money for education. That would be if our government in
|
||
their 'wisdom' had not tried to exercise control over people
|
||
in violation of our basic law.
|
||
I don't for a moment suggest that we cut off social
|
||
security payments tomorrow. There is no question what the
|
||
outcome of such a drastic measure would be. The vastness of
|
||
the dilemma and the people who exist only because of those
|
||
meager payments shows a real problem. The program should be
|
||
phased out over the next 15 to 20 years.
|
||
People who are now paying into the system should be
|
||
given the option for their money to be withheld as it is
|
||
presently. If they so choose, the money can go into a
|
||
private trust to gain interest and increase in value. The
|
||
difference now being that these monies will remain the
|
||
property of the one allowing the deductions. Naturally it
|
||
would pass on to his or her heirs as with any other prop-
|
||
erty. Congress could not use this money for any expenditure
|
||
they feel the urge to implement. For example, they couldn't
|
||
use these funds to raise their own salaries at whim.
|
||
For others who don't want money taken out of their
|
||
salaries, they should drop out of the system altogether.
|
||
|
||
Government has no right to intrude into the private affairs
|
||
of Americans. "But when a long train of abuses and usurpa-
|
||
tions, pursing invariably the same object evinces a design
|
||
to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right,
|
||
it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to
|
||
provide new guards for their future security." (Declara-
|
||
tion of Independence.)
|
||
The lone woman on the Supreme Court (Sandra Day
|
||
O'Conner) remarked to a TV reporter one day that she used to
|
||
think Social Security was unconstitutional. Now she doesn't
|
||
think so . . . wonder who gave her the indoctrination?
|
||
How do we correct the situation? Since Congress
|
||
created the boondoggle, Congress will have to be the ones to
|
||
change it. Call the local offices of your Senators and
|
||
Representatives and ask questions about this adventure in
|
||
socialism. Be certain to point out the lack of jurisdiction
|
||
for these type of programs. Tell them you want something
|
||
done about this violation of our Constitution. Further,
|
||
remind them you will be watching to see what is being done.
|
||
Phone calls every couple of weeks wouldn't be too often. It
|
||
has to be impressed on their minds that these socialistic
|
||
programs have to cease.
|
||
I'm certain you will hear a story like, "These things
|
||
are so interwoven in the fabric of our society, they would
|
||
be impossible to change." Remind our illustrious 'leaders'
|
||
that if any practice was unconstitutional when it began, it
|
||
is still unconstitutional. No amount of usage will make the
|
||
practice legal or give it an illusion of respectability.
|
||
There was never any intent on the part of the Founders
|
||
to allow the phrase "general welfare" to signify a right to
|
||
establish any specific welfare programs. To find the origin
|
||
of this statement, we must look to our first compact of
|
||
government, The Articles of Confederation.
|
||
|
||
Article III states: "The said states hereby severally
|
||
enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for
|
||
their common defence, the security of their Liberties, and
|
||
their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to
|
||
assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks
|
||
made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion,
|
||
sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever."
|
||
(Documents Illustrative of the Formation of the Union)
|
||
|
||
From this it's obvious what the term general welfare
|
||
means. There is no need to insult the readers intelligence
|
||
to imply that the general welfare clause magically became
|
||
authorization for specific welfare.
|
||
Another area in our Constitution which they may argue
|
||
is permission for social security, is the "necessary and
|
||
proper" clause (Art I, Sec 8). That's weak and won't hold
|
||
water. This only gives power to make laws which are
|
||
necessary and proper to carry out the duties and powers
|
||
listed in the basic document. It's not for anything they
|
||
decide is a great idea.
|
||
Hamilton, in Paper #78, said: "There is no position
|
||
which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a
|
||
delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission
|
||
under which it is exercised, is void." Anything they do
|
||
which is beyond what we have allowed or agreed to is void.
|
||
To return to the greatness this country was destined to
|
||
achieve, we must demand our government obey the law. It
|
||
must return to the confines to which we agreed when the
|
||
Constitution was established.
|
||
If you ever see the original of our Constitution (or an
|
||
exact copy), the first three words use decorative letters.
|
||
WE THE PEOPLE. Their authority for government comes from us
|
||
and only we can agree to a change.
|
||
If the members of Congress are not receptive to our
|
||
demands, we have a duty to vote them out of office. We must
|
||
sent Americans to Washington who will obey the oath to
|
||
support the supremacy of our Constitution which we ordered
|
||
in Article VI, Sec 3.
|
||
For this evil to continue, all we need do is nothing!
|
||
There is a limit to their power and that limit is you and
|
||
me.
|
||
Recently, in a controversy concerning the poor and
|
||
food, Reagen put his foot in his mouth. (Or, maybe it was
|
||
Nancy's foot!) He said the poor were unable to find food or
|
||
stamps due to a lack of knowledge. A late-night comedian
|
||
commented that if that is true, his staff must be starving
|
||
to death! 'Nuff said.
|
||
|
||
|
||
REGISTRATION IS ONLY $19.95.
|